Deception was one way (possibly not a good way) for children to interact with surroundings by considering others’ perspective. The development of deception itself, as well as the strategy of deception, was related to the environment they lived in and people they live with. In this study, we conducted experiment using “Die in a cup” task. By inducing parents to help their children to lie about the dice results, we showed that in order to escape from uncertainty (in exp1), or get a bigger chance to win a reward (in exp2), parents, together with their kids, lied on a aggregated level. Specifically, baby boys adopted more radical strategies to win for a present (by claiming they got the best results, Boys vs. Girls: 29% vs. 13% in exp1, 9%:0.4% in exp2), while baby girls ended up to choose a better but not obvious result. Although parents were not directly tested in our experiments, it is only with their help that children could complete their game, particularly showed consistent deception. Compared to previous research that men constantly cheat more than women, we could say that the way children were brought up shaped the way they will be as an adult.
| Published in | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.18 |
| Page(s) | 241-246 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Deception, Children, Die in a Cup
| [1] | Branas-Garza, P., & Rustichini, A. (2011). Organizing effects of testosterone and economic behavior: not just risk taking. PloS one, 6 (12), e29842. |
| [2] | Childs, J. (2012). Gender differences in lying. Economics Letters, 114 (2), 147-149. |
| [3] | Dräger, M., & Ibrahimi, M. (2019). Fate or Competitive Pressure? A Field Experiment on Competition with Children. |
| [4] | DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70 (5), 979. |
| [5] | Fischbacher, U., & Föllmi-Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise—an experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11 (3), 525-547. |
| [6] | Gerlach, P., Teodorescu, K., & Hertwig, R. (2019). The truth about lies: A meta-analysis on dishonest behavior. Psychological bulletin, 145 (1), 1. |
| [7] | Gervais, J., Tremblay, R. E., Desmarais-Gervais, L., & Vitaro, F. (2000). Children’s persistent lying, gender differences, and disruptive behaviours: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24 (2), 213-221. |
| [8] | Gneezy, U. (2005). Deception: The role of consequences. American Economic Review, 95 (1), 384-394. |
| [9] | Houser, D., List, J. A., Piovesan, M., Samek, A., & Winter, J. (2016). Dishonesty: From parents to children. European Economic Review, 82, 242-254. |
| [10] | Kraut, R. E., & Price, J. D. (1976). Machiavellianism in parents and their children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33 (6), 782. |
| [11] | Maggian, V., & Villeval, M. C. (2016). Social preferences and lying aversion in children. Experimental Economics, 19 (3), 663-685. |
| [12] | Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81 (1), 33. |
| [13] | Panitz, E. (1989). Psychometric investigation of the Mach IV scale measuring Machiavellianism. Psychological Reports, 64 (3), 963-968. |
| [14] | Schurr, A., & Ritov, I. (2016). Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (7), 1754-1759. |
| [15] | Wang, X., Lei, L., Liu, D., & Hu, H. (2016). Moderating effects of moral reasoning and gender on the relation between moral disengagement and cyberbullying in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 244–249. |
APA Style
Jinghua Tang. (2021). Parents May Help Their Kids to Lie. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 10(6), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.18
ACS Style
Jinghua Tang. Parents May Help Their Kids to Lie. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2021, 10(6), 241-246. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.18
AMA Style
Jinghua Tang. Parents May Help Their Kids to Lie. Psychol Behav Sci. 2021;10(6):241-246. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.18
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.18,
author = {Jinghua Tang},
title = {Parents May Help Their Kids to Lie},
journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
volume = {10},
number = {6},
pages = {241-246},
doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.18},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.18},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20211006.18},
abstract = {Deception was one way (possibly not a good way) for children to interact with surroundings by considering others’ perspective. The development of deception itself, as well as the strategy of deception, was related to the environment they lived in and people they live with. In this study, we conducted experiment using “Die in a cup” task. By inducing parents to help their children to lie about the dice results, we showed that in order to escape from uncertainty (in exp1), or get a bigger chance to win a reward (in exp2), parents, together with their kids, lied on a aggregated level. Specifically, baby boys adopted more radical strategies to win for a present (by claiming they got the best results, Boys vs. Girls: 29% vs. 13% in exp1, 9%:0.4% in exp2), while baby girls ended up to choose a better but not obvious result. Although parents were not directly tested in our experiments, it is only with their help that children could complete their game, particularly showed consistent deception. Compared to previous research that men constantly cheat more than women, we could say that the way children were brought up shaped the way they will be as an adult.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Parents May Help Their Kids to Lie AU - Jinghua Tang Y1 - 2021/12/02 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.18 DO - 10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.18 T2 - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JF - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JO - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences SP - 241 EP - 246 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7845 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20211006.18 AB - Deception was one way (possibly not a good way) for children to interact with surroundings by considering others’ perspective. The development of deception itself, as well as the strategy of deception, was related to the environment they lived in and people they live with. In this study, we conducted experiment using “Die in a cup” task. By inducing parents to help their children to lie about the dice results, we showed that in order to escape from uncertainty (in exp1), or get a bigger chance to win a reward (in exp2), parents, together with their kids, lied on a aggregated level. Specifically, baby boys adopted more radical strategies to win for a present (by claiming they got the best results, Boys vs. Girls: 29% vs. 13% in exp1, 9%:0.4% in exp2), while baby girls ended up to choose a better but not obvious result. Although parents were not directly tested in our experiments, it is only with their help that children could complete their game, particularly showed consistent deception. Compared to previous research that men constantly cheat more than women, we could say that the way children were brought up shaped the way they will be as an adult. VL - 10 IS - 6 ER -
Email: