Enset is a multipurpose crop of which every part is thoroughly utilized, cultivated as a food and fibre crop only in Ethiopia, particularly in the southern and south western parts of the country. This research was conducted with objective of exploring distribution, cultivation method and farmers’ traditional management system of ensets cultivars in Sheka Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. The study kebeles were selected using purposive sampling method and the simple random method was employed to select household informants based on the proportion to the size of total enset growing households in selected kebeles, accordingly 270 households were used for this study. The data were collected using open and close ended questionnaires,key informant interview, filed observation and focus group discussion. Then the data was analysed using SPSS 20.0 Software and microsoft excel. In the present exploration 68 enset local varieties (cultivars) have been identified. Maximum enset varieties were recorded (24 per household) from Masha District. Farmers select and maintain these local varieties that best meet their needs using their indigenous knowledge. The farmers cited resistance to pest and disease (25.09%), size of the plant (22.88%) and taste or quality of enset product (19.34%) as important criteria to categorize and select different varieties of enset. Enset local varieties; ‘Gudiro’, ‘Nobo’, ‘Yobo’ and ‘Cherallo’ were claimed to be widely adaptable and disease and pest resistant varieties of enset by most farmers in the area. Farmers cultivate enset in home garden (25.49%) and in main filed (21.64%) or both home garden and main (41.67%) as mono-crop (63.71%) or intercropped (36.29%) mode of cultivation. Enset is cultivated mainly for food (78.82%) in the Zone where the corm and the pseudostem are the most important sources of food. The types of food from these parts are ‘Kocho’, ‘Bulla or Etino’ and ‘Amicho or Utto’. Despite the facts that enset remained staple crop for Sheka zone for centuries, little research and development attention have so far given. As such potential of enset for food security and income generation has not been fully exploited. The traditional farming system and associated traditional wisdom that contributed for the availability of present day diversity need to be maintained and developed further, farmers should be supported and encouraged to continue the on-farm conservation activities. Enset processing is carried out by women using traditional tools and the process is laborious and tiresome. This indicates future research area in processing technology development.
Published in | Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jps.20170501.12 |
Page(s) | 6-18 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Enset, Indigenous Knowledge, Landraces
[1] | Addis T., Azerefegne F. and Blomme G. 2008. Density and distribution of enset root mealybugs on enset. African Crop Science Journal, 16(1), pp. 67–74. |
[2] | Alemu K. (in press). Farmers' Indigenous knowledge: Cultivation, Utilization and classification, of Enset in North Omo (Ethiopia). Pp. 1-8. |
[3] | Anonymous 2005. Maritu. Sheka Zonal Advertising and Cultural Office. Annual Bulletin 1(1). (Amharic Version). |
[4] | Ayele, A. and OmprakashS. 2014. Extension of Enset Plant Product for Rural Development in Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development: 2(3): pp 031-040. |
[5] | Baker, R. E. D and Simmonds, N. W. 1953. The Genus of Ensete in Africa. KEW Bulletin 8: pp 234-236. |
[6] | Berhane, F. and Sahelmemedhin, S. 2003. Assessment of different phosphorus forms in some agricultural soils ofEthiopia. Ethiopian Journal of agriculture, 5(2):193-213. |
[7] | Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia (CSAE) 2007. The National Statistics of Population; Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2007. |
[8] | Edison S., M. Unnikrishnan, B. Vimala, Santha V. Pillai, M. N. Sheela, M. T. Sreekumari and Abraham K. 2006. Biodiversity of Tropical Tuber Crops in India. NBA Scientific Bulletin Number - 7, National Biodiversity Authority, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, p60. |
[9] | FAO 1995. The United Nations Food & Agriculture Organisation (FAO). |
[10] | FAO, 2006. The improvement of farmers based seed production scheme and FAO, 2001. A Global Cassava Development Strategy and Implementation Plan. Volume1. |
[11] | Fekadu, D. (1996). Potential of Enset (Enseteventricosum) in ruminant Nutrition in Ethiopia, MSc. Thesis. SUA.Uppsale. |
[12] | Gezahegn G. and Mekbib F. 2016. In vitro Regeneration of Disease Free Enset (Ensete ventricosum (Welw) Cheesman) Planting Materials from Bacterial Wilt Diseased Plants Using Shoot Tip Culture. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare Vol. 6, No.17, pp. 44-53. |
[13] | Howard, J. B and Holloway, D. W. 1988. Chemistry of Tropical Root Crops: Significance for Nutrition and Agriculture in the Pacific Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Australian National University, Canberra. |
[14] | Hunduma T., K. Sadessa, E. Hilu and M. Oli 2015. Evaluation of Enset Clones Resistance against Enset Bacterial Wilt Disease (Xanthomonascampestrispv. musacearum). J VeterinarSciTechnolo, 6(3), pp 1-7. |
[15] | IBC 2008. Ethiopia: Second Country Report on the State of PGRFA to FAO, Addis Abeba, Ethiopia. IFPRI Issue brief, September 2008. Washington DC. |
[16] | Ikeorgu J. E. G. 2000. Root and Tuber Crops of Nigeria: Production, Challenges and Future. In: Akoroda M. O. (Ed.) Agronomy in Nigeria. pp. 60-69. |
[17] | Iyagba A. G. 2010. A review on root and tuber crop production and their weed management among small scale farmers in Nigeria. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science.5 (4): 52-57. |
[18] | Magule, T. O., B. Tesfaye, M. Catellani and M. Enrico Pè 2014. Indigenous knowledge, use and on-farm management of enset (Enseteventricosum (Welw.)Cheesman) diversity in Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 10 (41), pp 1-18. |
[19] | Mekbib, Y. and Deressa T. 2016. Exploration and collection of root and tuber crops in East Wollega and Ilu ababoa zones: recruiting declining genetic resources. Indian journal of Traditional Knoeledgw. Vol. 15(1). Pp. 86-92. |
[20] | Mulualem T. and Walle T. 2014. Farmers indigenous knowledge and assessment of enset (EnseteventricosumWelw. Cheesman) cultivars for major insect pests in Ojojia water shade Kembata-tembaro zone, South Ethiopia. Sky Journal of Agricultural Research 3(6), pp. 112–119. |
[21] | Maryo M., Nemomissa S., Bekele T.2014. Diversity and Distribution of Enset (Ensete Ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) Landraces in Kambatta Tembaro Zone, Southern Ethiopia Proceedings of the 4th National Conference on “Environment and Development”. Dilla, Ethiopia. Pp. 104-120. |
[22] | Sheka zone Agriculture and Rural Development Office 2012. |
[23] | Speijer, P. R. and R. Fogain 1999. Musa and Ensete nematode pest status in selected African countries. Mobilizing IPM for sustainable banana production in Africa – ed. by E. A. Frison, C. S. Gold, E. B. Karamura & R. A. Sikora, Proceedings of a workshop on banana IPM held in Nelspruit, p. 99-108. |
[24] | Tesfaye, Y. and F. Kebede, 2006. Diversity and cultural use of Enset (Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) in Bonga in situ conservation site, Ethiopia. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 4: 147–148. |
[25] | Tsegaye A. and Struik, P. C. 2001. Enset (Enseteventricosum (Welw.)Cheesman) kocho yield under different crop establishment methods as compared to yields of other carbohydrate-rich food crops. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 49(1), Pages 81–94. |
[26] | Tsehaye Y., and Kebebew F. 2006. Diversity and cultural use of Enset (Ensetventricosum (Welw.)Cheesman) in Bonga in situ Conservation Site, Ethiopia. Ethnobotany Research and Applications.4: 147-157. |
[27] | Yamane, Taro. 1967. Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2ndEd., New York: Harper and Row. |
[28] | Yemataw Z., Mohamed H., Diro M. and Addis T. 2014. Enset (Enseteventricosum) clone selection by farmers and their cultural practices in southern Ethiopia. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution.61 (6), pp 1091-1104. |
APA Style
Belachew Garedew, Aklilu Ayiza, Bewuketu Haile, Habtamu Kasaye. (2017). Indigenous Knowledge of Enset (Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) Cultivation and Management Practice by Shekicho People, Southwest Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Sciences, 5(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.12
ACS Style
Belachew Garedew; Aklilu Ayiza; Bewuketu Haile; Habtamu Kasaye. Indigenous Knowledge of Enset (Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) Cultivation and Management Practice by Shekicho People, Southwest Ethiopia. J. Plant Sci. 2017, 5(1), 6-18. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20170501.12
@article{10.11648/j.jps.20170501.12, author = {Belachew Garedew and Aklilu Ayiza and Bewuketu Haile and Habtamu Kasaye}, title = {Indigenous Knowledge of Enset (Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) Cultivation and Management Practice by Shekicho People, Southwest Ethiopia}, journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, pages = {6-18}, doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20170501.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20170501.12}, abstract = {Enset is a multipurpose crop of which every part is thoroughly utilized, cultivated as a food and fibre crop only in Ethiopia, particularly in the southern and south western parts of the country. This research was conducted with objective of exploring distribution, cultivation method and farmers’ traditional management system of ensets cultivars in Sheka Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. The study kebeles were selected using purposive sampling method and the simple random method was employed to select household informants based on the proportion to the size of total enset growing households in selected kebeles, accordingly 270 households were used for this study. The data were collected using open and close ended questionnaires,key informant interview, filed observation and focus group discussion. Then the data was analysed using SPSS 20.0 Software and microsoft excel. In the present exploration 68 enset local varieties (cultivars) have been identified. Maximum enset varieties were recorded (24 per household) from Masha District. Farmers select and maintain these local varieties that best meet their needs using their indigenous knowledge. The farmers cited resistance to pest and disease (25.09%), size of the plant (22.88%) and taste or quality of enset product (19.34%) as important criteria to categorize and select different varieties of enset. Enset local varieties; ‘Gudiro’, ‘Nobo’, ‘Yobo’ and ‘Cherallo’ were claimed to be widely adaptable and disease and pest resistant varieties of enset by most farmers in the area. Farmers cultivate enset in home garden (25.49%) and in main filed (21.64%) or both home garden and main (41.67%) as mono-crop (63.71%) or intercropped (36.29%) mode of cultivation. Enset is cultivated mainly for food (78.82%) in the Zone where the corm and the pseudostem are the most important sources of food. The types of food from these parts are ‘Kocho’, ‘Bulla or Etino’ and ‘Amicho or Utto’. Despite the facts that enset remained staple crop for Sheka zone for centuries, little research and development attention have so far given. As such potential of enset for food security and income generation has not been fully exploited. The traditional farming system and associated traditional wisdom that contributed for the availability of present day diversity need to be maintained and developed further, farmers should be supported and encouraged to continue the on-farm conservation activities. Enset processing is carried out by women using traditional tools and the process is laborious and tiresome. This indicates future research area in processing technology development.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Indigenous Knowledge of Enset (Ensete ventricosum (Welw.) Cheesman) Cultivation and Management Practice by Shekicho People, Southwest Ethiopia AU - Belachew Garedew AU - Aklilu Ayiza AU - Bewuketu Haile AU - Habtamu Kasaye Y1 - 2017/01/23 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jps.20170501.12 T2 - Journal of Plant Sciences JF - Journal of Plant Sciences JO - Journal of Plant Sciences SP - 6 EP - 18 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0731 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20170501.12 AB - Enset is a multipurpose crop of which every part is thoroughly utilized, cultivated as a food and fibre crop only in Ethiopia, particularly in the southern and south western parts of the country. This research was conducted with objective of exploring distribution, cultivation method and farmers’ traditional management system of ensets cultivars in Sheka Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. The study kebeles were selected using purposive sampling method and the simple random method was employed to select household informants based on the proportion to the size of total enset growing households in selected kebeles, accordingly 270 households were used for this study. The data were collected using open and close ended questionnaires,key informant interview, filed observation and focus group discussion. Then the data was analysed using SPSS 20.0 Software and microsoft excel. In the present exploration 68 enset local varieties (cultivars) have been identified. Maximum enset varieties were recorded (24 per household) from Masha District. Farmers select and maintain these local varieties that best meet their needs using their indigenous knowledge. The farmers cited resistance to pest and disease (25.09%), size of the plant (22.88%) and taste or quality of enset product (19.34%) as important criteria to categorize and select different varieties of enset. Enset local varieties; ‘Gudiro’, ‘Nobo’, ‘Yobo’ and ‘Cherallo’ were claimed to be widely adaptable and disease and pest resistant varieties of enset by most farmers in the area. Farmers cultivate enset in home garden (25.49%) and in main filed (21.64%) or both home garden and main (41.67%) as mono-crop (63.71%) or intercropped (36.29%) mode of cultivation. Enset is cultivated mainly for food (78.82%) in the Zone where the corm and the pseudostem are the most important sources of food. The types of food from these parts are ‘Kocho’, ‘Bulla or Etino’ and ‘Amicho or Utto’. Despite the facts that enset remained staple crop for Sheka zone for centuries, little research and development attention have so far given. As such potential of enset for food security and income generation has not been fully exploited. The traditional farming system and associated traditional wisdom that contributed for the availability of present day diversity need to be maintained and developed further, farmers should be supported and encouraged to continue the on-farm conservation activities. Enset processing is carried out by women using traditional tools and the process is laborious and tiresome. This indicates future research area in processing technology development. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -