A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males

Gholam Hossein Javanmard; Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi

doi:doi:10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12

| Peer-Reviewed

A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males

Gholam Hossein Javanmard, Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi

Published in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 3)

Received: 20 April 2017 Accepted: 8 May 2017 Published: 23 June 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The main objective of this causal-comparative research was to compare behavioral activation and inhibition systems and mindfulness in addicts and non-addicted men of Maragheh, Iran. In order to do this, 35 addicted males and 35 non-addicted men were chosen using purposeful sampling method and via matching the two groups. The participants answered the 120-item test of activation/inhibition systems (Gray-Wilson Personality Questionnaire or GWPQ) and the 39-item test of mindfulness (Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills or KIMS). Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and SPSS software. The findings showed that the compared groups in activation/inhibition systems and mindfulness had meaningful differences. The average scores of mindfulness in healthy people were higher than those of the addicted people. While the average scores of behavioral inhibition system in healthy people were higher than addicts, the average scores of behavioral activation system in addicts were higher than non-addicted people. In general, since this study showed that activity level of activation system in addicted people is more than non-addicts, activity level of inhibition system in non-addicts is more than addicted people, and that mindfulness skill in addicts is lower than non-addicts there is the necessity to design therapeutic and rehabilitative interventions.

Published in	Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12
Page(s)	43-48
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Activation/Inhibition Systems, Mindfulness, Addiction

