ADHD is the most frequently occurring neurobiological disorder in childhood and is defined by cardinal symptoms of inattention and/or hyperactivity and impulsivity. We evaluated school-age children referred for behaviour problems and screened for ADHD over a 22-month period. We compared the clinical and socio-economic characteristics of the two groups of children: those diagnosed with ADHD and non-ADHD. A total of 63 children were assessed for possible ADHD over the period. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in relation to several characteristics including sex ratio, mean age at referral and diagnosis, mean number of clinics attended, the time taken to complete the assessment and the socioeconomic status of patients’ families. The highest proportion of the ADHD and non-ADHD children lived in the most deprived areas. The main difference between both groups was the high rate of negative teachers’ responses. No teacher’s rating was positive for any child without a diagnosis. An ideal ADHD care pathway should follow multi-disciplinary approach, and rely on evidence-based feedback from the school, as a more reliable pointer to confirmed diagnosis of ADHD compared to just parental report. This will likely reduce assessment duration and avoid delays in diagnosis confirmation.
| Published in | Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.pbs.20170601.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-8 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
ADHD, Childhood, Adolescence, Socio-Economic, School-Age, Clinical Care Pathway
| [1] | Ford T, Goodman R, Meltzer H. The British Child and Adolescent Mental Health Survey 1999: the prevalence of DSM-IV disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2003; 42:1203–1211. |
| [2] | Polanczyk G, Silva de Lima M, Horta BH, et al. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2007; 164:942–948. |
| [3] | National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).Diagnosis and Management of ADHD in Children, Young People and Adults. Clinical Guidelines No. 72. 2009. Online: http://www.nice.org.uk/CG72 (Last accessed March 2016). |
| [4] | SpencerNJ, BlackburnCM, ReadJM. Disabling chronic conditions in childhood and socioeconomic disadvantage: a systematic review and meta-analyses of observational studies. BMJ Open 2015;5:e007062doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007062 |
| [5] | Department for Communities and Local Government (UK). English indices of deprivation 2015 Sept 2015. Online: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/464430/English_Index_of_Multiple_Deprivation_2015_-_Guidance.pdf. |
| [6] | Conners CK, Sitarenios G, Parker JDA, Epstein JN. Epstein. Revision and Restandardization of the Conners Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS-R): Factor Structure, Reliability, and Criterion Validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 1998a; 26 (4): 279-29. |
| [7] | Conners CK, Sitarenios G, Parker JDA, Epstein JN. The Revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): Factor Structure, Reliability, and Criterion Validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology.1998b; 26 (4): 257-268. |
| [8] | BussingR, FernandezM, HarwoodM, HouW, GarvanCW, EybergSM, SwansonJM. Parent and Teacher SNAP-IV Ratings of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms: Psychometric Properties and Normative Ratings From a School District Sample. Assessment. 2008; 15 (3): 317-28. doi: 10.1177/1073191107313888. Epub 2008 Feb 29. |
| [9] | Kieling RR, Kieling C, Aguiar AP, Costa AC, Dorneles BV, Rohde LA. Searching for the best approach to assess teachers' perception of inattention and hyperactivity problems at school. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014; 23 (6): 451-9. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0466-y. Epub 2013 Sep 3. |
| [10] | Alda JA, Serrano-Troncoso E. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: agreement between clinical impression and the SNAP-IV screening tool. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2013; 41 (2):76-83. Epub 2013 Mar 1. |
| [11] | Solanto MV, Alvir J. Reliability of DSM-IV Symptom Ratings of ADHD: implications for DSM-V. J Atten Disord. 2009; 13 (2):107-16. doi: 10.1177/1087054708322994. Epub 2009 Apr 16. |
| [12] | Caye A, Machado JD, Rohde LA. Evaluating Parental Disagreement In ADHD Diagnosis: Can We Rely On A Single Report From Home? J Atten Disord. 2013 Oct 4. [Epub ahead of print]. |
| [13] | Johnston C, Weiss MD, Murray C, Miller NV. The effects of instructions on mothers' ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in referred children. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014; 42 (3):479-88. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9789-x. |
| [14] | Odgers CL, Caspi A, Russell MA, Sampson RJ,NArseneault L, Moffitt TE. Supportive parenting mediates neighborhood socioeconomic disparities in children's antisocial behavior from ages 5 to 12. Dev Psychopathol.2012; 24 (3): 705-21. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000326. |
| [15] | Evans GW, Vermeylen FM, Barash A, Lefkowitz EG, Hutt RL. The experience of stressors and hassles among rural adolescents from low-and middle-income households in the USA. Children, Youth and Environments. 2009; 19 (2): 164–175. |
| [16] | Shonkoff JP, Phillips D. From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000. |
| [17] | Georgiopoulos AM, Hua LL. The diagnosis and treatment of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis: a retrospective study. Psychosomatics. 2011; 52: 160-166. |
| [18] | Efron D, Bryson H, Lycett K, Sciberras E. Children referred for evaluation for ADHD: comorbidity profiles and characteristics associated with a positive diagnosis. Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Jun 7. doi: 10.1111/cch.12364. [Epub ahead of print]. |
| [19] | AAP Subcommittee on Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management, Wolraich M, Brown L, Brown RT, et al.. ADHD: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011; 128 (5):1007–1022. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2654. Epub 2011 Oct 16. |
| [20] | Bilenberg N, Gillberg C, Houmann T et al. Prescription rates of ADHD medication in the Scandinavian countries and their national guidelines. Nord J Psychiatry. 2012; 66 (1):70-1. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2011.593102. Epub 2011 Sep 29. |
| [21] | Bolea-Alamañac B, Nutt DJ, Adamou M et al; British Association for Psychopharmacology. Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: update on recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol. 2014; 28 (3):179-203. doi: 10.1177/0269881113519509. Epub 2014 Feb 12. |
| [22] | Seixas M1, Weiss M, Müller U. Systematic review of national and international guidelines on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Psychopharmacol. 2012; 26 (6):753-65. doi: 10.1177/0269881111412095. Epub 2011 Sep 24. |
| [23] | Wagner DJ, Vallerand IA, McLennan JD. Treatment receipt and outcomes from a clinic employing the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatment guideline of the children's medication algorithm project. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014; 24 (9):472-80. doi: 10.1089/cap.2014.0014. Epub 2014 Oct 20. |
| [24] | Bussing R, Narwaney KJ, Winterstein AG et al. Pharmacotherapy for incident attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: practice patterns and quality metrics. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014; 30 (8): 1687-99. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.905461. Epub 2014 Apr 7. |
| [25] | Mitchell PB, Levy F, Hadzi-Pavlovic D et al. Practitioner characteristics and the treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012; 48 (6): 483-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02242.x. Epub 2011 Nov 23. |
| [26] | Murphy JM, McCarthy AE, Baer L, Zima BT, Jellinek MS. Alternative national guidelines for treating attention and depression problems in children: comparison of treatment approaches and prescribing rates in the United Kingdom and United States. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014; 22 (3): 179-92. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000026. |
| [27] | Epstein JN, Langberg JM, Lichtenstein PK, Kolb R, Altaye M, Simon JO. Use of an Internet portal to improve community-based pediatric ADHD care: a cluster randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2011; 128 (5): e1201-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0872. Epub 2011 Oct 17. |
| [28] | Robb A, Findling RL. Challenges in the transition of care for adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Postgrad Med. 2013; 125 (4):131-40. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2013.07.2685. |
| [29] | Klein B, Damiani-Taraba G, Koster A, Campbell J, Scholz C. Diagnosing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children involved with child protection services: are current diagnostic guidelines acceptable for vulnerable populations? Child Care Health Dev. 2015; 41 (2):178-85. doi: 10.1111/cch.12168. Epub 2014 Jun 18. |
| [30] | Section on Complementary And Integrative Medicine; Council on Children with Disabilities; American Academy of Pediatrics, Zimmer M, Desch L. Sensory integration therapies for children with developmental and behavioral disorders. Pediatrics. 2012; 129 (6):1186-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0876. Epub 2012 May 28. |
APA Style
Michael O. Ogundele. (2017). A Study of Comparative Clinical and Socio-Economic Characteristics of School-Age Children Screened for ADHD: Implications for Development of ADHD Clinical Care Pathway. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170601.11
ACS Style
Michael O. Ogundele. A Study of Comparative Clinical and Socio-Economic Characteristics of School-Age Children Screened for ADHD: Implications for Development of ADHD Clinical Care Pathway. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2017, 6(1), 1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20170601.11
AMA Style
Michael O. Ogundele. A Study of Comparative Clinical and Socio-Economic Characteristics of School-Age Children Screened for ADHD: Implications for Development of ADHD Clinical Care Pathway. Psychol Behav Sci. 2017;6(1):1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20170601.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20170601.11,
author = {Michael O. Ogundele},
title = {A Study of Comparative Clinical and Socio-Economic Characteristics of School-Age Children Screened for ADHD: Implications for Development of ADHD Clinical Care Pathway},
journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {1-8},
doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20170601.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170601.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20170601.11},
abstract = {ADHD is the most frequently occurring neurobiological disorder in childhood and is defined by cardinal symptoms of inattention and/or hyperactivity and impulsivity. We evaluated school-age children referred for behaviour problems and screened for ADHD over a 22-month period. We compared the clinical and socio-economic characteristics of the two groups of children: those diagnosed with ADHD and non-ADHD. A total of 63 children were assessed for possible ADHD over the period. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in relation to several characteristics including sex ratio, mean age at referral and diagnosis, mean number of clinics attended, the time taken to complete the assessment and the socioeconomic status of patients’ families. The highest proportion of the ADHD and non-ADHD children lived in the most deprived areas. The main difference between both groups was the high rate of negative teachers’ responses. No teacher’s rating was positive for any child without a diagnosis. An ideal ADHD care pathway should follow multi-disciplinary approach, and rely on evidence-based feedback from the school, as a more reliable pointer to confirmed diagnosis of ADHD compared to just parental report. This will likely reduce assessment duration and avoid delays in diagnosis confirmation.},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - A Study of Comparative Clinical and Socio-Economic Characteristics of School-Age Children Screened for ADHD: Implications for Development of ADHD Clinical Care Pathway AU - Michael O. Ogundele Y1 - 2017/03/02 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170601.11 DO - 10.11648/j.pbs.20170601.11 T2 - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JF - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences JO - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences SP - 1 EP - 8 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7845 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20170601.11 AB - ADHD is the most frequently occurring neurobiological disorder in childhood and is defined by cardinal symptoms of inattention and/or hyperactivity and impulsivity. We evaluated school-age children referred for behaviour problems and screened for ADHD over a 22-month period. We compared the clinical and socio-economic characteristics of the two groups of children: those diagnosed with ADHD and non-ADHD. A total of 63 children were assessed for possible ADHD over the period. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in relation to several characteristics including sex ratio, mean age at referral and diagnosis, mean number of clinics attended, the time taken to complete the assessment and the socioeconomic status of patients’ families. The highest proportion of the ADHD and non-ADHD children lived in the most deprived areas. The main difference between both groups was the high rate of negative teachers’ responses. No teacher’s rating was positive for any child without a diagnosis. An ideal ADHD care pathway should follow multi-disciplinary approach, and rely on evidence-based feedback from the school, as a more reliable pointer to confirmed diagnosis of ADHD compared to just parental report. This will likely reduce assessment duration and avoid delays in diagnosis confirmation. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -
Email: