The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector

Elijah Ige Ohimain

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19

| Peer-Reviewed

The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector

Elijah Ige Ohimain

Published in International Journal of Materials Science and Applications (Volume 3, Issue 2)

Received: 1 March 2014 Accepted: 8 April 2014 Published: 10 April 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The consumption of cement in Nigeria has increased to 18.5 million metric tonnes per annum (MMTPA) due to rapid urbanization and industrialization. Despite the huge demand for cement in Nigeria, domestic production was unable to meet the demand; hence the country relied on importation of cement to meet domestic construction needs. In 2002, the government adopted and implemented the backward integration policy (BIP), which requires cement import licenses be allocated only to importers who show proof of building factories for local cement manufacturing in Nigeria. Incentives under the policy include waiver of VAT and custom duty for importation of cement production equipment. The aim of this paper is to access the effect of the policy on the cement sector in Nigeria ten years after implementation. Following the implementation of the BIP, all the moribund existing government owned cement plants were privatized, while the private sector installed additional production and bagging capacities. Results showed that before BIP, Nigeria had an installed capacity of 4.03 MMTPA, but producing only 2 MMTPA. But 10 years after the implementation of the BIP, the country now produces 28 MMTPA with a total installed production capacity of 45 MMTPA and bagging capacity of 27.7 MMTPA, while additional 14 cement production plants of various capacities are under construction. Now that Nigeria has become self-sufficient in cement production, with domestic production exceeding the country’s need, additional policies that would address the new challenges of the cement sector particularly cement glut is required.

Published in	International Journal of Materials Science and Applications (Volume 3, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19
Page(s)	70-78
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Industrial Policy, Limestone, Solid Mineral, Vision 20: 2020

References

[1]	IEA ETSAP (2010). Cement production. IEA ETSAP - Technology brief 103 - June 2010. Energy Technology Systems Anal Programme - www.etsap.org.
[2]	E. M. Osano, DBA Assignment value chain analysis. Maastricht school of management, 2008.
[3]	S. Wang and X. Han, Sustainable cement production with improved energy efficiency and energy CO2 mitigation. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Sciences vol. 2, 2012, pp. 123 – 128.
[4]	H. G. Van Oss, US and World cement production 2008 and 2009. USGS Online Survey, 2010.
[5]	Pan African Capital, Nigerian cement industry. A review of opportunities and recurrent price hike. 2012, pp. 1 – 16.
[6]	FGN, Report of the vision 2020 national technical working group on manufacturing thematic area, 2009.
[7]	J. Kuenen, Cement production. EMEP/EEA emission inventory guidebook 2009.
[8]	British Geological Survey, Cement raw materials. Natural environment research council, 2005.
[9]	Y. Ali, The contribution of cement industry in economic development of Pakistan. Directorate general of training and research (Inland Revenue), Lahore. 2012, pp. 1 – 32.
[10]	D. N. Huntzinger, and T. D. Eatmon, A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, pp. 668 – 675.
[11]	Ministry of Solid Minerals Development, An inventory of solid mineral potentials of Nigeria. Prospectus for Investors, 2000, pp. 15.
[12]	Raw Materials Research and Development Council (RMRDC), Steel raw materials in Nigeria. Federal Ministry of Science and Technology, Abuja. 2001.
[13]	S.A. Mohammed, Privatization of the iron and steel industry in Africa. Paper presented at the 8th International Arab Iron and Steel Conference, held at Doha, Qatar 17th – 19th march, 2008.
[14]	S. Momoh, Cement glut and the deindustrialization of Nigeria debate. Business day, 2013, Wednesday 2 January.
[15]	Global Cement News, Dangote 6MT Calabar plant ready by July 2012. Wednesday May 30, 2012a.
[16]	O. Salami, New cement policy underway – Aganga. January 08, 2013. Filled under Business.
[17]	L. Adeloye, FG to unveil new cement policy dumps BIP. Punch January 08, 2013.
[18]	D. Abellegah, FG to introduce new backward integration policy in the cement industry. Business news January 08, 2013.
[19]	World Cement, Two new cement plants to add 4.2 million tpa of cement capacity in India, 2011.
[20]	Global cement News, CMAN declares Nigeria self-sufficient in cement. Monday October 08, 2012.
[21]	Global Cement News, Nigerian producers seek import ban before August 2012. Wednesday May 25, 2012.
[22]	Global cement News, Dangote to shut Gboko plant. Friday December 07, 2012.
[23]	D. Stephen, Nigeria prepares new policy to ease the tempest from cement glut, 2013.
[24]	E. Okoroanyanwu and A. Sanyaolu, Cement sector groans under massive importation. Daily sun January 03, 2013.
[25]	Manufacturing Today, Overview of the Nigerian cement industry. Tuesday August 02, 2011.
[26]	Naija 247 News, Dangote shuts Nigerian cement plant over glut. Wednesday December 05, 2012.
[27]	M. Akaigwe, Real reasons cement prices is high. Daily Sun, Thursday June 23, 2011.
[28]	Lead Capital limited, Nigeria’s cement manufacturing industry report. 2008, pp. 1 – 19.
[29]	S.K. Mandal, and S. Madheswaran, Technological progress, scale effect and total factor productivity growth in India cement industry: panel estimation of stochastic production frontier. Working paper, 2009, pp. 1- 20.
[30]	A. Samanta, A. Chowdhury, and A. Dutta, Process automation of cement plant. International Journal of Information Technology, control and Automation 22012, pp. 63 – 73.
[31]	S. Tongbo, China’s cement industry towards sustainability. Cement production is central to reducing energy consumption. Ital Cement group. http://www.italcementigroup.com/NR/rdonlyres/4FFAD881-52B9-439B-8D51-965D7CC4588F/0/Tongbo_UK.pdf downloaded 9 Feb 2013.
[32]	United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Iraq private sector growth and employment generation. An overview of the Iraqi cement industry, 2007, pp. 1 – 28.
[33]	A.F., Adenikinju, Electricity infrastructure failure in Nigeria: a survey-based analysis of the costs and adjustment responses. Energy Policy, 2003, pp. 1519-1530.
[34]	S. Khurana, R. Banerjee and U. Gaitonde, Energy balance and cogeneration for a cement plant. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2002, pp. 485 – 494.
[35]	C. Koroneos, G. Roumbas and N. Moussiopoulos, Exergy analysis of cement production. International Journal Energy, 2005, vol. 1, pp. 55 – 68.
[36]	A. M. Radwan, Different possible ways for saving energy in the cement production. Advances in Applied Science Research, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 1162 – 1174.
[37]	International Finance Corporation (IFC), Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines for Cement and Lime Manufacturing. 2006, pp. 1 -16.
[38]	United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) and Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI), Japan (1994). Output of a seminar on energy conservation in cement industry. The Energy Conservation center (ECC), Japan.
[39]	C. A. Hendriks, E. Worrell, D. de Jager, K. Blok and P. Riemer, Emission Reduction of Greenhouse Gases from the Cement Industry. 2004. IEA Greenhouse Gas R & D Programme.
[40]	European Commission (EC). Reference document on best available techniques in the cement, lime and magnesium oxide manufacturing industries, 2010.
[41]	European Cement Research Academy (ECRA). Development of state of the art- techniques in cement manufacturing: try a look ahead; cement sustainability initiative (CSI).
[42]	Cembureau, Best available techniques for the cement industry, 2009.
[43]	Business Dispatch (undated). Cement war: Dangote, WAPCO hit back at IBETO.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Elijah Ige Ohimain. (2014). The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector. International Journal of Materials Science and Applications, 3(2), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Elijah Ige Ohimain. The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector. Int. J. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2014, 3(2), 70-78. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Elijah Ige Ohimain. The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector. Int J Mater Sci Appl. 2014;3(2):70-78. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19,
  author = {Elijah Ige Ohimain},
  title = {The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector},
  journal = {International Journal of Materials Science and Applications},
  volume = {3},
  number = {2},
  pages = {70-78},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmsa.20140302.19},
  abstract = {The consumption of cement in Nigeria has increased to 18.5 million metric tonnes per annum (MMTPA) due to rapid urbanization and industrialization. Despite the huge demand for cement in Nigeria, domestic production was unable to meet the demand; hence the country relied on importation of cement to meet domestic construction needs. In 2002, the government adopted and implemented the backward integration policy (BIP), which requires cement import licenses be allocated only to importers who show proof of building factories for local cement manufacturing in Nigeria. Incentives under the policy include waiver of VAT and custom duty for importation of cement production equipment. The aim of this paper is to access the effect of the policy on the cement sector in Nigeria ten years after implementation. Following the implementation of the BIP, all the moribund existing government owned cement plants were privatized, while the private sector installed additional production and bagging capacities. Results showed that before BIP, Nigeria had an installed capacity of 4.03 MMTPA, but producing only 2 MMTPA. But 10 years after the implementation of the BIP, the country now produces 28 MMTPA with a total installed production capacity of 45 MMTPA and bagging capacity of 27.7 MMTPA, while additional 14 cement production plants of various capacities are under construction. Now that Nigeria has become self-sufficient in cement production, with domestic production exceeding the country’s need, additional policies that would address the new challenges of the cement sector particularly cement glut is required.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector
AU  - Elijah Ige Ohimain
Y1  - 2014/04/10
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19
T2  - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications
JF  - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications
JO  - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications
SP  - 70
EP  - 78
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2643
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19
AB  - The consumption of cement in Nigeria has increased to 18.5 million metric tonnes per annum (MMTPA) due to rapid urbanization and industrialization. Despite the huge demand for cement in Nigeria, domestic production was unable to meet the demand; hence the country relied on importation of cement to meet domestic construction needs. In 2002, the government adopted and implemented the backward integration policy (BIP), which requires cement import licenses be allocated only to importers who show proof of building factories for local cement manufacturing in Nigeria. Incentives under the policy include waiver of VAT and custom duty for importation of cement production equipment. The aim of this paper is to access the effect of the policy on the cement sector in Nigeria ten years after implementation. Following the implementation of the BIP, all the moribund existing government owned cement plants were privatized, while the private sector installed additional production and bagging capacities. Results showed that before BIP, Nigeria had an installed capacity of 4.03 MMTPA, but producing only 2 MMTPA. But 10 years after the implementation of the BIP, the country now produces 28 MMTPA with a total installed production capacity of 45 MMTPA and bagging capacity of 27.7 MMTPA, while additional 14 cement production plants of various capacities are under construction. Now that Nigeria has become self-sufficient in cement production, with domestic production exceeding the country’s need, additional policies that would address the new challenges of the cement sector particularly cement glut is required.
VL  - 3
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Elijah Ige Ohimain

Biomining and Geomicrobiology Research Unit, Biological Science Department, Faculty of Science, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Elijah Ige Ohimain. (2014). The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector. International Journal of Materials Science and Applications, 3(2), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Elijah Ige Ohimain. The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector. Int. J. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2014, 3(2), 70-78. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Elijah Ige Ohimain. The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector. Int J Mater Sci Appl. 2014;3(2):70-78. doi: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19,
  author = {Elijah Ige Ohimain},
  title = {The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector},
  journal = {International Journal of Materials Science and Applications},
  volume = {3},
  number = {2},
  pages = {70-78},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijmsa.20140302.19},
  abstract = {The consumption of cement in Nigeria has increased to 18.5 million metric tonnes per annum (MMTPA) due to rapid urbanization and industrialization. Despite the huge demand for cement in Nigeria, domestic production was unable to meet the demand; hence the country relied on importation of cement to meet domestic construction needs. In 2002, the government adopted and implemented the backward integration policy (BIP), which requires cement import licenses be allocated only to importers who show proof of building factories for local cement manufacturing in Nigeria. Incentives under the policy include waiver of VAT and custom duty for importation of cement production equipment. The aim of this paper is to access the effect of the policy on the cement sector in Nigeria ten years after implementation. Following the implementation of the BIP, all the moribund existing government owned cement plants were privatized, while the private sector installed additional production and bagging capacities. Results showed that before BIP, Nigeria had an installed capacity of 4.03 MMTPA, but producing only 2 MMTPA. But 10 years after the implementation of the BIP, the country now produces 28 MMTPA with a total installed production capacity of 45 MMTPA and bagging capacity of 27.7 MMTPA, while additional 14 cement production plants of various capacities are under construction. Now that Nigeria has become self-sufficient in cement production, with domestic production exceeding the country’s need, additional policies that would address the new challenges of the cement sector particularly cement glut is required.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Success of the Backward Integration Policy in the Nigerian Cement Sector
AU  - Elijah Ige Ohimain
Y1  - 2014/04/10
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19
T2  - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications
JF  - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications
JO  - International Journal of Materials Science and Applications
SP  - 70
EP  - 78
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2643
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20140302.19
AB  - The consumption of cement in Nigeria has increased to 18.5 million metric tonnes per annum (MMTPA) due to rapid urbanization and industrialization. Despite the huge demand for cement in Nigeria, domestic production was unable to meet the demand; hence the country relied on importation of cement to meet domestic construction needs. In 2002, the government adopted and implemented the backward integration policy (BIP), which requires cement import licenses be allocated only to importers who show proof of building factories for local cement manufacturing in Nigeria. Incentives under the policy include waiver of VAT and custom duty for importation of cement production equipment. The aim of this paper is to access the effect of the policy on the cement sector in Nigeria ten years after implementation. Following the implementation of the BIP, all the moribund existing government owned cement plants were privatized, while the private sector installed additional production and bagging capacities. Results showed that before BIP, Nigeria had an installed capacity of 4.03 MMTPA, but producing only 2 MMTPA. But 10 years after the implementation of the BIP, the country now produces 28 MMTPA with a total installed production capacity of 45 MMTPA and bagging capacity of 27.7 MMTPA, while additional 14 cement production plants of various capacities are under construction. Now that Nigeria has become self-sufficient in cement production, with domestic production exceeding the country’s need, additional policies that would address the new challenges of the cement sector particularly cement glut is required.
VL  - 3
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download