| Peer-Reviewed

Faba Bean Varieties and Bread Wheat Intercropping for Increasing Productivity at Tiyo District, Ethiopia

Received: 14 March 2022     Accepted: 12 April 2022     Published: 20 April 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Field experiment was conducted in 2019 main cropping season at Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, South-eastern Ethiopia to assess the compatibility of faba bean/wheat inter cropping, to select suitable variety of faba bean under different spatial patterns of intercropping, and to assess the economic feasibility of intercropping faba bean with bread wheat. The treatments were three faba bean varieties (Ashebeka, Hachalu and Tumsa) intercropped with bread wheat (variety Hulluka) in three different planting ratios (1W:1FB, 1W:2FB, 2W:1FB) and sole planting of the three faba bean varieties and wheat. Randomized complete block design with three replications was used. Planting ratio of 1W:2FB, sole cropped faba bean and planting ratio of 1W:1FB with variety Hachalu gave highest grain yield (3426.3 kg ha-1), above ground biomass (11257.3 kg ha-1) and harvest index of faba bean (36%), respectively. Planting ratio of 2W:1FB gave the highest wheat yield (1896.6 kg ha-1). The highest (8057.13 kg ha-1) above ground biomass yield of wheat was recorded at 2W:1FB. Highest gross monetary value of 100,591ETB ha-1 was obtained with planting ratio of 1W:2FB with variety Tumsa. Sole wheat gave the lowest gross monetary value of 59,752 ETB ha-1. This could be due to high price and better competition ability of faba bean with good rainfall distribution in the growing season.

Published in American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajpb.20220702.13
Page(s) 103-108
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Grain Yield, Gross Monetary Value, Land Equivalent Ratio, Planting Ratios, System Productivity

References
[1] El-Sheikh EAE, Ahmed EIA (2000). A note on the effect of intercropping and Rhizobium inoculation on the seed quality of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Agricultural Science 8: 157-163.
[2] Yucel DO (2013). Optimal intra-row spacing for production of local faba bean (Vicia faba L. Major) cultivars in the Mediterranean conditions. Pakstan Journal Botany 45 (6): 1933-1938.
[3] Central Statistical Agency (CSA) (2019). Agricultural sample survey volume I report on area and production of major crops. Statistical Bulletin 589, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[4] Dhima KV, Vasilakoglou IB, Keco RXh. Dima AK, Paschalidis KA, Gatsis TD (2013). Forage yield and competition indices of faba bean intercropped with oat. Grass and Forage Science 69 (2): 376-383.
[5] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2017). Database Available at: www.fao.org/faostat/ [accessed June 11, 2019]. Crop Prospects and Food Situation No. 1.
[6] Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2019). Strategic analysis and intervention plan for wheat and wheat products in the Agro Commodities Procurement Zone of the pilot Integrated Agro Industrial Park in Central-Eastern Oromia, Ethiopia.
[7] Georgis K, Abebe A, Negasi A, Dadi L, Sinebo W (1990). Cereal/legume intercropping research in Ethiopia, Proceedings of a Workshop on Research Methods for Cereal/Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa, pp. 167-175, Mexico, CIMMYT.
[8] Getachew G, Ghizaw A, Sinebo W (2008). Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA 2 (2): 257-263.
[9] Xu BC, Li FM, Shan L (2008). Switch grass and milk vetch intercropping under 2: 1 row-replacement in semiarid region, northwest China: aboveground biomass and water use efficiency. European Journal of Agronomy 28 (3): 485-492.
[10] Xia HY, Wang ZG, Zhao JH, Sun JH, Bao XG, Christie P, Zhang FS, Li L (2013). Contribution of inter specific interactions and phosphorus application to sustainable and productive intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 154: 53-64.
[11] Zhang FS, Li L (2003). Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant Soil 248 (1): 305-312.
[12] Yang F, Huang S, Gao R, Liu WG, Yong TW, Wang XC, Wu Xl, Yang WY (2014). Growth of soybean seedlings in relay strip intercropping systems in relation to light quantity and red: far-red ratio. Field Crops Research 155: 245-253.
[13] Sullivan P (2003). Intercropping principles and production practices. Agronomy Systems Guide. pp. 1-800.
[14] Adu-Gyamfi J, Myaka F, Sakala W, Odgaard R, Vesterager J, Høgh- Jensen H (2007). Biological nitrogen fixation and nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in farmer-managed intercrops of maize pigeon pea in semi-arid southern and eastern Africa. Plant and Soil 295 (1): 127-136.
[15] Dereje G, Adisu T, Mengesha M, Bogale T (2016). The Influence of intercropping Sorghum with legumes for management and control of Striga in Sorghum at Assosa Zone, Benshangul Gumuz Region, Western Ethiopia, East Africa. Advance in Crop Science and Technology 4 (5): 1-5.
[16] Girma T, Abrham E, Demekech W, Kidist A, Sherif G (2019). Effect of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and faba bean (Vicia fabae L.) intercropping on barley and faba bean yield components. Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal 3 (1): 7-13.
[17] Abayneh E (2003). Soils of Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center: National Soil Research Center (NSRC); Soil Survey and Land Evaluation Section. Technical Paper 76: 15.
[18] Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center (KARC) (2000). Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center laboratory manual.
[19] Hong TD, Ellis RH (1996). A Protocol to determine seed storage behavior. Rome: technical bulletin no. 1. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (in press).
[20] Biru A (1979). Agronomy Research Manual. Part III. Formula and Tables. Institute of Agricultural Research. Addis Ababa.
[21] Willey RS (1979). Intercropping – its importance and research needs, Part 1, Competition and yield advantages, Field Crop 32: 1-10.
[22] Statistical Analysis Software (SAS Institute) (2004). SAS User’s Guide, Version 9.0. SAS institute Inc., Cary, N. C. pp. 1-25.
[23] Gomez A, Gomez A (1984). Statistical analysis for agricultural research. An International Rice Research Institute book, A Willey Inter science Publication: Toronto Singapore, pp. 120-155.
[24] Merkine M, Teshome M (2018). Evaluation of faba bean (vicia faba l.) varieties for yield performance in Kaffa Zone, South western Ethiopia. International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology 5: 2349-8080.
[25] Ashenafi M, Mekuria W (2015). Effect of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) varieties on yield attributes at Sinana and Agerfa districts of Bale Zone, Southeastern Ethiopia. Journal of Biological Sciences 8 (4): 281-286.
[26] Klimek-Kopyra A, Kulig B, Oleksy A, Zając T (2015). Agronomic performance of naked oat (Avena nuda L.) and faba bean intercropping. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 75 (2): 168- 173.
[27] Tekle E, Raghavaiah Cherukuri V, Chavhan A, Ibrahim H (2015). Effect of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes, plant densities and phosphorus on productivity, nutrients uptake, soil fertility changes and economics in Central high lands of Ethiopia. International Journal of Life Sciences 3 (4): 287-305.
[28] Abdalla AA, Naim AM, Ahmed MF, Taha MB (2015). Biological Yield and Harvest Index of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) as affected by different Agro-ecological Environments. World Journal of Agricultural Research 3 (2): 78-82. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[29] Teshome G, Tamado T, Negash G (2015). Effect of varieties and population of intercropped soybean with maize on yield and yield components at Haro Sabu, Western Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal 4 (4): 31-39.
[30] Biruk T (2007). Effect of planting density and variety of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropped with sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) on performance of the component crops and productivity of the system in South Gonder, Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis Haramaya University, Ethiopia.
[31] Nargis A, Alim MA, Islam MM, Zabun N, Maksuder R, Hossain AS (2004). Evaluation of mixed and intercropping of lentil and wheat. Journal of Agronomy 3 (1): 48-51.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Debela Bekele, Mengistu Chemeda. (2022). Faba Bean Varieties and Bread Wheat Intercropping for Increasing Productivity at Tiyo District, Ethiopia. American Journal of Plant Biology, 7(2), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20220702.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Debela Bekele; Mengistu Chemeda. Faba Bean Varieties and Bread Wheat Intercropping for Increasing Productivity at Tiyo District, Ethiopia. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2022, 7(2), 103-108. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20220702.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Debela Bekele, Mengistu Chemeda. Faba Bean Varieties and Bread Wheat Intercropping for Increasing Productivity at Tiyo District, Ethiopia. Am J Plant Biol. 2022;7(2):103-108. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20220702.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20220702.13,
      author = {Debela Bekele and Mengistu Chemeda},
      title = {Faba Bean Varieties and Bread Wheat Intercropping for Increasing Productivity at Tiyo District, Ethiopia},
      journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {103-108},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20220702.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20220702.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20220702.13},
      abstract = {Field experiment was conducted in 2019 main cropping season at Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, South-eastern Ethiopia to assess the compatibility of faba bean/wheat inter cropping, to select suitable variety of faba bean under different spatial patterns of intercropping, and to assess the economic feasibility of intercropping faba bean with bread wheat. The treatments were three faba bean varieties (Ashebeka, Hachalu and Tumsa) intercropped with bread wheat (variety Hulluka) in three different planting ratios (1W:1FB, 1W:2FB, 2W:1FB) and sole planting of the three faba bean varieties and wheat. Randomized complete block design with three replications was used. Planting ratio of 1W:2FB, sole cropped faba bean and planting ratio of 1W:1FB with variety Hachalu gave highest grain yield (3426.3 kg ha-1), above ground biomass (11257.3 kg ha-1) and harvest index of faba bean (36%), respectively. Planting ratio of 2W:1FB gave the highest wheat yield (1896.6 kg ha-1). The highest (8057.13 kg ha-1) above ground biomass yield of wheat was recorded at 2W:1FB. Highest gross monetary value of 100,591ETB ha-1 was obtained with planting ratio of 1W:2FB with variety Tumsa. Sole wheat gave the lowest gross monetary value of 59,752 ETB ha-1. This could be due to high price and better competition ability of faba bean with good rainfall distribution in the growing season.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Faba Bean Varieties and Bread Wheat Intercropping for Increasing Productivity at Tiyo District, Ethiopia
    AU  - Debela Bekele
    AU  - Mengistu Chemeda
    Y1  - 2022/04/20
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20220702.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20220702.13
    T2  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    JF  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    JO  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    SP  - 103
    EP  - 108
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8337
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20220702.13
    AB  - Field experiment was conducted in 2019 main cropping season at Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, South-eastern Ethiopia to assess the compatibility of faba bean/wheat inter cropping, to select suitable variety of faba bean under different spatial patterns of intercropping, and to assess the economic feasibility of intercropping faba bean with bread wheat. The treatments were three faba bean varieties (Ashebeka, Hachalu and Tumsa) intercropped with bread wheat (variety Hulluka) in three different planting ratios (1W:1FB, 1W:2FB, 2W:1FB) and sole planting of the three faba bean varieties and wheat. Randomized complete block design with three replications was used. Planting ratio of 1W:2FB, sole cropped faba bean and planting ratio of 1W:1FB with variety Hachalu gave highest grain yield (3426.3 kg ha-1), above ground biomass (11257.3 kg ha-1) and harvest index of faba bean (36%), respectively. Planting ratio of 2W:1FB gave the highest wheat yield (1896.6 kg ha-1). The highest (8057.13 kg ha-1) above ground biomass yield of wheat was recorded at 2W:1FB. Highest gross monetary value of 100,591ETB ha-1 was obtained with planting ratio of 1W:2FB with variety Tumsa. Sole wheat gave the lowest gross monetary value of 59,752 ETB ha-1. This could be due to high price and better competition ability of faba bean with good rainfall distribution in the growing season.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, Asella, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Kulumsa Agricultural Research Center, Asella, Ethiopia

  • Sections