Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City

Biadglign Dessie

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City

Biadglign Dessie

Published in Science Journal of Business and Management (Volume 6, Issue 6)

Received: 29 November 2018 Accepted: 25 December 2018 Published: 23 January 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the determinant of good governance evidence from some selected public institutions in Jimma city. Currently a challenge associated with good governance is unbearable due to several factors such as corruption, conflict, bureaucracy, and poor service delivery, educational level etc. For this reason, the study will be important to the public institutions to recognize about the determinant of good governance and help to correct their mistakes. Causal research design was employed using quantitative research approach. Both primary and secondary sources of data were applied. Percentage, frequency, Pearson correlation and multiple liner regression were employed to analyze the data through statistical package of SPSS version 20. The finding revealed that all predictors such as; educational level, corruption, bureaucracy, and conflict have found to be significant impact on good governance with p-value of 0.000 for former three predictors, and p-value 0.014 is for the later variable. Besides, the study concludes that educational level has positive, and corruption, bureaucracy, and conflict also have negative and significant impact on good governance. Finally, recommendation to public institutions and suggestions for other researchers forwarded.

Published in	Science Journal of Business and Management (Volume 6, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11
Page(s)	100-106
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Bureaucracy, Conflict, Corruption, Educational Level, Good Governance, Public Institutions

References

[1]	Yahya, K. et al. (2014). Impact On Employees’ Good Governance Characteristics On Employees Job Satisfactions. International Journal Of Science, And Technology, 3(1), Pp. 320 – 338.
[2]	Resta. (2005). Governance Progress In Africa. Challenges And Trends. S. L. United Nations Department Of Economic And Social Affairs.
[3]	Chaudhry, I. S., Malik, S., Khan, K. N., & Rasool, S. (2009). Factors Affecting Good Governance In Pakistan:An Emperical Analysis. European Journal Scientific Research, 35 (3, P337).
[4]	Muktar, A. (2007). Meeting The Challenges Of Good Governance, Democratic Transition And Consolidation In The Harari People National Regional State: Unpublished Ma Thesis Addis Ababa University.
[5]	Rahmato D.; Bantirgu A.; & Endeshaw. (2008). Csos. Ingos In Ethiopia, Partners In Development And Good Governance, A Report Prepared For The Ad Hoc Cso/Ngo Task Force, Final Draft, Addis Ababa, Retrieved On 3/12/11 From.
[6]	Shimelis. (2005). Corruption And Anti-Corruption In Ethiopia A Case Study Of Ethiopian Customs Authority, Adiss Ababa.
[7]	Wan, I. H. (2014). Constraints And Impediments Of Good Governance In Africa: Future Prospects. Afro Asian Journal Of Social Sciences Volume 5, No. 5.1 Quarter I.
[8]	Javaid, U. (2010). Corruption And Its Deep Impact On Good Governance In Pakistan. Pakistan Economic And Social Review Volume 48, No. 1.
[9]	Dagnachew, A. (2014). We Do Well To Carry Out Our Responsibility, Not To Be Get A Profit. Health Give You, 2, P. 8.
[10]	Dayanandan, R. (2013). Good Governance Practice For Better Performance Of Community Organizations - Myths And Realities!! Journal Of Power, Politics & Governance, Vol. 1 No. 1,.
[11]	Bekele, A. (2013, June). The Challenges Of Good Governance In Africa: The Case Of Kenya By Adane Bekele The Challenges Of Good Governance In Africa: The Case Of Kenya. Unpublished Document.
[12]	Ahmed, N. (2015). Reinforcement Of Good Governance In The International Financial Institutions. Law, Social Justice & Global Development Journal (Lgd).
[13]	Bezabih, W. (2015). An Assessment Of Good Governance Practices And Challenges In Local Government Of Ethiopia: The Case Of Bonga Town Administration, In Kaffa Zone, Snnprs. Unpublished Document, 64-67.
[14]	Zeleke, A. (2016). Assessment Of The Challenges And Prospects Of Good Governance In The Revenue Generation Office Of Assosa Town Administration: Benishangul-Gumz Regional State-Ethiopia. Unpublished Document, 37-39.
[15]	Melese, N. (2016). Application Of Good Governance Principles For Urban Land Development And Management In Addis Ababa Administration: The Practices And Challenges In Yeka Sub-City.
[16]	Huda, Beg Etal. (2008). Bureaucracy And Good Governance The Summum Bonum Accelerating Tempo Of Development: An Overview On Bangladsh. Medwell Jounal, 79.
[17]	Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology Methods And Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd.
[18]	Hair, J. Et Al. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis,,, (7th Edition Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
[19]	Enahoro, N. I. (2016). The Role Of Bureaucracy In Good Governance In Nigeria. International Journal Of Advanced Legal Studies And Governance, Volume 6, Number 1.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Biadglign Dessie. (2019). Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City. Science Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Biadglign Dessie. Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 2019, 6(6), 100-106. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Biadglign Dessie. Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City. Sci J Bus Manag. 2019;6(6):100-106. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11,
  author = {Biadglign Dessie},
  title = {Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City},
  journal = {Science Journal of Business and Management},
  volume = {6},
  number = {6},
  pages = {100-106},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjbm.20180606.11},
  abstract = {The aim of the study was to assess the determinant of good governance evidence from some selected public institutions in Jimma city. Currently a challenge associated with good governance is unbearable due to several factors such as corruption, conflict, bureaucracy, and poor service delivery, educational level etc. For this reason, the study will be important to the public institutions to recognize about the determinant of good governance and help to correct their mistakes. Causal research design was employed using quantitative research approach. Both primary and secondary sources of data were applied. Percentage, frequency, Pearson correlation and multiple liner regression were employed to analyze the data through statistical package of SPSS version 20. The finding revealed that all predictors such as; educational level, corruption, bureaucracy, and conflict have found to be significant impact on good governance with p-value of 0.000 for former three predictors, and p-value 0.014 is for the later variable. Besides, the study concludes that educational level has positive, and corruption, bureaucracy, and conflict also have negative and significant impact on good governance. Finally, recommendation to public institutions and suggestions for other researchers forwarded.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City
AU  - Biadglign Dessie
Y1  - 2019/01/23
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11
T2  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JF  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JO  - Science Journal of Business and Management
SP  - 100
EP  - 106
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0634
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11
AB  - The aim of the study was to assess the determinant of good governance evidence from some selected public institutions in Jimma city. Currently a challenge associated with good governance is unbearable due to several factors such as corruption, conflict, bureaucracy, and poor service delivery, educational level etc. For this reason, the study will be important to the public institutions to recognize about the determinant of good governance and help to correct their mistakes. Causal research design was employed using quantitative research approach. Both primary and secondary sources of data were applied. Percentage, frequency, Pearson correlation and multiple liner regression were employed to analyze the data through statistical package of SPSS version 20. The finding revealed that all predictors such as; educational level, corruption, bureaucracy, and conflict have found to be significant impact on good governance with p-value of 0.000 for former three predictors, and p-value 0.014 is for the later variable. Besides, the study concludes that educational level has positive, and corruption, bureaucracy, and conflict also have negative and significant impact on good governance. Finally, recommendation to public institutions and suggestions for other researchers forwarded.
VL  - 6
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Biadglign Dessie

School of Management and Public Administration, College of Business and Economics, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Biadglign Dessie. (2019). Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City. Science Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Biadglign Dessie. Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City. Sci. J. Bus. Manag. 2019, 6(6), 100-106. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Biadglign Dessie. Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City. Sci J Bus Manag. 2019;6(6):100-106. doi: 10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11,
  author = {Biadglign Dessie},
  title = {Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City},
  journal = {Science Journal of Business and Management},
  volume = {6},
  number = {6},
  pages = {100-106},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjbm.20180606.11},
  abstract = {The aim of the study was to assess the determinant of good governance evidence from some selected public institutions in Jimma city. Currently a challenge associated with good governance is unbearable due to several factors such as corruption, conflict, bureaucracy, and poor service delivery, educational level etc. For this reason, the study will be important to the public institutions to recognize about the determinant of good governance and help to correct their mistakes. Causal research design was employed using quantitative research approach. Both primary and secondary sources of data were applied. Percentage, frequency, Pearson correlation and multiple liner regression were employed to analyze the data through statistical package of SPSS version 20. The finding revealed that all predictors such as; educational level, corruption, bureaucracy, and conflict have found to be significant impact on good governance with p-value of 0.000 for former three predictors, and p-value 0.014 is for the later variable. Besides, the study concludes that educational level has positive, and corruption, bureaucracy, and conflict also have negative and significant impact on good governance. Finally, recommendation to public institutions and suggestions for other researchers forwarded.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Determinants of Good Governance: Evidence from Some Selected Public Institutions in Jimma City
AU  - Biadglign Dessie
Y1  - 2019/01/23
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11
T2  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JF  - Science Journal of Business and Management
JO  - Science Journal of Business and Management
SP  - 100
EP  - 106
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-0634
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20180606.11
AB  - The aim of the study was to assess the determinant of good governance evidence from some selected public institutions in Jimma city. Currently a challenge associated with good governance is unbearable due to several factors such as corruption, conflict, bureaucracy, and poor service delivery, educational level etc. For this reason, the study will be important to the public institutions to recognize about the determinant of good governance and help to correct their mistakes. Causal research design was employed using quantitative research approach. Both primary and secondary sources of data were applied. Percentage, frequency, Pearson correlation and multiple liner regression were employed to analyze the data through statistical package of SPSS version 20. The finding revealed that all predictors such as; educational level, corruption, bureaucracy, and conflict have found to be significant impact on good governance with p-value of 0.000 for former three predictors, and p-value 0.014 is for the later variable. Besides, the study concludes that educational level has positive, and corruption, bureaucracy, and conflict also have negative and significant impact on good governance. Finally, recommendation to public institutions and suggestions for other researchers forwarded.
VL  - 6
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download