At present, there are few literatures on the comparative study of cultural manufacturing and cultural services in China. In this paper, the first selection of 45 cultural manufacturing sub-categories in 2013 and 75 cultural services sub-scale enterprises above the cross-sectional data for multiple linear regression studies, comparative cultural manufacturing and cultural services in the total value added and per capita Value - labor productivity aspects of the impact of similarities and differences. The empirical results show that the influence factors of cultural manufacturing and cultural service are somewhat similar, but some are not quite the same. Such as labor factors in the number and wage levels have a greater impact on the cultural manufacturing and cultural services industry; In addition, the fixed assets for the value of cultural manufacturing and labor productivity are very significant, but the fixed assets for culture The impact of the service sector is relatively small, and even the impact on the labor productivity of cultural services can be negligible.
Published in | Science Innovation (Volume 5, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.si.20170504.19 |
Page(s) | 245-249 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cultural Manufacturing Industry, Cultural Service Industry, Added Value, Comparative Study
[1] | 厉无畏,王玉梅.以文化提升上海产业的附加值和竞争力[J].上海经济研究,2003,06:52-56。 |
[2] | 薛永武.论文化产业的经济属性和社会属性[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,05:32-40。 |
[3] | 付小颖.河南加快文化服务业发展的路径选择[J].学习论坛,2015,07:63-66。 |
[4] | 厉无畏.上海创意产业发展的思路与对策[J].上海经济,2005,S1:66-71。 |
[5] | 董承华.微笑曲线理论视角下的文化产业发展分析[J].新视野,2012,06:41-44。 |
[6] | 郭新茹,刘冀,唐月民.价值链视角下我国文化产业参与国际分工现状的实证研究——基于技术含量的测度[J].经济经纬,2014,05:81-86。 |
[7] | 邬民乐.改革以来中国劳动生产率的增长因素:基于产业结构的分析[J].西北人口,2009,02:37-41。 |
[8] | 王丽英,刘后平.产业结构变迁对劳动生产率增长的贡献及其区域差异——基于Shift-share模型的实证分析[J].西部论坛,2010,05:94-100。 |
[9] | 裴长洪.中国经济转型升级与服务业发展[J].财经问题研究,2012,08:3-9。 |
[10] | 雷光华.关于提升我国文化产业国际竞争力的思考[J].湖南社会科学,2004,01:177-180。 |
[11] | 池建宇,姚林青.中国文化产业劳动生产率的国际比较——基于与英美两国之比较[J].中央财经大学学报,2010,11:75-79。 |
[12] | 刘冰.金砖国家文化产业发展比较研究[J/OL].调研世界,2016(01)。 |
[13] | 梁玢.劳动生产率视角下文化创意产业发展研究——以北京市为例[J].商业时代,2014,15:123-125。 |
[14] | 李治堂.中美出版产业发展与结构比较分析[J].科技与出版,2015,07:100-105。 |
APA Style
Chang Qing. (2017). A Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Value Added of Cultural Manufacturing and Cultural Service in China. Science Innovation, 5(4), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.19
ACS Style
Chang Qing. A Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Value Added of Cultural Manufacturing and Cultural Service in China. Sci. Innov. 2017, 5(4), 245-249. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170504.19
AMA Style
Chang Qing. A Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Value Added of Cultural Manufacturing and Cultural Service in China. Sci Innov. 2017;5(4):245-249. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170504.19
@article{10.11648/j.si.20170504.19, author = {Chang Qing}, title = {A Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Value Added of Cultural Manufacturing and Cultural Service in China}, journal = {Science Innovation}, volume = {5}, number = {4}, pages = {245-249}, doi = {10.11648/j.si.20170504.19}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.19}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20170504.19}, abstract = {At present, there are few literatures on the comparative study of cultural manufacturing and cultural services in China. In this paper, the first selection of 45 cultural manufacturing sub-categories in 2013 and 75 cultural services sub-scale enterprises above the cross-sectional data for multiple linear regression studies, comparative cultural manufacturing and cultural services in the total value added and per capita Value - labor productivity aspects of the impact of similarities and differences. The empirical results show that the influence factors of cultural manufacturing and cultural service are somewhat similar, but some are not quite the same. Such as labor factors in the number and wage levels have a greater impact on the cultural manufacturing and cultural services industry; In addition, the fixed assets for the value of cultural manufacturing and labor productivity are very significant, but the fixed assets for culture The impact of the service sector is relatively small, and even the impact on the labor productivity of cultural services can be negligible.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Comparative Study on the Influencing Factors of the Value Added of Cultural Manufacturing and Cultural Service in China AU - Chang Qing Y1 - 2017/06/06 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.19 DO - 10.11648/j.si.20170504.19 T2 - Science Innovation JF - Science Innovation JO - Science Innovation SP - 245 EP - 249 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.19 AB - At present, there are few literatures on the comparative study of cultural manufacturing and cultural services in China. In this paper, the first selection of 45 cultural manufacturing sub-categories in 2013 and 75 cultural services sub-scale enterprises above the cross-sectional data for multiple linear regression studies, comparative cultural manufacturing and cultural services in the total value added and per capita Value - labor productivity aspects of the impact of similarities and differences. The empirical results show that the influence factors of cultural manufacturing and cultural service are somewhat similar, but some are not quite the same. Such as labor factors in the number and wage levels have a greater impact on the cultural manufacturing and cultural services industry; In addition, the fixed assets for the value of cultural manufacturing and labor productivity are very significant, but the fixed assets for culture The impact of the service sector is relatively small, and even the impact on the labor productivity of cultural services can be negligible. VL - 5 IS - 4 ER -