| Peer-Reviewed

Agro-morphological Characterization of Eight (08) Cowpea Accessions [(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)] from Benin and Ghana Introduced in Center-Benin

Received: 28 August 2020     Accepted: 5 October 2020     Published: 25 January 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The present study allowed to characterize at agro-morphological level, eight (08) traditional cowpea accessions from Benin and Ghana in order to identify the best performing ones. The test was installed in a Randomized Complete Block (RCB) design with four (04) repetitions in a station in Savè in Center-Benin. The parameters studied are the date of flowering and maturation, the numbers of stems and leaflets per plant, the height of plants, the port of the stem, the lengths of pods and petiole, the weights of pods, tops, seeds and of 100 seeds, the seed yield, the colors of flowers, pods and seeds, the shapes of leaflets and of seeds, the size and the appearance of seeds. Xlsat version 2018.6 software was used for multi-component analysis to categorize accessions by their significant variables. SAS 9.2 software was used for the analysis of variance and the comparison of the means of variables. The number of branches, the length of the petiole, the height of the plants, the number of leaves, the length of the pods, the weights of the pods and of the tops had a positive influence on the cowpea seeds yield. The accessions were classified into three groups. The first group is made up of three (03) high-performance accessions, Nketewade, Mung bean lens and Songotra, with a short cycle of 61 to 62 days and a high yield of between 1050 kg/ha and 1300 kg/ha. The second group is that of the Djetoko and black eye bean accessions of long-cycle from 80 to 88 days, with a yield of between 620 kg/ha and 800 kg/ha. The third group is made up of false Cassoulet, Ennepa and Nsroma accessions with a short cycle of 62 to 65 days and a low yield of between 175 kg/ha and 230 kg/ha. Multilocal tests and genetic molecular characterization must be considered for a good valuation of these cowpea accessions.

Published in American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajpb.20210601.11
Page(s) 1-10
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Plant Height, Performance, Pod Length, Number of Leaflets, Yield

References
[1] A. S. Langyintuo, J Lowenberg-DeBoer, M. Faye, D. Lambert, G. Ibro, B. Moussa, A. Kergna, S. Kushwaha, S. Mussa, G. Ntoukam. “Cowpea supply and demand in West, and Central Africa”. In Cowpea Production in Field Crops Research, Peter HG, Anthony EH, Dernot PC (eds),” 2003, pp. 59-68.
[2] F. M. Quin, “Introduction. In: advances in cowpea Research” Sing B. B., Mohan Raj, D. R., Dashiel K. E. and Jackai, L. E. N (eds), Co-publication of international Institute of tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria and Japan International Research center Agricultural Science (JICARS), 1997, pp. 11-28.
[3] Bello, S., Baco, M. N. (2015). Importance, typology of holders and local taxonomy of cowpea varietal diversity in Northeastern Benin, Annales des Sciences Agronomiques, 19 (2) special volume: 337-366, ISSN 1659–5009, 2015.
[4] S. Bello, A. Affokpon, CA Djihinto, and M. Idrissou-Touré, “Sensitivity to pests, seed production and agro-pastoral interests of the cowpea variety IT 95K-193-12 in South Benin,” 2016, 12 p. Technical and Information Document (DT&I), Legal deposit N° 9054 of 11/28/2016, 4th quarter, National Library of Benin, ISBN: 978-99919-2-616-2.
[5] J. Abalo, “Ghana: soon improved cowpea for smallholders,” Ghana, Projects, Africa Top Success, http://africatopsuccess.com, 2018, posted 10/27/2018, accessed July 16, 2020.
[6] CBDD (Beninese Center for Sustainable Development), “Revue bimestrielle,” N ° 11, July-August 2000, p 7.
[7] INRAB, “Master Plan for Agricultural Research (PDRA) of Benin.” INRAB, Cotonou, Benin, 1996, 12 p.
[8] S. Bello, “Testing of some methodological approaches to assess the diversity of plant genetic resources: application to cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp:) in the North-East of Benin,” Thesis by DEA, FSA / UAC, 2005, 152 p.
[9] Baco, M. N., Ahanchédé, A., Bello, S., Dansi, A., Vodouhè, R., Biaou, G., Lescure, J. P. (2008). Assessment of management practices for cowpea varietal diversity (Vigna unguiculata): a methodological attempt experimented in the village of Sori in Benin. Published in "Cahiers agriculture, Caa070166) R1. http://www.cahiersagricultures.fr/. (IF in 2013=0.597).
[10] Bello, S., Baco, M. N., Djihinto, C. A., Ahanchede, A. (2018a). Management practices for cowpea varietal diversity in North-East Benin, Bulletin de la Recherche Agronomique du Bénin (BRAB), 84: 28-42. ISSN on paper (on hard copy): 1025-2355 and ISSN on line (on line): 1840-7099, http://www.slire.net and http://www.inrab.org.
[11] Bello, S., Babalakoun, A. O., Zoudjihékpon, J., Coulibaly, K. A. (2018b). Diversity of cowpea entomofauna (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers) in northwestern Benin, Journal of Applied Biosciences, 132: 13424-13438, ISSN 1997-5902.
[12] Bello, S., Babalakoun, O. A., Coulibaly, K. A., Zoundjihekpon, J. (2019a). Efficacy of aqueous plant extracts for the control of thrips on different cultivars of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in North-West Benin. Ann. UP, Sci Series. Nat. Agron. June 2019; 9 (1): 107-122, ISSN: 1840-8494, eISSN: 1840-8508.
[13] Bello, S., Babalakoun, O. A., Coulibaly, K. A., Zoundjihekpon, J. (2019b). Evaluation of the losses in stock of cowpea seeds treated in the field with aqueous extracts of plants in the North-West of Benin. International Journal of Innovation Sciences and Research, 8 (8): 1492-1502, ISSN: 2319-9369, website: http://www.ijisr.com.
[14] Bello, S., Babalakoun, O. A., Coulibaly, K. A., Zoundjihekpon, J. (2020a). Efficacy of aqueous plant extracts for control of bedbugs on cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers) cultivars in northwestern Benin. Agricultural Science Research Journal, 10 (1): 15–30, ISSN-L: 2026-6073.
[15] Bello, S., Babalakoun, A. O., Zoundjihekpon, J., Coulibaly, A. A. (2020b). Efficacy of plants aqueous extracts for greenflies management on six cowpea cultivars in northwest of Benin. International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research, 7 (5): 5810-5817. www.ijramr.com.
[16] N. Aho, “Constraints and advantages of cowpea. In: Pulses,”International Foundation for Science,” FIS- Grev Turegatan, Stockholm, Sweden, 1988, p. 19.
[17] Aly, D., Ahouansou, R. H., Mama, V. J., Olou, D., Agli, C. (2017). Participatory evaluation and selection of improved cowpea varieties in rural areas in the Couffo department in Benin. African Crop Science Journal, 25 (4): 509-520. ISSN 1021-9730 / 2017. www.ajol.info/ and www.bioline.org.br/cs, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v25i4.8.
[18] BG Soule, “The cowpea market in the Gulf of Guinea countries (Ivory Coast, Ghana, Togo, Benin and Nigeria),” Regional Analysis and Social Expertise Laboratory (LARES), Provisional version, January 2002, 31 p.
[19] I. Baoua, M. Nouri, AK Saidou, and L. Amadou, “Some new varieties of early cowpea productive and resistant to pests,” Technical sheet N ° 003-2013 / INRAN, Republic of Niger, Ministry of Agriculture, National Institute of Agronomic Research of Niger (INRAN), Tropical Legumes II (eds), 2013, 3 p. Website: http://inran.refer.ne, Email: inran@intnet.ne or dginran@yahoo.com.
[20] I. Ali, “Agronomic performances of eight varieties of dual-use cowpea, their forage quality and their tolerance towards main enemies,” University Abdou Moumouni of Niamey. Thesis for the Diploma of Agricultural Techniques Engineer, 2005, 48 p.
[21] Y. Dugje, LO Omoigui, F. Ekeleme, AY Kamara, H. Ajeigbe, “Cowpea production in West Africa,” Farmer's guide, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, May 2009, 27 p.
[22] RECA, “Cowpea varieties registered in the National Catalog of Plant Species and Varieties (CNEV) of Niger,” 2012, 3 p.
[23] Gbaguidi, A. A., Dansi, A., Loko, L. Y., Dansi, M., Sanni, A. (2013). Diversity and agronomic performances of the cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) landraces in Southern Benin. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science, 3 (4): 121-133.
[24] Gbaguidi, A. A., Assogba, P., Dansi, M., Yedomonhan, H., Dansi, A. 2015. Agro-morphological characterization of cowpea accessions cultivated in Benin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Science, 9 (2): 1050-1066.
[25] Zannou, A., Ahanchédé, A., Struik P. C., Richards, P., Zoundjihékpon, J., Tossou R., Goodhue S., 2004. Yam and cowpea diversity management by farmers in the guinea-sudan transition zone of Benin. N. J. A. S Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 52 (3-4): 393-420.
[26] Abadassi, J. (2014). Agronomic Traits of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Populations cultivated in Benin. International Journal of Science and Advanced Technology, 4 (2): 4.
[27] A. Tchokanaka, E. O. Salissou, A. B. Cheik, L. I. Mama, and I. Bachir, “Technical economic sheet for the cultivation of cowpea,” Zinder region, 2016, 3 p.
[28] IBPGR, “Descriptors for Cowpea,” IBPGR, Rome, 1983, 34 p.
[29] Cobbinah, F. A., Addo-Quaye, A. A., Asante, I. K. (2011). Characterization, evaluation and selection of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) accessions with desirable traits from eight regions of Ghana, ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 6 (7): 21-32.
[30] Radhouane, L. (2004). Study of morpho-phenological variability in Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, 138: 18-22.
[31] H. I. Oumarou, B. Soumana, A. Toulou, B. Yamba, “Evaluation of seed and haulm yields of improved and local varieties of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) walp.] In school fields and in seed multiplication fields in Karma (Niger),” 2017, 9 p.
[32] Stoilova, T., Pereira, G. (2013). Assessment of the genetic diversity in a germplasm Collection of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) using morphological traits. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8 (2): 208-215.
[33] Doumbia, I. Z., Akromah, R., Asibuo, J. Y. (2013). Comparative study of cowpea germplasms diversity from Ghana and Mali using morphological characteristics. Journal. Plant Breed. Genetic, 01 (03): 139-147.
[34] Khan, A., Bari, A., Khan, S., Shan, N. H., Zada, I. (2010). Performance of cowpea genotypes at higher altitude of NWFP. Pak Journal Botanique, 42 (4): 2291-2296.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Saliou Bello, Raphiou Maliki, Appolinaire Adandonon, Adolphe Azonkpin, Thomas Aidjo Houndete, et al. (2021). Agro-morphological Characterization of Eight (08) Cowpea Accessions [(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)] from Benin and Ghana Introduced in Center-Benin. American Journal of Plant Biology, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20210601.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Saliou Bello; Raphiou Maliki; Appolinaire Adandonon; Adolphe Azonkpin; Thomas Aidjo Houndete, et al. Agro-morphological Characterization of Eight (08) Cowpea Accessions [(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)] from Benin and Ghana Introduced in Center-Benin. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2021, 6(1), 1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20210601.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Saliou Bello, Raphiou Maliki, Appolinaire Adandonon, Adolphe Azonkpin, Thomas Aidjo Houndete, et al. Agro-morphological Characterization of Eight (08) Cowpea Accessions [(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)] from Benin and Ghana Introduced in Center-Benin. Am J Plant Biol. 2021;6(1):1-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20210601.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20210601.11,
      author = {Saliou Bello and Raphiou Maliki and Appolinaire Adandonon and Adolphe Azonkpin and Thomas Aidjo Houndete and Gustave Dagbenonbakin},
      title = {Agro-morphological Characterization of Eight (08) Cowpea Accessions [(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)] from Benin and Ghana Introduced in Center-Benin},
      journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology},
      volume = {6},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-10},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20210601.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20210601.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20210601.11},
      abstract = {The present study allowed to characterize at agro-morphological level, eight (08) traditional cowpea accessions from Benin and Ghana in order to identify the best performing ones. The test was installed in a Randomized Complete Block (RCB) design with four (04) repetitions in a station in Savè in Center-Benin. The parameters studied are the date of flowering and maturation, the numbers of stems and leaflets per plant, the height of plants, the port of the stem, the lengths of pods and petiole, the weights of pods, tops, seeds and of 100 seeds, the seed yield, the colors of flowers, pods and seeds, the shapes of leaflets and of seeds, the size and the appearance of seeds. Xlsat version 2018.6 software was used for multi-component analysis to categorize accessions by their significant variables. SAS 9.2 software was used for the analysis of variance and the comparison of the means of variables. The number of branches, the length of the petiole, the height of the plants, the number of leaves, the length of the pods, the weights of the pods and of the tops had a positive influence on the cowpea seeds yield. The accessions were classified into three groups. The first group is made up of three (03) high-performance accessions, Nketewade, Mung bean lens and Songotra, with a short cycle of 61 to 62 days and a high yield of between 1050 kg/ha and 1300 kg/ha. The second group is that of the Djetoko and black eye bean accessions of long-cycle from 80 to 88 days, with a yield of between 620 kg/ha and 800 kg/ha. The third group is made up of false Cassoulet, Ennepa and Nsroma accessions with a short cycle of 62 to 65 days and a low yield of between 175 kg/ha and 230 kg/ha. Multilocal tests and genetic molecular characterization must be considered for a good valuation of these cowpea accessions.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Agro-morphological Characterization of Eight (08) Cowpea Accessions [(Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.)] from Benin and Ghana Introduced in Center-Benin
    AU  - Saliou Bello
    AU  - Raphiou Maliki
    AU  - Appolinaire Adandonon
    AU  - Adolphe Azonkpin
    AU  - Thomas Aidjo Houndete
    AU  - Gustave Dagbenonbakin
    Y1  - 2021/01/25
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20210601.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20210601.11
    T2  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    JF  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    JO  - American Journal of Plant Biology
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 10
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8337
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20210601.11
    AB  - The present study allowed to characterize at agro-morphological level, eight (08) traditional cowpea accessions from Benin and Ghana in order to identify the best performing ones. The test was installed in a Randomized Complete Block (RCB) design with four (04) repetitions in a station in Savè in Center-Benin. The parameters studied are the date of flowering and maturation, the numbers of stems and leaflets per plant, the height of plants, the port of the stem, the lengths of pods and petiole, the weights of pods, tops, seeds and of 100 seeds, the seed yield, the colors of flowers, pods and seeds, the shapes of leaflets and of seeds, the size and the appearance of seeds. Xlsat version 2018.6 software was used for multi-component analysis to categorize accessions by their significant variables. SAS 9.2 software was used for the analysis of variance and the comparison of the means of variables. The number of branches, the length of the petiole, the height of the plants, the number of leaves, the length of the pods, the weights of the pods and of the tops had a positive influence on the cowpea seeds yield. The accessions were classified into three groups. The first group is made up of three (03) high-performance accessions, Nketewade, Mung bean lens and Songotra, with a short cycle of 61 to 62 days and a high yield of between 1050 kg/ha and 1300 kg/ha. The second group is that of the Djetoko and black eye bean accessions of long-cycle from 80 to 88 days, with a yield of between 620 kg/ha and 800 kg/ha. The third group is made up of false Cassoulet, Ennepa and Nsroma accessions with a short cycle of 62 to 65 days and a low yield of between 175 kg/ha and 230 kg/ha. Multilocal tests and genetic molecular characterization must be considered for a good valuation of these cowpea accessions.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Agricultural Research Centre of South-Benin, National Agricultural Research Institute of Benin (CRA-Sud/INRAB), Attogon, Republic of Benin

  • Agricultural Research Centre of Center-Benin, National Agricultural Research Institute of Benin (CRA-Centre/INRAB), Allada, Republic of Benin

  • School of Crop and Seed Production and Management (EGPVS), National University of Agriculture, Ketou, Republic of Benin

  • Ouinhi Communal Unit, Territorial Agency of Agricultural Development (ATDA) of Pole 5, Ouinhi, Republic of Benin

  • Coton and Fibers Agricultural Research Centre (CRA-CF), National Agricultural Research Institute of Benin (CRA-CF/INRAB), Cotonou, Republic of Benin

  • Smallholders Agricultural Productivity Enhancement Program (SAPEP) Project, National Agricultural Research Institute of Benin (SAPEP/INRAB), Abomey-Calavi, Republic of Benin

  • Sections