The Confucian society advocate "filial", and some rules and precepts of Buddhism Confucianism between draw further apart, so the contradictions and conflicts, so in this situation, how to re interpret the connotation of filial piety culture, adapt to the different periods of Buddhism two teach, has become an important issue in ancient China the ethics of society. As Confucianism teaches communication under the two product of the Northern Song Dynasty, “Xiaolun” is one of the two teaching media through communication and dialogue, Qisong’s filial piety, explore the traditional culture of filial piety in Confucianism interaction, how to promote Confucianism and Buddhism complete absorption and transformation each other in interactive communication, and pointed out that Buddhism The extension of Confucianism is the essence of the Buddhist filial piety.
Published in | Science Innovation (Volume 5, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.si.20170503.11 |
Page(s) | 127-131 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Xiaolun, Filial Piety Culture, Interaction Between Confucianism and Buddhism, Medium, The Buddhist Filial Piety
[1] | 张燕婴.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局,2006:2-14。 |
[2] | 陶新宏.宋初佛教儒学化之管窥——以契嵩《辅教编》为例[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2011(3):53-57。 |
[3] | 刘复生.宋仁宗时期反佛老思潮及其特点[J].中州学刊,1993(4):115-120。 |
[4] | 孙复.孙明复先生小集[M].《宋集珍本丛刊》第三册.北京:线装书局,2004:170。 |
[5] | 赖永海.慧能与中国佛教的儒学化:林有能、霍启昌主编.六祖慧能思想研究[C].广州:学术研究杂志社,1997:61-69。 |
[6] | 释契嵩.镡津文集[M].《宋集珍本丛刊》第四册.北京:线装书局,2004:362-411。 |
[7] | 赖永海.宋元时期佛儒交融思想探微[J].中华佛学学报,1992(5):109-120。 |
[8] | 胡平生.孝经译注[M].北京:中华书局,1996:1-31。 |
[9] | 陈来.古代宗教与伦理[M].北京:三联书店,1996:300。 |
[10] | 万丽华、蓝旭.孟子译注[M].北京:中华书局,2006:315。 |
[11] | 张载.张载集[M].章锡琛,点校.北京:中华书局,1978:410。 |
[12] | 张轩.从《辅教编》看契嵩“儒释一贯”的基本理路与特点[J].洛阳师范学院学报,2014(1):52-55。 |
[13] | 秦海滢.传统孝文化的传播与外延——以明代山东为研究对象[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2006(1):63-67。 |
[14] | 李翔.试论中国传统孝文化的历史变迁及其价值[J].四川民族学院学报,2010(5):48-56。 |
[15] | 喻静.对佛教孝道观研究的反思——以释契嵩为例[J].社会科学论坛,2013(2):31-39。 |
[16] | 郑佳佳、张禹东.论佛日契嵩的孝道观——以《辅教篇•孝论》为中心[J].华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(1):69-77。 |
[17] | 查金萍.契嵩的“非韩”及其在宋代韩愈接受史中的意义[J].聊城大学学报(社会科学版),2014(6):30-36。 |
[18] | 陈坚.“妥协论证”与“方便教化”——牟子和契嵩对于儒学的不同抉择[J].宜春学院学报,2015(5):15-22。 |
[19] | 郭锋航.宋代禅僧的儒学观研究[J].湖北社会科学,2015(10):115-117。 |
APA Style
Wu Bin. (2017). The Study of "Xiaolun" in the Interaction Role Between Confucianism and Buddhism and the Buddhist Filial Piety. Science Innovation, 5(3), 127-131. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170503.11
ACS Style
Wu Bin. The Study of "Xiaolun" in the Interaction Role Between Confucianism and Buddhism and the Buddhist Filial Piety. Sci. Innov. 2017, 5(3), 127-131. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170503.11
AMA Style
Wu Bin. The Study of "Xiaolun" in the Interaction Role Between Confucianism and Buddhism and the Buddhist Filial Piety. Sci Innov. 2017;5(3):127-131. doi: 10.11648/j.si.20170503.11
@article{10.11648/j.si.20170503.11, author = {Wu Bin}, title = {The Study of "Xiaolun" in the Interaction Role Between Confucianism and Buddhism and the Buddhist Filial Piety}, journal = {Science Innovation}, volume = {5}, number = {3}, pages = {127-131}, doi = {10.11648/j.si.20170503.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170503.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.si.20170503.11}, abstract = {The Confucian society advocate "filial", and some rules and precepts of Buddhism Confucianism between draw further apart, so the contradictions and conflicts, so in this situation, how to re interpret the connotation of filial piety culture, adapt to the different periods of Buddhism two teach, has become an important issue in ancient China the ethics of society. As Confucianism teaches communication under the two product of the Northern Song Dynasty, “Xiaolun” is one of the two teaching media through communication and dialogue, Qisong’s filial piety, explore the traditional culture of filial piety in Confucianism interaction, how to promote Confucianism and Buddhism complete absorption and transformation each other in interactive communication, and pointed out that Buddhism The extension of Confucianism is the essence of the Buddhist filial piety.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Study of "Xiaolun" in the Interaction Role Between Confucianism and Buddhism and the Buddhist Filial Piety AU - Wu Bin Y1 - 2017/04/20 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170503.11 DO - 10.11648/j.si.20170503.11 T2 - Science Innovation JF - Science Innovation JO - Science Innovation SP - 127 EP - 131 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20170503.11 AB - The Confucian society advocate "filial", and some rules and precepts of Buddhism Confucianism between draw further apart, so the contradictions and conflicts, so in this situation, how to re interpret the connotation of filial piety culture, adapt to the different periods of Buddhism two teach, has become an important issue in ancient China the ethics of society. As Confucianism teaches communication under the two product of the Northern Song Dynasty, “Xiaolun” is one of the two teaching media through communication and dialogue, Qisong’s filial piety, explore the traditional culture of filial piety in Confucianism interaction, how to promote Confucianism and Buddhism complete absorption and transformation each other in interactive communication, and pointed out that Buddhism The extension of Confucianism is the essence of the Buddhist filial piety. VL - 5 IS - 3 ER -