References

[1]	Abdi, Reza; Bakhshipour Roodsari, Abbas; and Mahmoud Alilo, Mohammad. (2011). sensitivity of the tendency and behavioral inhibition system on drug addicts, smokers and non-smokers, Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 17 (3), 247-241.
[2]	Ahmadvand, Zahra; Heidari Nasab, Leila, Shaieri, Mohammadreza (2013). A study of the validity and reliability of five-dimensional mindfulness questionnaire in non-clinical Iranian samples. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 7 (3), 229-237.
[3]	Alimoradi, Abdul Latif; Hooshyar, Samaneh; Modarres Ghoravi, Morteza. (2011). Comparing the brain-Behavioral Systems and mental health in drug addicts and non addicts. Journal of Mental Health, 13 (4), 13-304
[4]	Azad fallah, Parviz, Dadsetan, Parirokh (2000). Brain / Behavior systems: biological structures of Personality, Journal of Psychology, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp. 82-63. Azad fallah, c. (2000). Ecological- psychological basis of addiction. Journal of Psychology, no.3, 246-234.
[5]	Babapour, Khairaddin; Dadashzadeh, Rahim, Toosi, Fahimeh. (1390), "comparing smokers’ and nonsmokers’ behavioral system. Journal of Modern psychological research year 6, no. 23, Summer 2011.
[6]	Bjork, J. M., Hommer, D. W., Grant, S. J., & Danube, C. (2004). Impulsivity in Abstinent Alcohl-Dependent Patients: Relation to Control Subjects and Type 1-/ Type 2- Like Traits. Alcohol, 34(1), 133- 150.
[7]	Breslin, F., Zak, M., MC Main, S. (2002). An information processing analysis of mindfulness: Im placations for relapse prevention in the treatment of substance abuse. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(3): 275-99.
[8]	Dabaghi, P.; Asgharnejad Farid, Ali; Atef Vahid, Asghar; MohammadKazem and Bolhari, Jafar. (2008), "The effectiveness of group cognitive therapy based on mindfulness (mindfulness) and spiritual schema activation in the prevention of relapse in opioid abuse." Journal of thought and behavior, No. 4, pp. 375-366.
[9]	Delavar, Ali (2010). Research methods in psychology and Educational science, Tehran, published and edited.
[10]	De Pascalis, V.; Varriale, V.; & D Antono, l. (2010). "Event- related components of the punishment and reward sesitivity" Clinical Neurophysiolojy. 121 (1), 60-76.
[11]	Desjardins, J., Zeleneski, J. M., &Cpplan, R. J. (2008). An Investigation of Maternal Personality, Parenting and Subjective Well-Being, Personality and Individuol Differences, Vol.44:587-597.
[12]	Flavell J. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of Cognitive developmental inquiry. Am Psychol. 1979; (34):906-11.
[13]	Franken I H, Muris P.(2006) BIS/BAS Personality characteristics And College Students Substance us. Personality IndivDiffer, 40:1497-503.
[14]	Hamedi, Ali; Shahidi, Shahryar; Khademi, Ali. (2013). the effectiveness of mindfulness and advice on the prevention of relapse Journal of Substance Abuse Addiction Studies, 7 (28).
[15]	Hasking PA, (2006) Reinforcement Sensitivity, Coping DisorderedEating and Drinking Behaviors in Adolescents. Pers IndiveDiffer,40:677-88.
[16]	Hayes, S., Luma, J. B., & Bond, F. (2006). Acceptance andcommitment therapy: Model, Processes andoutcomes. Behav Res Ther, 44, 1- 25.
[17]	Hundt, N. E., Kimbrel, N. A., Mitchell, J. T., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2008). High BAS, but not low BIS, Predicts extemalizing symptoms in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3),563-573.
[18]	Kayani, AR; Ghasemi, Nizamuddin; Pourabbas, A. (2012). Comparing the effectiveness of group therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy based on cognitive emotion regulation in consumer awareness on glass addicted. Journal of Substance Abuse Addiction Studies, 6 (24).
[19]	Kimbrel, N. A., Nelson- Gray, R. O., & Mitchell, J. T. (2007). Reinforcement sensitivity and maternal style us predictors of psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(6), 1139-1149.
[20]	Klori, Ali; Borjali, Ahmed; Falsafinejad, MR; Sohrabi, F. (2011). Effectiveness of model of relapse and temptation prevention in drug addicted. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 3 (4).
[21]	Loxton, N. J., &Dawe, s. (2007). Howdodys functional eating and hazardous drinking women perform on behavioral measures of reward and punishment sensitivity? Personality and Individual Differencees, 42(6), 1163-1127.
[22]	Loxton N. J., DAW S. (2008) Reward and Punishment Sensitivity Dysfunctional eating and hazardous drinking women: Associations with family risk Appetite, 47:361-71.
[23]	Ly, C., & Gomez, R. (2014). Unique associations of reinforcement sensitivity theory dimensions with social interaction anxiety and social observation anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 20-24.
[24]	Maleki Gamchy, A; Khademi, A. (2014). Comparing the Behavioral Systems BAS \ BIS in drug-dependent and normal individuals. Police Medicine Journal, 3 (2), 67-67.
[25]	Oconnor, R. M., Stewart, S. H., & Watt, M. C. (2009). Distinguishing BAS risk for university students drinking, smoking, and gambling behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(4), 514-519.
[26]	Orki, Muhammad, Bayat Shohreh; Khoda Dost, S. (2012), "Assessing the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral intervention model based on Marlatt with mindfulness-based cognitive therapy effectiveness and treatment of drug addicted mental health seekers" Journal of Studies / no.2 - summer 2012.
[27]	Pourkord Mahdi, Abolghasemi, Abas; Narimani, Mohammad, Rezaei Jamaloie, H. (2013). The direct or indirect effects of self-efficacy, impulsivity, activation of social behavior inhibition in drug adicted students. Journal of Substance Abuse Addiction Studies, 7 (26).
[28]	Pourmohseni Klori, Fereshteh; Haghshenas, Azadeh; Asadi, Saba (2011). Examining brain-behavioral systems and gender differences in addicted and non-addicted. New Cognitive Science, 13 (2), 9
[29]	Rutter, M. (2002). Substance Use and Abuse: Causal Pathways Considerations, In M. Rutter & Taylor (Ads) Child and And Adolescent Psychiatry Models Approaches, Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 455- 462.
[30]	Treloar, C., Laybutt, B., & Carruthers, S. (2010). Using mindfulness Develop healt education strategies for blood bome virus Prevention in injecting drug use. Drugs: Education, prevention, And Policy, 17(4): 431-42.
[31]	Vervoort L., Wolters, L. H., Hogendoom, S. M. DC Huan, E., Boer, F. &Prins, P. J. M. (2010).Sensitivity of Gray WWW.Science direct.Com/Science article/ Pii/ So 1918869100000 non-anxious children and adolescent. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 629-633.
[32]	Windle, M., & Windle, R. C. (2006). Adolescent temperament and lifetime psychiatric and substanceabuse disorders assessed in yang adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 15-25.
[33]	Witkiewitz, K., Marlatt, GA., & Walker D. (2005). Mindfulness-based relapse Prevention for alcohol and substance use disorders. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 19(3):211-28.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Gholam Hossein Javanmard, Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi. (2017). A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 6(3), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Gholam Hossein Javanmard; Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi. A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2017, 6(3), 43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Gholam Hossein Javanmard, Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi. A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males. Psychol Behav Sci. 2017;6(3):43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12,
  author = {Gholam Hossein Javanmard and Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi},
  title = {A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males},
  journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {43-48},
  doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20170603.12},
  abstract = {The main objective of this causal-comparative research was to compare behavioral activation and inhibition systems and mindfulness in addicts and non-addicted men of Maragheh, Iran. In order to do this, 35 addicted males and 35 non-addicted men were chosen using purposeful sampling method and via matching the two groups. The participants answered the 120-item test of activation/inhibition systems (Gray-Wilson Personality Questionnaire or GWPQ) and the 39-item test of mindfulness (Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills or KIMS). Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and SPSS software. The findings showed that the compared groups in activation/inhibition systems and mindfulness had meaningful differences. The average scores of mindfulness in healthy people were higher than those of the addicted people. While the average scores of behavioral inhibition system in healthy people were higher than addicts, the average scores of behavioral activation system in addicts were higher than non-addicted people. In general, since this study showed that activity level of activation system in addicted people is more than non-addicts, activity level of inhibition system in non-addicts is more than addicted people, and that mindfulness skill in addicts is lower than non-addicts there is the necessity to design therapeutic and rehabilitative interventions.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males
AU  - Gholam Hossein Javanmard
AU  - Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi
Y1  - 2017/06/23
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12
T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
SP  - 43
EP  - 48
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7845
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12
AB  - The main objective of this causal-comparative research was to compare behavioral activation and inhibition systems and mindfulness in addicts and non-addicted men of Maragheh, Iran. In order to do this, 35 addicted males and 35 non-addicted men were chosen using purposeful sampling method and via matching the two groups. The participants answered the 120-item test of activation/inhibition systems (Gray-Wilson Personality Questionnaire or GWPQ) and the 39-item test of mindfulness (Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills or KIMS). Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and SPSS software. The findings showed that the compared groups in activation/inhibition systems and mindfulness had meaningful differences. The average scores of mindfulness in healthy people were higher than those of the addicted people. While the average scores of behavioral inhibition system in healthy people were higher than addicts, the average scores of behavioral activation system in addicts were higher than non-addicted people. In general, since this study showed that activity level of activation system in addicted people is more than non-addicts, activity level of inhibition system in non-addicts is more than addicted people, and that mindfulness skill in addicts is lower than non-addicts there is the necessity to design therapeutic and rehabilitative interventions.
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Gholam Hossein Javanmard

Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran
Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi

Department of Psychology, Science & Research Branch of Islamic Azad University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Gholam Hossein Javanmard, Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi. (2017). A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 6(3), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Gholam Hossein Javanmard; Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi. A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2017, 6(3), 43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Gholam Hossein Javanmard, Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi. A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males. Psychol Behav Sci. 2017;6(3):43-48. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12,
  author = {Gholam Hossein Javanmard and Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi},
  title = {A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males},
  journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {43-48},
  doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20170603.12},
  abstract = {The main objective of this causal-comparative research was to compare behavioral activation and inhibition systems and mindfulness in addicts and non-addicted men of Maragheh, Iran. In order to do this, 35 addicted males and 35 non-addicted men were chosen using purposeful sampling method and via matching the two groups. The participants answered the 120-item test of activation/inhibition systems (Gray-Wilson Personality Questionnaire or GWPQ) and the 39-item test of mindfulness (Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills or KIMS). Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and SPSS software. The findings showed that the compared groups in activation/inhibition systems and mindfulness had meaningful differences. The average scores of mindfulness in healthy people were higher than those of the addicted people. While the average scores of behavioral inhibition system in healthy people were higher than addicts, the average scores of behavioral activation system in addicts were higher than non-addicted people. In general, since this study showed that activity level of activation system in addicted people is more than non-addicts, activity level of inhibition system in non-addicts is more than addicted people, and that mindfulness skill in addicts is lower than non-addicts there is the necessity to design therapeutic and rehabilitative interventions.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparison of Behavioral Activation/Inhibition Systems and Mindfulness in Addicts and Non-addicted Males
AU  - Gholam Hossein Javanmard
AU  - Masumeh Mirhasanpour Vahedi
Y1  - 2017/06/23
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12
T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
SP  - 43
EP  - 48
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7845
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170603.12
AB  - The main objective of this causal-comparative research was to compare behavioral activation and inhibition systems and mindfulness in addicts and non-addicted men of Maragheh, Iran. In order to do this, 35 addicted males and 35 non-addicted men were chosen using purposeful sampling method and via matching the two groups. The participants answered the 120-item test of activation/inhibition systems (Gray-Wilson Personality Questionnaire or GWPQ) and the 39-item test of mindfulness (Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills or KIMS). Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and SPSS software. The findings showed that the compared groups in activation/inhibition systems and mindfulness had meaningful differences. The average scores of mindfulness in healthy people were higher than those of the addicted people. While the average scores of behavioral inhibition system in healthy people were higher than addicts, the average scores of behavioral activation system in addicts were higher than non-addicted people. In general, since this study showed that activity level of activation system in addicted people is more than non-addicts, activity level of inhibition system in non-addicts is more than addicted people, and that mindfulness skill in addicts is lower than non-addicts there is the necessity to design therapeutic and rehabilitative interventions.
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download