Objective: To assess application and effect evaluation of 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method in nursing quality management of outpatient injection room. Methods: We invested 16 nurses and 200 patients to join our study in treatment process. Additionally, we grouped the data accord to different time periods. The time periods of control group are from July 2017 to June 2018, we did not implement 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method in this time period. The time periods of intervention group are from July 2018 to June 2019, we implement 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method in this time period. Our researchers collected the information include the quality indicators, nurse satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Result: In the quality indicators research, intervention group participants have better performance than that of control group in this study. In particular, the intervention group has not cases in Total number of no-write opening time of sterile articles in use and Total number of expired or waste of medicine and substance. But the control group has cases in those two domains (0 vs 25, 0 vs 210). In nurse satisfaction research, the result indicate intervention group has better nurse satisfaction assessment in our research result (87.5% vs 62.5%). In patient satisfaction, the intervention group patients provide more good assessment in satisfaction research, and the result is statistical significance (190 vs 171, p = 0.012). Conclusion: the 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method has influence to improve the nursing quality in outpatient injection room.
| Published in | Science Journal of Clinical Medicine (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sjcm.20200902.13 |
| Page(s) | 34-36 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Nursing Quality, Outpatient Injection Room, Satisfaction
| [1] | Aiken LH, Sloane DM, Bruyneel L, et al. Nurse staffing and education and hospital mortality in nine European countries: A retrospective observational study. Lancet. 2016; 383 (9931): 1824–1830. |
| [2] | Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare. Clinical governance for nurses and midwives. Sydney: ACSQHC. 2017. |
| [3] | Canadian Nurses Association. Framework for the practice of registered nurses in Canada. Ottawa. 2015. |
| [4] | Slater P, McCance T, McCormack B. The development and testing of the Person-centred Practice Inventory - Staff (PCPI-S). International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2017; 29 (4): 541–547. |
| [5] | Ancarani A, Di Mauro C, Gitto S, Mancuso P, Ayach A. Technology acquisition and efficiency in Dubai hospitals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2016; 113: 475–485. |
| [6] | Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA. 2017; 307 (14): 1513–1516. |
| [7] | Bessant J, Künne C, Möslein K. Opening Up Healthcare Innovation: Innovation Solutions for a 21st Century Healthcare System. 2015. |
| [8] | Lishan X, Xiaoxia L, Lina C. Study on the application of five routine working regulations in the improvement of drug supply management during the infusion in the primary hospitals. Nursing Practice and Research. 2018; 15 (11): 109-110. |
| [9] | Yake G, Guihua L, Xiaojuan L, Lin Y. Application of "Five Routine Working Regulation" in the Management of Pharmacy Cold Chain. 2018; 32 (09): 1297-1300. |
| [10] | Järvelin J, Häkkinen U. Can patient injury claims be utilised as a quality indicator? Health Policy 2016; 104 (2): 155–62. |
| [11] | Cashin A, Heartfield M, Bryce J, Devey L, Buckley T, Cox D, et al. Standards for practice for registered nurses in Australia. Collegian. 2017; 24: 255–266. |
| [12] | Groene O, Skau JKH, Frølich A. An international review of projects on hospital performance assessment. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2018; 20 (3): 162–171. |
| [13] | Beaussier A-L, Demeritt D, Griffiths A, Rothstein H. Accounting for failure: risk-based regulation and the problems of ensuring healthcare quality in the NHS. Health, Risk & Society 2016; 18 (3–4): 205–224. |
| [14] | Carinci F, Van Gool K, Mainz J, Veillard J, Pichora EC, Januel JM, et al. Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2015; 27 (2): 137–146. |
| [15] | Griffiths A, Leaver MP. Wisdom of patients: predicting the quality of care using aggregated patient feedback. BMJ Quality Safety. 2018; 27 (2): 110–118. |
APA Style
Xiaoxia Liu, Guohua Huang. (2020). Application and Effect Evaluation of 'Five Routine Working Regulation' Method in Nursing Quality Management of Outpatient Injection Room. Science Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(2), 34-36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20200902.13
ACS Style
Xiaoxia Liu; Guohua Huang. Application and Effect Evaluation of 'Five Routine Working Regulation' Method in Nursing Quality Management of Outpatient Injection Room. Sci. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(2), 34-36. doi: 10.11648/j.sjcm.20200902.13
AMA Style
Xiaoxia Liu, Guohua Huang. Application and Effect Evaluation of 'Five Routine Working Regulation' Method in Nursing Quality Management of Outpatient Injection Room. Sci J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):34-36. doi: 10.11648/j.sjcm.20200902.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sjcm.20200902.13,
author = {Xiaoxia Liu and Guohua Huang},
title = {Application and Effect Evaluation of 'Five Routine Working Regulation' Method in Nursing Quality Management of Outpatient Injection Room},
journal = {Science Journal of Clinical Medicine},
volume = {9},
number = {2},
pages = {34-36},
doi = {10.11648/j.sjcm.20200902.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20200902.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjcm.20200902.13},
abstract = {Objective: To assess application and effect evaluation of 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method in nursing quality management of outpatient injection room. Methods: We invested 16 nurses and 200 patients to join our study in treatment process. Additionally, we grouped the data accord to different time periods. The time periods of control group are from July 2017 to June 2018, we did not implement 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method in this time period. The time periods of intervention group are from July 2018 to June 2019, we implement 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method in this time period. Our researchers collected the information include the quality indicators, nurse satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Result: In the quality indicators research, intervention group participants have better performance than that of control group in this study. In particular, the intervention group has not cases in Total number of no-write opening time of sterile articles in use and Total number of expired or waste of medicine and substance. But the control group has cases in those two domains (0 vs 25, 0 vs 210). In nurse satisfaction research, the result indicate intervention group has better nurse satisfaction assessment in our research result (87.5% vs 62.5%). In patient satisfaction, the intervention group patients provide more good assessment in satisfaction research, and the result is statistical significance (190 vs 171, p = 0.012). Conclusion: the 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method has influence to improve the nursing quality in outpatient injection room.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Application and Effect Evaluation of 'Five Routine Working Regulation' Method in Nursing Quality Management of Outpatient Injection Room AU - Xiaoxia Liu AU - Guohua Huang Y1 - 2020/05/29 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20200902.13 DO - 10.11648/j.sjcm.20200902.13 T2 - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine JF - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine JO - Science Journal of Clinical Medicine SP - 34 EP - 36 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2732 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjcm.20200902.13 AB - Objective: To assess application and effect evaluation of 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method in nursing quality management of outpatient injection room. Methods: We invested 16 nurses and 200 patients to join our study in treatment process. Additionally, we grouped the data accord to different time periods. The time periods of control group are from July 2017 to June 2018, we did not implement 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method in this time period. The time periods of intervention group are from July 2018 to June 2019, we implement 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method in this time period. Our researchers collected the information include the quality indicators, nurse satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Result: In the quality indicators research, intervention group participants have better performance than that of control group in this study. In particular, the intervention group has not cases in Total number of no-write opening time of sterile articles in use and Total number of expired or waste of medicine and substance. But the control group has cases in those two domains (0 vs 25, 0 vs 210). In nurse satisfaction research, the result indicate intervention group has better nurse satisfaction assessment in our research result (87.5% vs 62.5%). In patient satisfaction, the intervention group patients provide more good assessment in satisfaction research, and the result is statistical significance (190 vs 171, p = 0.012). Conclusion: the 'Five Routine Working Regulation' method has influence to improve the nursing quality in outpatient injection room. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -
Email: