Batch testing involves testing items in a group rather than testing the items individually for resource saving purposes. Estimation of proportion of a trait of interest using batch testing model insulates individuals of a population against stigma. In this paper, an estimator of the unknown proportion of a trait in batch testing model based on a quality control process is constructed and its properties discussed. In quality control, a batch is rejected if constituent defective members are greater than l, the cut off value. It is observed that if l = 0, then the obvious batch testing strategy is obtained. Hence when l > 0, the batch testing strategy is generalized. The proposed model is superior to the existing models when the proportion of a trait is relatively high. The application of the model on Genetically Modified Organisms contamination is carried out.
Published in | American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics (Volume 4, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34 |
Page(s) | 619-629 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Quality Control, Batching Testing, Cut off Value, Proportion, Genetically Modified Organisms
[1] | Dorfman, R. (1943). The detection of defective members of large population. Annals of Matematical Statistics, 14, 436-440. |
[2] | Johnson, N. I., Kotz, S. and Wu, X. (1991). Inspection errors for Attributes in Quality Control. London; Chapman and Hall. |
[3] | Nyongesa, L. K. (2004). Testing For the Presence of Disease by Pooling Samples. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat., 46, 901 -909. |
[4] | Thomson, K. H. (1962). Estimation of the Proportion of Vectors in a Natural Population of Insects, Biometrics, 18, 568-578. |
[5] | Sobel, M., and Elashoff, R.M., (1975). Group -testing with a new goal, Estimation. Biometrika, 62, 181-193. |
[6] | Gastwirth, L. J. and Johnson, W. O. (1994). Screening with Cost-Effective Quality Control: Potential Applications to HIV and Drug Testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 972-981. |
[7] | Brookmeyer, R. (1999). Analysis of Multistage Pooling Studies of Biological Specimens for Estimating Disease Incidence and Prevalence. Biometrics, 55, 608-612. |
[8] | Hughes-Oliver, M. J. and Swallow, H. W. (1994). A Two-Stage Adaptive Procedure for Estimating Small Proportions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 982-993. |
[9] | Tu, M. X., Litvak, E. and Pagano, M. (1995). On the Informative and Accuracy of Pooled Testing in Estimating Prevalence of a Rare Disease: Application to HIV Screening. Biometrika, 82, 287-297. |
[10] | Xie, M., Tatsuoka, K., Sacks, J. and Young, S.S. (2001). Group Testing With Blockers and Synergism. Journal of the American statistical association, 96, 92-102. |
[11] | Hepworth, G. (1999). Estimation of Proportions by Group Testing. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne. |
[12] | Biggerstaff, B. (2008). Confidence Intervals for the Difference of two proportions Estimated from Pooled samples. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 13, 478-496. |
[13] | Nyongesa, L. K., (2011). Dual Estimation of Prevalence and Disease Incidence in Pool-Testing Strategy. Communication in Statistics Theory and Method. 40, 1-12. |
[14] | Tebbs, J. M., McMaham, C. S. and Bilder, C. R. (20130. Two-stage Hierarchical Group Testing for Multiple Infections with Application to the Infertility Prevention Project, Biometrics, 69, 1064-1073. |
[15] | Hepworth, G. and Watson, R. (2015). Revisiting Retesting in the Estimation of Proportions by Group- Testing, Communications in Statistics-simulation and Computation, DOI:10.1080/03610918.2014.960725. |
[16] | McMaham, C. S., Tebbs, J. M. and Bilder, C. R. (2013). Regression Models for Group Testing Data with Pool Dilution Effects, Biostatistics, 14, 284-298. |
[17] | Montegmery, D. C. (2009). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (6th edition). New York, John Wiley and Sons. |
[18] | Hepworth, G. and Watson, R. (2009). Debiased Estimation of Proportions in Group Testing. Applied Statistics, 58, 105-121. |
[19] | Schaarschmidt, F. (2007). Experimental Design for One-sided Confidence Intervals or Hypothesis tests in Binomial Group Testing. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science, 2, 32-40. |
[20] | Bhattacharyya, G. K., Karandinos, M. G., and DeFoliart, G. R. (1979). Point Estimates and Confidence Intervals for Infection Rates Using Pooled Organisms in Epidemiologic Studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 124-131. |
[21] | Swallow, W. H. (1985). Group Testing for Estimating Infection Rates and Probability of Disease Transmission. Phytopathology, 75, 882-889. |
[22] | Lovison, G., Gore, S. D. and Patil, G. P. (1994). Design and Analysis of Composite Sampling Procedures: a review. In Handbook of Statistics, 12, 103-166. Amsterdam: Elsevier. |
[23] | Hung, M. and Swallow, H. W. (2000). Use of Binomial Group Testing In Tests of Hypotheses for Classification or Quantitative Covariates. Biometrics, 56, 204-212. |
[24] | Remund, K. M., Wright, D. L. and Holden, L. R. (2001). Statistical Considerations in Seed purity testing for transgenic traits. Seed Science Research, 11, 101-120. |
[25] | Kobilinsky, A. and Bertheau, Y. (2005). Minimum Cost Acceptance sampling plans for Grain Control with application to GMO detection. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 75, 189-200. |
[26] | Montesinos-Lopes, O. A., Montesinos, A., Eskridge, K. and Crossa, J. (2014). Estimating a Proportion based on Group Testing for Correlated Binary Response. J Biomet biostat, 5, 185-196. |
[27] | Liu, C., Liu, A., Zhang, B. and Zhang, Z. (2013). Improved Confidence Intervals of a small Probability from Pooled Testing with Misclassification. Frontiers in Public Health, DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2013.00039. |
APA Style
Ronald W. Wanyonyi, Kennedy L. Nyongesa, Adu Wasike. (2015). Estimation of Proportion of a Trait by Batch Testing Model in a Quality Control Process. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 4(6), 619-629. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34
ACS Style
Ronald W. Wanyonyi; Kennedy L. Nyongesa; Adu Wasike. Estimation of Proportion of a Trait by Batch Testing Model in a Quality Control Process. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 2015, 4(6), 619-629. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34
AMA Style
Ronald W. Wanyonyi, Kennedy L. Nyongesa, Adu Wasike. Estimation of Proportion of a Trait by Batch Testing Model in a Quality Control Process. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2015;4(6):619-629. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34
@article{10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34, author = {Ronald W. Wanyonyi and Kennedy L. Nyongesa and Adu Wasike}, title = {Estimation of Proportion of a Trait by Batch Testing Model in a Quality Control Process}, journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics}, volume = {4}, number = {6}, pages = {619-629}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtas.20150406.34}, abstract = {Batch testing involves testing items in a group rather than testing the items individually for resource saving purposes. Estimation of proportion of a trait of interest using batch testing model insulates individuals of a population against stigma. In this paper, an estimator of the unknown proportion of a trait in batch testing model based on a quality control process is constructed and its properties discussed. In quality control, a batch is rejected if constituent defective members are greater than l, the cut off value. It is observed that if l = 0, then the obvious batch testing strategy is obtained. Hence when l > 0, the batch testing strategy is generalized. The proposed model is superior to the existing models when the proportion of a trait is relatively high. The application of the model on Genetically Modified Organisms contamination is carried out.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Estimation of Proportion of a Trait by Batch Testing Model in a Quality Control Process AU - Ronald W. Wanyonyi AU - Kennedy L. Nyongesa AU - Adu Wasike Y1 - 2015/12/22 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34 DO - 10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34 T2 - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics JF - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics JO - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics SP - 619 EP - 629 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-9006 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20150406.34 AB - Batch testing involves testing items in a group rather than testing the items individually for resource saving purposes. Estimation of proportion of a trait of interest using batch testing model insulates individuals of a population against stigma. In this paper, an estimator of the unknown proportion of a trait in batch testing model based on a quality control process is constructed and its properties discussed. In quality control, a batch is rejected if constituent defective members are greater than l, the cut off value. It is observed that if l = 0, then the obvious batch testing strategy is obtained. Hence when l > 0, the batch testing strategy is generalized. The proposed model is superior to the existing models when the proportion of a trait is relatively high. The application of the model on Genetically Modified Organisms contamination is carried out. VL - 4 IS - 6 ER -