Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research

Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi; Peter Golding; Luis Perez; Anand Raj

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research

Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi, Peter Golding, Luis Perez, Anand Raj

Published in Science Journal of Energy Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 2)

Received: 22 April 2021 Accepted: 21 May 2021 Published: 25 June 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The Permian Basin in Western Texas and North Eastern New Mexico is an energy powerhouse. With three sub-basins i.e., Delaware, Central Basin Platform and Midland Basin producing hydrocarbons from both conventional and unconventional plays, the Texan Permian has been a focus of more interest from energy companies than the North-Western Shelf of the basin in New Mexico. However, the less explored North Western shelf of the basin in New Mexico furnishes equal opportunity for oil and gas exploration companies for further exploration research and subsequent discoveries. This research is an attempt to showcase the exploration significance and highlight the gaps for in exploration research in the New Mexico Permian Basin. We compare the oil plays in both Texas and New Mexico Permian based on reservoir geology and basin architecture. Overall, The Permian Basin is dominated by carbonate reservoirs. They account for 75% of all oil production followed by clastics, which contribute 14%; then come the mixed clastics and carbonates accounting for 8%; and lastly cherts make up around 3%. The leading growing production zone is the San Andres platform (Northwest shelf) carbonate play (4.0 billion bbl) followed by the Leonard restricted platform carbonate play (3.3 billion bbl). The Lower Permian Horseshoe and Pennsylvanian plays are next (2.7 billion bbl) and lastly by the San Andres platform carbonate play contributes to the overall production (2.2 billion bbl). With known potential of shelf plays we determine that North Western Shelf has similar stratigraphy and extensive hydrocarbon potential yet to be researched and explored.

Published in	Science Journal of Energy Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12
Page(s)	22-29
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Permian Basin, Reservoirs, Delaware Basin, Central Basin Platform and Midland Basin

References

[1]	Ball, M. M. (2006). Permian Basin Province (044).
[2]	Barnaby, R. J., & Ward, W. B. (2007). Outcrop analog for mixed siliciclastic–carbonate ramp reservoirs—stratigraphic hierarchy, facies architecture, and geologic heterogeneity: Grayburg Formation, Permian Basin, USA. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 77 (1), 34-58.
[3]	Bouma, A. H., 1962, Sedimentology of Some Flysch Deposits. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 168.
[4]	Comer, J. B. (1991). Stratigraphic analysis of the upper Devonian Woodford formation, Permian basin, west Texas and southeastern New Mexico (Vol. 201). Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin.
[5]	Driskill, B., Pickering, J., Rowe, H., 2018, Interpretation of High Resolution XRF data from the Bone Spring and Upper Wolfcamp, Delaware Basin, USA, URTeC Technical Program, 2018, URTeC: 2901968.
[6]	Dutton, S. P., Kim, E. M., Broadhead, R. F., Breton, C. L., Raatz, W. D., Ruppel, S. C., and Kerans, C., 2005, Play analysis and digital portfolio of major oil reservoirs in the Permian Basin: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations No. 271, 287 p., CD-ROM.
[7]	Forand, D., Heesakkers, V., & Schwartz, K. (2017, September). Constraints on natural fracture and in-situ stress trends of unconventional reservoirs in the Permian Basin, USA. In Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Austin, Texas, 24-26 July 2017 (pp. 654-672). Society of Exploration Geophysicists, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
[8]	Galley, J. D., 1958, Oil and gas geology in the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico, in Weeks, L. G., ed., Habitat of oil—a symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, p. 395–446.
[9]	Galloway, W. E., Ewing, T. E., Garrett, C. M., Jr., Tyler, N., and Bebout, D. G., 1983, Atlas of major Texas oil reservoirs: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, p. 139.
[10]	Gibson, G. R., 1965, Oil and gas in southwestern region—geologic framework, in Young, A., and Galley, J. E., eds., Fluids in the subsurface environment: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 4, p. 66–100.
[11]	Green, H., Šegvić, B., Zanoni, G., Omodeo-Salé, S., & Adatte, T. (2020). Evaluation of Shale Source Rocks and Clay Mineral Diagenesis in the Permian Basin, USA: Inferences on Basin Thermal Maturity and Source Rock Potential. Geosciences, 10 (10), 381.
[12]	Haughton, P., Christopher, D., McCaffrey, W., Simon, B., 2009, Hybrid sediment gravity flow deposits – Classification, origin and significance. Marine and Petroleum Geology. v. 26. 1900-1918. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.02.012.
[13]	Jarvie, D. M., B. L. Claxton, B. Henk, and J. T. Breyer, 2001, Oil and Shale Gas from the Barnett Shale, Ft. Worth Basin, Texas: AAPG National Convention, June 3-6, 2001, Denver, CO, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 85/13 (Supplement), p. A100.
[14]	Jarvie, D. M., Prose, D., Jarvie, B. M., Drozd, R., & Maende, A. (2017, April). Conventional and unconventional petroleum systems of the delaware basin. In Proceedings of the AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA (pp. 2-5).
[15]	Jones, T. S., 1973, Stratigraphy of the Permian Basin of West Texas: West Texas Geological Society Publication 53-29, p. 63.
[16]	Kvale, E. and Rahman, M., 2016, Depositional Facies and Organic Content of Upper Wolfcamp Fm (Permian) Delaware Basin and Implication for Sequences. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference.
[17]	Lowe, D. R., 1982, Sediment Gravity Flows: II Depositional Models with Special Reference to the Deposits of High-Density Turbidity Currents. Journal of Sedimentary Research.
[18]	Osleger, D. A., & Tinker, S. W. (1999). Three-dimensional architecture of Upper Permian high-frequency sequences, Yates-Capitan shelf margin, Permian Basin, USA.
[19]	Parker, A., D. Entzminger, J. Leone, M. Sonnenfeld, and L. Canter, 2014, Lessons Learned from the KCC #503H Woodford Horizontal Well at Keystone South Field.
[20]	Winkler County, TX: AAPG 2014 Southwest Section Annual Convention, Midland, Texas, May 11-14, 2014, Search and Discovery Article #20254 (2014).
[21]	Pierre, J. P., Andrews, J. R., Young, M. H., Sun, A. Y., & Wolaver, B. D. (2020). Projected Landscape Impacts from Oil and Gas Development Scenarios in the Permian Basin, USA. Environmental Management, 66 (3), 348-363.
[22]	Tyler, N., Bebout, D. G., Garrett, C. M., Jr., Guevara, E. H., Hocott, C. R., Holtz, M. H., Hovorka, S. D., Kerans, C., Lucia, F. J., Major, R. P., Ruppel, S. C., and Vander Stoep, G. W., 1991, Integrated characterization of Permian Basin reservoirs, University Lands, West Texas: targeting the remaining resource for advanced oil recovery: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology Report of Investigations No. 203, 42 p.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi, Peter Golding, Luis Perez, Anand Raj. (2021). Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research. Science Journal of Energy Engineering, 9(2), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi; Peter Golding; Luis Perez; Anand Raj. Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research. Sci. J. Energy Eng. 2021, 9(2), 22-29. doi: 10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi, Peter Golding, Luis Perez, Anand Raj. Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research. Sci J Energy Eng. 2021;9(2):22-29. doi: 10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12,
  author = {Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi and Peter Golding and Luis Perez and Anand Raj},
  title = {Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research},
  journal = {Science Journal of Energy Engineering},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {22-29},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjee.20210902.12},
  abstract = {The Permian Basin in Western Texas and North Eastern New Mexico is an energy powerhouse. With three sub-basins i.e., Delaware, Central Basin Platform and Midland Basin producing hydrocarbons from both conventional and unconventional plays, the Texan Permian has been a focus of more interest from energy companies than the North-Western Shelf of the basin in New Mexico. However, the less explored North Western shelf of the basin in New Mexico furnishes equal opportunity for oil and gas exploration companies for further exploration research and subsequent discoveries. This research is an attempt to showcase the exploration significance and highlight the gaps for in exploration research in the New Mexico Permian Basin. We compare the oil plays in both Texas and New Mexico Permian based on reservoir geology and basin architecture. Overall, The Permian Basin is dominated by carbonate reservoirs. They account for 75% of all oil production followed by clastics, which contribute 14%; then come the mixed clastics and carbonates accounting for 8%; and lastly cherts make up around 3%. The leading growing production zone is the San Andres platform (Northwest shelf) carbonate play (4.0 billion bbl) followed by the Leonard restricted platform carbonate play (3.3 billion bbl). The Lower Permian Horseshoe and Pennsylvanian plays are next (2.7 billion bbl) and lastly by the San Andres platform carbonate play contributes to the overall production (2.2 billion bbl). With known potential of shelf plays we determine that North Western Shelf has similar stratigraphy and extensive hydrocarbon potential yet to be researched and explored.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research
AU  - Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi
AU  - Peter Golding
AU  - Luis Perez
AU  - Anand Raj
Y1  - 2021/06/25
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12
T2  - Science Journal of Energy Engineering
JF  - Science Journal of Energy Engineering
JO  - Science Journal of Energy Engineering
SP  - 22
EP  - 29
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-8126
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12
AB  - The Permian Basin in Western Texas and North Eastern New Mexico is an energy powerhouse. With three sub-basins i.e., Delaware, Central Basin Platform and Midland Basin producing hydrocarbons from both conventional and unconventional plays, the Texan Permian has been a focus of more interest from energy companies than the North-Western Shelf of the basin in New Mexico. However, the less explored North Western shelf of the basin in New Mexico furnishes equal opportunity for oil and gas exploration companies for further exploration research and subsequent discoveries. This research is an attempt to showcase the exploration significance and highlight the gaps for in exploration research in the New Mexico Permian Basin. We compare the oil plays in both Texas and New Mexico Permian based on reservoir geology and basin architecture. Overall, The Permian Basin is dominated by carbonate reservoirs. They account for 75% of all oil production followed by clastics, which contribute 14%; then come the mixed clastics and carbonates accounting for 8%; and lastly cherts make up around 3%. The leading growing production zone is the San Andres platform (Northwest shelf) carbonate play (4.0 billion bbl) followed by the Leonard restricted platform carbonate play (3.3 billion bbl). The Lower Permian Horseshoe and Pennsylvanian plays are next (2.7 billion bbl) and lastly by the San Andres platform carbonate play contributes to the overall production (2.2 billion bbl). With known potential of shelf plays we determine that North Western Shelf has similar stratigraphy and extensive hydrocarbon potential yet to be researched and explored.
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi

Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
Peter Golding

Department of Engineering Education and Leadership, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
Luis Perez

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA
Anand Raj

Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi, Peter Golding, Luis Perez, Anand Raj. (2021). Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research. Science Journal of Energy Engineering, 9(2), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi; Peter Golding; Luis Perez; Anand Raj. Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research. Sci. J. Energy Eng. 2021, 9(2), 22-29. doi: 10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi, Peter Golding, Luis Perez, Anand Raj. Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research. Sci J Energy Eng. 2021;9(2):22-29. doi: 10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12,
  author = {Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi and Peter Golding and Luis Perez and Anand Raj},
  title = {Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research},
  journal = {Science Journal of Energy Engineering},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {22-29},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjee.20210902.12},
  abstract = {The Permian Basin in Western Texas and North Eastern New Mexico is an energy powerhouse. With three sub-basins i.e., Delaware, Central Basin Platform and Midland Basin producing hydrocarbons from both conventional and unconventional plays, the Texan Permian has been a focus of more interest from energy companies than the North-Western Shelf of the basin in New Mexico. However, the less explored North Western shelf of the basin in New Mexico furnishes equal opportunity for oil and gas exploration companies for further exploration research and subsequent discoveries. This research is an attempt to showcase the exploration significance and highlight the gaps for in exploration research in the New Mexico Permian Basin. We compare the oil plays in both Texas and New Mexico Permian based on reservoir geology and basin architecture. Overall, The Permian Basin is dominated by carbonate reservoirs. They account for 75% of all oil production followed by clastics, which contribute 14%; then come the mixed clastics and carbonates accounting for 8%; and lastly cherts make up around 3%. The leading growing production zone is the San Andres platform (Northwest shelf) carbonate play (4.0 billion bbl) followed by the Leonard restricted platform carbonate play (3.3 billion bbl). The Lower Permian Horseshoe and Pennsylvanian plays are next (2.7 billion bbl) and lastly by the San Andres platform carbonate play contributes to the overall production (2.2 billion bbl). With known potential of shelf plays we determine that North Western Shelf has similar stratigraphy and extensive hydrocarbon potential yet to be researched and explored.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparing Resource Plays in the Texas and New Mexico Permian Basin – Implications for Exploration Research
AU  - Mary Naadanswa Adu-Gyamfi
AU  - Peter Golding
AU  - Luis Perez
AU  - Anand Raj
Y1  - 2021/06/25
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12
T2  - Science Journal of Energy Engineering
JF  - Science Journal of Energy Engineering
JO  - Science Journal of Energy Engineering
SP  - 22
EP  - 29
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-8126
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210902.12
AB  - The Permian Basin in Western Texas and North Eastern New Mexico is an energy powerhouse. With three sub-basins i.e., Delaware, Central Basin Platform and Midland Basin producing hydrocarbons from both conventional and unconventional plays, the Texan Permian has been a focus of more interest from energy companies than the North-Western Shelf of the basin in New Mexico. However, the less explored North Western shelf of the basin in New Mexico furnishes equal opportunity for oil and gas exploration companies for further exploration research and subsequent discoveries. This research is an attempt to showcase the exploration significance and highlight the gaps for in exploration research in the New Mexico Permian Basin. We compare the oil plays in both Texas and New Mexico Permian based on reservoir geology and basin architecture. Overall, The Permian Basin is dominated by carbonate reservoirs. They account for 75% of all oil production followed by clastics, which contribute 14%; then come the mixed clastics and carbonates accounting for 8%; and lastly cherts make up around 3%. The leading growing production zone is the San Andres platform (Northwest shelf) carbonate play (4.0 billion bbl) followed by the Leonard restricted platform carbonate play (3.3 billion bbl). The Lower Permian Horseshoe and Pennsylvanian plays are next (2.7 billion bbl) and lastly by the San Andres platform carbonate play contributes to the overall production (2.2 billion bbl). With known potential of shelf plays we determine that North Western Shelf has similar stratigraphy and extensive hydrocarbon potential yet to be researched and explored.
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download