In recent years there has been a gradually increasing interest in the terms on which the design and representation of the architectural object is based. This interest, as a product of the occurrence of digital technologies and the convergence of different scientific fields, is based on the specialization of design tools in such a way as to support and enhance the discussion around digital holography as an open process for action. Up until now, the dialogue on the form and representation of the architectural object has paid much greater attention to the creation of tangible models, which function as vehicles for the shaping and projection of visual messages that express and convey the designed object to the social whole. However, the true challenge lies in the development of a methodology or mechanism which, having as its starting point the traditional object representation practices, will allow for a combination of new technologies towards creating new visual messages. In this text, the process of putting together a new architectural object, the digital hologram, will be seen as one such mechanism. The new views and strategies on space are open to treating spatial constructions, as a restructuring of the structures that could bring about changes for more favorable conditions for the representation of the architectural form. Thus, the strategies of architectural pioneering are judged by their ability to develop new procedures that are capable of reversing. This is clearly a pragmatic approach to pioneering, which in the best cases manages to assign new meanings to traditional concepts with which architecture is associated, and to take different design and representation parameters into account in the process of creating an object.
Published in | American Journal of Physics and Applications (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajpa.20180601.11 |
Page(s) | 1-5 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Digital Holography, Syntax, Architectural Object, Hologram, Quantum Geometry
[1] | Kourniatis, N., “Space as a common concept of signification of Geometry and Architecture, From the Projective Geometry of the Baroque to Modern Parametric Topological Design”, Doctoral Thesis / School of Architecture, National Technical University of Athens, 2013. |
[2] | Lucente, M., “Optimization of Hologram Computation for Real-Time Display”, MIT Media Laboratory published in SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 1992. |
[3] | Smigielski, P., “Holographie Optique – Principes”, Techniques de l’ Ingenieur, 1998. |
[4] | Hariharan, P., “Basics of Holography”, Cambridge University Press, 2002. |
[5] | Bjelkhagen, H., Brotherton-Ratcliffe, D., “Ultra-Realistic Imaging: Advanced Techniques in Analogue and Digital Colour Holography”, CRC Press, 2013. |
[6] | Zizzi, P., A., “Holography, Quantum Geometry, and Quantum Information Theory”, Entropy, ISSN 1099-4300, 2000. |
[7] | Morel, Ph., “Formes de Langages Formels (Workshop Introduction)”, Meudon: Villa Van Doesburg, 2005. |
[8] | Wiley, J., “Experiments in Associative Urbanism”, Architectural Design, Volume 79, Issue 4, John Wiley & Sons, 2009. [3] Manovich, L., “The Language of New Media”, MIT Press, 2002. |
[9] | Stanislovas, Z., “Advances in digital holography – Vilnius”, Lithuania: Geola Digital Lab, 2008. |
[10] | Michael, H. W, “Multiple Viewpoint Rendering for Three Dimensional” Displays: Phd thesis / School of Architecture and Planning, Program in Media Arts and Sciences; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997. |
[11] | Lars, H., “Singstad Ingar Diffusers for Holographic Stereography”, Department of Physics; University of Oslo, University of Bergen. |
APA Style
Kourniatis Nicolaos, Christidi Nikoletta, Fakiri Ioanna, Tsoumpri Dimitra, Tsoukalas Nikolaos, et al. (2017). The Meta-Mechanics of Holography and How It Affects Architecture. American Journal of Physics and Applications, 6(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20180601.11
ACS Style
Kourniatis Nicolaos; Christidi Nikoletta; Fakiri Ioanna; Tsoumpri Dimitra; Tsoukalas Nikolaos, et al. The Meta-Mechanics of Holography and How It Affects Architecture. Am. J. Phys. Appl. 2017, 6(1), 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpa.20180601.11
AMA Style
Kourniatis Nicolaos, Christidi Nikoletta, Fakiri Ioanna, Tsoumpri Dimitra, Tsoukalas Nikolaos, et al. The Meta-Mechanics of Holography and How It Affects Architecture. Am J Phys Appl. 2017;6(1):1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ajpa.20180601.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajpa.20180601.11, author = {Kourniatis Nicolaos and Christidi Nikoletta and Fakiri Ioanna and Tsoumpri Dimitra and Tsoukalas Nikolaos and Karas Vaggelis}, title = {The Meta-Mechanics of Holography and How It Affects Architecture}, journal = {American Journal of Physics and Applications}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {1-5}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajpa.20180601.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20180601.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajpa.20180601.11}, abstract = {In recent years there has been a gradually increasing interest in the terms on which the design and representation of the architectural object is based. This interest, as a product of the occurrence of digital technologies and the convergence of different scientific fields, is based on the specialization of design tools in such a way as to support and enhance the discussion around digital holography as an open process for action. Up until now, the dialogue on the form and representation of the architectural object has paid much greater attention to the creation of tangible models, which function as vehicles for the shaping and projection of visual messages that express and convey the designed object to the social whole. However, the true challenge lies in the development of a methodology or mechanism which, having as its starting point the traditional object representation practices, will allow for a combination of new technologies towards creating new visual messages. In this text, the process of putting together a new architectural object, the digital hologram, will be seen as one such mechanism. The new views and strategies on space are open to treating spatial constructions, as a restructuring of the structures that could bring about changes for more favorable conditions for the representation of the architectural form. Thus, the strategies of architectural pioneering are judged by their ability to develop new procedures that are capable of reversing. This is clearly a pragmatic approach to pioneering, which in the best cases manages to assign new meanings to traditional concepts with which architecture is associated, and to take different design and representation parameters into account in the process of creating an object.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Meta-Mechanics of Holography and How It Affects Architecture AU - Kourniatis Nicolaos AU - Christidi Nikoletta AU - Fakiri Ioanna AU - Tsoumpri Dimitra AU - Tsoukalas Nikolaos AU - Karas Vaggelis Y1 - 2017/11/21 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20180601.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajpa.20180601.11 T2 - American Journal of Physics and Applications JF - American Journal of Physics and Applications JO - American Journal of Physics and Applications SP - 1 EP - 5 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-4308 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajpa.20180601.11 AB - In recent years there has been a gradually increasing interest in the terms on which the design and representation of the architectural object is based. This interest, as a product of the occurrence of digital technologies and the convergence of different scientific fields, is based on the specialization of design tools in such a way as to support and enhance the discussion around digital holography as an open process for action. Up until now, the dialogue on the form and representation of the architectural object has paid much greater attention to the creation of tangible models, which function as vehicles for the shaping and projection of visual messages that express and convey the designed object to the social whole. However, the true challenge lies in the development of a methodology or mechanism which, having as its starting point the traditional object representation practices, will allow for a combination of new technologies towards creating new visual messages. In this text, the process of putting together a new architectural object, the digital hologram, will be seen as one such mechanism. The new views and strategies on space are open to treating spatial constructions, as a restructuring of the structures that could bring about changes for more favorable conditions for the representation of the architectural form. Thus, the strategies of architectural pioneering are judged by their ability to develop new procedures that are capable of reversing. This is clearly a pragmatic approach to pioneering, which in the best cases manages to assign new meanings to traditional concepts with which architecture is associated, and to take different design and representation parameters into account in the process of creating an object. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -