Beginning in the mid 20th Century the Chesapeake Bay began to show the first signs of eutrophication, with seasonal depletion of free oxygen in bottom waters (hypoxia). Eutrophication is driven largely by external loading of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). These nutrients maintain high levels of phytoplankton productivity and subsequent transfer of fixed carbon to the sediments. That carbon fuels heterotrophs that uptake free oxygen in the bottom waters at a faster rate than it can be replenished during seasonal stratification, resulting in periods of persistent hypoxia and anoxia. Aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of the settled plankton and detritus drives the release of remineralized nutrients such as orthophosphate (P). Episodic and seasonal mixing events transport the N and P to better illuminated surface waters where it supports blooms of phytoplankton, which will settle and continue the positive feedback loop of eutrophication. To better understand the role of sediments in the ongoing stress caused by eutrophication in the Chesapeake Bay we incubated sediment cores at temperatures to model an in situ seasonal cycle. We measured oxygen concentrations and P levels to estimate the release of orthophosphate to the overlying waters under various oxygen conditions. During oxic conditions the net flux of orthophosphate was from the water column into the sediments. Anoxia drove P flux from the sediments back to the water column. These results indicate internal P loading during periods of anoxia by the sediments to the water column may lead to continued eutrophication.
| Published in | Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science (Volume 7, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.wros.20180703.13 |
| Page(s) | 42-48 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Eutrophication, Chesapeake Bay, Multiple Stressors, Hypoxia, Sediment
| [1] | D. Breitburg, “Effects of hypoxia, and the balance between hypoxia and enrichment, on coastal fishes and fisheries,” Estuaries, vol. 25, no. 4 B, pp. 767–781, 2002. |
| [2] | J. D. Hagy, W. R. Boynton, C. W. Keefe, and K. V. Wood, “Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950-2001: Long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow,” Estuaries, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 634–658, 2004. |
| [3] | S. W. Nixon, “Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns,” Ophelia, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 199–219, 1995. |
| [4] | C. C. F. and N. M. R., “Twenty‐One‐Year Simulation of Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Using the CE‐QUAL‐ICM Eutrophication Model,” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1119–1133, Sep. 2013. |
| [5] | M. Huettel, P. Berg, and J. E. Kostka, “Benthic Exchange and Biogeochemical Cycling in Permeable Sediments,” Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 23–51, 2014. |
| [6] | J. E. Cloern, “Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal\reutrophication problem,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., vol. 210, pp. 223–253, 2001. |
| [7] | D. A. Smith and G. Matisoff, “Sediment Oxygen Demand in the Central Basin of Lake Erie,” J. Great Lakes Res., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 731–744, 2008. |
| [8] | R. Howarth et al., “Coupled biogeochemical cycles: Eutrophication and hypoxia in temperate estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems,” in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2011, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18–26. |
| [9] | W. Boynton and W. Kemp, “Nutrient regeneration and oxygen consumption by sediments along an estuarine salinity gradient,” Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., vol. 23, pp. 45–55, 1985. |
| [10] | D. J. Conley, J. Carstensen, R. Vaquer-Sunyer, and C. M. Duarte, “Ecosystem thresholds with hypoxia,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 629, no. 1, pp. 21–29, 2009. |
| [11] | S. K. Sturdivant, R. J. Díaz, and G. R. Cutter, “Bioturbation in a declining oxygen environment, in situ observations from wormcam,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 4, 2012. |
| [12] | W. R. Boynton, M. A. C. Ceballos, E. M. Bailey, C. L. S. Hodgkins, J. L. Humphrey, and J. M. Testa, “Oxygen and Nutrient Exchanges at the Sediment-Water Interface: a Global Synthesis and Critique of Estuarine and Coastal Data,” Estuaries and Coasts, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 301–333, Mar. 2018. |
| [13] | C. M. Crain, K. Kroeker, and B. S. Halpern, “Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems,” Ecol. Lett., vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1304–1315, 2008. |
| [14] | P. J. J., T. C. R., and M. C. D., “Reconceptualizing synergism and antagonism among multiple stressors,” Ecol. Evol., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 1538–1547, Mar. 2015. |
| [15] | N. N. Rabalais et al., “Nutrient Changes in the Mississippi River and System Responses on the Adjacent Continental Shelf,” Estuaries, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 386, 1996. |
| [16] | D. Scavia, N. N. Rabalais, R. E. Turner, D. Justić, and W. J. Wiseman, “Predicting the response of Gulf of Mexico hypoxia to variations in Mississippi River nitrogen load,” Limnol. Oceanogr., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 951–956, 2003. |
| [17] | M. Li et al., “What drives interannual variability of hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay: Climate forcing versus nutrient loading?,” Geophys. Res. Lett., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2127–2134, 2016. |
| [18] | J. M. Testa et al., “Quantifying the effects of nutrient loading on dissolved O2 cycling and hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay using a coupled hydrodynamic–biogeochemical model,” J. Mar. Syst., vol. 139, pp. 139–158, 2014. |
| [19] | R. J. Diaz, “Overview of Hypoxia around the World,” J. Environ. Qual., vol. 30, no. 2, p. 275, 2001. |
| [20] | W. C. Long and R. D. Seitz, “Hypoxia in chesapeake bay tributaries: Worsening effects on macrobenthic community structure in the York River,” Estuaries and Coasts, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 287–297, 2009. |
| [21] | R. J. Diaz, G. R. Cutter, and D. M. Dauer, “A comparison of two methods for estimating the status of benthic habitat quality in the Virginia Chesapeake Bay,” J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol., vol. 285, pp. 371–381, 2003. |
| [22] | H. S. Lim, R. J. Diaz, J. S. Hong, and L. C. Schaffner, “Hypoxia and benthic community recovery in Korean coastal waters,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1517–1526, 2006. |
| [23] | W. M. Kemp, J. M. Testa, D. J. Conley, D. Gilbert, and J. D. Hagy, “Temporal responses of coastal hypoxia to nutrient loading and physical controls,” Biogeosciences, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 2985–3008, 2009. |
| [24] | W. Boynton, W. M. Kemp, C. G. Osborne, and V. S. Kennedy, “Nutrient fluxes across the sediment-water interface in the turbid zone of a coastal plain estuary,” in Estuarine Perspectives, 1980, pp. 93–109. |
| [25] | V. Ruban and D. Demare, “Sediment phosphorus and internal phosphate flux in the hydroelectric reservoir of Bort-les-Orgues, France,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 373/374, pp. 349–359, 1998. |
| [26] | S. R. Joshi, R. K. Kukkadapu, D. J. Burdige, M. E. Bowden, D. L. Sparks, and D. P. Jaisi, “Organic matter remineralization predominates phosphorus cycling in the mid-bay sediments in the chesapeake bay,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 5887–5896, 2015. |
| [27] | J. Testa and W. Michael Kemp, Hypoxia-induced shifts in nitrogen and phosphorus cycling in Chesapeake Bay, vol. 57. 2012. |
| [28] | P. J. Tango and R. A. Batiuk, “Chesapeake Bay recovery and factors affecting trends: Long-term monitoring, indicators, and insights,” Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci., vol. 4, pp. 12–20, 2016. |
| [29] | J. B. Percival and P. J. Lindsay, "Measurement of physical properties of sediments. In: Murdoch A, Azcue J, Mudroch P. Manual of physico-chemical analysis of aquatic sediments. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc: 1997. Pp. 7-38 |
| [30] | J. M. Testa et al., “Ecological Forecasting and the Science of Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay,” Bioscience, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 614–626, 2017. |
| [31] | R. A. Batiuk, D. L. Breitburg, R. J. Diaz, T. M. Cronin, D. H. Secor, and G. Thursby, “Derivation of habitat-specific dissolved oxygen criteria for Chesapeake Bay and its tidal tributaries,” J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol., vol. 381, no. SUPPL., 2009. |
APA Style
Tiara Nydia Moore, Benjamin Elias Cuker. (2018). Sedimentary Oxygen Demand and Orthophosphate Release: Sustaining Eutrophication in a Tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science, 7(3), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20180703.13
ACS Style
Tiara Nydia Moore; Benjamin Elias Cuker. Sedimentary Oxygen Demand and Orthophosphate Release: Sustaining Eutrophication in a Tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. J. Water Resour. Ocean Sci. 2018, 7(3), 42-48. doi: 10.11648/j.wros.20180703.13
AMA Style
Tiara Nydia Moore, Benjamin Elias Cuker. Sedimentary Oxygen Demand and Orthophosphate Release: Sustaining Eutrophication in a Tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. J Water Resour Ocean Sci. 2018;7(3):42-48. doi: 10.11648/j.wros.20180703.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.wros.20180703.13,
author = {Tiara Nydia Moore and Benjamin Elias Cuker},
title = {Sedimentary Oxygen Demand and Orthophosphate Release: Sustaining Eutrophication in a Tributary of the Chesapeake Bay},
journal = {Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science},
volume = {7},
number = {3},
pages = {42-48},
doi = {10.11648/j.wros.20180703.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20180703.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wros.20180703.13},
abstract = {Beginning in the mid 20th Century the Chesapeake Bay began to show the first signs of eutrophication, with seasonal depletion of free oxygen in bottom waters (hypoxia). Eutrophication is driven largely by external loading of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). These nutrients maintain high levels of phytoplankton productivity and subsequent transfer of fixed carbon to the sediments. That carbon fuels heterotrophs that uptake free oxygen in the bottom waters at a faster rate than it can be replenished during seasonal stratification, resulting in periods of persistent hypoxia and anoxia. Aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of the settled plankton and detritus drives the release of remineralized nutrients such as orthophosphate (P). Episodic and seasonal mixing events transport the N and P to better illuminated surface waters where it supports blooms of phytoplankton, which will settle and continue the positive feedback loop of eutrophication. To better understand the role of sediments in the ongoing stress caused by eutrophication in the Chesapeake Bay we incubated sediment cores at temperatures to model an in situ seasonal cycle. We measured oxygen concentrations and P levels to estimate the release of orthophosphate to the overlying waters under various oxygen conditions. During oxic conditions the net flux of orthophosphate was from the water column into the sediments. Anoxia drove P flux from the sediments back to the water column. These results indicate internal P loading during periods of anoxia by the sediments to the water column may lead to continued eutrophication.},
year = {2018}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Sedimentary Oxygen Demand and Orthophosphate Release: Sustaining Eutrophication in a Tributary of the Chesapeake Bay AU - Tiara Nydia Moore AU - Benjamin Elias Cuker Y1 - 2018/09/28 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20180703.13 DO - 10.11648/j.wros.20180703.13 T2 - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science JF - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science JO - Journal of Water Resources and Ocean Science SP - 42 EP - 48 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7993 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wros.20180703.13 AB - Beginning in the mid 20th Century the Chesapeake Bay began to show the first signs of eutrophication, with seasonal depletion of free oxygen in bottom waters (hypoxia). Eutrophication is driven largely by external loading of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N). These nutrients maintain high levels of phytoplankton productivity and subsequent transfer of fixed carbon to the sediments. That carbon fuels heterotrophs that uptake free oxygen in the bottom waters at a faster rate than it can be replenished during seasonal stratification, resulting in periods of persistent hypoxia and anoxia. Aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of the settled plankton and detritus drives the release of remineralized nutrients such as orthophosphate (P). Episodic and seasonal mixing events transport the N and P to better illuminated surface waters where it supports blooms of phytoplankton, which will settle and continue the positive feedback loop of eutrophication. To better understand the role of sediments in the ongoing stress caused by eutrophication in the Chesapeake Bay we incubated sediment cores at temperatures to model an in situ seasonal cycle. We measured oxygen concentrations and P levels to estimate the release of orthophosphate to the overlying waters under various oxygen conditions. During oxic conditions the net flux of orthophosphate was from the water column into the sediments. Anoxia drove P flux from the sediments back to the water column. These results indicate internal P loading during periods of anoxia by the sediments to the water column may lead to continued eutrophication. VL - 7 IS - 3 ER -
Email: