Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students

Brandy M. Chufar; Terry F. Pettijohn II

doi:doi:10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16

| Peer-Reviewed

Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students

Brandy M. Chufar, Terry F. Pettijohn II

Published in Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 3)

Received: 18 June 2013 Published: 10 July 2013

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Perfectionism is currently believed to be a multidimensional construct. This study focused on the perspective that perfectionism has both positive and negative qualities. Specifically, this study predicted that adaptive perfectionists would perform better on a task and have higher levels of self-esteem and self-efficacy than maladaptive perfectionists. Maladaptive perfectionists, in general, have been found to have lower performance, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Sixty-five university students completed two trials on the O’Conner Tweezer Dexterity Test and completed questionnaires about perfectionism, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. As predicted, the adaptive perfectionists showed the greatest performance increases on the task as well as reporting higher self-esteem and self-efficacy than the other perfectionist styles. This study supports the perspective that perfectionism can be positive and negative.

Published in	Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16
Page(s)	117-123
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Perfectionism, Dexterity, Self-Esteem, Self-Efficacy, College Students

References

[1]	Ansbacher, H. L., & Ansbacher, R. R. (Eds). (1991). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. New York: Basic Books.
[2]	Hamachek, D. E. (1978). Psychodynamics of normal and neurotic perfectionism. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior, 15(1), 27-33.
[3]	Aldea, M. A., & Rice, K. G. (2006). The role of emotional dysregulation in perfectionism and psychological distress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(4), 498-510. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.4.498
[4]	Rice, K. G., & Ashby, J. S. (2007). An efficient method for classifying perfectionists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(1), 72-85. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.72
[5]	Grzegorek, J. L., Slaney, R. B., Franze, S., & Rice, K. G. (2004). Self-criticism, dependency, self-esteem, and grade point average satisfaction among clusters of perfectionists and nonperfectionists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(2), 192-200. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.51.2.192
[6]	Rice, K. G., Ashby, J. S., & Slaney, R. B. (1998). Self-esteem as a mediator between perfectionism and depression: A structural equations analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 304-314. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.304
[7]	Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 456-470. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456
[8]	Hibbard, D. R., Davies, K. L. (2011). Perfectionism and psychological adjustment among college students: Does educational context matter? North American Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 187-200.
[9]	Chang, E. C., Watkins, A., & Banks, K. (2004). How adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism relate to positive and negative psychological functioning: Testing a stress-mediation model in black and white female college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 93-102. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.93
[10]	Gilman, R., & Ashby, J. S. (2003). Multidimensional perfectionism in a sample of middle school students: An exploratory investigation. Psychology in the Schools, 40(6), 677-689. doi:10.1002/pits.10125
[11]	Blankstein, K. R., Dunkley, D. M., & Wilson, J. (2008). Evaluative concerns and personal standards perfectionism: Self-esteem as a mediator and moderator of relations with personal and academic needs and estimated GPA. Current Psychology, 27(1), 29-61. doi:10.1007/s12144-008-9022
[12]	Stoeber, J., & Eysenck, M. W. (2008). Perfectionism and efficiency: Accuracy, response bias, and invested time in proof-reading performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1673-1678. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.08.001
[13]	Stoeber, J., Chesterman, D., & Tarn, T. (2010). Perfectionism and task performance: Time on task mediates the perfectionistic strivings–performance relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 458-462. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.021
[14]	Kobori, O., Hayakawa, M., & Tanno, Y. (2009). Do perfectionists raise their standards after success? An experimental examination of the revaluation of standard setting in perfectionism. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40(4), 515-521. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.07.003
[15]	Hanchon, T. A. (2010). The relations between perfectionism and achievement goals. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 885-890. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.023
[16]	Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[17]	Stoeber, J., Hutchfield, J., & Wood, K. V. (2008). Perfectionism, self-efficacy, and aspiration level: Differential effects of perfectionistic striving and self-criticism after success and failure. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(4), 323-327. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.021
[18]	American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
[19]	Slaney, R. B., Rice, K. G., Mobley, M., Trippi, J., & Ashby, J. S. (2001). The revised Almost Perfect Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 130–145.
[20]	Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[21]	Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER Nelson.
[22]	Rice, K. G., Ashby, J. S., & Gilman, R. (2011). Classifying adolescent perfectionists. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 563-577. doi:10.1037/a0022482
[23]	Aldea, M. A., Rice, K. G., Gormley, B., & Rojas, A. (2010). Telling perfectionists about their perfectionism: Effects of providing feedback on emotional reactivity and psychological symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(12), 1194-1203. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2010.09.003.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Brandy M. Chufar, Terry F. Pettijohn II. (2013). Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(3), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Brandy M. Chufar; Terry F. Pettijohn II. Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2013, 2(3), 117-123. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Brandy M. Chufar, Terry F. Pettijohn II. Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students. Psychol Behav Sci. 2013;2(3):117-123. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16,
  author = {Brandy M. Chufar and Terry F. Pettijohn II},
  title = {Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students},
  journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
  volume = {2},
  number = {3},
  pages = {117-123},
  doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20130203.16},
  abstract = {Perfectionism is currently believed to be a multidimensional construct. This study focused on the perspective that perfectionism has both positive and negative qualities. Specifically, this study predicted that adaptive perfectionists would perform better on a task and have higher levels of self-esteem and self-efficacy than maladaptive perfectionists. Maladaptive perfectionists, in general, have been found to have lower performance, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Sixty-five university students completed two trials on the O’Conner Tweezer Dexterity Test and completed questionnaires about perfectionism, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. As predicted, the adaptive perfectionists showed the greatest performance increases on the task as well as reporting higher self-esteem and self-efficacy than the other perfectionist styles. This study supports the perspective that perfectionism can be positive and negative.},
 year = {2013}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students
AU  - Brandy M. Chufar
AU  - Terry F. Pettijohn II
Y1  - 2013/07/10
PY  - 2013
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16
T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
SP  - 117
EP  - 123
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7845
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16
AB  - Perfectionism is currently believed to be a multidimensional construct. This study focused on the perspective that perfectionism has both positive and negative qualities. Specifically, this study predicted that adaptive perfectionists would perform better on a task and have higher levels of self-esteem and self-efficacy than maladaptive perfectionists. Maladaptive perfectionists, in general, have been found to have lower performance, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Sixty-five university students completed two trials on the O’Conner Tweezer Dexterity Test and completed questionnaires about perfectionism, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. As predicted, the adaptive perfectionists showed the greatest performance increases on the task as well as reporting higher self-esteem and self-efficacy than the other perfectionist styles. This study supports the perspective that perfectionism can be positive and negative.
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Brandy M. Chufar

Department of Psychology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina, USA
Terry F. Pettijohn II

Department of Psychology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, South Carolina, USA

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Brandy M. Chufar, Terry F. Pettijohn II. (2013). Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2(3), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Brandy M. Chufar; Terry F. Pettijohn II. Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 2013, 2(3), 117-123. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Brandy M. Chufar, Terry F. Pettijohn II. Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students. Psychol Behav Sci. 2013;2(3):117-123. doi: 10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16,
  author = {Brandy M. Chufar and Terry F. Pettijohn II},
  title = {Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students},
  journal = {Psychology and Behavioral Sciences},
  volume = {2},
  number = {3},
  pages = {117-123},
  doi = {10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pbs.20130203.16},
  abstract = {Perfectionism is currently believed to be a multidimensional construct. This study focused on the perspective that perfectionism has both positive and negative qualities. Specifically, this study predicted that adaptive perfectionists would perform better on a task and have higher levels of self-esteem and self-efficacy than maladaptive perfectionists. Maladaptive perfectionists, in general, have been found to have lower performance, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Sixty-five university students completed two trials on the O’Conner Tweezer Dexterity Test and completed questionnaires about perfectionism, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. As predicted, the adaptive perfectionists showed the greatest performance increases on the task as well as reporting higher self-esteem and self-efficacy than the other perfectionist styles. This study supports the perspective that perfectionism can be positive and negative.},
 year = {2013}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Meeting High Standards: The Effect of Perfectionism on Task Performance, Self-Esteem, and Self-Efficacy in College Students
AU  - Brandy M. Chufar
AU  - Terry F. Pettijohn II
Y1  - 2013/07/10
PY  - 2013
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16
T2  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JF  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
JO  - Psychology and Behavioral Sciences
SP  - 117
EP  - 123
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-7845
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20130203.16
AB  - Perfectionism is currently believed to be a multidimensional construct. This study focused on the perspective that perfectionism has both positive and negative qualities. Specifically, this study predicted that adaptive perfectionists would perform better on a task and have higher levels of self-esteem and self-efficacy than maladaptive perfectionists. Maladaptive perfectionists, in general, have been found to have lower performance, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. Sixty-five university students completed two trials on the O’Conner Tweezer Dexterity Test and completed questionnaires about perfectionism, self-esteem, and self-efficacy. As predicted, the adaptive perfectionists showed the greatest performance increases on the task as well as reporting higher self-esteem and self-efficacy than the other perfectionist styles. This study supports the perspective that perfectionism can be positive and negative.
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download