The study was conducted to determine the socializing and psychological factors in contact lens users. Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2021 to February 2022 in a study period of 3 months. This study was carried out at The University of Faisalabad and Madinah Teaching Hospital, Faisalabad. The sample size was of 150 patients in this study. Data was collected by convenient sampling technique. Inclusion standards were 15 to 30 years old, and both genders (male and female). In this study soft contact lens user wearing duration since one year of two types (daily wear and extended wear). Results:- Mean ± Standard deviation is 24.59 ± 2.284 years. 86% and 84% were self-confidence and feel delighted. 92% were complimented while 90% were socially comfortable and 86% were working easily in their lives. Only 13% felt difficulty in sports and 18% had difficulty in wearing and removal of contact lenses. Contact lenses were affordable for 76% of subjects. Only 9.3% had eye allergies and 20% were going for routine eye exam for contact lenses. Contact Lens Quality of Life has good psychometric qualities. To summarize ocular and visual effects further composed of parameters that concluded as there were less than 30% of contact lens users with visual symptoms. It is concluded that subjects who were fitted with soft contact lenses, their quality of life was improved.
Published in | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.pbs.20221104.15 |
Page(s) | 143-150 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Quality of Life, Contact Lens, Psychological Factors
[1] | Fallowfield L. What is quality of life. 2009 May; 2. |
[2] | Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. John Wiley & Sons; 2013 May 23. |
[3] | Yildiz EH, Erdurmus M, Elibol ES, Acar B, Vural ET. Contact lens impact on quality of life in keratoconus patients: rigid gas permeable versus soft silicone-hydrogel keratoconus lenses. International journal of ophthalmology. 2015; 8 (5): 1074. |
[4] | Rah MJ, Walline JJ, Jones-Jordan LA, Sinnott LT, Jackson JM, Manny RE, Coffey B, Lyons S, ACHIEVE Study Group. Vision specific quality of life of pediatric contact lens wearers. Optometry and Vision Science. 2010 Aug 1; 87 (8): 560-6. |
[5] | Walline JJ, Gaume A, Jones LA, Rah MJ, Manny RE, Berntsen DA, Chitkara M, Kim A, Quinn N. Benefits of contact lens wear for children and teens. Eye & contact lens. 2007 Nov 1; 33 (6): 317-21. |
[6] | Smith MJ, Walline JJ. Controlling myopia progression in children and adolescents. Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics. 2015; 6: 133. |
[7] | McMonnies CW. Improving patient education and attitudes toward compliance with instructions for contact lens use. Contact lens and anterior eye. 2011 Oct 1; 4 (5): 241-8. |
[8] | Bullimore MA, Brennan NA. Myopia control: why each diopter matters. Optometry and Vision Science. 2019 Jun 1; 96 (6): 463-5. |
[9] | McMonnies CW. How contact lens comfort may be influenced by psychiatric and psychological conditions and mechanisms. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2014 Jul 1; 97 (4): 308-10. |
[10] | Cardona G, Llovet I. Compliance amongst contact lens wearers: comprehension skills and reinforcement with written instructions. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2004 Jun 1; 27 (2): 75-81. |
[11] | Ocansey S, Ogbomo GO, Abu EK, Morny EK, Adjei-Boye O. Profile, knowledge, and attitude of contact lens users regarding contact lens wear in Ghana. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2019 Apr 1; 42 (2): 170-7. |
[12] | Juhong J, Mordmuang A, Jewboonchu J, Rattanathamma P, Narkkul U, Karnjana K, Udomwech L. Rub and Rinse Contact Lenses Before Wearing as a Protective Regimen Against Contact Lens-Related Eye Infections. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, NZ). 2022; 16: 567. |
[13] | Moreddu R, Vigolo D, Yetisen AK. Contact lens technology: from fundamentals to applications. Advanced healthcare materials. 2019 Aug; 8 (15): 1900368. |
[14] | Vidal-Rohr M, Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN, Cerviño A. Effect of contact lens surface properties on comfort, tear stability and ocular physiology. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2018 Feb 1; 41 (1): 117-21. |
[15] | Suchecki JK, Donshik P, Ehlers WH. Contact lens complications. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America. 2003 Sep 1; 16 (3): 471-84. |
[16] | Sharma VK, Kalra N, Sinha R. Contact Lens-Associated Emergencies. InCorneal Emergencies 2022 (pp. 285-298). Springer, Singapore. |
[17] | Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott L, Chitkara M, Coffey B, Jackson JM, Manny RE, Rah MJ, Prinstein MJ, ACHIEVE Study Group. Randomized trial of the effect of contact lens wear on self-perception in children. Optometry and vision science. 2009 Mar 1; 86 (3): 222-32. |
[18] | Vega J, Orsborn G, Diamanti S. First and third generation silicone hydrogel contact lens physical properties impact on patient preferences. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2018 Jun 1; 41: S94-5. |
[19] | Kreps EO, Pesudovs K, Claerhout I, Koppen C. Mini-scleral lenses improve vision-related quality of life in keratoconus. Cornea. 2021 Jul 1; 40 (7): 859-64. |
[20] | Jacobs DS, Carrasquillo KG, Cottrell PD, Fernández-Velázquez FJ, Gil-Cazorla R, Jalbert I, Pucker AD, Riccobono K, Robertson DM, Szczotka-Flynn L, Speedwell L. BCLA CLEAR–Medical use of contact lenses. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2021 Apr 1; 44 (2): 289-329. |
[21] | Yang B, Ma X, Liu L, Cho P. Vision-related quality of life of Chinese children undergoing orthokeratology treatment compared to single vision spectacles. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2021 Aug 1; 44 (4): 101350. |
