Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices

Hasan Tahat; Mylene Gueneron; Gary Pruitt; Pius Ndegwa; Nichole Embertson

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15

| Peer-Reviewed

Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices

Hasan Tahat, Mylene Gueneron, Gary Pruitt, Pius Ndegwa, Nichole Embertson

Published in American Journal of Environmental Protection (Volume 10, Issue 6)

Received: 22 November 2021 Accepted: 15 December 2021 Published: 29 December 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency (YRCAA) in collaboration with the Dairy industry and environmental scientists, has developed, over a period of three years, an Air Quality Management Policy for Dairy Operations. The Policy is geared towards a systematic implementation of proven Best Management Practices (BMPs), which are specific for each dairy operation, to reduce air emissions in the Yakima Valley, WA. The BMPs are grouped in tiers with respect to effectiveness, cost, ease of implementation, and compatibility with the State mandated nutrient management plans for dairies. Tier 1 BMPs are generally the least expensive and easiest to implement, while Tier 3 BMPs are the most challenging and expensive to implement. The BMPs focus on air emission reduction of major air pollutants from dairy operations, namely; ammonia, nitrous oxide, hydrogen sulfide, volatile organic compounds, odor, particulate matter and methane. The dairy operations are broken down into the following components/systems: nutrition, feed management, milking parlor, housing (freestall and drylots), grazing, manure management and land application. The components in each dairy depend on the overall management design and not every dairy has all these components. A total of 41 dairy operations within the YRCAA jurisdiction were included in the policy representing a total of 145,000 head of cattle (lactating cows, dry cows, heifers and calves). To obtain baseline data, the YRCAA staff conducted site visits for each facility in 2014 and assigned a “score” for each dairy component ranging from A to D. The results presented here are not specific to each facility but aggregated. Based on all participating dairies; 21% scored an “A”, 30% scored a “B”, 37% scored a “C”, and 12% scored a “D”. These data will be used as a baseline to compare future BMPs implementations to determine air emission reductions. In general, results show that guided and voluntary implementation of BMPs has the potential to significantly reduce ammonia, volatile organic compounds, and odor emissions in the Valley.

Published in	American Journal of Environmental Protection (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15
Page(s)	158-165
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Dairy Operation, Air Quality, Air Emissions Reduction, Best Management Practices, Cost and Tiers, Implementation Dairy Systems/Component, Baseline Data

References

[1]	Armstrong, D V. 1994. “Heat Stress Interaction with Shade and Cooling.” Journal of Dairy Science 77 (7). Elsevier: 2044–50. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77149-6. Sund, J. L., C. J. Evenson, K. A. Strevett, R. W. Nairn, D. Athay, and E. Trawinski. 2001. Nutrient conversion by photosynthetic bacteria in a concentrated animal feeding operation lagoon system. J. Environ. Qual. 30: 648-655.
[2]	Bjorneberg, D L, A B Leytem, D T Westermann, P R Griffiths, L Shao, and M J Pollard. 2009. “Measurement of Atmospheric Ammonia, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide at a Concentrated Dairy Production Facility in Southern Idaho Using Open-Path FTIR Spectrometry.” American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 52 (5): 1749–56.
[3]	Borrelli, J., J. M. Gregory, and W. Abtew. 1989. Wind barriers - a reevaluation of height, spacing, and porosity. Trans. ASAE. 32: 2023-2027.
[4]	Braam C. R., Ketelaars J. M, and M. J. Smits. 1997. “Effects of Floor Design and Floor Cleaning on Ammonia Emission from Cubicle Houses for Dairy Cows.” Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Sciences, no. 45. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Netherlands Jounral of Agricultural Science 45: 49–64.
[5]	Embertson, N. M, A. L. Elliottt, and J. G. Davis. 2007. Review: Mitigation Strategies To Reduce Harmful Air Emissions From Livestock Operations.
[6]	Frank, B., M. Persson, and G. Gustafsson. 2002. “Feeding Dairy Cows for Decreased Ammonia Emission.” Livestock Production Science 76 (1-2): 171–79.
[7]	Freedman, D., B. Koopman, and E. P. Lincoln. 1983. “Chemical and Biological Flocculation of Purple Sulphur Bacteria in Anaerobic Lagoon Effluent.” Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research.
[8]	Heederik, Dick, Torben Sigsgaard, Peter S Thorne, Joel N Kline, Rachel Avery, Jakob H Bønløkke, Elizabeth a Chrischilles, et al. 2007. “Health Effects of Airborne Exposures from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations.” Environmental Health Perspectives 115 (2): 298–302. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8835.
[9]	Hilhorst, M A, R W Melse, H C Willers, C M Groenestein, and G J Monteny. 1999. Reduction of Methane Emissions from Manure. Wageningen, The Netherlands.
[10]	Johnson, K. A., and D. E. Johnson. 1995. “Methane Emissions from Cattle.” Journal of Animal Science 73 (8): 2483–92.
[11]	Kroodsma, W, J. W. H Huis in ’t Veld, and R Scholtens. 1993. “Ammonia Emission and Its Reduction from Cubicle Houses by Flushing.” Livestock Production Science.
[12]	Lawrence, A. J., R. H. Grant, M. T. boehm, A. j. Heber, J. M. wolf, S. D. cortus, B. W. Bogan, J. C. Ramirez-Dorronsoro, C. A. Diehl. 2009. "Measurements of Air Quality around Various Open Areas Sources in USA." International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering 1: 4.
[13]	Leytem, April B, Robert S Dungan, David L Bjorneberg, and Anita C Koehn. 2015. “Emissions of Ammonia, Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrous Oxide from Dairy Cattle Housing and Manure Management Systems.” Journal of Environmental Quality 40 (5): 1383–94. Accessed January 27. doi: 10.2134/jeq2009.0515.
[14]	Liang, Y., J. J. Leonard, J. J R Feddes, and W. B. McGill. 2006. “Influence of Carbon and Buffer Amendment on Ammonia Volatilization in Composting.” Bioresource Technology 97 (5): 748–61.
[15]	Loftus, Christine, Michael Yost, Paul Sampson, Griselda Arias, Elizabeth Torres, Victoria Breckwich Vasquez, Parveen Bhatti, and Catherine Karr. 2015. “Regional PM2.5 and Asthma Morbidity in an Agricultural Community: A Panel Study.” Environmental Research 136 (January). Elsevier: 505–12. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.030.
[16]	Miller, Daniel N, and Elaine D Berry. 2005. “Cattle Feedlot Soil Moisture and Manure Content: Impacts on Greenhouse Gases, Odor Compounds, Nitrogen Losses and Dust.” J. Environ. Qual, no. 34: 644–55.
[17]	Misselbrook, Tom H, Siobhan K E Brookman, Ken A Smith, Trevor Cumby, Adrian G Williams, and Dan F Mccrory. 2005. “Atmospheric Pollutants and Trace Gases Crusting of Stored Dairy Slurry to Abate Ammonia Emissions : Pilot-Scale Studies.” Journal of Environmental Quality 34: 411–19.
[18]	Mitlöhner, F M, M L Galyean, and J J Mcglone. 2002. “Shade Effects on Performance, Carcass Traits, Physiology, and Behavior of Heat-Stressed Feedlot Heifers.” Journal of Animal Science 80: 2043–50.
[19]	Monteny, Gert J., Andre Bannink, and David Chadwick. 2006. “Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategies for Animal Husbandry.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112 (2-3): 163–70.
[20]	Ndegwa, P. M, A. N. Hristov, J. Arogo, R. E. Sheffield. 2008. A review of ammonia emissions mitigation techniques for concentrated animal feeding operations. Biosyst. Engineering 100 (4): 453-469.
[21]	Pope, C Arden, Majid Ezzati, and Douglas W Dockery. 2009. “Fine-Particulate Air Pollution and Life Expectancy in the United States.” The New England Journal of Medicine 360 (4): 376–86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0805646.
[22]	YRCAA dairy policy. 2013. Air Quality Management Policy and Best Management Practices for Dairy Operations. Yakima, WA.
[23]	Purdy, C W, R N Clark, and D C Straus. 2009. “Ambient and Indoor Particulate Aerosols Generated by Dairies in the Southern High Plains.” Journal of Dairy Science 92 (12): 6033–45. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2498.
[24]	Rotz, C. A. 2004. “Management to Reduce Nitrogen Losses in Animal Production.” Journal of Animal Science.
[25]	Smits, M. C. J., H. Valk, A. Elzing, and A. Keen. 1995. “Effect of Protein Nutrition on Ammonia Emission from a Cubicle House for Dairy Cattle.” Livestock Production Science.
[26]	Søgaard, H. T, S. G Sommer, N. J Hutchings, J. F. M Huijsmans, D. W Bussink, and F Nicholson. 2002. “Ammonia Volatilization from Field-Applied Animal Slurry—the ALFAM Model.” Atmospheric Environment 36 (20): 3309–19. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00300-X.
[27]	Sommer, S G, and J E Olesen. 2000. “Modelling Ammonia Volatilization from Animal Slurry Applied with Trail Hoses to Cereals.” Atmospheric Environment 34 (15): 2361–72. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00442-2.
[28]	Thompson, R B, and J J Meisinger. 2004. “Gaseous Nitrogen Losses and Ammonia Volatilization Measurement Following Land Application of Cattle Slurry in the Mid-Atlantic Region of the.” Plant and Soil 266: 231–46.
[29]	Washington Dairy Product Commission (WDPC), 2013.
[30]	White, S. L., R. E. Sheffield, S. P. Washburn, L. D. King, and J. T. Green. 2001. Spatial and time distribution of dairy cattle excreta in an intensive pasture system. J. Environ. Qual. 30: 2180-2187.
[31]	Williams, D’Ann L, Patrick N Breysse, Meredith C McCormack, Gregory B Diette, Shawn McKenzie, and Alison S Geyh. 2011. “Airborne Cow Allergen, Ammonia and Particulate Matter at Homes Vary with Distance to Industrial Scale Dairy Operations: An Exposure Assessment.” Environmental Health : A Global Access Science Source 10 (1). BioMed Central Ltd: 72. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-72.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Hasan Tahat, Mylene Gueneron, Gary Pruitt, Pius Ndegwa, Nichole Embertson. (2021). Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 10(6), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Hasan Tahat; Mylene Gueneron; Gary Pruitt; Pius Ndegwa; Nichole Embertson. Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices. Am. J. Environ. Prot. 2021, 10(6), 158-165. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Hasan Tahat, Mylene Gueneron, Gary Pruitt, Pius Ndegwa, Nichole Embertson. Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices. Am J Environ Prot. 2021;10(6):158-165. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15,
  author = {Hasan Tahat and Mylene Gueneron and Gary Pruitt and Pius Ndegwa and Nichole Embertson},
  title = {Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices},
  journal = {American Journal of Environmental Protection},
  volume = {10},
  number = {6},
  pages = {158-165},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajep.20211006.15},
  abstract = {The Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency (YRCAA) in collaboration with the Dairy industry and environmental scientists, has developed, over a period of three years, an Air Quality Management Policy for Dairy Operations. The Policy is geared towards a systematic implementation of proven Best Management Practices (BMPs), which are specific for each dairy operation, to reduce air emissions in the Yakima Valley, WA. The BMPs are grouped in tiers with respect to effectiveness, cost, ease of implementation, and compatibility with the State mandated nutrient management plans for dairies. Tier 1 BMPs are generally the least expensive and easiest to implement, while Tier 3 BMPs are the most challenging and expensive to implement. The BMPs focus on air emission reduction of major air pollutants from dairy operations, namely; ammonia, nitrous oxide, hydrogen sulfide, volatile organic compounds, odor, particulate matter and methane. The dairy operations are broken down into the following components/systems: nutrition, feed management, milking parlor, housing (freestall and drylots), grazing, manure management and land application. The components in each dairy depend on the overall management design and not every dairy has all these components. A total of 41 dairy operations within the YRCAA jurisdiction were included in the policy representing a total of 145,000 head of cattle (lactating cows, dry cows, heifers and calves). To obtain baseline data, the YRCAA staff conducted site visits for each facility in 2014 and assigned a “score” for each dairy component ranging from A to D. The results presented here are not specific to each facility but aggregated. Based on all participating dairies; 21% scored an “A”, 30% scored a “B”, 37% scored a “C”, and 12% scored a “D”. These data will be used as a baseline to compare future BMPs implementations to determine air emission reductions. In general, results show that guided and voluntary implementation of BMPs has the potential to significantly reduce ammonia, volatile organic compounds, and odor emissions in the Valley.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices
AU  - Hasan Tahat
AU  - Mylene Gueneron
AU  - Gary Pruitt
AU  - Pius Ndegwa
AU  - Nichole Embertson
Y1  - 2021/12/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15
T2  - American Journal of Environmental Protection
JF  - American Journal of Environmental Protection
JO  - American Journal of Environmental Protection
SP  - 158
EP  - 165
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5699
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15
AB  - The Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency (YRCAA) in collaboration with the Dairy industry and environmental scientists, has developed, over a period of three years, an Air Quality Management Policy for Dairy Operations. The Policy is geared towards a systematic implementation of proven Best Management Practices (BMPs), which are specific for each dairy operation, to reduce air emissions in the Yakima Valley, WA. The BMPs are grouped in tiers with respect to effectiveness, cost, ease of implementation, and compatibility with the State mandated nutrient management plans for dairies. Tier 1 BMPs are generally the least expensive and easiest to implement, while Tier 3 BMPs are the most challenging and expensive to implement. The BMPs focus on air emission reduction of major air pollutants from dairy operations, namely; ammonia, nitrous oxide, hydrogen sulfide, volatile organic compounds, odor, particulate matter and methane. The dairy operations are broken down into the following components/systems: nutrition, feed management, milking parlor, housing (freestall and drylots), grazing, manure management and land application. The components in each dairy depend on the overall management design and not every dairy has all these components. A total of 41 dairy operations within the YRCAA jurisdiction were included in the policy representing a total of 145,000 head of cattle (lactating cows, dry cows, heifers and calves). To obtain baseline data, the YRCAA staff conducted site visits for each facility in 2014 and assigned a “score” for each dairy component ranging from A to D. The results presented here are not specific to each facility but aggregated. Based on all participating dairies; 21% scored an “A”, 30% scored a “B”, 37% scored a “C”, and 12% scored a “D”. These data will be used as a baseline to compare future BMPs implementations to determine air emission reductions. In general, results show that guided and voluntary implementation of BMPs has the potential to significantly reduce ammonia, volatile organic compounds, and odor emissions in the Valley.
VL  - 10
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Hasan Tahat

Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency (YRCAA), Yakima, USA
Mylene Gueneron

Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency (YRCAA), Yakima, USA
Gary Pruitt

Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency (YRCAA), Yakima, USA
Pius Ndegwa

Biological Systems Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, USA
Nichole Embertson

Whatcom Conservation District, Lynden, USA

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Hasan Tahat, Mylene Gueneron, Gary Pruitt, Pius Ndegwa, Nichole Embertson. (2021). Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 10(6), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Hasan Tahat; Mylene Gueneron; Gary Pruitt; Pius Ndegwa; Nichole Embertson. Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices. Am. J. Environ. Prot. 2021, 10(6), 158-165. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Hasan Tahat, Mylene Gueneron, Gary Pruitt, Pius Ndegwa, Nichole Embertson. Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices. Am J Environ Prot. 2021;10(6):158-165. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15,
  author = {Hasan Tahat and Mylene Gueneron and Gary Pruitt and Pius Ndegwa and Nichole Embertson},
  title = {Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices},
  journal = {American Journal of Environmental Protection},
  volume = {10},
  number = {6},
  pages = {158-165},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajep.20211006.15},
  abstract = {The Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency (YRCAA) in collaboration with the Dairy industry and environmental scientists, has developed, over a period of three years, an Air Quality Management Policy for Dairy Operations. The Policy is geared towards a systematic implementation of proven Best Management Practices (BMPs), which are specific for each dairy operation, to reduce air emissions in the Yakima Valley, WA. The BMPs are grouped in tiers with respect to effectiveness, cost, ease of implementation, and compatibility with the State mandated nutrient management plans for dairies. Tier 1 BMPs are generally the least expensive and easiest to implement, while Tier 3 BMPs are the most challenging and expensive to implement. The BMPs focus on air emission reduction of major air pollutants from dairy operations, namely; ammonia, nitrous oxide, hydrogen sulfide, volatile organic compounds, odor, particulate matter and methane. The dairy operations are broken down into the following components/systems: nutrition, feed management, milking parlor, housing (freestall and drylots), grazing, manure management and land application. The components in each dairy depend on the overall management design and not every dairy has all these components. A total of 41 dairy operations within the YRCAA jurisdiction were included in the policy representing a total of 145,000 head of cattle (lactating cows, dry cows, heifers and calves). To obtain baseline data, the YRCAA staff conducted site visits for each facility in 2014 and assigned a “score” for each dairy component ranging from A to D. The results presented here are not specific to each facility but aggregated. Based on all participating dairies; 21% scored an “A”, 30% scored a “B”, 37% scored a “C”, and 12% scored a “D”. These data will be used as a baseline to compare future BMPs implementations to determine air emission reductions. In general, results show that guided and voluntary implementation of BMPs has the potential to significantly reduce ammonia, volatile organic compounds, and odor emissions in the Valley.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Regional Air Emissions Reduction from Dairy Operations Via Best Management Practices
AU  - Hasan Tahat
AU  - Mylene Gueneron
AU  - Gary Pruitt
AU  - Pius Ndegwa
AU  - Nichole Embertson
Y1  - 2021/12/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15
T2  - American Journal of Environmental Protection
JF  - American Journal of Environmental Protection
JO  - American Journal of Environmental Protection
SP  - 158
EP  - 165
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5699
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211006.15
AB  - The Yakima Regional Clean Air Agency (YRCAA) in collaboration with the Dairy industry and environmental scientists, has developed, over a period of three years, an Air Quality Management Policy for Dairy Operations. The Policy is geared towards a systematic implementation of proven Best Management Practices (BMPs), which are specific for each dairy operation, to reduce air emissions in the Yakima Valley, WA. The BMPs are grouped in tiers with respect to effectiveness, cost, ease of implementation, and compatibility with the State mandated nutrient management plans for dairies. Tier 1 BMPs are generally the least expensive and easiest to implement, while Tier 3 BMPs are the most challenging and expensive to implement. The BMPs focus on air emission reduction of major air pollutants from dairy operations, namely; ammonia, nitrous oxide, hydrogen sulfide, volatile organic compounds, odor, particulate matter and methane. The dairy operations are broken down into the following components/systems: nutrition, feed management, milking parlor, housing (freestall and drylots), grazing, manure management and land application. The components in each dairy depend on the overall management design and not every dairy has all these components. A total of 41 dairy operations within the YRCAA jurisdiction were included in the policy representing a total of 145,000 head of cattle (lactating cows, dry cows, heifers and calves). To obtain baseline data, the YRCAA staff conducted site visits for each facility in 2014 and assigned a “score” for each dairy component ranging from A to D. The results presented here are not specific to each facility but aggregated. Based on all participating dairies; 21% scored an “A”, 30% scored a “B”, 37% scored a “C”, and 12% scored a “D”. These data will be used as a baseline to compare future BMPs implementations to determine air emission reductions. In general, results show that guided and voluntary implementation of BMPs has the potential to significantly reduce ammonia, volatile organic compounds, and odor emissions in the Valley.
VL  - 10
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download