In recent days there is change in trend of rainfall across the country where its starts in May and ceases early-to-mid September. This implies that adjusting cropping calendar is vital to adapt to the changing climate of the area. The field experiments were carried out at Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center (DZARC) and Alemtena during the main cropping season from 2015 to 2017 to determine appropriate sowing date for tef varieties. The treatments consisted of three sowing date (early-July, mid-July, and late-July) and two recently released tef varieties (Kora and Boset). The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design in a factorial arrangement and replicated four times per treatment. Data were taken crop growth, biomass yield, and grain yield. Combined analysis of variance overs years showed that interaction effects of variety by sowing date were significant effects on plant height and panicle length at DZAR while, at Alemtena, plant height and panicle length was significantly affected only by variety. At both location biomass and grain yield of tef was significantly affected by variety and sowing date interaction. Among the different sowing date treatments, sowing of Kora variety in mid-July showed the highest mean biomass yield (8444.4 kg/ha and grain yield (1813.3 kg/ha) at DZARC but at Alemtena the highest biomass (9766.2 kg/ha) and grain yield (1595.7 kg/ha) was achieved Kora was sown in earl-July. However, sowing of Boset variety at mid-July was comparable yield advantages. Over all, based on the result of this study, sowing of mid-July and early-July would be recommended for the mentioned variety production at DZARC and Alemtena, respectively.
Published in | American Journal of Life Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajls.20200803.11 |
Page(s) | 34-40 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Climate Change, Sowing Time, Tef, Yield
[1] | CSA (Central Statistical Agency) (2019). Agricultural Sample Survey 2016/2017 Agricultural Sample Survey. Agricultural sample survey, report on area and production of major crops, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[2] | Hailu, T. A., & Seyfu, K. (2001). Production and Importance of Tef in Ethiopia Agriculture. In T. Hailu, B. A. Getachew, & S. Mark (Eds.), Tef research and development. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Tef Genetics and Improvement (pp. 3–7). DebreZeit, Ethiopia. 2000 October 16-19. Addis Abeba: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR). |
[3] | Agren and Gibson (1968). Chemical composition of tef as compared to that of wheat, barley and grain sorghum. Economic Botany, 20 (3): 268-273. |
[4] | Melak-Hail Mengesha (1966). Chemical composition of teff as compared to that of wheat, barley and grain sorghum. Economic Botany, 20 (3): 268-273. |
[5] | Bultosa Geremew (2007). Physicochemical Characteristics of Grain and Flour in 13 Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] Grain Varieties. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3 (12): 2042-2051. |
[6] | Baye, K. (2018) Tef: nutrient composition and health benefits, ESSP Working Paper 67, Washington, D. C. and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[7] | Ethiopian Nutrition Survey (1959). A Report by Inter-Departmental Committee on Nutrition for National Defense, ENS, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[8] | Dejene, K. 2009. The influence of soil water deficit imposed during various developmental phases on physiological processes of tef (Eragrostis tef). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 132, 283-289. |
[9] | Berhanu, A. (2004). The food security role of agriculture in Ethiopia. Journal of agricultural Development and Economics, 1 (1): Pp. 138-153. |
[10] | Spaenij-Dekking L, Kooy-Winkelaar Y, Koning F. (2005). The Ethiopian cereal tef in celiac disease. Engl J Med, 353: 1748-1749. |
[11] | Assefa K, Chanyalew S, Tadele Z. (2013). Achievements and Prospects of Tef Improvement-Proceedings of the Second International Workshop, November 7-9, 2011, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Switzerland. |
[12] | Aslani F, Mehrvar MR. (2012). Responses of wheat genotypes as affected by different sowing dates. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4: 72-74. |
[13] | Kenea, Y., Gezahegn, A. and Workneh, N. (2000). Farming Systems Research on Tef: Smallholders’ production practices. Hailu, T., Getachew, B. and Sorrells, M. (eds.). Narrowing the Rift: Tef Research and Development. Proceeding of the international workshop on Tef genetics and improvement, 16-19 October 2000, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[14] | Yilma, S. and Cajuste, J. (1980). Tef production guideline. Published by IAR Extension and Liaison Department, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[15] | BFS/USAID. (2017). Climate-Smart Agriculture in Ethiopia. CSA Country Profiles for Africa Series. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT); Bureau for Food Security, United States Agency for International Development (BFS/USAID), Washington, D. C. 26 p. |
[16] | Murphy C. (2014). Observed and projected climate change in the Philippines, Honduras, Kenya, Malawi and Ethiopia. Department of Geography, Maynooth University and Mavuto Tembo, Mzuzu Unviersity, Malawi. Available at: http://bit.ly/2id29YL. |
[17] | USAID (2015). Climate variability and change in Ethiopia. Summary report. United States Agency for International Development (USAID). |
[18] | Dejene K. Mengistu and Lemlem S. Mekonnen (January 25th 2012). Integrated Agronomic Crop Managements to Improve Tef Productivity Under Terminal Drought, Water Stress, Ismail Md. Mofizur Rahman and Hiroshi Hasegawa, Intech Open, DOI: 10.5772/30662. Available. from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/water-stress/integrated-agronomic-crop-managments-to-improve-tef-productivity-under-terminal-drought. |
[19] | Elizabet, B., Temesgen, D., Gbetibouo, G. and Ringler, C. (2009). Adaptation to climate change in Ethiopia and South Africa: Options and Constraints. Environmental Science and Policy, 12: 413-426. |
[20] | WRB (World Reference Base) (2006). A framework for international classification, correlation and communication, world soil resource report 103, Rome, p68. |
[21] | Mesfin, T., J. Mohammed, A. Taklete, F. Merga, and C. S. Wortmann (2014). Skip-row planting of maize and sorghum production in semi-arid Ethiopia. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 8: 140–146. Doi: 10.5897/ AJPS2013.1137. |
[22] | Black, C. A. (1965). Methods of soil analysis: Part I physical and mineralogical properties. ASA, Madison, WI. |
[23] | Jambere T. (2016). Reducing land Degradation and Farmers’ Vulnerability to Climate Change in the Highland and Dry areas of North-Western Ethiopia. Technical Report of Experimental Activities. June, 2013 to January, 2014. |
[24] | Ketema S. (1997). Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. Promoting the Conservation and Use of Underutilized and Neglected crops. International Plant Genetics Resources Institute (IPGRI), Biodiversity Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 50 pp. |
[25] | Shahzad, M A., Din, W. U. Sahi, S. T. Khan M. Ehsanullah M. and. Ahmad, M. (2007). Effectof sowing dates and seed treatment on grain yield and quality of wheat. Pakistan Journalof Agricultural Science, 44 (4): 581-583. |
[26] | Seyoum Y., and Cajuste J. (1980). Tef production guideline. Published by IAR Extension and Liaison Department, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[27] | Juraimi A. S, Begum M., Ahmed M. Sherif and Rajan A. (2009). Effects of sowing date and nutsedge removal time on plant growth and yield of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter]. African Journal of Applied Sciences, 6 (10): 1820-1825. |
[28] | Ketema S. (1989). Copping systems, production technology, pests, diseases, utilization and forage use of millets with special emphasis on tef in Ethiopia. Page 309-314. In seetharam, A., K. w. small millets in Global Agriculture. Proceedings of the first Intentional small millets workshop, Banglore, India, October 29-November 2, 1986, oxford and IBH publishing co. PVT. LTD, New Delhi, India. |
APA Style
Bizuwork Tafes Desta, Almaz Meseret Gezahegn, Sisay Eshetu Tesema. (2020). Planting Time Effects on the Productivity of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Varieties in Ethiopia. American Journal of Life Sciences, 8(3), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20200803.11
ACS Style
Bizuwork Tafes Desta; Almaz Meseret Gezahegn; Sisay Eshetu Tesema. Planting Time Effects on the Productivity of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Varieties in Ethiopia. Am. J. Life Sci. 2020, 8(3), 34-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20200803.11
AMA Style
Bizuwork Tafes Desta, Almaz Meseret Gezahegn, Sisay Eshetu Tesema. Planting Time Effects on the Productivity of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Varieties in Ethiopia. Am J Life Sci. 2020;8(3):34-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20200803.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajls.20200803.11, author = {Bizuwork Tafes Desta and Almaz Meseret Gezahegn and Sisay Eshetu Tesema}, title = {Planting Time Effects on the Productivity of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Varieties in Ethiopia}, journal = {American Journal of Life Sciences}, volume = {8}, number = {3}, pages = {34-40}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajls.20200803.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20200803.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajls.20200803.11}, abstract = {In recent days there is change in trend of rainfall across the country where its starts in May and ceases early-to-mid September. This implies that adjusting cropping calendar is vital to adapt to the changing climate of the area. The field experiments were carried out at Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center (DZARC) and Alemtena during the main cropping season from 2015 to 2017 to determine appropriate sowing date for tef varieties. The treatments consisted of three sowing date (early-July, mid-July, and late-July) and two recently released tef varieties (Kora and Boset). The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design in a factorial arrangement and replicated four times per treatment. Data were taken crop growth, biomass yield, and grain yield. Combined analysis of variance overs years showed that interaction effects of variety by sowing date were significant effects on plant height and panicle length at DZAR while, at Alemtena, plant height and panicle length was significantly affected only by variety. At both location biomass and grain yield of tef was significantly affected by variety and sowing date interaction. Among the different sowing date treatments, sowing of Kora variety in mid-July showed the highest mean biomass yield (8444.4 kg/ha and grain yield (1813.3 kg/ha) at DZARC but at Alemtena the highest biomass (9766.2 kg/ha) and grain yield (1595.7 kg/ha) was achieved Kora was sown in earl-July. However, sowing of Boset variety at mid-July was comparable yield advantages. Over all, based on the result of this study, sowing of mid-July and early-July would be recommended for the mentioned variety production at DZARC and Alemtena, respectively.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Planting Time Effects on the Productivity of Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Varieties in Ethiopia AU - Bizuwork Tafes Desta AU - Almaz Meseret Gezahegn AU - Sisay Eshetu Tesema Y1 - 2020/08/13 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20200803.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajls.20200803.11 T2 - American Journal of Life Sciences JF - American Journal of Life Sciences JO - American Journal of Life Sciences SP - 34 EP - 40 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5737 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20200803.11 AB - In recent days there is change in trend of rainfall across the country where its starts in May and ceases early-to-mid September. This implies that adjusting cropping calendar is vital to adapt to the changing climate of the area. The field experiments were carried out at Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center (DZARC) and Alemtena during the main cropping season from 2015 to 2017 to determine appropriate sowing date for tef varieties. The treatments consisted of three sowing date (early-July, mid-July, and late-July) and two recently released tef varieties (Kora and Boset). The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design in a factorial arrangement and replicated four times per treatment. Data were taken crop growth, biomass yield, and grain yield. Combined analysis of variance overs years showed that interaction effects of variety by sowing date were significant effects on plant height and panicle length at DZAR while, at Alemtena, plant height and panicle length was significantly affected only by variety. At both location biomass and grain yield of tef was significantly affected by variety and sowing date interaction. Among the different sowing date treatments, sowing of Kora variety in mid-July showed the highest mean biomass yield (8444.4 kg/ha and grain yield (1813.3 kg/ha) at DZARC but at Alemtena the highest biomass (9766.2 kg/ha) and grain yield (1595.7 kg/ha) was achieved Kora was sown in earl-July. However, sowing of Boset variety at mid-July was comparable yield advantages. Over all, based on the result of this study, sowing of mid-July and early-July would be recommended for the mentioned variety production at DZARC and Alemtena, respectively. VL - 8 IS - 3 ER -