Before quasi-experimental in public health research and development (R&D) modeling is step 2 of the main steps of doing R&D in public health include Step 1: Studying Situations, Problems, and Needs, Step 2: Creating and Auditing Innovation, Step 3: Experimenting and Studying Results of using Innovation, and Step 4: Assessing and Improving Innovation. Researchers apply to model to create and invent innovation/ product (the machine, program, procedure) for solving in health and objective to present a technique of modeling R&D in public health which the technique of modeling are conductor: 1) create or develop forms (a. study of relevant documents and research, b. study from real context, and c. formatting); 2) verification of model accuracy (a. model testing with assessments under with specified standards assessments, b. pattern testing with assessment by the qualified person, c. format testing by surveying opinions of relevant personnel, and d. format testing by testing the format) which used for modeling a semantic model and a causal model.
Published in | World Journal of Public Health (Volume 5, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.13 |
Page(s) | 89-98 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Modeling, Public Health, Research and Development
[1] | Phongpisanu B. (2019). Process of Research and Development in Public Health. Int J Clin Case Stud Rep, 2 (1): 61-65. |
[2] | Phongpisanu B. (2018). Main Steps of Doing Research and Development in Public Health. Med J Clin Trials Case Stud, 2 (10): 000183. DOI: 10.23880/mjccs-16000183. |
[3] | Phongpisanu B. (2019). Techniques for Writing Chapter I of Research and Development in Public Health. Med J Clin Trials Case Stud, 3 (4): 000222. DOI: 10.23880/mjccs-16000222. |
[4] | Bardo, J. W. and Hartman, J. J. (1982). Urban Society: A Systematic Introduction. New York: F. E. Peacock Publishers. |
[5] | Good, C. V. (1973). Dictionary of Education (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. |
[6] | Keeves, P. J. (1988). Model and model building Education Research, methodology and measurement: An International Handbook. Oxford: Pegamon Press, 559. |
[7] | Willer, D. (1967). Scientific Sociology: Theory and method. Englewood cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice–Hall. |
[8] | Longman, C. (2009). Longman Dictionary of contemporary English. England: Pearson Education. |
[9] | Hausser, D. L. (1980). Comparison of different models for organizational analysis. In organizational assessment perspective on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of work life. New York: John Wiley & Son. |
[10] | Nadler, D. A. (1980). Role of Model in Organization Assessment. New York: John Wiley & Son. |
[11] | Michael, H. M., Michael, A. and Khendouri, F. 1985. Management: Individual and Organizational Effectiveness (2 rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row. |
[12] | Stoner, J. A. F. and Wankel, C. 1986. Management (3 rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. |
[13] | Steiner, E. (1988). Methodology of theory building. Sydney: Ecology Research Associates. |
[14] | Smith E. W. and others. (1997). The education’s encyclopedia. New York: Prentice-Hall. |
[15] | Keeves, J. P. (1997). Educational research, and methodology, and measurement: An international handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press. |
[16] | Keeves, P. J. (1988). Model and model building Education Research, methodology and measurement: An International Handbook. Oxford: Pegamon Press, 561-565. |
[17] | Joyce, B. R. and Weil, M. (1972). Model of Teaching. New York: Prentice-Hall. |
[18] | Brown, W. B. & Moberg, D. J. (1980). Organization Theory and Management: A Macro Approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons. |
[19] | Keefe, W. J. (1994). Leadership in Midlle Level Education. Virginia National. |
[20] | Meason, Albert & Khedourri. (1985). Management. New York: Harper & Row. |
[21] | Willer, D. (1967). Scientific Sociology: Theory and Method. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. |
[22] | Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluations. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. |
[23] | Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
[24] | Scriven, M. (1973). “Goal-free evaluation.” In E. R. House (ed.). School Evaluation: The Politics and Process. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. |
[25] | Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization-focused evaluation. California: Sage Publications. |
[26] | Fetterman, D. M. (1996). “Empowerment evaluation: An introduction to theory and practice.” In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, and A. Wandersman (Eds.). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment & accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. |