[22] | Chaudhari P, Ghate VM, Lewis SA. Next-generation contact lenses: Towards bioresponsive drug delivery and smart technologies in ocular therapeutics. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2021 Apr 1; 161: 80-99. |
[23] | Wang Y, Jacobs DS. Role of therapeutic contact lenses in management of corneal disease. Current opinion in ophthalmology. 2022 Jul 1; 33 (4): 306-10. |
[24] | Alvarez-Peregrina C, Sanchez-Tena MA, Martin M, Villa-Collar C, Povedano-Montero FJ. Multifocal contact lenses: A bibliometric study. Journal of Optometry. 2022 Jan 1; 15 (1): 53-9. |
[25] | Carnt N, Gonzalez-Garcia MJ. The R-evolution of contact lenses: Will long-term contact lens wearers in the future be the same as now? Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2022 Feb 1; 45 (1). |
[26] | Hebri HV, Badami A, Rao R. Commentary: Comparative analysis of quality of life in photorefractive keratectomy. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2022 Jan; 70 (1): 72. |
APA Style
Muhammad Aneeq Alyas, Maryam Jabbar, Namra Kanwal, Fariah Ata, Fareena Tehreem, et al. (2022). The Impact of Contact Lenses on Quality of Life. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 11(4), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221104.15
ACS Style
Muhammad Aneeq Alyas; Maryam Jabbar; Namra Kanwal; Fariah Ata; Fareena Tehreem, et al. The Impact of Contact Lenses on Quality of Life. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2022, 11(4), 143-150. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20221104.15
@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20221104.15, author = {Muhammad Aneeq Alyas and Maryam Jabbar and Namra Kanwal and Fariah Ata and Fareena Tehreem and Rabia Bushra Ehsan}, title = {The Impact of Contact Lenses on Quality of Life}, journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences}, volume = {11}, number = {4}, pages = {143-150}, doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20221104.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221104.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20221104.15}, abstract = {The study was conducted to determine the socializing and psychological factors in contact lens users. Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2021 to February 2022 in a study period of 3 months. This study was carried out at The University of Faisalabad and Madinah Teaching Hospital, Faisalabad. The sample size was of 150 patients in this study. Data was collected by convenient sampling technique. Inclusion standards were 15 to 30 years old, and both genders (male and female). In this study soft contact lens user wearing duration since one year of two types (daily wear and extended wear). Results:- Mean ± Standard deviation is 24.59 ± 2.284 years. 86% and 84% were self-confidence and feel delighted. 92% were complimented while 90% were socially comfortable and 86% were working easily in their lives. Only 13% felt difficulty in sports and 18% had difficulty in wearing and removal of contact lenses. Contact lenses were affordable for 76% of subjects. Only 9.3% had eye allergies and 20% were going for routine eye exam for contact lenses. Contact Lens Quality of Life has good psychometric qualities. To summarize ocular and visual effects further composed of parameters that concluded as there were less than 30% of contact lens users with visual symptoms. It is concluded that subjects who were fitted with soft contact lenses, their quality of life was improved.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Impact of Contact Lenses on Quality of Life AU - Muhammad Aneeq Alyas AU - Maryam Jabbar AU - Namra Kanwal AU - Fariah Ata AU - Fareena Tehreem AU - Rabia Bushra Ehsan Y1 - 2022/08/31 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221104.15 DO - 10.11648/j.pbs.20221104.15 T2 - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JF - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JO - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences SP - 143 EP - 150 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7845 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221104.15 AB - The study was conducted to determine the socializing and psychological factors in contact lens users. Descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2021 to February 2022 in a study period of 3 months. This study was carried out at The University of Faisalabad and Madinah Teaching Hospital, Faisalabad. The sample size was of 150 patients in this study. Data was collected by convenient sampling technique. Inclusion standards were 15 to 30 years old, and both genders (male and female). In this study soft contact lens user wearing duration since one year of two types (daily wear and extended wear). Results:- Mean ± Standard deviation is 24.59 ± 2.284 years. 86% and 84% were self-confidence and feel delighted. 92% were complimented while 90% were socially comfortable and 86% were working easily in their lives. Only 13% felt difficulty in sports and 18% had difficulty in wearing and removal of contact lenses. Contact lenses were affordable for 76% of subjects. Only 9.3% had eye allergies and 20% were going for routine eye exam for contact lenses. Contact Lens Quality of Life has good psychometric qualities. To summarize ocular and visual effects further composed of parameters that concluded as there were less than 30% of contact lens users with visual symptoms. It is concluded that subjects who were fitted with soft contact lenses, their quality of life was improved. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -