A productivity of queen bee depends on several factors. Queen age is one of the most important factors affecting queen’s, as well as colony performance. The study was conducted to determine the effects of queen ages on performances of honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies. The queens were reared from local honeybee, Apis mellifera bandasii (A. m. bandasii); nuclei colonies were formed and then transferred to standard Langstroth hives when all the frames of the nuclei boxes were occupied with brood and adult bees. Performances of the colonies headed by the new queens were evaluated over three years. Brood area, number of queen cell cups started and swarm queen cells constructed, number of empty cells/100 cells/per colony (brood solidness) and honey yield per harvest were determined every active season for three consecutive years. Colonies headed by 1-, 2- and 3-year-old queens produced 4721.43±511.85, 5523.08±490.07 and 3433.82±413.83 cm2 sealed brood, and constructed 0.07±0.07, 2.23±0.52 and 9.90±1.89 queen cell cups and swarm cells/colony with 1.86±0.38, 2.40±1.65 and 8.85±2.52 empty cells/100 cells/per colony, respectively. Honey harvested from 1- and 3-year-old queen colonies averaged 13.34±1.11 and 10.50±2.04 kg/colony/harvest, respectively. The colonies headed by 1-, and 2-year-old queens had more brood areas, better brood solidity, less number of queen cells but no significant differences in honey production compared to colonies headed by 3-year-old queens. Our results indicate that queen age has a significant effect on colony performances, suggesting that requeening every three years is adequate for our local honeybee colonies.
Published in | American Journal of Life Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajls.20190706.15 |
Page(s) | 128-132 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Apis mellifera, Queen Age, Brood Rearing, Swarm Queen Cells, Queen Cell Cups
[1] | Cengiz M, Emsen B, Dodologlu A. Some characteristics of queenbees (Apis mellifera L.) rearing in queenright and queenless colonies. J Anim Vet Adv. 2009; 8: 1083–1085. |
[2] | Invernizzi C, Harriet J, Carvalho S. Evaluation of different queen introduction methods in honeybee colonies in Uruguay. Apiact. 2006; 41: 1–20. |
[3] | Akyol E, Yeninar H, Karatepe M, Karatepe B, Özkök D. Effects of queen ages on Varroa (Varroa destructor) infestation level in honey bee (Apis mellifera caucasica) colonies and colony performance. Ital J Anim Sci. 2007; 6: 143–149. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2007.143. |
[4] | Seeley TD. Life History Strategy of the Honey Bee, Apis mellifera. Oecologia. 1978; 32: 109–118. |
[5] | Crane E. Bees and beekeeping: Science, practice and world resources. Oxford: Heinemann Newnes; 1990. |
[6] | De Hazan M, Lensky Y, Cassier P. Effects of queen honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) ageing on her attractiveness to workers. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Physiol. 1989; 93: 777–783. doi: 10.1016/0300-9629(89)90501-X. |
[7] | Lensky Y, Slabezki Y. The inhibiting effect of the queen bee (Apis mellfer L.) foot-print pheromone on the construction of swarming queen cups. J Insect Physiol. 1981; 27: 313–323. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(81)90077-9. |
[8] | Simpson J. Variation in the incidence of swarming among colonies of Apis mellifera throughout the summer. Insectes Soc. 1959; 6: 85–99. |
[9] | Forster IW. Swarm Control in Honey Bee Colonies. New Zeal J Agric Res. 1969; 12: 605–610. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1969.10421245. |
[10] | Hatjina F, Costa C, Büchler R, Uzunov A, Drazic M, Filipi J, et al. Population dynamics of European honey bee genotypes under sdifferent environmental conditions. J Apic Res. 2014; 53: 233–247. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.53.2.05. |
[11] | Hauser H, Lensky Y. The effect of the age of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L) queen on worker population, swarming and honey yields in a subtropical climate. Apidologie. 1994; 25: 566–578. doi: 10.1051/apido:19940607. |
[12] | Rangel J, Böröczky K, Schal C, Tarpy DR. Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Queen Reproductive Potential Affects Queen Mandibular Gland Pheromone Composition and Worker Retinue Response. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0156027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156027. |
[13] | Furgala B, McCutcheon DM. Wintering productive colonies. In: Graham JM, editor. The hive and the honey bee. Hamilton, Illinois: Dadant & Sons; 1992. pp. 829–868. |
[14] | Akyol E, Kaftanoglu O. Colony characteristics and the performance of Caucasian (Apis mellifera caucasica) and Mugla (Apis mellifera anatoliaca) bees and their reciprocal crosses. J Apic Res. 2001; 40: 11–15. |
[15] | Delaplane KS, Steen J van der, Guzman-Novoa E. Standard methods for estimating strength parameters of Apis mellifera colonies. In: Dietemann V, Ellis JD, Neumann P, editors. The COLOSS BEEBOOK, Volume I: standard methods for Apis mellifera research. Journal of Apicultural Research 52 (1); 2013. pp. 1–12. doi: 10.3896/IBRA/1.52.1.03. |
[16] | Maucourt S, Fournier V, Giovenazzo P. Comparison of three methods to multiply honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Apidologie. 2018; 49: 314–324. doi: 10.1007/s13592-017-0556-9. |
[17] | Kostarelou-Damianidou M, Thrasyvoulou A, Tselios D, Bladenopoulos K. Brood and honey production of honey bee colonies requeened at various frequencies. J Apic Res. 1995; 34: 9–14. doi: 10.1080/00218839.1995.11100880. |
[18] | Akyol E, Yeninar H, Korkmaz A, Çakmak İ, Akyol E, Yeninar H, et al. An observation study on the effects of queen age on some characteristics of honey bee colonies. Ital J Anim Sci. 2008; 7: 19–25. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2008.19. |
[19] | Winston ML. The Biology of the Honey Bee. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press; 1987. doi: 10.1002/9780470114735.hawley00624. |
[20] | Uzunov A, Costa C, Panasiuk B, Meixner M, Kryger P, Hatjina F, et al. Swarming, defensive and hygienic behaviour in honey bee colonies of different genetic origin in a pan-European experiment. J Apic Res. 2014; 53: 248–260. doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.53.2.06. |
[21] | Uzunov A. Biological and productive characteristics of native honey bee (Apis mellifera macedonica) on the territory of Republic of Macedonia, PhD thesis. Faculty for Agricultural Sciences and Food. Skopje, Macedonia; 2013. |
[22] | Simpson J. The age of queen honeybees and the tendency of their colonies to swarm. J Agric Sci. Queen Mary, University of London; 1960; 54: 195. doi: 10.1017/s002185960002236x. |
[23] | Woyke J. Effect of Sex Allele Homo-Heterozygosity on Honeybee Colony Populations and on their Honey Production 1. Favourable Development Conditions and Unrestricted Queens. J Apic Res. 1981; 20: 148–155. doi: 10.1080/00218839.1980.11099997. |
[24] | Lee K V., Goblirsch M, McDermott E, Tarpy DR, Spivak M. Is the Brood Pattern within a Honey Bee Colony a Reliable Indicator of Queen Quality? Insects. 2019; 10: 12. doi: 10.3390/insects10010012. |
[25] | VanEngelsdorp D, Tarpy DR, Lengerich EJ, Pettis JS. Idiopathic brood disease syndrome and queen events as precursors of colony mortality in migratory beekeeping operations in the eastern United States. Prev Vet Med. Elsevier B. V.; 2013; 108: 225–233. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.08.004. |
[26] | Laidlaw HH. Cotemporary Queen rearing. Hamilton, Illinois: Dadant and Sons Inc.; 1979. p. 199. |
[27] | Woyke J. Correlations and interactions between population, length of worker life and honey production by honeybees in a temperate region. J Apic Res. 1984; 23: 148–156. doi: 10.1080/00218839.1984.11100624. |
[28] | Guler A, Kaftanoglu O. Determination of Performances Some Important Races and Ecotypes of Turkish Honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) Under Migratory Beekeeping Conditions. Tr J Vet Anim Sci. 1999; 23: 577–581. |
[29] | Szabo TI, Lefkovitch LP. Effect of brood production and population size on honey production of honeybee colonies in Alberta, Canada. Apidologie. 1989; 20: 157–163. doi: 10.1051/apido:19890206. |
APA Style
Zewdu Ararso Hora, Gemechis Legesse Yadeta, Tadele Alemu Hundie. (2019). Young Honeybee (Apis mellifera bandasii) Queens Perform Better than Old Ones. American Journal of Life Sciences, 7(6), 128-132. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20190706.15
ACS Style
Zewdu Ararso Hora; Gemechis Legesse Yadeta; Tadele Alemu Hundie. Young Honeybee (Apis mellifera bandasii) Queens Perform Better than Old Ones. Am. J. Life Sci. 2019, 7(6), 128-132. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20190706.15
AMA Style
Zewdu Ararso Hora, Gemechis Legesse Yadeta, Tadele Alemu Hundie. Young Honeybee (Apis mellifera bandasii) Queens Perform Better than Old Ones. Am J Life Sci. 2019;7(6):128-132. doi: 10.11648/j.ajls.20190706.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajls.20190706.15, author = {Zewdu Ararso Hora and Gemechis Legesse Yadeta and Tadele Alemu Hundie}, title = {Young Honeybee (Apis mellifera bandasii) Queens Perform Better than Old Ones}, journal = {American Journal of Life Sciences}, volume = {7}, number = {6}, pages = {128-132}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajls.20190706.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20190706.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajls.20190706.15}, abstract = {A productivity of queen bee depends on several factors. Queen age is one of the most important factors affecting queen’s, as well as colony performance. The study was conducted to determine the effects of queen ages on performances of honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies. The queens were reared from local honeybee, Apis mellifera bandasii (A. m. bandasii); nuclei colonies were formed and then transferred to standard Langstroth hives when all the frames of the nuclei boxes were occupied with brood and adult bees. Performances of the colonies headed by the new queens were evaluated over three years. Brood area, number of queen cell cups started and swarm queen cells constructed, number of empty cells/100 cells/per colony (brood solidness) and honey yield per harvest were determined every active season for three consecutive years. Colonies headed by 1-, 2- and 3-year-old queens produced 4721.43±511.85, 5523.08±490.07 and 3433.82±413.83 cm2 sealed brood, and constructed 0.07±0.07, 2.23±0.52 and 9.90±1.89 queen cell cups and swarm cells/colony with 1.86±0.38, 2.40±1.65 and 8.85±2.52 empty cells/100 cells/per colony, respectively. Honey harvested from 1- and 3-year-old queen colonies averaged 13.34±1.11 and 10.50±2.04 kg/colony/harvest, respectively. The colonies headed by 1-, and 2-year-old queens had more brood areas, better brood solidity, less number of queen cells but no significant differences in honey production compared to colonies headed by 3-year-old queens. Our results indicate that queen age has a significant effect on colony performances, suggesting that requeening every three years is adequate for our local honeybee colonies.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Young Honeybee (Apis mellifera bandasii) Queens Perform Better than Old Ones AU - Zewdu Ararso Hora AU - Gemechis Legesse Yadeta AU - Tadele Alemu Hundie Y1 - 2019/12/24 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20190706.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajls.20190706.15 T2 - American Journal of Life Sciences JF - American Journal of Life Sciences JO - American Journal of Life Sciences SP - 128 EP - 132 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5737 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajls.20190706.15 AB - A productivity of queen bee depends on several factors. Queen age is one of the most important factors affecting queen’s, as well as colony performance. The study was conducted to determine the effects of queen ages on performances of honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies. The queens were reared from local honeybee, Apis mellifera bandasii (A. m. bandasii); nuclei colonies were formed and then transferred to standard Langstroth hives when all the frames of the nuclei boxes were occupied with brood and adult bees. Performances of the colonies headed by the new queens were evaluated over three years. Brood area, number of queen cell cups started and swarm queen cells constructed, number of empty cells/100 cells/per colony (brood solidness) and honey yield per harvest were determined every active season for three consecutive years. Colonies headed by 1-, 2- and 3-year-old queens produced 4721.43±511.85, 5523.08±490.07 and 3433.82±413.83 cm2 sealed brood, and constructed 0.07±0.07, 2.23±0.52 and 9.90±1.89 queen cell cups and swarm cells/colony with 1.86±0.38, 2.40±1.65 and 8.85±2.52 empty cells/100 cells/per colony, respectively. Honey harvested from 1- and 3-year-old queen colonies averaged 13.34±1.11 and 10.50±2.04 kg/colony/harvest, respectively. The colonies headed by 1-, and 2-year-old queens had more brood areas, better brood solidity, less number of queen cells but no significant differences in honey production compared to colonies headed by 3-year-old queens. Our results indicate that queen age has a significant effect on colony performances, suggesting that requeening every three years is adequate for our local honeybee colonies. VL - 7 IS - 6 ER -