The theoretical and methodological perspective was the materialism historical dialectic with Granscian categories, with concepts of the historical hegemonic block, counter hegemonic block, organicity, domination. The main sources of data used are primary and secondary, which include data collected by the author based on the technique of participant observation of the qualitative method. This social scientific essay analyzes political process of the others parliamentary coup carried out in Paraguay. These socials events were done to promote the Constitutional Amendment for presidential re-election. However, they were aborted by the citizen pressure that culminated in the March 2017 crisis with the death of Rodrigo Quintana, a young leader of the Authentic Radical Liberal Party - PLRA. This sad social event was followed by a series of parliamentary blows in 2018 during the electoral campaign being defined only after the elections of 2018. In this context, the work aims to shed light on the events that preceded the results of the 2018 elections. For this purpose, it is analyzed the different blows that were given in different powers of the State preparing the continuity of the same regime, in the years 2017 and 2018. The conclusion is that a cris of organization within the hegemonic block, first of all. Then, it was a crisis of domination between the hegemonic block and the counter hegemonic block with the final polarization of the 2018 election.
| Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20190804.17 |
| Page(s) | 190-197 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Parliamentary Coup, Radical Democracy, Historical Hegemonic Block, Counter Hegemonic Block, Organicity, Hegemony, Domination.
| [1] | Gransci A. (1971). Selection from the Presion Noteboks. New York: International Publishers. |
| [2] | Campos, Daniel. (1986). “Socio-Economic Changes and Capitalist Agricultural Expansion: A Theoretical, Historical and Analytical Model for the Paraguayan Case. Wisconsin University, Madison-USA. MSc Thesis. |
| [3] | Campos R. D., D, (1987). “White Gold Producers in Paraguay: Socioeconomica Change and Technologrical Transformation through Cotton Production”. Wisconsin University, Madison-USA. PhD Thesis. |
| [4] | Bobbio N., (1977). ¿Existe una Doctrina Marxista del Estado? En EL MARXISMO Y ESTADO. Edit. Avance, Barcelona, España. |
| [5] | Colletti, L. (1972). From –frousseau to Lenin: Estudies in Ideology and Society. New York: Monthly Review Press. |
| [6] | Borón Atilio, (2000). “¿Posmarxismo? Crisis, Recomposición o Liquidación del Marxismo en la obra de Ernesto Laclau.” En Libro: Tras el Buho de Minerva. Mercado contra democracia en el capitalismo del fin de siglo. Atilio Boron. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Buenos Aires. Argentina. |
| [7] | Coraggio, J. L. (1986). “Economics and Politics in the Transition on the Nicaragua Experiencie.” En Transition and Devlopment. Monthly Review Press, Center for Study of the Americas. |
| [8] | Nuñez S. O., (1989). “Clases, sujetos y movimientos populares en la lucha por la democracia, la revolución y el socialismo.” En Construcción de la Democracia en Nicaragua. Escuela de Sociología, Universidad Centroamericana –UCA. |
| [9] | Donolo, C. (1985). “Algo más sobre el Autoritarismo político y social.” Los Límites de la Democracia. Biblioteca de Ciencias Sociales, Vol 2. |
| [10] | Luxemburgo, Rosa. (1969). ¿Reforma o Revolución? Máspero. Paris, Francia. Traducción de Irene Petit en Versión Española en www.marxist.org |
| [11] | Laclau E. y Mouffe Ch. (1987). Hegemonía y Estrategia socialista. Hacia la Radicalización de la Democracia. Edit. Siglo XXI, Madrid, España. |
| [12] | Therborn G, (1979). “The Travail of Latin American Democracy.” New Left Review No 113-114. |
| [13] | Therborn G. (1980). What Does The Ruling Class Do When it Rules. London: New Left Book. |
| [14] | Campos R. D., D. (2017). El Golpe de Estado Parlamentario del 2012 en Paraguay: Análisis del Proceso Político. Religación. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades. Vol II, No 7 Quito, Ecuador. Setiembre 2017 pp 144-159. |
| [15] | Codas R. (2018). Lugo, Progresismo Político en el Paraguay. En Regalado R. (cop.). Los Gobiernos Progresistas y de Izquierda en América Latina: Apuntes para un Debate y Balance necesarios. XXII Seminario Internacional “Los partidos políticos y una Nueva Sociedad. Partido del Trabajo, México. |
| [16] | Avalos Ch. (2018). 31 M. La noche Trágica de la Democracia. Edit. El Lector, Asunción, Paraguay. |
| [17] | Cálcena R. J. et. al. (2018). La Enmienda de Fuego y Sangre. Edit. Tiempo Edic. y Contenidos. Asunción, Paraguay. |
| [18] | Periódicos: ABC Color, Última Hora, La Nación y Diario 5 Días; así como archivos y artículos de periodistas columnistas especializados. |
| [19] | Archivos audiovisuales de Canales de Televisión sobre la coyuntura analizada. |
| [20] | Canal Telefuturo. (2017). Golpe Parlamentario: Violan la Constitución. El Marzo Paraguay de Cartes. Video Editado por Canal Telefuturo. Asunción, Paraguay. |
| [21] | Documentos de Archivo del autor y cuaderno de campo de investigación participativa. |
| [22] | DGEEC/STP. (2017). Encuesta Permanente de Hogares 2016. Asunción, Paraguay. |
| [23] | DGEEC/STP. (2016). Encuesta Permanente de Hogares 2015. Asunción, Paraguay |
| [24] | Carter Miguel. (2018). “Itaipú: La Riqueza Energética perdida del Paraguay, de cara a la revisión en 2023”. Universidad de Columbia, USA y Centro DEMOS, Asunción, Paraguay. |
| [25] | PRO Desarrollo Paraguay. (2016). Economía Subterránea, El caso paraguayo. Asociación PRO Desarrollo Paraguay. 4ª Asunción, Paraguay. |
| [26] | Campos, R. D., D. (2013). Reforma Agraria: Una Causa Nacional. Edit. Arandurá. Asunción, Paraguay. |
| [27] | Regalado R. et. al. (2018). Los Gobiernos Progresitas y de Izquierda en América Latina: Apuntes para un Debate y un Balance necesarios. XXII Seminario Internacional “Los Partidos y una Nueva Sociedad. Partido del Trabajo. México. |
APA Style
Daniel Campos Ruíz Díaz. (2019). The Other Coups: The 2018 Election, Between Legacy and Legitimacy. Social Sciences, 8(4), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20190804.17
ACS Style
Daniel Campos Ruíz Díaz. The Other Coups: The 2018 Election, Between Legacy and Legitimacy. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(4), 190-197. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20190804.17
AMA Style
Daniel Campos Ruíz Díaz. The Other Coups: The 2018 Election, Between Legacy and Legitimacy. Soc Sci. 2019;8(4):190-197. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20190804.17
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ss.20190804.17,
author = {Daniel Campos Ruíz Díaz},
title = {The Other Coups: The 2018 Election, Between Legacy and Legitimacy},
journal = {Social Sciences},
volume = {8},
number = {4},
pages = {190-197},
doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20190804.17},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20190804.17},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20190804.17},
abstract = {The theoretical and methodological perspective was the materialism historical dialectic with Granscian categories, with concepts of the historical hegemonic block, counter hegemonic block, organicity, domination. The main sources of data used are primary and secondary, which include data collected by the author based on the technique of participant observation of the qualitative method. This social scientific essay analyzes political process of the others parliamentary coup carried out in Paraguay. These socials events were done to promote the Constitutional Amendment for presidential re-election. However, they were aborted by the citizen pressure that culminated in the March 2017 crisis with the death of Rodrigo Quintana, a young leader of the Authentic Radical Liberal Party - PLRA. This sad social event was followed by a series of parliamentary blows in 2018 during the electoral campaign being defined only after the elections of 2018. In this context, the work aims to shed light on the events that preceded the results of the 2018 elections. For this purpose, it is analyzed the different blows that were given in different powers of the State preparing the continuity of the same regime, in the years 2017 and 2018. The conclusion is that a cris of organization within the hegemonic block, first of all. Then, it was a crisis of domination between the hegemonic block and the counter hegemonic block with the final polarization of the 2018 election.},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Other Coups: The 2018 Election, Between Legacy and Legitimacy AU - Daniel Campos Ruíz Díaz Y1 - 2019/08/15 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20190804.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20190804.17 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 190 EP - 197 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20190804.17 AB - The theoretical and methodological perspective was the materialism historical dialectic with Granscian categories, with concepts of the historical hegemonic block, counter hegemonic block, organicity, domination. The main sources of data used are primary and secondary, which include data collected by the author based on the technique of participant observation of the qualitative method. This social scientific essay analyzes political process of the others parliamentary coup carried out in Paraguay. These socials events were done to promote the Constitutional Amendment for presidential re-election. However, they were aborted by the citizen pressure that culminated in the March 2017 crisis with the death of Rodrigo Quintana, a young leader of the Authentic Radical Liberal Party - PLRA. This sad social event was followed by a series of parliamentary blows in 2018 during the electoral campaign being defined only after the elections of 2018. In this context, the work aims to shed light on the events that preceded the results of the 2018 elections. For this purpose, it is analyzed the different blows that were given in different powers of the State preparing the continuity of the same regime, in the years 2017 and 2018. The conclusion is that a cris of organization within the hegemonic block, first of all. Then, it was a crisis of domination between the hegemonic block and the counter hegemonic block with the final polarization of the 2018 election. VL - 8 IS - 4 ER -
Email: