Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry

Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt; Tangka Julius Kewir; Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain; Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue; Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi; Tedongmo Gouana Jospin; Nono Wandji Brice Leonel

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14

Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry

Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt, Tangka Julius Kewir, Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain, Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue, Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi, Tedongmo Gouana Jospin, Nono Wandji Brice Leonel

Published in International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy (Volume 10, Issue 4)

Received: 5 November 2021 Accepted: 27 November 2021 Published: 9 December 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Biomethanization is a process leading to the production of biogas. Characteristics effects of some materials on biomethanization results are not well known by now. That is the raison of studying the effect of the chemical composition of chosen substrates that are chicken dung, pig slurry and rabbit poop on biomethanization characteristics. These substrates of 1 mm particles size and 13.33% water content were first subjected to chemical analysis. Experimentation consisted of mixing 1.3 kg of each substrate with 6.2 L of water for a 15% dry matter content in the final mixture. Biomethanized cow dung (0.81 L) was added as inoculum to each mixture to give a ratio of inoculum volume to mixture volume of 10%. The biomethanization temperature was maintained at 38°C during all the process. The evolution of the composition and the biogas yield of each substrate was monitored using respectively an infrared biogas analyser and a digital manometer installed on each experimental unit. The main results were as follows: the C/N ratio was highest in rabbit poop (28.57), followed by pig slurry (14) and finally chicken dung (11). The organic matter content was also highest in rabbit poop (80%), but followed by chicken dung (65%) and pig slurry (50%). The final methane content was highest in rabbit poop (58.61%), followed by chicken dung (51.59%) and pig slurry (50.83%). The final percentage of carbon dioxide was highest in the pig slurry (12.62%), followed by the rabbit poop (11.31%) and finally the chicken dung (9.98%). In terms of biogas yield and hydraulic retention time, rabbit poop gave the highest yield of 0.109 m³.kg^-1 of dry matter in 37 days. This were followed by chicken dung with 0.067 m³.kg^-1 of dry matter in 27 days and pig slurry with 0.037 m³.kg^-1 of dry matter in 20 days. In the light of these results, the main conclusion is that, more the organic matter content is high and C/N ratio is in the optimal range of 25 to 30, higher are biogas yield and methane content, and longer is the hydraulic retention time.

Published in	International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy (Volume 10, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14
Page(s)	145-154
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Substrate Characteristics, Biogas Composition Evolution, Yield, Hydraulic Retention Time

References

[1]	Bo, T., Zhu, X., Zhang, L., Tao, Y., He, X., Li, D., Yan, Z., 2014. A new upgraded biogas production process: Coupling microbial electrolysis cell and anaerobic digestion in single-chamber, barrel-shape stainless steel reactor. Electrochemistry Communications journal, ELSEVIER. 45 (2014) 67–70.
[2]	Chandra, R., Vijay V. K., Subbarao P. M. V., Khura T. K., 2012. Production of methane from anaerobic digestion of Jatropha and Pongamia oil cakes. Applied Energy, 93: 148–159.
[3]	Denudt, P., 2017. Modélisation prévisionnelle de la production de biogaz de biogaz. Bimont, France: LHOTELLIER SOLUTIONS, IKOS ENVIRONNEMENT, 20pp.
[4]	Dobre, P., Nicolae, F., Matei, F., 2014. Main factors affecting biogas production - an overview. Bucharest, Romani: Université des sciences agronomiques et de médecine vétérinaire, 14pp.
[5]	Elsayeda, M., Abomohrac, E-F., Aia, P., Jina, K., Fana, Q., Zhanga, Y., 2019. Acetogenesis and methanogenesis liquid digestates for pretreatment of rice straw: A holistic approach for efficient biomethane production and nutrient recycling. Energy Conversion and Management 195 (2019) 447-456.
[6]	Hermand, P., (2008). Production d’effluents porcins et avicoles: de l’énergie à revendre. La biométhanisation: une opportunité pour nous filières. Namur, Belgique: IRCO, 37pp.
[7]	IRENA (Internaational Renewable Energy Agency), 2013. L’Afrique et les énergies renouvelables: La voie vers la croissance durable. Abu Dhabi, Emirates Arabes Unies: IRENA, 36pp.
[8]	Jarret, G., Cozannet, P., Martinez, J., Dourmad, J. Y., 2011. Effect of different quality wheat dried distiller's grain solubles (DDGS) in pig diets on composition of excreta and methane production from faeces and slurry. Livestock Science 140 (2011) 275–282.
[9]	Kadam, R., Panwar, N. L., 2017. Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review. 73: 892–903.
[10]	Kouas, M., 2018. Caractérisation cinétique de la biodégradation de substrats solides et application à l’optimisation et à la modélisation de la co-digestion. Montpellier, France: Université de Montpellier. 243pp.
[11]	McCarty, P. L., Mosey, F. E., 1991. Modelling of anaerobic digestion processes (a discussion of concepts), Water Science and Technology, vol. 24, no 8: 17–33.
[12]	Miliotti, E., Casini, D., Rosi, L., Lotti, G., Rizzo, A. M., Chiaramonti, D., 2020. Lab-scale pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization of biomass digestate: Characterization of solid products and compliance with biochar standards. Biomass and Bioenergy 139 (2020) 105593.
[13]	Moletta, R., Verstraete, W., Brauman, A., Fonty, G., Roger, P., Godon, J. J., Bernet, N., Buffière, P., Noyola, A., Camacho, P., Prévot, C., Berger, S., Couturier, C., Carrère, H., Bouchez, T., Guiot, S. R., Bultel, Y., Klein, J. M., Fouletier, J., Hirtzberger, P., Patureau, D., Hernandez-Raquet, G., Steyer, J. P., Latrille, E., Chatain, V., Ohannessian, A., Germain, P., Arnaud, T., Moletta-Denat, M., 2011. La Méthanisation. 2^e édition. Paris, France: Lavoisier, 547pp.
[14]	Nikiema, M., Sawadogo, J. B., Somda, M. K., Traoré, D., Dianou, D., Traoré, A. S., 2015. Optimisation de la production de Biométhane à partir des déchets organiques municipaux. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 9 (5): 2743 – 2756.
[15]	Ouachem, D., Kaboul, N., 2012. The Marl as a Natural Supply on Broiler Chicken Feed: Effects on the Starter Performance, the Abdominal Fat and the Dropping Moisture. International Journal of Poultry Science 11 (3): 225-228.
[16]	Parawira, W., Murto, M., Read, J. S., Mattiasson, B., 2005. « Profile of hydrolases and biogas production during two-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion of solid potato waste », Process Biochemistry, vol. 40, no 9, p. 3412–3418.
[17]	Pauwels, J. M., van Ranst, E., Verloo, M., and MvondoZe, A., 1992. Manuel de Laboratoire de pédologie. Publications Agricoles N° 28. Bruxelles: AGCD. Bruxelles, Belgique, 180pp.
[18]	Sogang, S. H. B., Nsah-ko, T., Djousse, K. B. M., Tangka, J. K., 2021. Effect of Oil Extraction Conditions on the Anaerobic Fermentation of Jatropha curcas Seed Cakes. Science Journal of Energy Engineering; 9 (1): 1-7.
[19]	Tambone, F., Orzi, V., D'Imporzano, G., Adani, F., 2017. Solid and liquid fractionation of digestate: mass balance, chemical characterization, and agronomic and environmental value, Bioresource Technology S0960-8524(17)31246-4.
[20]	Tangka, J., K., Ketuma, C., T., Ajaga, N., Viyoi, C., T., 2016. Modelling of the Operation of a Small Generator Set Powered by Scrubbed Biogas from Cow Dung. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology. 14 (1): 1-8.
[21]	Traoré, D., Nikiema, M., Somda, M., K., Sawadogo, J., B., Dayeri, D., Traoré, A., S., 2016. Contribution à la biométhanisation de la biomasse végétale: cas des résidus de légumes au Burkina-Faso. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences. 10 (1): 35-47.
[22]	Velthof, G. L., Bannink, A., Oenema, O., van der Meer, H. G., 2000. Relationships between animal nutrition and manure quality, A literature review on C, N, P and S compounds. Holland, Wageningen: Alterra, Green World Research, 42pp.
[23]	Wei, Y., Hong, J., Ji, W., 2018. Thermal characterization and pyrolysis of digestate for phenol production. Fuel 232 (2018) 141-146.
[24]	Yin, Q., Zhu, X., Zhar, G., Bo, T., Yang, Y., Tao, Y., He, X., Li, D., Yan, Z., 2015. Enhanced methane production in an anaerobic digestion and microbial electrolysis cell coupled system with co-cultivation of Geobacter and Methanosarcina. Journal of Environmental Sciences, ScienceDirect, 00496: 5.
[25]	Yoon, Y., M., Kim, S., H., Shin, K., S., Kim, C., H., 2014. Effects of substrate to inoculum ratio on the biochemical methane potential of piggery slaughterhouse wastes. Asian Australas Journal of Animal Sciences. 27 (4): 600-607.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt, Tangka Julius Kewir, Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain, Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue, Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi, et al. (2021). Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry. International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy, 10(4), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt; Tangka Julius Kewir; Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain; Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue; Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi, et al. Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry. Int. J. Sustain. Green Energy 2021, 10(4), 145-154. doi: 10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt, Tangka Julius Kewir, Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain, Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue, Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi, et al. Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry. Int J Sustain Green Energy. 2021;10(4):145-154. doi: 10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14,