[27] | Chen, H. T. (2004). “The roots of theory-driven evaluation current views and origins.” In M. C. Alkin (ed.). Evaluation Roots. Thousand Oaks: Calif: Sage. |
[28] | Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M. S., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). Evaluation Models viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (8th ed). Boston: Khuwer-Nijhoff. |
[29] | Eisner, E. (1976). Educational connoisseurship and criticism: Their form and functions in education evaluation. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 39 (2), 192-193. |
[30] | Keeves, P. J. (1988). Model and model building Education Research, methodology and measurement: An International Handbook. Oxford: Pegamon Press, 560. |
[31] | Phongpisanu B. (2019). Conducting a Path analysis of Virtual Service Provider Office Management (VSPOM) Structure for Service Plan in the Regional Health Service in Thailand, Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology: 13 (4), 1793-1799. DOI: 10.5958/0973-9130.2019.00571.1. |
[32] | Nemoto, T., & Beglar, D. (2014). Developing Likert-scale questionnaires. In N. Sonda & A. Krause (Eds.), JALT2013 Conference Proceedings. Tokyo: JALT. |
APA Style
Phongpisanu Boonda. (2020). A Technique of Modeling in Public Health Research and Development. World Journal of Public Health, 5(4), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.13
ACS Style
Phongpisanu Boonda. A Technique of Modeling in Public Health Research and Development. World J. Public Health 2020, 5(4), 89-98. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.13
AMA Style
Phongpisanu Boonda. A Technique of Modeling in Public Health Research and Development. World J Public Health. 2020;5(4):89-98. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.13
@article{10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.13, author = {Phongpisanu Boonda}, title = {A Technique of Modeling in Public Health Research and Development}, journal = {World Journal of Public Health}, volume = {5}, number = {4}, pages = {89-98}, doi = {10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.wjph.20200504.13}, abstract = {Before quasi-experimental in public health research and development (R&D) modeling is step 2 of the main steps of doing R&D in public health include Step 1: Studying Situations, Problems, and Needs, Step 2: Creating and Auditing Innovation, Step 3: Experimenting and Studying Results of using Innovation, and Step 4: Assessing and Improving Innovation. Researchers apply to model to create and invent innovation/ product (the machine, program, procedure) for solving in health and objective to present a technique of modeling R&D in public health which the technique of modeling are conductor: 1) create or develop forms (a. study of relevant documents and research, b. study from real context, and c. formatting); 2) verification of model accuracy (a. model testing with assessments under with specified standards assessments, b. pattern testing with assessment by the qualified person, c. format testing by surveying opinions of relevant personnel, and d. format testing by testing the format) which used for modeling a semantic model and a causal model.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Technique of Modeling in Public Health Research and Development AU - Phongpisanu Boonda Y1 - 2020/11/27 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.13 DO - 10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.13 T2 - World Journal of Public Health JF - World Journal of Public Health JO - World Journal of Public Health SP - 89 EP - 98 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-6059 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.13 AB - Before quasi-experimental in public health research and development (R&D) modeling is step 2 of the main steps of doing R&D in public health include Step 1: Studying Situations, Problems, and Needs, Step 2: Creating and Auditing Innovation, Step 3: Experimenting and Studying Results of using Innovation, and Step 4: Assessing and Improving Innovation. Researchers apply to model to create and invent innovation/ product (the machine, program, procedure) for solving in health and objective to present a technique of modeling R&D in public health which the technique of modeling are conductor: 1) create or develop forms (a. study of relevant documents and research, b. study from real context, and c. formatting); 2) verification of model accuracy (a. model testing with assessments under with specified standards assessments, b. pattern testing with assessment by the qualified person, c. format testing by surveying opinions of relevant personnel, and d. format testing by testing the format) which used for modeling a semantic model and a causal model. VL - 5 IS - 4 ER -