On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs

Ying Zhou; Jiugen Xiao

doi:doi:10.11648/j.si.20170505.18

| Peer-Reviewed

On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs

Ying Zhou, Jiugen Xiao

Published in Science Innovation (Volume 5, Issue 5)

Received: 1 August 2017 Published: 2 August 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Saussure's general language course is the first masterpiece of modern linguistics. One of the important contents is the arbitrariness of linguistic signs. In this regard, more and more scholars questioned that language signs are iconicity or motivation, iconicity and arbitrariness in opposition, pointed out that Saussure discussed the arbitrariness of language symbol have great limitations, regardless of the signifier and signified, or its elements (pronunciation, vocabulary, syntax), There is a non – arbitrariness; and that, even if Saussure proposed absolute arbitrariness and relative arbitrariness theory, some problems still can't explain. In our opinion, everything in the world is relative, and we should also take a dialectical approach to the arbitrariness of linguistic signs.

Published in	Science Innovation (Volume 5, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.si.20170505.18
Page(s)	289-292
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Saussure, Linguistic Signs, Arbitrariness, Function, Limitation

References

[1]	Bloomfield, L. 1924. Review of Saussure. Modern Language Journal8．转引自熊兵．美国结构主义语言学再认识[J]．外语教学与研究，2005,(01）。
[2]	赵蓉晖．作为社会语言学家的雅库宾斯基及其语言观[J]．俄语语言文学研究，2007,(03)。
[3]	段胜峰，李诗慧．索绪尔语言任意性中的非任意性解读[J]．海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)，2015,(05)。
[4]	费尔迪南•德•索绪尔．普通语言学教程[M]．高名凯译．北京：商务印书馆，1980。
[5]	屠友祥．语言单位：居间介质与话语链[J]．外语教学与研究，2016,(03)。
[6]	李葆嘉．论索绪尔符号任意性原则的失误与复归[J]．语言文字应用，1994,(03)。
[7]	王德春．论语言单位的任意性和理据性——兼评王寅《论语言符号象似性》[J]．外国语(上海外国语大学学报)，2001,(01)。
[8]	许国璋．语言符号的任意性问题——语言哲学探索之一[J]．外语教学与研究，1988,(03)。
[9]	王寅．论语言符号象似性［J］．外语与外语教学，1999,(05)。
[10]	王寅、李弘．英语词汇速记教程[M]．北京：科学普及出版社，1996。
[11]	Dwight Bolinger. Aspects of Language[M]，方立等译．北京：外语教学与研究出版社，1999。
[12]	沈家煊．句法的象似性问题[J]．外语教学与研究，1993,(01)。
[13]	李川．二分与三合：从言－文角度看中西思维方式的分野[J]．郑州大学学报(哲社科版)，2016,(02)。
[14]	王红生．语言符号的任意性及其理论效能[J]．西安交通大学学报(社科版)，2017,(03)。

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ying Zhou, Jiugen Xiao. (2017). On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs. Science Innovation, 5(5), 289-292. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ying Zhou; Jiugen Xiao. On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs. Sci. Innov. 2017, 5(5), 289-292. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170505.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ying Zhou, Jiugen Xiao. On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs. Sci Innov. 2017;5(5):289-292. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170505.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20170505.18,
  author = {Ying Zhou and Jiugen Xiao},
  title = {On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {5},
  number = {5},
  pages = {289-292},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20170505.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20170505.18},
  abstract = {Saussure's general language course is the first masterpiece of modern linguistics. One of the important contents is the arbitrariness of linguistic signs. In this regard, more and more scholars questioned that language signs are iconicity or motivation, iconicity and arbitrariness in opposition, pointed out that Saussure discussed the arbitrariness of language symbol have great limitations, regardless of the signifier and signified, or its elements (pronunciation, vocabulary, syntax), There is a non – arbitrariness; and that, even if Saussure proposed absolute arbitrariness and relative arbitrariness theory, some problems still can't explain. In our opinion, everything in the world is relative, and we should also take a dialectical approach to the arbitrariness of linguistic signs.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs
AU  - Ying Zhou
AU  - Jiugen Xiao
Y1  - 2017/08/02
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20170505.18
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 289
EP  - 292
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.18
AB  - Saussure's general language course is the first masterpiece of modern linguistics. One of the important contents is the arbitrariness of linguistic signs. In this regard, more and more scholars questioned that language signs are iconicity or motivation, iconicity and arbitrariness in opposition, pointed out that Saussure discussed the arbitrariness of language symbol have great limitations, regardless of the signifier and signified, or its elements (pronunciation, vocabulary, syntax), There is a non – arbitrariness; and that, even if Saussure proposed absolute arbitrariness and relative arbitrariness theory, some problems still can't explain. In our opinion, everything in the world is relative, and we should also take a dialectical approach to the arbitrariness of linguistic signs.
VL  - 5
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ying Zhou

School of Chinese Language and Literature, Research Center of Language and Language Life, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China
Jiugen Xiao

School of Chinese Language and Literature, Research Center of Language and Language Life, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ying Zhou, Jiugen Xiao. (2017). On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs. Science Innovation, 5(5), 289-292. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ying Zhou; Jiugen Xiao. On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs. Sci. Innov. 2017, 5(5), 289-292. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170505.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ying Zhou, Jiugen Xiao. On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs. Sci Innov. 2017;5(5):289-292. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170505.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20170505.18,
  author = {Ying Zhou and Jiugen Xiao},
  title = {On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {5},
  number = {5},
  pages = {289-292},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20170505.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20170505.18},
  abstract = {Saussure's general language course is the first masterpiece of modern linguistics. One of the important contents is the arbitrariness of linguistic signs. In this regard, more and more scholars questioned that language signs are iconicity or motivation, iconicity and arbitrariness in opposition, pointed out that Saussure discussed the arbitrariness of language symbol have great limitations, regardless of the signifier and signified, or its elements (pronunciation, vocabulary, syntax), There is a non – arbitrariness; and that, even if Saussure proposed absolute arbitrariness and relative arbitrariness theory, some problems still can't explain. In our opinion, everything in the world is relative, and we should also take a dialectical approach to the arbitrariness of linguistic signs.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - On the Function and Limitation of the Arbitrariness of Saussure's Linguistic Signs
AU  - Ying Zhou
AU  - Jiugen Xiao
Y1  - 2017/08/02
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20170505.18
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 289
EP  - 292
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170505.18
AB  - Saussure's general language course is the first masterpiece of modern linguistics. One of the important contents is the arbitrariness of linguistic signs. In this regard, more and more scholars questioned that language signs are iconicity or motivation, iconicity and arbitrariness in opposition, pointed out that Saussure discussed the arbitrariness of language symbol have great limitations, regardless of the signifier and signified, or its elements (pronunciation, vocabulary, syntax), There is a non – arbitrariness; and that, even if Saussure proposed absolute arbitrariness and relative arbitrariness theory, some problems still can't explain. In our opinion, everything in the world is relative, and we should also take a dialectical approach to the arbitrariness of linguistic signs.
VL  - 5
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download