Background: Submucosal tumors of the digestive tract are common diseases, which are difficult to diagnose and treat because of their occurrence in the digestive tract. In the past, follow-up observation or surgical operation were usually adopted for SMT, but the surgical operation had many disadvantages such as large trauma, many complications and long postoperative recovery time. In contrast, endoscopic therapy is characterized by safety. The clinical features of endoscopic mass resection remain unclear. Objective: To analyze the clinical features of submucosal masses of digestive tract. The pathological types and distribution of the tumor and the safety of endoscopic surgery were also discussedMethods: We analyzed the clinical data of 108 patients with submucosal tumors of the digestive tract by endoscopic surgery in our hospital. Results: The submucosal masses of the digestive tract were mainly leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, mostly benign lesions, mainly distributed in the mucosa and muscularis propria, and there was no difference between the sexes. The operative complication rate of endoscopic surgery for submucosal masses of digestive tract is low. Conclusion: c of small gastric submucosal tumors is safe enough and effective in diagnosis and treatment. EMR and ERE are still commonly used endoscopic surgery methods at present.
| Published in | International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijbse.20210901.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-5 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Submucosal Tumor, Endoscopic Resection, EMR
| [1] | Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2020; 32 (2): 219-239. |
| [2] | Tang X, Tan Y, Liu D. Angiolipoma: a rare esophageal submucosal tumor. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 86 (2): 399-400. |
| [3] | Shibata M, Kusafuka K, Ono H. A Rare Submucosal Tumor of the Esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152 (1): e6-e7. |
| [4] | Zhang SL, Du X, Tang XY, Liu D. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for an unusually sized esophageal submucosal tumor protruding into the mediastinum. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2019; 111 (9): 710-711. |
| [5] | Hashimoto R, Okuzono T, Akahira J. An Uncommon Gastric Submucosal Tumor with Mucosal Erosion. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 16 (5): e57-e58. |
| [6] | Liu Q, Ding L, Qiu X, Meng F. Updated evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020; 73: 28-41. |
| [7] | Du Z, Ding W, Chen T. Suitability and efficacy of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for the treatment of giant leiomyoma in the middle and lower esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2019; 32 (12): 55-59. |
| [8] | Hosokawa K, Yoshida S. [Recent advances in endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998; 25 (4): 476-483. |
| [9] | Nishida T, Goto O, Raut CP, Yahagi N. Diagnostic and treatment strategy for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer. 2016; 122 (20): 3110-3118. |
| [10] | Nishida T, Blay JY, Hirota S, Kitagawa Y, Kang YK. The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines. Gastric Cancer. 2016; 19 (1): 3-14. |
| [11] | Lu J, Jiao T, Li Y, Zheng M, Lu X. Facilitating retroflexed endoscopic full-thickness resection through loop-mediated or rope-mediated countertraction (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016; 83 (1): 223-228. |
| [12] | Shi D, Li R, Chen W, Zhang D, Zhang L, Guo R, et al. Application of novel endoloops to close the defects resulted from endoscopic full-thickness resection with single-channel gastroscope: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc. 2017; 31 (2): 837-842. |
| [13] | Pioche M, Bertrand G, Rivory J. Correction: Endoscopic perforation during EMR or ESD: who should take care of the patient? Endosc Int Open. 2018; 6 (3): E382. |
| [14] | Yamamoto H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection--current success and future directions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 9 (9): 519-529. |
| [15] | Gotoda T. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2007; 10 (1): 1-11. |
| [16] | Cheng XL, Liu H. Gastric adenocarcinoma mimicking a submucosal tumor: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2019; 7 (19): 3138-3144. |
APA Style
Weixiang Ye, Zhaolin Chen. (2021). Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of Submucosal Tumor of Digestive Tract Under Endoscope. International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 9(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210901.11
ACS Style
Weixiang Ye; Zhaolin Chen. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of Submucosal Tumor of Digestive Tract Under Endoscope. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9(1), 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbse.20210901.11
AMA Style
Weixiang Ye, Zhaolin Chen. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of Submucosal Tumor of Digestive Tract Under Endoscope. Int J Biomed Sci Eng. 2021;9(1):1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbse.20210901.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijbse.20210901.11,
author = {Weixiang Ye and Zhaolin Chen},
title = {Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of Submucosal Tumor of Digestive Tract Under Endoscope},
journal = {International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {1-5},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijbse.20210901.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210901.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbse.20210901.11},
abstract = {Background: Submucosal tumors of the digestive tract are common diseases, which are difficult to diagnose and treat because of their occurrence in the digestive tract. In the past, follow-up observation or surgical operation were usually adopted for SMT, but the surgical operation had many disadvantages such as large trauma, many complications and long postoperative recovery time. In contrast, endoscopic therapy is characterized by safety. The clinical features of endoscopic mass resection remain unclear. Objective: To analyze the clinical features of submucosal masses of digestive tract. The pathological types and distribution of the tumor and the safety of endoscopic surgery were also discussedMethods: We analyzed the clinical data of 108 patients with submucosal tumors of the digestive tract by endoscopic surgery in our hospital. Results: The submucosal masses of the digestive tract were mainly leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, mostly benign lesions, mainly distributed in the mucosa and muscularis propria, and there was no difference between the sexes. The operative complication rate of endoscopic surgery for submucosal masses of digestive tract is low. Conclusion: c of small gastric submucosal tumors is safe enough and effective in diagnosis and treatment. EMR and ERE are still commonly used endoscopic surgery methods at present.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of Submucosal Tumor of Digestive Tract Under Endoscope AU - Weixiang Ye AU - Zhaolin Chen Y1 - 2021/01/22 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210901.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijbse.20210901.11 T2 - International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering JF - International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering JO - International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering SP - 1 EP - 5 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7235 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbse.20210901.11 AB - Background: Submucosal tumors of the digestive tract are common diseases, which are difficult to diagnose and treat because of their occurrence in the digestive tract. In the past, follow-up observation or surgical operation were usually adopted for SMT, but the surgical operation had many disadvantages such as large trauma, many complications and long postoperative recovery time. In contrast, endoscopic therapy is characterized by safety. The clinical features of endoscopic mass resection remain unclear. Objective: To analyze the clinical features of submucosal masses of digestive tract. The pathological types and distribution of the tumor and the safety of endoscopic surgery were also discussedMethods: We analyzed the clinical data of 108 patients with submucosal tumors of the digestive tract by endoscopic surgery in our hospital. Results: The submucosal masses of the digestive tract were mainly leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, mostly benign lesions, mainly distributed in the mucosa and muscularis propria, and there was no difference between the sexes. The operative complication rate of endoscopic surgery for submucosal masses of digestive tract is low. Conclusion: c of small gastric submucosal tumors is safe enough and effective in diagnosis and treatment. EMR and ERE are still commonly used endoscopic surgery methods at present. VL - 9 IS - 1 ER -
Email: