This paper took Shangbao terraced field in Chongyi County as the research object. With the DEM data of Chongyi County and Google Earth images as data sources, this paper obtained Shangbao terraced landscape by vectorization and calculated the landscape metrics through Fragstats 4.2, then analyzed landscape granularity effect and the landscape changes in different elevations, finally we made a comparation between Shangbao terraced field and Hani terrace field in Yuanyang County. The results indicated that: 1) Shangbao terraced field has high Landscape fragmentation, the patch shape is more irregular and the landscape has high aggregation; 2) Terraced field landscape metrics change significantly with the scales change, the landscape metrics are strongly scale-dependent; 3) The terraced field gradient is obvious, terraced field mainly distribute in the range of altitude between 500 m and 800 m, terraced field landscape fragmentation is highest at altitude more than 1000 m, the patch shape is most irregular in the range of altitude between 800 m and 1000 m, aggregation is highest in the range of altitude between 300 m and 500 m; 4) The landscape fragmentation of Shangbao terraced field is higher than Hani terraced field, and the landscape aggregation is slightly higher than Hani terraced field, and the patch shape is relatively regular than Hani terraced field.
Published in | Science Discovery (Volume 4, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.sd.20160406.17 |
Page(s) | 387-392 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Shangbao, Terraced Field, Landscape Pattern, Granularity Effect
[1] | Wall, G. Landscape resources, tourism and landscape change in Bali, Indonesia [A].//: Ringer G. Destinations: Cultural Landscapes of Tourism [M]. London: Routledge, 1998. |
[2] | 角媛梅.哈尼梯田自然与文化景观生态研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2009。 |
[3] | 角媛梅,程国栋,肖笃宁.哈尼梯田文化景观及其保护研究[J].地理研究,2002,21(6):733-741。 |
[4] | 高荣乐.梯田史料[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1983。 |
[5] | Dacawi, R. The Ifugao way of forest conservation[J]. Philippine Upland World, 1982, 1 (2): 14-15. |
[6] | Naoki, L, Mahito, K, Nobukazu, N. Ecological and social evaluation of landscape in a rural area with terrace Paddy field in southwestern Japan [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 70 (1): 60-71. |
[7] | 李振民,邹宏霞,易倩倩,等.梯田农业文化遗产旅游资源潜力评估研究[J].经济地理,2015,35(6):198-208。 |
[8] | 陆玉麒.云南哀牢山的梯田景观[J].热带地理,1994,14(2):180-185。 |
[9] | 毛佑全.哈尼族梯田文化论[J].农业考古,1991,(3):291-299。 |
[10] | 王清华.云南亚热带山区哈尼族的梯田文化[J].农业考古,1991,(3):300-306。 |
[11] | Van, O K, Govers, G, Desmet, P. Evaluating the effects of changes in landscape structure on soil erosion by water and tillage [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2000, 15: 577-589. |
[12] | 李军明,邓敏.龙脊梯田农业文化与梯田景观保护机制研究[J].农业考古,2014,(4):324-328。 |
[13] | 徐义强,李凯冬.农业文化遗产红河哈尼梯田保护与开发刍议[J].农业考古,2013,(1):279-281。 |
[14] | Valentin, C, Agus, F, Alamban, R, et al. Runoff and sediment losses from 27 upland catchments in Southeast Asia: Impact of rapid land use changes and conservation practices [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2008, 128 (128): 225-238. |
[15] | 陈蝶,卫伟,陈利顶,等.梯田生态系统服务与管理研究进展[J].山地学报,2016,34(3):374-384。 |
[16] | 刘某承,熊英,白艳莹,等.生态功能改善目标导向的哈尼梯田生态补偿标准研究[J].生态学报,2017,37(7):1-8。 |
[17] | 谢雯颖,田昆,刘令聪,等.哈尼梯田人工湿地旅游利用中生态系统可持续性及其传统文化保护[J].湿地科学与管理,2012,8(1):56-59。 |
[18] | Shi, j c. The Hani Terrace field at Honghe: Typical Chinese Wetland [J]. Journal of Yunnan Nationalities University, 2004, 21 (5): 77-81. |
[19] | 陆祥宇.稻作传统与哈尼梯田文化景观保护研究[D].北京:清华大学,2012。 |
[20] | 谈燕君.基于客家生态文化的景观研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2013。 |
[21] | 张小娟,宋维峰,吴锦奎,等.元阳梯田水源区土壤水氢氧同位素特征[J].环境科学,2015,36(6):2102-2108。 |
[22] | 段兴凤,宋维峰,李英俊,等.湖南紫鹊界、云南元阳及广西龙脊古梯田研究进展[J].亚热带水土保持,2011,23(1):31-35。 |
[23] | 角媛梅,张丹丹.全球重要农业文化遗产:云南红河哈尼梯田研究进展与展望[J].云南地理环境研究,2011,23(5):1-6+12。 |
[24] | 王浩,叶文,薛熙明.遗产视角下的元阳哈尼梯田旅游开发——基于国内外梯田旅游发展模式的研究[J].旅游研究,2009,1(3):23-32。 |
[25] | 王龙,宋维峰,杨寿荣,等.广西龙脊梯田区森林枯落物水文效应研究[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(6):84-88。 |
[26] | 向欢欢,沈世伟.国内梯田旅游研究进展[J].现代化农业,2016,5:51-53。 |
[27] | 刘宇,吕一河,傅伯杰.景观格局-土壤侵蚀研究中景观指数的意义解释及局限性[J].生态学报,2011,31(1):267-275。 |
[28] | 郑新奇.景观格局空间分析技术及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2010。 |
[29] | Geoffrey,W,孙业红,吴平.梯田与旅游——探索梯田可持续旅游发展路径[J].旅游学刊,2014,29(4):12-18。 |
[30] | 高玉玲,王健.中国梯田旅游景观开发的前景与模式——对紫鹊界梯田、龙脊梯田和元阳梯田旅游开发比较研究[J].中共青岛市委党校青岛行政学院学报,2011,(4):86-91。 |
[31] | 角媛梅,杨丽萍.哀牢山区哈尼梯田的分形特征[J].生态学报,2007,27(11):4583-4589。 |
[32] | 角媛梅,杨有洁,胡文英,等.哈尼梯田景观空间格局与美学特征分析[J].地理研究,2006,25(4):624-632。 |
[33] | 王妍,张超,宋维峰,等.元阳梯田空间分布特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2013,20(2):103-107。 |
APA Style
Li Ming-juan, Liao Fu-qiang, Wen Peng-hui, Shu Xiao-bo, Ma Ding-guo, et al. (2016). The Analysis of Landscape Spatial Pattern of Hakka Terrace Case of Shangbao Terraced Field in Chongyi County of Jiangxi. Science Discovery, 4(6), 387-392. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20160406.17
ACS Style
Li Ming-juan; Liao Fu-qiang; Wen Peng-hui; Shu Xiao-bo; Ma Ding-guo, et al. The Analysis of Landscape Spatial Pattern of Hakka Terrace Case of Shangbao Terraced Field in Chongyi County of Jiangxi. Sci. Discov. 2016, 4(6), 387-392. doi: 10.11648/j.sd.20160406.17
@article{10.11648/j.sd.20160406.17, author = {Li Ming-juan and Liao Fu-qiang and Wen Peng-hui and Shu Xiao-bo and Ma Ding-guo and Zhong Xian-liang}, title = {The Analysis of Landscape Spatial Pattern of Hakka Terrace Case of Shangbao Terraced Field in Chongyi County of Jiangxi}, journal = {Science Discovery}, volume = {4}, number = {6}, pages = {387-392}, doi = {10.11648/j.sd.20160406.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20160406.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sd.20160406.17}, abstract = {This paper took Shangbao terraced field in Chongyi County as the research object. With the DEM data of Chongyi County and Google Earth images as data sources, this paper obtained Shangbao terraced landscape by vectorization and calculated the landscape metrics through Fragstats 4.2, then analyzed landscape granularity effect and the landscape changes in different elevations, finally we made a comparation between Shangbao terraced field and Hani terrace field in Yuanyang County. The results indicated that: 1) Shangbao terraced field has high Landscape fragmentation, the patch shape is more irregular and the landscape has high aggregation; 2) Terraced field landscape metrics change significantly with the scales change, the landscape metrics are strongly scale-dependent; 3) The terraced field gradient is obvious, terraced field mainly distribute in the range of altitude between 500 m and 800 m, terraced field landscape fragmentation is highest at altitude more than 1000 m, the patch shape is most irregular in the range of altitude between 800 m and 1000 m, aggregation is highest in the range of altitude between 300 m and 500 m; 4) The landscape fragmentation of Shangbao terraced field is higher than Hani terraced field, and the landscape aggregation is slightly higher than Hani terraced field, and the patch shape is relatively regular than Hani terraced field.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Analysis of Landscape Spatial Pattern of Hakka Terrace Case of Shangbao Terraced Field in Chongyi County of Jiangxi AU - Li Ming-juan AU - Liao Fu-qiang AU - Wen Peng-hui AU - Shu Xiao-bo AU - Ma Ding-guo AU - Zhong Xian-liang Y1 - 2016/12/01 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20160406.17 DO - 10.11648/j.sd.20160406.17 T2 - Science Discovery JF - Science Discovery JO - Science Discovery SP - 387 EP - 392 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0650 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sd.20160406.17 AB - This paper took Shangbao terraced field in Chongyi County as the research object. With the DEM data of Chongyi County and Google Earth images as data sources, this paper obtained Shangbao terraced landscape by vectorization and calculated the landscape metrics through Fragstats 4.2, then analyzed landscape granularity effect and the landscape changes in different elevations, finally we made a comparation between Shangbao terraced field and Hani terrace field in Yuanyang County. The results indicated that: 1) Shangbao terraced field has high Landscape fragmentation, the patch shape is more irregular and the landscape has high aggregation; 2) Terraced field landscape metrics change significantly with the scales change, the landscape metrics are strongly scale-dependent; 3) The terraced field gradient is obvious, terraced field mainly distribute in the range of altitude between 500 m and 800 m, terraced field landscape fragmentation is highest at altitude more than 1000 m, the patch shape is most irregular in the range of altitude between 800 m and 1000 m, aggregation is highest in the range of altitude between 300 m and 500 m; 4) The landscape fragmentation of Shangbao terraced field is higher than Hani terraced field, and the landscape aggregation is slightly higher than Hani terraced field, and the patch shape is relatively regular than Hani terraced field. VL - 4 IS - 6 ER -