The study was conducted in Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar to assess honeybee disease, enemies and their control mechanisms. For this study three peasant associations were selected through purposive sampling. From each peasant association 20 respondents were selected by systematic random sampling and data collected using semi-structured questioner, observation; and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The result revealed that disease like Nosema (43.3%), Chalk brood (30.0%), Varroa mites (8.3%) and bee paralysis (18.3%) and from enemies such as ant (43.3%), bird (16.7%), termites (28.3%) and wildcat (11.7%) were found in the study area, However, farmers use different control mechanism like cleaning the hive, keeping the colony strong, putting of ash on their nest and regular inspection of the hive the apiary site should be free from those chemical’s like insecticide and herbicide sprayed on foraging flowers and beekeepers should take some measures or negotiate with scrap growers and problem is observed poor traditional system of management like watering feeding and health care management most of the beekeepers is traditionally. There are three types of beekeeping systems; traditional (80.0%), transitional (16.7%) and modern (3.3%), but traditional hive is more affected by disease than other. All of the respondent in the study area there are number of challenges for honeybee. In general honey bee production potential of farmers in the area is constrained by various challenges especially by bee diseases and enemies. The most important bee disease in the area was found Nosema and the prime enemies are ant those impede productivity of honey bee in the area. There should be given good extension service and sustainable awareness creation through various means of incentives to empower beekeepers for controlling of bee diseases and enemies by coordinating their indigenous knowledge with the scientific methods.
Published in | American Journal of Plant Biology (Volume 5, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.15 |
Page(s) | 105-109 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Control Mechanism, Disease, Enemies, Honeybee
[1] | EEPD, 2006. Export of honey bee and bee wax, draft report, EEPD. Minister of trade and industry, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[2] | Adgaba A, Al Ghamdi AG, Shenkute S, Ismaiel S, Al Kahtani Y, Tadess MJ, Ansari W, Abebe MQ, Abdulaziz A 2014. Socio economic analysis of beekeeping and determinants of box hive technology adoption in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 24 (6): 1876-1884. |
[3] | Amsalu Belay, 2001. Bee management training manual Holeta research center. |
[4] | C. S. A, (Central Statistics Authority), 2014. Potential 0f honey bee production in Amhara region Ethiopia. |
[5] | Olyerinde and Ande, 2009. Distribution and impact of honey bee pests on colony developments in Kwara State, Nigeria. J. Agric. Soc. |
[6] | CSA (Central Statistics Authority). 2016. Agricultural sample survey. Livestock and livestock characteristics. Volume II. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[7] | Hartman, I, 2004. The management of resource and marginalization in bee keeping societies of south west Ethiopia. Paper submitted to the conference: Bridge scale and Epistemology, Alexandria. P. I. |
[8] | Gezahegn Taddese, 2001. Marketing of honey and bee wax in Ethiopia: past, present and perspective feature. Pp. 78-88 proceeding of the third national Annual conference of the Ethiopia beekeepers association (EBA). September 3-4, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[9] | Abrol D. P, 2001. Honeybee disease and their management. Proceeding of the Second National Annual Conference of Ethiopia Beekeepers Association (EBA). September 10-11, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[10] | Workneh, 2007. National apiculture strategy document. Holeta Research Center. |
[11] | Dessalegn Belay, 2001. Same major of and predator of honeybee in Ethiopia. Holeta bee research center. |
APA Style
Assefa Adane, Barkot Yonis, Tsehaynesh Fentahun. (2020). Assessment of Honeybee Diseases, Enemies and Their Control Mechanisms in Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar, Ethiopia. American Journal of Plant Biology, 5(4), 105-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.15
ACS Style
Assefa Adane; Barkot Yonis; Tsehaynesh Fentahun. Assessment of Honeybee Diseases, Enemies and Their Control Mechanisms in Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar, Ethiopia. Am. J. Plant Biol. 2020, 5(4), 105-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.15
AMA Style
Assefa Adane, Barkot Yonis, Tsehaynesh Fentahun. Assessment of Honeybee Diseases, Enemies and Their Control Mechanisms in Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar, Ethiopia. Am J Plant Biol. 2020;5(4):105-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.15, author = {Assefa Adane and Barkot Yonis and Tsehaynesh Fentahun}, title = {Assessment of Honeybee Diseases, Enemies and Their Control Mechanisms in Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar, Ethiopia}, journal = {American Journal of Plant Biology}, volume = {5}, number = {4}, pages = {105-109}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpb.20200504.15}, abstract = {The study was conducted in Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar to assess honeybee disease, enemies and their control mechanisms. For this study three peasant associations were selected through purposive sampling. From each peasant association 20 respondents were selected by systematic random sampling and data collected using semi-structured questioner, observation; and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The result revealed that disease like Nosema (43.3%), Chalk brood (30.0%), Varroa mites (8.3%) and bee paralysis (18.3%) and from enemies such as ant (43.3%), bird (16.7%), termites (28.3%) and wildcat (11.7%) were found in the study area, However, farmers use different control mechanism like cleaning the hive, keeping the colony strong, putting of ash on their nest and regular inspection of the hive the apiary site should be free from those chemical’s like insecticide and herbicide sprayed on foraging flowers and beekeepers should take some measures or negotiate with scrap growers and problem is observed poor traditional system of management like watering feeding and health care management most of the beekeepers is traditionally. There are three types of beekeeping systems; traditional (80.0%), transitional (16.7%) and modern (3.3%), but traditional hive is more affected by disease than other. All of the respondent in the study area there are number of challenges for honeybee. In general honey bee production potential of farmers in the area is constrained by various challenges especially by bee diseases and enemies. The most important bee disease in the area was found Nosema and the prime enemies are ant those impede productivity of honey bee in the area. There should be given good extension service and sustainable awareness creation through various means of incentives to empower beekeepers for controlling of bee diseases and enemies by coordinating their indigenous knowledge with the scientific methods.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of Honeybee Diseases, Enemies and Their Control Mechanisms in Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar, Ethiopia AU - Assefa Adane AU - Barkot Yonis AU - Tsehaynesh Fentahun Y1 - 2020/11/27 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.15 T2 - American Journal of Plant Biology JF - American Journal of Plant Biology JO - American Journal of Plant Biology SP - 105 EP - 109 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8337 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpb.20200504.15 AB - The study was conducted in Gondar Zuria District, North Gondar to assess honeybee disease, enemies and their control mechanisms. For this study three peasant associations were selected through purposive sampling. From each peasant association 20 respondents were selected by systematic random sampling and data collected using semi-structured questioner, observation; and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The result revealed that disease like Nosema (43.3%), Chalk brood (30.0%), Varroa mites (8.3%) and bee paralysis (18.3%) and from enemies such as ant (43.3%), bird (16.7%), termites (28.3%) and wildcat (11.7%) were found in the study area, However, farmers use different control mechanism like cleaning the hive, keeping the colony strong, putting of ash on their nest and regular inspection of the hive the apiary site should be free from those chemical’s like insecticide and herbicide sprayed on foraging flowers and beekeepers should take some measures or negotiate with scrap growers and problem is observed poor traditional system of management like watering feeding and health care management most of the beekeepers is traditionally. There are three types of beekeeping systems; traditional (80.0%), transitional (16.7%) and modern (3.3%), but traditional hive is more affected by disease than other. All of the respondent in the study area there are number of challenges for honeybee. In general honey bee production potential of farmers in the area is constrained by various challenges especially by bee diseases and enemies. The most important bee disease in the area was found Nosema and the prime enemies are ant those impede productivity of honey bee in the area. There should be given good extension service and sustainable awareness creation through various means of incentives to empower beekeepers for controlling of bee diseases and enemies by coordinating their indigenous knowledge with the scientific methods. VL - 5 IS - 4 ER -