  author = {Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt and Tangka Julius Kewir and Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain and Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue and Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi and Tedongmo Gouana Jospin and Nono Wandji Brice Leonel},
  title = {Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry},
  journal = {International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy},
  volume = {10},
  number = {4},
  pages = {145-154},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijrse.20211004.14},
  abstract = {Biomethanization is a process leading to the production of biogas. Characteristics effects of some materials on biomethanization results are not well known by now. That is the raison of studying the effect of the chemical composition of chosen substrates that are chicken dung, pig slurry and rabbit poop on biomethanization characteristics. These substrates of 1 mm particles size and 13.33% water content were first subjected to chemical analysis. Experimentation consisted of mixing 1.3 kg of each substrate with 6.2 L of water for a 15% dry matter content in the final mixture. Biomethanized cow dung (0.81 L) was added as inoculum to each mixture to give a ratio of inoculum volume to mixture volume of 10%. The biomethanization temperature was maintained at 38°C during all the process. The evolution of the composition and the biogas yield of each substrate was monitored using respectively an infrared biogas analyser and a digital manometer installed on each experimental unit. The main results were as follows: the C/N ratio was highest in rabbit poop (28.57), followed by pig slurry (14) and finally chicken dung (11). The organic matter content was also highest in rabbit poop (80%), but followed by chicken dung (65%) and pig slurry (50%). The final methane content was highest in rabbit poop (58.61%), followed by chicken dung (51.59%) and pig slurry (50.83%). The final percentage of carbon dioxide was highest in the pig slurry (12.62%), followed by the rabbit poop (11.31%) and finally the chicken dung (9.98%). In terms of biogas yield and hydraulic retention time, rabbit poop gave the highest yield of 0.109 m3.kg-1 of dry matter in 37 days. This were followed by chicken dung with 0.067 m3.kg-1 of dry matter in 27 days and pig slurry with 0.037 m3.kg-1 of dry matter in 20 days. In the light of these results, the main conclusion is that, more the organic matter content is high and C/N ratio is in the optimal range of 25 to 30, higher are biogas yield and methane content, and longer is the hydraulic retention time.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry
AU - Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt
AU - Tangka Julius Kewir
AU - Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain
AU - Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue
AU - Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi
AU - Tedongmo Gouana Jospin
AU - Nono Wandji Brice Leonel
Y1 - 2021/12/09
PY - 2021
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14
DO - 10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14
T2 - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy
JF - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy
JO - International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy
SP - 145
EP - 154
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2575-1549
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14
AB - Biomethanization is a process leading to the production of biogas. Characteristics effects of some materials on biomethanization results are not well known by now. That is the raison of studying the effect of the chemical composition of chosen substrates that are chicken dung, pig slurry and rabbit poop on biomethanization characteristics. These substrates of 1 mm particles size and 13.33% water content were first subjected to chemical analysis. Experimentation consisted of mixing 1.3 kg of each substrate with 6.2 L of water for a 15% dry matter content in the final mixture. Biomethanized cow dung (0.81 L) was added as inoculum to each mixture to give a ratio of inoculum volume to mixture volume of 10%. The biomethanization temperature was maintained at 38°C during all the process. The evolution of the composition and the biogas yield of each substrate was monitored using respectively an infrared biogas analyser and a digital manometer installed on each experimental unit. The main results were as follows: the C/N ratio was highest in rabbit poop (28.57), followed by pig slurry (14) and finally chicken dung (11). The organic matter content was also highest in rabbit poop (80%), but followed by chicken dung (65%) and pig slurry (50%). The final methane content was highest in rabbit poop (58.61%), followed by chicken dung (51.59%) and pig slurry (50.83%). The final percentage of carbon dioxide was highest in the pig slurry (12.62%), followed by the rabbit poop (11.31%) and finally the chicken dung (9.98%). In terms of biogas yield and hydraulic retention time, rabbit poop gave the highest yield of 0.109 m3.kg-1 of dry matter in 37 days. This were followed by chicken dung with 0.067 m3.kg-1 of dry matter in 27 days and pig slurry with 0.037 m3.kg-1 of dry matter in 20 days. In the light of these results, the main conclusion is that, more the organic matter content is high and C/N ratio is in the optimal range of 25 to 30, higher are biogas yield and methane content, and longer is the hydraulic retention time.
VL - 10
IS - 4
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt

Renewable Energy Laboratory, Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Tangka Julius Kewir

Renewable Energy Laboratory, Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain

Renewable Energy Laboratory, Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue

Mechanical Engineering Department, College of Technology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi

Renewable Energy Laboratory, Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Tedongmo Gouana Jospin

Renewable Energy Laboratory, Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Nono Wandji Brice Leonel

Renewable Energy Laboratory, Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt, Tangka Julius Kewir, Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain, Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue, Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi, et al. (2021). Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry. International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy, 10(4), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt; Tangka Julius Kewir; Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain; Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue; Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi, et al. Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry. Int. J. Sustain. Green Energy 2021, 10(4), 145-154. doi: 10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt, Tangka Julius Kewir, Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain, Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue, Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi, et al. Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry. Int J Sustain Green Energy. 2021;10(4):145-154. doi: 10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14,
  author = {Sogang Segning Harry Bertholt and Tangka Julius Kewir and Djousse Kanouo Boris Merlain and Nsah-Ko Tchoumboue and Lontsi Kuefouet Alexi and Tedongmo Gouana Jospin and Nono Wandji Brice Leonel},
  title = {Characterization of Wet Mesophilic Biomethanization of Three Types of Materials: Chicken Dung, Rabbit Poop and Pig Slurry},
  journal = {International Journal of Sustainable and Green Energy},
  volume = {10},
  number = {4},
  pages = {145-154},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijrse.20211004.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijrse.20211004.14},
  abstract = {Biomethanization is a process leading to the production of biogas. Characteristics effects of some materials on biomethanization results are not well known by now. That is the raison of studying the effect of the chemical composition of chosen substrates that are chicken dung, pig slurry and rabbit poop on biomethanization characteristics. These substrates of 1 mm particles size and 13.33% water content were first subjected to chemical analysis. Experimentation consisted of mixing 1.3 kg of each substrate with 6.2 L of water for a 15% dry matter content in the final mixture. Biomethanized cow dung (0.81 L) was added as inoculum to each mixture to give a ratio of inoculum volume to mixture volume of 10%. The biomethanization temperature was maintained at 38°C during all the process. The evolution of the composition and the biogas yield of each substrate was monitored using respectively an infrared biogas analyser and a digital manometer installed on each experimental unit. The main results were as follows: the C/N ratio was highest in rabbit poop (28.57), followed by pig slurry (14) and finally chicken dung (11). The organic matter content was also highest in rabbit poop (80%), but followed by chicken dung (65%) and pig slurry (50%). The final methane content was highest in rabbit poop (58.61%), followed by chicken dung (51.59%) and pig slurry (50.83%). The final percentage of carbon dioxide was highest in the pig slurry (12.62%), followed by the rabbit poop (11.31%) and finally the chicken dung (9.98%). In terms of biogas yield and hydraulic retention time, rabbit poop gave the highest yield of 0.109 m3.kg-1 of dry matter in 37 days. This were followed by chicken dung with 0.067 m3.kg-1 of dry matter in 27 days and pig slurry with 0.037 m3.kg-1 of dry matter in 20 days. In the light of these results, the main conclusion is that, more the organic matter content is high and C/N ratio is in the optimal range of 25 to 30, higher are biogas yield and methane content, and longer is the hydraulic retention time.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download