Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process

María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez; Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez; Horacio Sánchez Barcenas

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process

María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez, Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez, Horacio Sánchez Barcenas

Published in Science Journal of Education (Volume 5, Issue 3)

Received: 11 April 2017 Published: 12 April 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The educational issue has always been the subject of intense debate on the part of researchers, government and specialists in the subject. Lately, the discussion has focused on the scope and limits of education systems, that is, the educational apparatus has responded so much to the resolution of problems that afflict society as a whole. One of the strongest critics revolves around the evaluation process, the most compelling argument being that the ways of evaluating are no longer the most convenient according to the times in which we live, this on the one hand, on the one hand, all the actors involved in the education must be subject to the evaluation including the same institutions, not only the students and teachers, so it seems that there is a total separation of the planning-evaluation processes. The purpose is to make a series of reflections and considerations about the evaluation process and the main actors involved in it.

Published in	Science Journal of Education (Volume 5, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14
Page(s)	100-104
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Education, Process, Actors, Student

References

[1]	Delgadillo Licea, Amneris (2001). Participatory diagnosis in institutions. Ed. Academic Spanish. Mexico.
[2]	J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan; 21(Suppl 1): S16–S20. The Role of the Student Teacher Relationship in the Formation of Physicians.
[3]	FIMPES (2006) Journal of the FIMPES Research Commission. Ed. New Season. Mexico. Consulted in August 2014. http://www.fimpes.org.mx/phocadownload/RevistaCIF/Revista-CIF-3.pdf
[4]	Mejía Pérez, Omar (2012). From traditional assessment to a new competency-based assessment. Autonomous University of Fresnillo, Educare Electronic Magazine Vol. 16, No. 1. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
[5]	OCDE (2010). Review of Assessment and Evaluation Frameworks to Improve School Results. Report of the practices of the Evaluation of Basic Education in Mexico. Consulted on February 20, 2017. https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/CBR%20Mexico%20Spanish.pdf
[6]	Sylvia Schmelkes (2013). INEE. National Institute for the Evaluation of Education. Mexico.
[7]	Gracia, Ma. Amalia, Horbath, Jorge E. (2014). The Educational Evaluation in Mexico. Journal of International Relations, Strategy and Security [online], Date of consultation: February 20, 2017. Available: ISSN 1909-3063.
[8]	Popham, W. J. (1980): Problems and Techniques of Educational Evaluation. Ed. Anaya. Madrid Spain.
[9]	García Ramos, J. M. (1989). Pedagogical bases of evaluation. Ed. Synthesis. Madrid. Spain.
[10]	Mejía Pérez, Omar (2012). From traditional assessment to a new competency-based assessment. Autonomous University of Fresnillo, Educare Electronic Magazine Vol. 16, No. 1. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
[11]	Chomsky, Noam. (1969). The object of education. Ed. Ministry of Education. Spain.
[12]	Gracia, Ma. Amalia, Horbath, Jorge E. (2014). The Educational Evaluation in Mexico. Journal of International Relations, Strategy and Security [online], Date of consultation: February 20, 2017. Available: ISSN 1909-3063.
[13]	Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, Issue #67, January 14, 2007. © by CJEAP and the author(s).
[14]	Catherine E. Casey & Ruth A. Childs. (January 14, 2007). Teacher Education Program Admission Criteria and What Beginning Teachers. Need to know to be Successful Teachers. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez, Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez, Horacio Sánchez Barcenas. (2017). Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process. Science Journal of Education, 5(3), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez; Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez; Horacio Sánchez Barcenas. Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process. Sci. J. Educ. 2017, 5(3), 100-104. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez, Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez, Horacio Sánchez Barcenas. Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process. Sci J Educ. 2017;5(3):100-104. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14,
  author = {María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez and Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez and Horacio Sánchez Barcenas},
  title = {Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process},
  journal = {Science Journal of Education},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {100-104},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20170503.14},
  abstract = {The educational issue has always been the subject of intense debate on the part of researchers, government and specialists in the subject. Lately, the discussion has focused on the scope and limits of education systems, that is, the educational apparatus has responded so much to the resolution of problems that afflict society as a whole. One of the strongest critics revolves around the evaluation process, the most compelling argument being that the ways of evaluating are no longer the most convenient according to the times in which we live, this on the one hand, on the one hand, all the actors involved in the education must be subject to the evaluation including the same institutions, not only the students and teachers, so it seems that there is a total separation of the planning-evaluation processes. The purpose is to make a series of reflections and considerations about the evaluation process and the main actors involved in it.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process
AU  - María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez
AU  - Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez
AU  - Horacio Sánchez Barcenas
Y1  - 2017/04/12
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14
T2  - Science Journal of Education
JF  - Science Journal of Education
JO  - Science Journal of Education
SP  - 100
EP  - 104
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-0897
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14
AB  - The educational issue has always been the subject of intense debate on the part of researchers, government and specialists in the subject. Lately, the discussion has focused on the scope and limits of education systems, that is, the educational apparatus has responded so much to the resolution of problems that afflict society as a whole. One of the strongest critics revolves around the evaluation process, the most compelling argument being that the ways of evaluating are no longer the most convenient according to the times in which we live, this on the one hand, on the one hand, all the actors involved in the education must be subject to the evaluation including the same institutions, not only the students and teachers, so it seems that there is a total separation of the planning-evaluation processes. The purpose is to make a series of reflections and considerations about the evaluation process and the main actors involved in it.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez

National Polytechnic Institute, Higher School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering – Zacatenco, Communications and Electronics Engineering, Mexico City, Mexico
Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez

National Polytechnic Institute, Higher School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering – Zacatenco, Communications and Electronics Engineering, Mexico City, Mexico
Horacio Sánchez Barcenas

National Polytechnic Institute, Higher School of Economics, Professional Unit "Lázaro Cárdenas", Mexico City, Mexico

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez, Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez, Horacio Sánchez Barcenas. (2017). Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process. Science Journal of Education, 5(3), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez; Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez; Horacio Sánchez Barcenas. Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process. Sci. J. Educ. 2017, 5(3), 100-104. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez, Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez, Horacio Sánchez Barcenas. Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process. Sci J Educ. 2017;5(3):100-104. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14,
  author = {María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez and Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez and Horacio Sánchez Barcenas},
  title = {Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process},
  journal = {Science Journal of Education},
  volume = {5},
  number = {3},
  pages = {100-104},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20170503.14},
  abstract = {The educational issue has always been the subject of intense debate on the part of researchers, government and specialists in the subject. Lately, the discussion has focused on the scope and limits of education systems, that is, the educational apparatus has responded so much to the resolution of problems that afflict society as a whole. One of the strongest critics revolves around the evaluation process, the most compelling argument being that the ways of evaluating are no longer the most convenient according to the times in which we live, this on the one hand, on the one hand, all the actors involved in the education must be subject to the evaluation including the same institutions, not only the students and teachers, so it seems that there is a total separation of the planning-evaluation processes. The purpose is to make a series of reflections and considerations about the evaluation process and the main actors involved in it.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Actors and Responsibilities of the Educational Process
AU  - María de Jesús Velázquez Vázquez
AU  - Martín Darío Castillo Sánchez
AU  - Horacio Sánchez Barcenas
Y1  - 2017/04/12
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14
T2  - Science Journal of Education
JF  - Science Journal of Education
JO  - Science Journal of Education
SP  - 100
EP  - 104
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-0897
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20170503.14
AB  - The educational issue has always been the subject of intense debate on the part of researchers, government and specialists in the subject. Lately, the discussion has focused on the scope and limits of education systems, that is, the educational apparatus has responded so much to the resolution of problems that afflict society as a whole. One of the strongest critics revolves around the evaluation process, the most compelling argument being that the ways of evaluating are no longer the most convenient according to the times in which we live, this on the one hand, on the one hand, all the actors involved in the education must be subject to the evaluation including the same institutions, not only the students and teachers, so it seems that there is a total separation of the planning-evaluation processes. The purpose is to make a series of reflections and considerations about the evaluation process and the main actors involved in it.
VL  - 5
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download