This research project on chauvinism and gender differences was two-fold, combining the analyzed results of 13 meta-analyses and 3 long-term trend data studies with the results of eight case studies of interviewed women, ranging in age from 30 to 80. Qualitative analyses were conducted as to the types of male support they received in their lives, their experiences with chauvinism, how they coped with chauvinism, and their life decisions as a result of experiencing chauvinism. The variances between females and males on cognitive, intellectual, academic achievement and interests were examined in the research base and the case studies, questioning whether or not there is a gender difference, as well as the influences of culture, other people and academic expectations. Results showed a positive trend over time regarding chauvinism. In the earlier research studies there were more gender differences between males and females but with confounding variables such as testing instrumentation, testing bias, academic course work availability and conscious holding back of females in academics and careers. However, more recent studies showed a distinct lack of gender differences and some question of how much of the earlier results contributed to the building of a stereotypic view of females. In the case studies, younger women tended to experience less onerous types of chauvinism than did the older women, but all eight women experienced chauvinism in their lives and remembered it well. Results include the ways they learned to cope with chauvinism and how they moved forward in their lives and careers in spite of chauvinism.
Published in | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.11 |
Page(s) | 1-13 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Gender Differences, Chauvinism, Meta-Analyses Gender Differences, Longitudinal Studies on Gender Differences
[1] | Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research? Qualitative Sociology, 42 (2), 139-160. |
[2] | Chrisler, J. C., & McCreary, D. R. (2010). Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology (Vol. 1). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. |
[3] | Deary, I., Thorpe, G., Wilson, V., Starr, J. M., & Whalley, L. J. (2003). Population sex differences in IQ at age 11: The Scottish mental survey 1932. Intelligence, 31, 533-542. |
[4] | Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. |
[5] | Doyle, R. A., & Voyer, D. (2016). Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 103-1164-1195. |
[6] | Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 33–72. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.33. |
[7] | Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45. 10.1126/science.7604277. |
[8] | Hunt, E. B. (2010). Human Intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. |
[9] | Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139. |
[10] | Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495. doi: 10.1126/science.1160364. |
[11] | Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53-69. doi: 10.1037/0033- 2909.104.1.53. |
[12] | Kirkland, R., Peterson, E., Baker, C., Miller, S., & Pulos, S. (2013). Meta-analysis reveals adult female superiority in “Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test.” North American Journal of Psychology, 15, 449 - 458. |
[13] | Konner, M. (2012). Misogyny, Chauvinism, Sexism, or What? Psychology Today, October 2012. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-tangled-wing/201210/misogyny-chauvinism-sexism-or-what |
[14] | Lindberg, S. M., & Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1123-1135. doi: 10.1037/a0021276. |
[15] | Lynn, R., & Mikk, J. (2009). Sex differences in reading achievement. Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 1363, 3–13. doi: 10.3176/tr.2009.1.01. |
[16] | Macintosh, N. (2011). IQ and Human Intelligence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. |
[17] | Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 10593–10597 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809921106. |
[18] | Nowell, A., & Hedges, L. V. (1998). Trends in gender differences in academic achievement from 1960 to 1994: An analysis of differences in mean, variance, and extreme scores. Sex Roles, 39, 21–43. doi: 10.1023/A:1018873615316. |
[19] | Pearson, K. (1904). Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. British Medical Journal, 3, 1243-1246. |
[20] | Plotnik, R., & Kouyoumdjian, H. (2013). Introduction to Psychology (pp. 282-28). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. |
[21] | Strand, S., Deary, I. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Sex differences in cognitive abilities test scores: A UK national picture. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 463-480, 10.1348/000709905X50906. |
[22] | Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884. doi: 10.1037/a0017364. |
[23] | Terry, W. S. (2015). Learning and Memory: Basic Principles, Processes and Procedures (4th ed.). East Suffix, England: Psychology Press. |
[24] | Thompson, A. E., & Daniel Voyer, D. (2014). Sex differences in the ability to recognize non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 28 (7), 1164-1195. 10.1080/02699931.2013.875889. |
[25] | Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievement: A meta-analysis. University of New Brunswick Psychological Bulletin, 4, 1174-1204, 2014 American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036620 |
[26] | Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, doi: 250-270. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250. |
[27] | Voyer, D., Voyer, S. D., & Saint-Aubin J. (2017). Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin Review, 24 (2), 307-334. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1085-7. PMID: 27357955. |
APA Style
Lorna Idol. (2022). The Chronic Case of Chauvinism: These Times Are Changing. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.11
ACS Style
Lorna Idol. The Chronic Case of Chauvinism: These Times Are Changing. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2022, 11(1), 1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.11
AMA Style
Lorna Idol. The Chronic Case of Chauvinism: These Times Are Changing. Psychol Behav Sci. 2022;11(1):1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.11
@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.11, author = {Lorna Idol}, title = {The Chronic Case of Chauvinism: These Times Are Changing}, journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {1-13}, doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20221101.11}, abstract = {This research project on chauvinism and gender differences was two-fold, combining the analyzed results of 13 meta-analyses and 3 long-term trend data studies with the results of eight case studies of interviewed women, ranging in age from 30 to 80. Qualitative analyses were conducted as to the types of male support they received in their lives, their experiences with chauvinism, how they coped with chauvinism, and their life decisions as a result of experiencing chauvinism. The variances between females and males on cognitive, intellectual, academic achievement and interests were examined in the research base and the case studies, questioning whether or not there is a gender difference, as well as the influences of culture, other people and academic expectations. Results showed a positive trend over time regarding chauvinism. In the earlier research studies there were more gender differences between males and females but with confounding variables such as testing instrumentation, testing bias, academic course work availability and conscious holding back of females in academics and careers. However, more recent studies showed a distinct lack of gender differences and some question of how much of the earlier results contributed to the building of a stereotypic view of females. In the case studies, younger women tended to experience less onerous types of chauvinism than did the older women, but all eight women experienced chauvinism in their lives and remembered it well. Results include the ways they learned to cope with chauvinism and how they moved forward in their lives and careers in spite of chauvinism.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Chronic Case of Chauvinism: These Times Are Changing AU - Lorna Idol Y1 - 2022/01/12 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.11 DO - 10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.11 T2 - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JF - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JO - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences SP - 1 EP - 13 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7845 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20221101.11 AB - This research project on chauvinism and gender differences was two-fold, combining the analyzed results of 13 meta-analyses and 3 long-term trend data studies with the results of eight case studies of interviewed women, ranging in age from 30 to 80. Qualitative analyses were conducted as to the types of male support they received in their lives, their experiences with chauvinism, how they coped with chauvinism, and their life decisions as a result of experiencing chauvinism. The variances between females and males on cognitive, intellectual, academic achievement and interests were examined in the research base and the case studies, questioning whether or not there is a gender difference, as well as the influences of culture, other people and academic expectations. Results showed a positive trend over time regarding chauvinism. In the earlier research studies there were more gender differences between males and females but with confounding variables such as testing instrumentation, testing bias, academic course work availability and conscious holding back of females in academics and careers. However, more recent studies showed a distinct lack of gender differences and some question of how much of the earlier results contributed to the building of a stereotypic view of females. In the case studies, younger women tended to experience less onerous types of chauvinism than did the older women, but all eight women experienced chauvinism in their lives and remembered it well. Results include the ways they learned to cope with chauvinism and how they moved forward in their lives and careers in spite of chauvinism. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -