| Peer-Reviewed

Reconstruction of Type V Hepatic Arterial in the Adult and Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipient

Received: 24 November 2019     Accepted: 3 January 2020     Published: 13 January 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The replaced common hepatic artery (RCHA) is an uncommon arterial anomaly that, when present, makes hepatic arterial reconstruction during liver transplantation technically challenging. At our institution, the reconstruction of the recipient RCHA consists of 2 techniques that include either an infrarenal donor iliac artery aortic conduit or a direct donor celiac trunk anastomosis to the proximal RCHA. Our experience demonstrates that the direct anastomosis to the RCHA provides a reliable source of arterial inflow, allows preservation of the recipient arterial anatomy, and minimizes the dissection required to create an infrarenal aortic conduit. Between September 1998 and April 2019, we performed 1782 liver transplants (1230 adults, >18 years; 552 pediatric, <18 years). There were 36 (2.92%) adult and 20 (3.07%) pediatric liver transplant recipients that possessed a RCHA. Allograft and patient survivals were 94.70% and 94.10%, in both the infrarenal conduit and direct Type-V anastomosis cohorts at 1 year, respectively. To date, hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) has not occurred in the 2 cohorts of pediatric transplant recipients. In conclusion, the direct donor celiac trunk to RCHA anastomosis is a safe and effective way to perform arterial reconstruction with low hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary complication rates.

Published in Journal of Surgery (Volume 8, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.js.20200801.11
Page(s) 1-4
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Liver Transplantation, Arterial Reconstruction, Arterial Anomaly

References
[1] Johnathan Hiatt, Joubin Gabbay, Ronald W. Busuttil. Surgical Anatomy of the Hepatic Arteries in 1000 Cases. Annals of Surgery. July 1994; 220 (1): 50-52.
[2] Astrid Herrero, Regis Souche, Emmanuel Joly, Gildas Boisset, Hussein Habibeh, Hassan Bouyabrine, Fabrizio Panaro Jose Ursic-Bedoya, Samir Jaber, Boris Guiu, Georges Philippe Pageaux, Francis Navarro. Early Hepatic Artery Thrombosis After Liver Transplantation: What is the Impact of the Arterial Reconstruction Type? World Journal of Surgery. August 2017; 41 (8): 2101-2110.
[3] Joel R. Schroering, Chandrashekhar A. Kubal, Jonathan A. Fridell, Taylor J. Hathaway, Ross C. Robinson, Richard S. Mangus. Impact of Variant Donor Hepatic Arterial Anatomy on Clinical Graft Outcomes in Liver Transplantation. Liver Transplantation. October 2018; 24 (10) 1481-1484.
[4] Taizo Hibi, Seigo Nishida, David M. Levi, Daisuke Sugiyama, Kyota Fukazawa, Akin Tekin, Ji Fan, Gennaro Delvaggi, Phillip Ruiz, Andreas G. Tzakis. Long-Term Deleterious Effects of Aortohepatic Donduits in Primary Liver Transplantation: Proceed With Caution. Liver Transplantation. 2013 August; 19 (8): 916-925.
[5] Salvatore, Gruttadauria, Carlo Scotti Foglieni, Cataldo Doria, Angelo Luca, Augusto Lauro, Ignazio R Marino. The Hepatic Artery in Liver Transplantation and Surgery: Vascular Anomalies in 701 Cases. Clinical Transplantation. October 2001; 15 (5): 359-363.
[6] Paolo Muiesan, Mohamed Rela, Franco Nodari, Hector Vilca Melendez, Vassilis Smyrniotis, Vassilis Vougas, Nigel Heaton. Use of Infrarenal Conduits for Arterial Revascularization in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation. Liver Transplantation and Surgery. May 1998; 4 (3): 232-235.
[7] Ioannis Fouzas, Vasilios Papanikolaou, Georgios Katsanos, Nikolaos Antoniadis, Nikolaos Salveridis, Katerina Karakasi, Soterios Vasileiadou, Aegues Fouza, Eleni Mouloudi, Gakis Imvrios, Caedmon Papanikolaou. Hepatic Artery Anatomic Variations and Reconstruction in Liver Grafts Procured in Greece: The Effect on Hepatic Artery Thrombosis. Transplantation Proceedings. March 2019; 51 (2): 416-420.
[8] Ailín C. Rogers, Sandhya Chalasani, Anthony G. Ryan, Keith Simon Cross, Morgan P. McMonagle. The Twin Evils of Concomitant Rare Pathology with Variant Anatomy: Superior Mesenteric Artery Aneurysm and a Replaced Right Hepatic Artery. Annals of Vascular Surgery. January 2017; 38: 318. e1-318. e6.
[9] Marcio F. Chedid, Tomaz J. M. Grezzana-Filho, Aljamir D. Chedid, Luiz Pedro P. Hendges, Ian Leipnitz, Mario R. Alvares-da-Silva, Ariane N. Backes, Matheus J. Reis, Cleber Dario P. Kruel, Cleber R. P. Kruel. Liver Transplantation Utilizing Mixed Biologic and Synthetic Arterial Conduits. Case Reports in Surgery. 2016: 9245079.
[10] Caitlin W. Hicks, Richard. A. Burkhart, Matthew J. Weiss, Christopher L. Wolfgang, Andrew M. Cameron, Timothy M. Pawlik. Management of Type 9 Hepatic Arterial Anatomy at the time of Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Considerations for Preservation and Reconstruction of a Completely Replaced Common Hepatic Artery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. July 2016; 20 (7): 1400-1404.
[11] Osamu Aramaki, Yasuhiko Sugawara, Norihiro Kokudo, Tadatoshi Takayama, Masatoshi Makuuchi. Branch Patch Reconstruction in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Arterialization of Grafts with Replaced Type Arteries. Transplantation. December 2006; 82 (11): 1541-1543.
[12] Massimo Del Gaudio, Gian Luca Grazi, Giorgio Ercolani, Matteo Ravaioli, Giovanni Varotti, Matteo Cescon, Gaetano Vetrone, Giovanni Ramacciato, Antonio Daniele Pinna. Outcome of Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Liver Transplantation with an Iliac Arterial Interposition Graft. Clinical Transplantation. 2005 May; 19 (3): 399-405.
[13] Yi Ma, Qiang Li, Zhi-Ming Ye, Xiao-Feng Zhu, Xiao-Shun He. Use of Arterial Conduit for Arterial Revascularization During Liver and Multivisceral Transplantation. Chinese Medical Journal. 2011 October; 124 (19): 2986-2989.
[14] Dong-Hwan Jung, Cheon-Soo Park, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Gil-Chun Park, Yong-Pil Cho, Sung-Gyu Lee. Placement of an Aortohepatic Conduit as an Alternative to Standard Arterial Anastomosis in Liver Transplantation. Annals of Transplantation, 2018; 23: 61-65.
[15] John A. Geha, N. Thao Galvan, Michael Kueht, Dor Yoeli, Joe D. Geha, Abbas Rana, Ronald T. Cotton, Christine A. O’Mahony, John A. Goss. Celiac Axis Extension Grafts in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation. Liver Transplantation. August 2018; 24: 1138-1141.
[16] Philip K. Ng, Abbas Rana, Ramya P. Masand, Kalpesh Patel, Andras A. Heczey, John A. Goss, Ryan W. Himes. Fatal Central Nervous System Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease in a Patient Who Underwent Liver Transplantation for Hepatoblastoma. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. January 2018; 66 (1): e21-e23.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    John Abraham Geha, Matthew Benjamin Goss, Joseph Daniel Geha, Christine Ann O’Mahony, Nhu Thao Nguyen Galvan, et al. (2020). Reconstruction of Type V Hepatic Arterial in the Adult and Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipient. Journal of Surgery, 8(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20200801.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    John Abraham Geha; Matthew Benjamin Goss; Joseph Daniel Geha; Christine Ann O’Mahony; Nhu Thao Nguyen Galvan, et al. Reconstruction of Type V Hepatic Arterial in the Adult and Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipient. J. Surg. 2020, 8(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20200801.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    John Abraham Geha, Matthew Benjamin Goss, Joseph Daniel Geha, Christine Ann O’Mahony, Nhu Thao Nguyen Galvan, et al. Reconstruction of Type V Hepatic Arterial in the Adult and Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipient. J Surg. 2020;8(1):1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.js.20200801.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.js.20200801.11,
      author = {John Abraham Geha and Matthew Benjamin Goss and Joseph Daniel Geha and Christine Ann O’Mahony and Nhu Thao Nguyen Galvan and Abbas Rana and Ronald Timothy Cotton and Michael Louis Kueht and John Allen Goss},
      title = {Reconstruction of Type V Hepatic Arterial in the Adult and Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipient},
      journal = {Journal of Surgery},
      volume = {8},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-4},
      doi = {10.11648/j.js.20200801.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20200801.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.js.20200801.11},
      abstract = {The replaced common hepatic artery (RCHA) is an uncommon arterial anomaly that, when present, makes hepatic arterial reconstruction during liver transplantation technically challenging. At our institution, the reconstruction of the recipient RCHA consists of 2 techniques that include either an infrarenal donor iliac artery aortic conduit or a direct donor celiac trunk anastomosis to the proximal RCHA. Our experience demonstrates that the direct anastomosis to the RCHA provides a reliable source of arterial inflow, allows preservation of the recipient arterial anatomy, and minimizes the dissection required to create an infrarenal aortic conduit. Between September 1998 and April 2019, we performed 1782 liver transplants (1230 adults, >18 years; 552 pediatric, <18 years). There were 36 (2.92%) adult and 20 (3.07%) pediatric liver transplant recipients that possessed a RCHA. Allograft and patient survivals were 94.70% and 94.10%, in both the infrarenal conduit and direct Type-V anastomosis cohorts at 1 year, respectively. To date, hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) has not occurred in the 2 cohorts of pediatric transplant recipients. In conclusion, the direct donor celiac trunk to RCHA anastomosis is a safe and effective way to perform arterial reconstruction with low hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary complication rates.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Reconstruction of Type V Hepatic Arterial in the Adult and Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipient
    AU  - John Abraham Geha
    AU  - Matthew Benjamin Goss
    AU  - Joseph Daniel Geha
    AU  - Christine Ann O’Mahony
    AU  - Nhu Thao Nguyen Galvan
    AU  - Abbas Rana
    AU  - Ronald Timothy Cotton
    AU  - Michael Louis Kueht
    AU  - John Allen Goss
    Y1  - 2020/01/13
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20200801.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.js.20200801.11
    T2  - Journal of Surgery
    JF  - Journal of Surgery
    JO  - Journal of Surgery
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 4
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0930
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.js.20200801.11
    AB  - The replaced common hepatic artery (RCHA) is an uncommon arterial anomaly that, when present, makes hepatic arterial reconstruction during liver transplantation technically challenging. At our institution, the reconstruction of the recipient RCHA consists of 2 techniques that include either an infrarenal donor iliac artery aortic conduit or a direct donor celiac trunk anastomosis to the proximal RCHA. Our experience demonstrates that the direct anastomosis to the RCHA provides a reliable source of arterial inflow, allows preservation of the recipient arterial anatomy, and minimizes the dissection required to create an infrarenal aortic conduit. Between September 1998 and April 2019, we performed 1782 liver transplants (1230 adults, >18 years; 552 pediatric, <18 years). There were 36 (2.92%) adult and 20 (3.07%) pediatric liver transplant recipients that possessed a RCHA. Allograft and patient survivals were 94.70% and 94.10%, in both the infrarenal conduit and direct Type-V anastomosis cohorts at 1 year, respectively. To date, hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) has not occurred in the 2 cohorts of pediatric transplant recipients. In conclusion, the direct donor celiac trunk to RCHA anastomosis is a safe and effective way to perform arterial reconstruction with low hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary complication rates.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA

  • John P. and Katherine G. McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA

  • Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA

  • Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA

  • Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA

  • Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA

  • Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA

  • Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA

  • Division of Abdominal Transplantation, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA

  • Sections