Evaluation and demonstration study was conducted at Gerbi kebele of Adami Tulu Jidokombolcha district on two-two and three year age old Borana bulls with the objectives of evaluation and demonstration of bulls fattening technologies at on-farm level. One farmer’s research extension group (FREG) was formed for fattening the bulls. Twenty bulls were purchased from Borana zone by farmers for the fattening trials. Two feeding treatments (T1=Grazing + 20% crushed maize grain + 45% wheat bran + 35% Noug cake and T2=Grazing + 65% wheat bran + 35% cotton seed cakes) were evaluated. The animals were randomly assigned for dietary rations and data on live weight change of the animals were taken using weight chart tape (developed by JICA project). Final body weights, total weight gain and average daily weight gain of the bulls were not significant (P>0.05) between the treatments. Bulls fed on treatment one attained an average daily weight gain of 0.83 kg; while bulls fed on treatment two gained 0.76 kg per day. Total gross margin of treatment one (53, 154.5 ETB) was higher than treatment two (49, 467.75 ETB). Cost-benefit analysis indicated that feeding option number one (T1) is more economical as compared to bulls fed on T2. However, fatteners can use any of the feeding options depending on availability of the ingredients in their area.
| Published in | American Journal of Life Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.20 |
| Page(s) | 152-156 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Young Borana Bulls, Beef Fattening, East Shoa, Technology Demonstration
| [1] | Central Statically Agency (CSA), Ethiopia Sample survey Enumeration. Addis Ababa. Ethiopia. (2017). |
| [2] | Mezgebe G, Gizaw Solomon, Urge Mengistu, Chavhan A. (2017). Begait cattle production systems and production performances in northern Ethiopia. Int. J. of Life Sciences. 5 (4): 506-516. |
| [3] | Negassa A., Shahidur R., Gebremedhin B., “Livestock Production and Marketing in Ethiopia,” Ethiopia Strategy Support Program II, ESSP II Working Paper, pp: 26-35. August, 2011. |
| [4] | Mummed YY, Edward Cottington Webb (2015). Carcass quality audit-A strategy to improve beef sector in Ethiopia,” African Journal of Agricultural Research. 10 (28): 2731-2737. |
| [5] | Zekarias Seiko Minota, “The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on Economic Growth in Eastern Africa: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis,” Applied Economics and Finance. 2016. 3 (1): 145-160. |
| [6] | Belay Zeleke, Minale Getachew (2017). Traditional Cattle Husbandry Practice in Gamo Gofa Zone, Southern Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Novel Research in Life Sciences. 4 (5) p: 1-7. |
| [7] | Tsigereda Fekadu, Mengistu Urge, Emebet Moreda (2016). Assessment of Traditional CattleFattening Practices in Hararghe Highland Parts of Ethiopia. World journal of agricultural science. 12 (2) p: 149-160. |
| [8] | Girma Debele, Mieso Guru, Tesfaye Alemu Tucho, Arse Gebeyehu, Frehowit Messele, Ashebir Worku, Aman Gudeto (2015). Effect of different feeds option on growth response and carcass characteristic of two years aged Borana bulls for export market weight gain at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center. Basic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Review. 4 (5) p: 139-145. |
| [9] | Kassahun Ahmed, Berhan Tamir, Ashenafi Mengistu (2017). Constraints, opportunities and motives of cattle fattening practices in urban and peri-urban kebeles of Kombolcha town, South Wollo Zone, Ethiopia. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America. ISSN Print: 2151-7517, ISSN Online: 2151-7525. |
| [10] | Gebreselassie N (2018). Review on Beef Cattle Production and Marketing System in Ethiopia. Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production. J Fisheries Livest Prod. 6 (3) DOI: 10.4172/2332-2608.1000277. |
| [11] | DAGRIS (Domestic Animal Genetic Resources Information System), International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Accessed date, April 9, 2018 http://eth.dagris.info/species/85/breeds. |
| [12] | Shewangizaw Wolde, Zekarias Bassa, Tesfaye Alem (2014). Assessment of cattle fattening and marketing system and constraints affecting cattle fattening in Central Southern Region of Ethiopia. African Journal of Agriculture Research. 9 (41), p. 3050-3055. |
| [13] | Ahmed K, Tamir B, Mengistu A. (2017). Cattle selection criteria and fattening practices in urban and peri-urban Kebeles of Dessie and Kombolcha Towns, Ethiopia. Online J. Anim. Feed Res. 7 (2) p: 29-37. |
| [14] | Mieso Guru, Girma Debele, Tesfaye Alemu Tucho, Frehiwot Mesele, Tesfaye Alemu Aredo (2013). Evaluation of different feeding options on yearling Borana bulls to attain export market weight at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center,” American Journal of Cell and Animal Biology. 1 (1) p: 01-09. |
| [15] | Tesfaye Alemu Tucho, Tesfaye Alemu Aredo, Girma Debele, Mieso Guru, Ashebir Worku, Aman Gudeto, Frehowit Messele (2018). Evaluation of different dietary rations for growth performance and carcass characteristics of two years old Kereyu bulls for export/local market weight. Basic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Review. 6 (6). p: 49-56. |
| [16] | Ashebir Worku, Tesfaye Alemu, Mieso Guru, Aman Gudeto, Frehiwot Mesele, Genet Dadi (2019). Evaluation of different feeding options on growth response and carcass characteristic of yearling Kereyu-Bulls to attain local/export market weight. Int J Agric Sc Food Technol. 5 (2) p: 050-053. |
| [17] | Tesfaye Alemu, Ashebir Worku, Genet Dadi, Mieso Guru, Aman Gudeto (2019). Evaluation of different feeding options for growing two years old Arsi-Bulls to attain export market weight. Basic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Review. 7 (1). P. 11-17. |
| [18] | Aman Gudeto, Tesfaye Alemu, Mieso Guru, Ashebir Worku, Genet Dadi (2019). Evaluation of Different Feeding Options for Yearling Arsi Bulls to Attain Export Market Weight. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 19 (14). ISSN 2224-3208. |
| [19] | Mieso G, Girma D, Tesfaye A, Aman G, Ashebir W, Frehiwot M, “On-farm demonstration of urea wheat straw based cattle fattening at Negele-Arsi district of West Arsi Zone,” Proceeding of review workshop on completed research activities of livestock directorate held at Agricultural research center, Adami Tulu, Ethiopia, p. 33-38, 4-8 Sep, 2017. |
| [20] | Nabi Husein, Dawit Abate, Lalisa Diriba, Masarat Xilahun (2018). Pre Scaling Up of Urea Molasses Block Technology to Fatten Arsi Oxen in West Arsi and East Shewa Zone of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 8 (15). ISSN 2225-093X. |
| [21] | Adebabay Kebede, Addisu Bitew, Tewodros Bimrew, Asresu Yitayew, Yihalem Denekew, Yeshiwas Ferede, Getinet Zeleke (2013). Comparative Evaluation of the Fattening Performance of Fogera and Adet Old Oxen at Andassa Livestock Reseach Center, Ethiopia. Int. J. Pharm. Med. & Bio. Sc. 2 (4). |
APA Style
Aman Gudeto, Mieso Guru, Tesfaye Alemu Tucho, Ashebir Worku, Genet Dadi, et al. (2020). On-Farm Evaluation and Demonstration of Different Feeding Technological Options for Beef Cattle Fattening in Adami Tulu Jidokombolcha District of East Shoa Zone. American Journal of Life Sciences, 8(5), 152-156. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.20
ACS Style
Aman Gudeto; Mieso Guru; Tesfaye Alemu Tucho; Ashebir Worku; Genet Dadi, et al. On-Farm Evaluation and Demonstration of Different Feeding Technological Options for Beef Cattle Fattening in Adami Tulu Jidokombolcha District of East Shoa Zone. Am. J. Life Sci. 2020, 8(5), 152-156. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.20
AMA Style
Aman Gudeto, Mieso Guru, Tesfaye Alemu Tucho, Ashebir Worku, Genet Dadi, et al. On-Farm Evaluation and Demonstration of Different Feeding Technological Options for Beef Cattle Fattening in Adami Tulu Jidokombolcha District of East Shoa Zone. Am J Life Sci. 2020;8(5):152-156. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.20
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.20,
author = {Aman Gudeto and Mieso Guru and Tesfaye Alemu Tucho and Ashebir Worku and Genet Dadi and Frehiwot Mesele and Girma Debele},
title = {On-Farm Evaluation and Demonstration of Different Feeding Technological Options for Beef Cattle Fattening in Adami Tulu Jidokombolcha District of East Shoa Zone},
journal = {American Journal of Life Sciences},
volume = {8},
number = {5},
pages = {152-156},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.20},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.20},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajls.20200805.20},
abstract = {Evaluation and demonstration study was conducted at Gerbi kebele of Adami Tulu Jidokombolcha district on two-two and three year age old Borana bulls with the objectives of evaluation and demonstration of bulls fattening technologies at on-farm level. One farmer’s research extension group (FREG) was formed for fattening the bulls. Twenty bulls were purchased from Borana zone by farmers for the fattening trials. Two feeding treatments (T1=Grazing + 20% crushed maize grain + 45% wheat bran + 35% Noug cake and T2=Grazing + 65% wheat bran + 35% cotton seed cakes) were evaluated. The animals were randomly assigned for dietary rations and data on live weight change of the animals were taken using weight chart tape (developed by JICA project). Final body weights, total weight gain and average daily weight gain of the bulls were not significant (P>0.05) between the treatments. Bulls fed on treatment one attained an average daily weight gain of 0.83 kg; while bulls fed on treatment two gained 0.76 kg per day. Total gross margin of treatment one (53, 154.5 ETB) was higher than treatment two (49, 467.75 ETB). Cost-benefit analysis indicated that feeding option number one (T1) is more economical as compared to bulls fed on T2. However, fatteners can use any of the feeding options depending on availability of the ingredients in their area.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - On-Farm Evaluation and Demonstration of Different Feeding Technological Options for Beef Cattle Fattening in Adami Tulu Jidokombolcha District of East Shoa Zone AU - Aman Gudeto AU - Mieso Guru AU - Tesfaye Alemu Tucho AU - Ashebir Worku AU - Genet Dadi AU - Frehiwot Mesele AU - Girma Debele Y1 - 2020/09/17 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.20 DO - 10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.20 T2 - American Journal of Life Sciences JF - American Journal of Life Sciences JO - American Journal of Life Sciences SP - 152 EP - 156 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5737 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20200805.20 AB - Evaluation and demonstration study was conducted at Gerbi kebele of Adami Tulu Jidokombolcha district on two-two and three year age old Borana bulls with the objectives of evaluation and demonstration of bulls fattening technologies at on-farm level. One farmer’s research extension group (FREG) was formed for fattening the bulls. Twenty bulls were purchased from Borana zone by farmers for the fattening trials. Two feeding treatments (T1=Grazing + 20% crushed maize grain + 45% wheat bran + 35% Noug cake and T2=Grazing + 65% wheat bran + 35% cotton seed cakes) were evaluated. The animals were randomly assigned for dietary rations and data on live weight change of the animals were taken using weight chart tape (developed by JICA project). Final body weights, total weight gain and average daily weight gain of the bulls were not significant (P>0.05) between the treatments. Bulls fed on treatment one attained an average daily weight gain of 0.83 kg; while bulls fed on treatment two gained 0.76 kg per day. Total gross margin of treatment one (53, 154.5 ETB) was higher than treatment two (49, 467.75 ETB). Cost-benefit analysis indicated that feeding option number one (T1) is more economical as compared to bulls fed on T2. However, fatteners can use any of the feeding options depending on availability of the ingredients in their area. VL - 8 IS - 5 ER -
Email: