Cooperatives enable people to improve their social and economic conditions by pooling their resource and efforts together in ways that are more productive than working individually. The aim of this study was to identify determinants to performance of MPACs. Multistage sampling was employed to select study area and sample households. Study area selected purposively because of its accessibility and relatively large numbers of functional cooperatives. Primary data were collected from 122 members of sample cooperatives those were selected using simple random sampling proportional to size of members in the cooperative through semi-structured interview schedule and key informant interview and focus discussion. Moreover, secondary data were obtained from audit reports of sample cooperatives. The collected data entered to SPSS version 20. Descriptive analysis such as mean, percentage and frequency were analyzed along with probit model. However, their moderate involvement in service provision of agricultural input distribution cooperatives output marketing service in the study area was found as it was not outstanding that majority of the cooperatives did not carry out purchasing of farmers output. The model result revealed that from thirteen explanatory variables included in the model for analysis numbers of shareholding in cooperative, membership to union and working relationship in cooperative were found to be significantly and positively related to members’ satisfaction to overall performance of MPACs. On the other hand, family size of household, cooperative age and degree of corruption in cooperative were found to be significantly influence degree of member’s satisfaction to their cooperative overall performance negatively. Therefore, cooperative management and staff members should strive to render valuable services to its members.
Published in | International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (Volume 8, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijebo.20200802.11 |
Page(s) | 23-30 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cooperative, Determinants, Multipurpose and Performance
[1] | Bezabih Emana, (2009). Cooperatives: A Path to Economic and Social Empowerment in Ethiopia, CoopAfrica, Working Paper No. 9, ILO, Rome. |
[2] | Veerakumaran, G., (2007). Ethiopian Cooperative Movement-An Explorative Study. |
[3] | Bernard, T., Gashaw, Tesfaye,& Solomon, Lema., (2013). Agricultural cooperatives in Ethiopia: Results of the 2012 ATA Baseline Survey International Food Policy Research Institute Washington, DC. |
[4] | Destahun Haile, (2007). Cooperative approach to local development: the case of coffee cooperative unions in coffee growing regions of Ethiopia, M. A. thesis, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. |
[5] | Rao. P. M. S and Tesfay Gebrehiwet, (2014). Member control practices in cooperatives. Journal of Business Management and Social Sciences Research (JBM and SSR); ISSN No: 2319-5614, Volume 3, No. 5. |
[6] | Getnet, Kindie. & Anullo, Tesfaye., (2012). Agricultural cooperatives and rural livelihoods: Evidence from Ethiopia. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83 (2), Pp. 181–198. |
[7] | CSA (Central Statistical Authority), (2007). Summary and statistical report of the 2007 population and housing census. |
[8] | Mensah, O., Damoah, O. & Robert, A., (2012). Assessing Farmer's Satisfaction of Agronomic Services Received in Ghana Using the SERVQUAL Model- a Case Study of Kumasi Metropolis. International journal of Business and Social Science, 3 (19), Pp. 51–60. |
[9] | Greene, W. H., (2002). Econometric Analysis. Fivth Edition, Pretice Hall International, Inc. New York. |
[10] | Demeke Tilahun, (2007). Performance of Coffee Marketing Cooperatives and Members Satisfaction in Dale District: SNNPRS-Southern. M. Sc. Thesis, Haramaya University, Ethiopia. |
[11] | Costa, A. C. 2003. Work team trust and effectiveness. Personnel Review, 32, 605–623. |
[12] | Almaz, Mesfine., (2008). Comparative Study on the Performance of Dairy Cooperative Input and output Marketing in Astbie Womerta, Alamata and Enderta woreda in Tigray Region. M.Sc Thesis, Mekelle University, Ethiopia. |
[13] | Dejene Debebe. & Matthews Haile., (2016). A Study on factors affecting farmer's cooperative membership increment in Bench Maji Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia., 6 (2), Pp. 129–138. |
APA Style
Assefa Adane, Degsew Melak, Wuletaw Mekuria. (2020). Determinants to Performance of Multipurpose Agricultural Cooperatives (MPACs): A Case of Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar, Ethiopia. International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8(2), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20200802.11
ACS Style
Assefa Adane; Degsew Melak; Wuletaw Mekuria. Determinants to Performance of Multipurpose Agricultural Cooperatives (MPACs): A Case of Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar, Ethiopia. Int. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2020, 8(2), 23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20200802.11
AMA Style
Assefa Adane, Degsew Melak, Wuletaw Mekuria. Determinants to Performance of Multipurpose Agricultural Cooperatives (MPACs): A Case of Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar, Ethiopia. Int J Econ Behav Organ. 2020;8(2):23-30. doi: 10.11648/j.ijebo.20200802.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijebo.20200802.11, author = {Assefa Adane and Degsew Melak and Wuletaw Mekuria}, title = {Determinants to Performance of Multipurpose Agricultural Cooperatives (MPACs): A Case of Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar, Ethiopia}, journal = {International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization}, volume = {8}, number = {2}, pages = {23-30}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijebo.20200802.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20200802.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijebo.20200802.11}, abstract = {Cooperatives enable people to improve their social and economic conditions by pooling their resource and efforts together in ways that are more productive than working individually. The aim of this study was to identify determinants to performance of MPACs. Multistage sampling was employed to select study area and sample households. Study area selected purposively because of its accessibility and relatively large numbers of functional cooperatives. Primary data were collected from 122 members of sample cooperatives those were selected using simple random sampling proportional to size of members in the cooperative through semi-structured interview schedule and key informant interview and focus discussion. Moreover, secondary data were obtained from audit reports of sample cooperatives. The collected data entered to SPSS version 20. Descriptive analysis such as mean, percentage and frequency were analyzed along with probit model. However, their moderate involvement in service provision of agricultural input distribution cooperatives output marketing service in the study area was found as it was not outstanding that majority of the cooperatives did not carry out purchasing of farmers output. The model result revealed that from thirteen explanatory variables included in the model for analysis numbers of shareholding in cooperative, membership to union and working relationship in cooperative were found to be significantly and positively related to members’ satisfaction to overall performance of MPACs. On the other hand, family size of household, cooperative age and degree of corruption in cooperative were found to be significantly influence degree of member’s satisfaction to their cooperative overall performance negatively. Therefore, cooperative management and staff members should strive to render valuable services to its members.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Determinants to Performance of Multipurpose Agricultural Cooperatives (MPACs): A Case of Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar, Ethiopia AU - Assefa Adane AU - Degsew Melak AU - Wuletaw Mekuria Y1 - 2020/04/28 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20200802.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijebo.20200802.11 T2 - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization JF - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization JO - International Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization SP - 23 EP - 30 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-7616 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijebo.20200802.11 AB - Cooperatives enable people to improve their social and economic conditions by pooling their resource and efforts together in ways that are more productive than working individually. The aim of this study was to identify determinants to performance of MPACs. Multistage sampling was employed to select study area and sample households. Study area selected purposively because of its accessibility and relatively large numbers of functional cooperatives. Primary data were collected from 122 members of sample cooperatives those were selected using simple random sampling proportional to size of members in the cooperative through semi-structured interview schedule and key informant interview and focus discussion. Moreover, secondary data were obtained from audit reports of sample cooperatives. The collected data entered to SPSS version 20. Descriptive analysis such as mean, percentage and frequency were analyzed along with probit model. However, their moderate involvement in service provision of agricultural input distribution cooperatives output marketing service in the study area was found as it was not outstanding that majority of the cooperatives did not carry out purchasing of farmers output. The model result revealed that from thirteen explanatory variables included in the model for analysis numbers of shareholding in cooperative, membership to union and working relationship in cooperative were found to be significantly and positively related to members’ satisfaction to overall performance of MPACs. On the other hand, family size of household, cooperative age and degree of corruption in cooperative were found to be significantly influence degree of member’s satisfaction to their cooperative overall performance negatively. Therefore, cooperative management and staff members should strive to render valuable services to its members. VL - 8 IS - 2 ER -