Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road

Xingneng Xia; Taozhu Feng; Xie Zhou

doi:doi:10.11648/j.si.20170504.18

| Peer-Reviewed

Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road

Xingneng Xia, Taozhu Feng, Xie Zhou

Published in Science Innovation (Volume 5, Issue 4)

Received: 10 May 2017 Published: 11 May 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This paper divides technology innovation into knowledge-output phase and commercialization phase, using the panel data of the “one belt and one road” from 2010 to 2014. And also it measures the technology innovation efficiency during the two phases based on DEA and malmquist index. Meanwhile, we make the quantitative adjustment of the input and output index of the two phases. the results shows as follows: The technical efficiency is generally lower in the knowledge-output phase compared to the commercialization phase. Scale efficiency is the main cause of restricting the improvement of technical efficiency of 21^st century Maritime Silk Road, while pure technical efficiency is the main cause of technical efficiency of the Silk Road Economic Belt. The growth of TFP generally comes from the technical progress. Technical efficiency has a lager potential growth to improve. Finally, for the above-mentioned problems, we give the corresponding policy suggestions.

Published in	Science Innovation (Volume 5, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.si.20170504.18
Page(s)	238-244
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

One Belt and One Road, Technology Innovation, Pure Technical Efficiency, Scale Efficiency, DEA, TFP

References

[1]	刘卫东．“一带一路”战略的科学内涵与科学问题[J]．地理科学进展，2015(05):538-544。
[2]	吴建南，杨若愚．中国与“一带一路”国家的科技合作态势研究[J]．科学学与科学技术管理，2016(01):14-19。
[3]	孔庆峰、董虹蔚．一带一路”国家的贸易便利化水平测算与贸易潜力研究[J]．国际贸易问题，2015(12)：158-168。
[4]	杨广青、杜海鹏．人民币汇率变动对我国出口贸易的影响—基于“一带一路”沿线79个国家和地区面板数据的研究[J]．经济学家，2015(11)：43-50。
[5]	张良卫．“一带一路”战略下的国际贸易与国际物流协同分析—以广东省为例[J]．财经科学，2015(07)：81-88。
[6]	陈恒、魏修建．“一带一路”物流业发展驱动因素的动态轨迹演变—基于劳动力投入的视角[J]．上海财经大学学报，2015(02)：31-42。
[7]	Jooh Lee＆Eunsup Shim. Moderating effects of R＆D on corporate growth in U. S． and Japanese hi－tech industries: an empirical study［J］． The Journal of High Technology Management Research，1995(6):179－191．
[8]	Romijn H,Mike A． Innovation,networking and proximity: lessons from small high technology firms in the UK［J］. Regional Studies，2002，36(1):81－86．
[9]	Neelankavil J. P, Alaganar V. T. Strategic resource commitment of high technology firms an international comparison［J］. Journal of Business Research，2003(6):493－502.
[10]	赵树宽、余海晴、巩顺龙．基于DEA方法的吉林省高技术企业创新效率研究[J]．科研管理，2013(02)：36-43。
[11]	熊婵、买忆媛、何晓斌．基于DEA方法的中国高科技创业企业运营效率研究[J]．管理科学，2014(02)：26-37。
[12]	Maria A. The evaluation of regional innovation and cluster policies: looking for new approaches［J］. In Decentralization and Evaluation, 2000(4): 276－315。
[13]	郭军华、倪明．基于非参数HMB指数法的区域创新效率变动分析[J]．管理学报，2011（01）:137-142。
[14]	官建成，陈凯华．我国高技术产业技术创新效率的测度［J］．数量经济技术经济研究，2009(10):19－33。
[15]	魏权龄．数据包络分析[M]北京：科学出版社，2004。

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Xingneng Xia, Taozhu Feng, Xie Zhou. (2017). Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road. Science Innovation, 5(4), 238-244. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Xingneng Xia; Taozhu Feng; Xie Zhou. Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road. Sci. Innov. 2017, 5(4), 238-244. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170504.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Xingneng Xia, Taozhu Feng, Xie Zhou. Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road. Sci Innov. 2017;5(4):238-244. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170504.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20170504.18,
  author = {Xingneng Xia and Taozhu Feng and Xie Zhou},
  title = {Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {5},
  number = {4},
  pages = {238-244},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20170504.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20170504.18},
  abstract = {This paper divides technology innovation into knowledge-output phase and commercialization phase, using the panel data of the “one belt and one road” from 2010 to 2014. And also it measures the technology innovation efficiency during the two phases based on DEA and malmquist index. Meanwhile, we make the quantitative adjustment of the input and output index of the two phases. the results shows as follows: The technical efficiency is generally lower in the knowledge-output phase compared to the commercialization phase. Scale efficiency is the main cause of restricting the improvement of technical efficiency of 21st century Maritime Silk Road, while pure technical efficiency is the main cause of technical efficiency of the Silk Road Economic Belt. The growth of TFP generally comes from the technical progress. Technical efficiency has a lager potential growth to improve. Finally, for the above-mentioned problems, we give the corresponding policy suggestions.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road
AU  - Xingneng Xia
AU  - Taozhu Feng
AU  - Xie Zhou
Y1  - 2017/05/11
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20170504.18
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 238
EP  - 244
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.18
AB  - This paper divides technology innovation into knowledge-output phase and commercialization phase, using the panel data of the “one belt and one road” from 2010 to 2014. And also it measures the technology innovation efficiency during the two phases based on DEA and malmquist index. Meanwhile, we make the quantitative adjustment of the input and output index of the two phases. the results shows as follows: The technical efficiency is generally lower in the knowledge-output phase compared to the commercialization phase. Scale efficiency is the main cause of restricting the improvement of technical efficiency of 21st century Maritime Silk Road, while pure technical efficiency is the main cause of technical efficiency of the Silk Road Economic Belt. The growth of TFP generally comes from the technical progress. Technical efficiency has a lager potential growth to improve. Finally, for the above-mentioned problems, we give the corresponding policy suggestions.
VL  - 5
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Xingneng Xia

Management College, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China
Taozhu Feng

Economic College, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
Xie Zhou

Economic College, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Xingneng Xia, Taozhu Feng, Xie Zhou. (2017). Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road. Science Innovation, 5(4), 238-244. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Xingneng Xia; Taozhu Feng; Xie Zhou. Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road. Sci. Innov. 2017, 5(4), 238-244. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170504.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Xingneng Xia, Taozhu Feng, Xie Zhou. Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road. Sci Innov. 2017;5(4):238-244. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170504.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.si.20170504.18,
  author = {Xingneng Xia and Taozhu Feng and Xie Zhou},
  title = {Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road},
  journal = {Science Innovation},
  volume = {5},
  number = {4},
  pages = {238-244},
  doi = {10.11648/j.si.20170504.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20170504.18},
  abstract = {This paper divides technology innovation into knowledge-output phase and commercialization phase, using the panel data of the “one belt and one road” from 2010 to 2014. And also it measures the technology innovation efficiency during the two phases based on DEA and malmquist index. Meanwhile, we make the quantitative adjustment of the input and output index of the two phases. the results shows as follows: The technical efficiency is generally lower in the knowledge-output phase compared to the commercialization phase. Scale efficiency is the main cause of restricting the improvement of technical efficiency of 21st century Maritime Silk Road, while pure technical efficiency is the main cause of technical efficiency of the Silk Road Economic Belt. The growth of TFP generally comes from the technical progress. Technical efficiency has a lager potential growth to improve. Finally, for the above-mentioned problems, we give the corresponding policy suggestions.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Study on China Regional Innovation Efficiency of One Belt and One Road
AU  - Xingneng Xia
AU  - Taozhu Feng
AU  - Xie Zhou
Y1  - 2017/05/11
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.si.20170504.18
T2  - Science Innovation
JF  - Science Innovation
JO  - Science Innovation
SP  - 238
EP  - 244
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-787X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170504.18
AB  - This paper divides technology innovation into knowledge-output phase and commercialization phase, using the panel data of the “one belt and one road” from 2010 to 2014. And also it measures the technology innovation efficiency during the two phases based on DEA and malmquist index. Meanwhile, we make the quantitative adjustment of the input and output index of the two phases. the results shows as follows: The technical efficiency is generally lower in the knowledge-output phase compared to the commercialization phase. Scale efficiency is the main cause of restricting the improvement of technical efficiency of 21st century Maritime Silk Road, while pure technical efficiency is the main cause of technical efficiency of the Silk Road Economic Belt. The growth of TFP generally comes from the technical progress. Technical efficiency has a lager potential growth to improve. Finally, for the above-mentioned problems, we give the corresponding policy suggestions.
VL  - 5
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download