As part of agriculture, agroforestry has great contribution as in-situ conservation for global biodiversity, because it contains different components. Besides, it improves the livelihoods of smallholder farmers by providing various products and services. However, there are limited scientific evidence and studies so far available on the roles of agroforestry to biodiversity conservation. Objective of the current study was to assess contribution of agroforestry on woody species diversity, conservation to sustain rural livelihoods at Ginir district, Southeast Ethiopia. Totally, six villages were selected based on their respective distance from the accessible roads and their agroforestry potential. A total of 70 sample HHs were randomly selected from the farmers full practiced agroforestry categories based on proportions of their representation. For the inventory of woody species, the lengths of farm boundary plantations were divided into 10 m sections. One section was selected for every 50 m of boundary length. A quadrant size of 10 m × 5 m and 50 m × 50 m were used for homegarden and parklands were conducted by taken one quadrant sample for each agroforestry practice from a house head farm. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed. Measurement of diversity needed to quantify and characterize agroforestry practices according to the degree of diversity and to examined the relationship of different agroforestry practices and woody species diversity at the village level and Kebeles. The result showed that 67 woody species belonging to 36 families and 58 genera were identified. Miomosoidceae was the most dominant family with 10 (15%) species, followed by Myrtaceae family with 6 (9%) species, Anacardiaceae and Rutaceae family accounted for 8 (12%). In terms of species diversity, home gardens (2.47) were more diversified than parklands (2.33) and boundary plantation (1.98) in the overall study sites. Finally, it is concluded that Agroforestry were used to maintaining or as an option for maintaining native woody species to improve the rural community livelihoods of the rural farmers.
| Published in | American Journal of Environmental Protection (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajep.20211004.13 |
| Page(s) | 90-99 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Woody Species, Diversity, Conservation, Household, Agroforestry Practices
| [1] | Nikiema, A., van der Maesen, L. J. G. & Hall John, B. (2005). Woody species composition of Sudan savanna parklands in relation to rural land use gradients in Burkina Faso. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, 102 pp. |
| [2] | Badege, B., Sisay, A., Efrem, B., Haile Selassie, B., & Michael, W. (2006). Agricultural and rural development in Ethiopia summary and recommendations, International conference on a development strategy of Horn of Africa rural and agricultural development panel organized by the Africa program, the University of Texas, October 20-22, 2006. |
| [3] | Ministry of Mines and Energy (MoME). (2003). Geological Survey of Ethiopia: Industrial Minerals and Rocks Resource Potentials of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. |
| [4] | Feoli, E., Gallizia, L. V. & Woldu, Z. (2002). Processes of Environmental Degradation and Opportunities for Rehabilitation in Adwa, Northern Ethiopia. Landscape Ecology 17: 315-32. |
| [5] | Duguma, L. A. & Hager, H. (2010). Woody plants diversity and possession, and their future prospects in small-scale tree and shrub growing in agricultural landscapes in central highlands of Ethiopia. Small-Scale Forestry, 9 (2), 153–174. doi: 10.1007/s11842-009-9108-0. |
| [6] | Kiptot, E.& S. Franzel. (2011). Gender and Agroforestry in Africa: Are women participating? World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi. |
| [7] | McNeely J. A. &Scroth G., (2006). Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation - traditional practices, present dynamics and lessons for the future. Biodiversity Conservation, 15: 549-554. |
| [8] | Kindt, R., Simons, A. J. &Damme, P. V. (2004). Do Farm Characteristics Explain Differences in Tree Species Diversity among Western Kenyan Farms? Agroforestry Systems 63: 63 – 74. |
| [9] | Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. London: Croom Helm Limited, 179 pp. |
| [10] | Ingram, J. (1990). The role of trees in maintaining and improving soil productivity - a review of the literature. In: Prinsley, R. T. (Ed.). Agroforestry for Sustainable Production: Economic Implications. Commonwealth Science Council, London, pp. 243-303. |
| [11] | Boffa, J. M., Taonda B. J. S. and Dickey B. J. (2000). Field scale influence of karate (Vitellariaparadoxa) on sorghum production in the Sudan zone of Burkina Faso. Agroforestry C. |
| [12] | Maitima et al, (2004). A methodological guide on how identify trends in the linkages between changes in land use, biodiversity and land degradation. LUCID Working Paper (No. 43). Nairobi, Kenya. |
| [13] | Zomer et al. (2009). Trees on farm: analysis of global extent and geographical patterns of agroforestry. ICRAF Working Paper (No. 89) Kenya, Nairobi. World Agroforestry Center. |
| [14] | Gardon, J. E., Hawthorne, W. D., Sandoval, G. and Barrance, A. J. (2003). Trees and farming in the dry zone of southern Honduras II: the potential for tree diversity conservation. Agroforestry Systems 59: 107-117. |
| [15] | GWARDO (2010). GinirWereda Agricultural and Rural Development Office basics data. |
| [16] | Bandeira PF, Martorell CJ, Meave A, Caballero J (2005) The role of rustic coffee plantations in the conservation of wild tree diversity in the Chinantec region of Mexico. BiodiversConserv 14: 1225–1240. |
| [17] | Tesfaye, A. (2005). Diversity in Homegarden Agroforestry systems of Southern Ethiopia. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Netherlands. |
| [18] | Abed, T. and Stephens, N. C. (2003). Tree measurement manual for farm foresters. Second edition, edited M. Parsons. National Forest Inventory, Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra. |
| [19] | Scherret al. (1990). Building opportunities for small-farm agroforestry to supply domestic wood markets in developing countries. Agroforestry System, 61-62 (1-3), 357–370. |
| [20] | Azene Bekele, (1993). Useful Trees and Shrubs of Ethiopia. Identification, Propagation, and Management for Agricultural and Pastoral Communities. Regional Soil Conservation Unit, Swedish International Development Authority. 473 pp. |
| [21] | Hedberg, I. & Edwards, S. (1989). Flora of Ethiopia, vol. 3. Addis Ababa and Asmara, Ethiopia, Uppsala, Sweden, 659 pp. |
| [22] | Kent M, Coker P (1992). Vegetation Description and Analysis: A practical approach. Belhaven Press, London. p. 263. |
| [23] | Diserud, O. H. and Odegaard, F. (2006) A Multiple-Site Similarity Measure. Biology Letters, 3, 20-22. |
| [24] | Mesele, N. (2002). Socio economic aspects of farmers eucalypt plant practice in the enset coffee based agroforestry system of Sidama, Ethiopia: The case of Awassa and shebedino district Msc thesis, ISSN 1402-201X. |
| [25] | Balcha, A. (2013). Plants used in material culture in Oromo community, Jimma, Southwest Oromia, Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science 7 (7): 285-299. |
| [26] | Belay T, et al (2014). Woody plant diversity in an Afromontane agricultural landscape Debark District, northern Ethiopia). Forests Trees and Livelihoods 23 (4): 261-279. |
| [27] | Bajigo A, Tadesse M (2015). Woody Species Diversity of Traditional Agroforestry Practices in Gununo Watershed in Wolayitta Zone, Ethiopia. Forest Resource 4: 4. |
| [28] | Motuma, T. el at (2008). Woody Species Diversity in a Changing Landscape in the South-Central Highland of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 128, 52-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.001 |
| [29] | Abiot M, Gonfa K (2015). Woody Species Diversity in Traditional Agroforestry Practices of Dellomenna District, Southeastern Ethiopia: Implication for Maintaining Native Woody Species. International Journal of Biodiversity pp. 1-13. |
| [30] | Tefera M, Mirutse G, Ensermu K (2015). Ethno-botanical study of homegarden plants in Sebeta-Awas District of the Oromia Region of Ethiopia to assess use, species diversity and management practices. Journal of Ethno-biology and Ethno-medicine 11 (64): 1-13. |
| [31] | Mekonnen, E. L., Asfaw, Z. &Zewudie, S. (2014). Plant species diversity of homegarden agroforestry in Jabitenan District, northwestern Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 6 (4), 301–307. doi: 10.5897/IJBC2014.0677. |
| [32] | Etefa G, Raj AJ (2013). Assessment of biodiversity in cropland agroforestry and its role in livelihood development in dryland areas: A case study from Tigray region, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Technology 9 (4): 829-844. |
| [33] | Tola el at (2014). Balancing ecosystem services and disservices: smallholder farmers & use and management of forest and trees in an agricultural landscape in southwestern Ethiopia. Ecology and Society 19 (1): 30. |
| [34] | Abreha A, Gebrekidan W (2014). Woody Plant Inventory and Diversity in Traditional Agroforestry of Selected Peasant Association of South Gonder Zone, North West Ethiopia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science 4 (15): 2224-3216. |
| [35] | Zebene et. al.,(2015). Plant Species Richness and Structure of Homegarden Agroforestry in Jabithenan District, North-Western Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Sciences Vol. 4 No. 2. 2015. Pp. 52-58. |
| [36] | Megabit Beyene, Muktar Mohammed, LisaneworkNigatu.(2018). Plant Species Diversity and Structure in Homegarden Agroforestry Systems of Bulen District, North-Western Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Vol. 7, No. 6, 2018, pp. 121-132. |
| [37] | Muktar, R. (2006). Farm characteristics and tree species diversity in Arbegona district, high lands of southern Ethiopia. MSc thesis report No. 2006: 83, 88 pp. |
| [38] | Aklilu A, et al.(2013). Agroforestry Practices and Farmers’ Perception in Koga Watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. |
| [39] | Simon S, Girma B (2004). Composition, structure and regeneration status of woody species in Dindin national forest, souse east Ethiopia: implication for conservation. Ethiopian Journal of Biological Science 3 (1): 31-48. |
| [40] | Ewuketu L M, Zebene A, Solomon Z (2014). Plant species diversity of homegarden Agroforestry in Jabithenan District, North- western, Ethiopia. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 6 (4): 301-307. |
APA Style
Hirpa Abebe, Zebene Asfaw. (2021). Contribution of Agroforestry to Woody Species Diversity and Conservation in Ginir District, Southeast Ethiopia. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 10(4), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211004.13
ACS Style
Hirpa Abebe; Zebene Asfaw. Contribution of Agroforestry to Woody Species Diversity and Conservation in Ginir District, Southeast Ethiopia. Am. J. Environ. Prot. 2021, 10(4), 90-99. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20211004.13
AMA Style
Hirpa Abebe, Zebene Asfaw. Contribution of Agroforestry to Woody Species Diversity and Conservation in Ginir District, Southeast Ethiopia. Am J Environ Prot. 2021;10(4):90-99. doi: 10.11648/j.ajep.20211004.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajep.20211004.13,
author = {Hirpa Abebe and Zebene Asfaw},
title = {Contribution of Agroforestry to Woody Species Diversity and Conservation in Ginir District, Southeast Ethiopia},
journal = {American Journal of Environmental Protection},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {90-99},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajep.20211004.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211004.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajep.20211004.13},
abstract = {As part of agriculture, agroforestry has great contribution as in-situ conservation for global biodiversity, because it contains different components. Besides, it improves the livelihoods of smallholder farmers by providing various products and services. However, there are limited scientific evidence and studies so far available on the roles of agroforestry to biodiversity conservation. Objective of the current study was to assess contribution of agroforestry on woody species diversity, conservation to sustain rural livelihoods at Ginir district, Southeast Ethiopia. Totally, six villages were selected based on their respective distance from the accessible roads and their agroforestry potential. A total of 70 sample HHs were randomly selected from the farmers full practiced agroforestry categories based on proportions of their representation. For the inventory of woody species, the lengths of farm boundary plantations were divided into 10 m sections. One section was selected for every 50 m of boundary length. A quadrant size of 10 m × 5 m and 50 m × 50 m were used for homegarden and parklands were conducted by taken one quadrant sample for each agroforestry practice from a house head farm. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed. Measurement of diversity needed to quantify and characterize agroforestry practices according to the degree of diversity and to examined the relationship of different agroforestry practices and woody species diversity at the village level and Kebeles. The result showed that 67 woody species belonging to 36 families and 58 genera were identified. Miomosoidceae was the most dominant family with 10 (15%) species, followed by Myrtaceae family with 6 (9%) species, Anacardiaceae and Rutaceae family accounted for 8 (12%). In terms of species diversity, home gardens (2.47) were more diversified than parklands (2.33) and boundary plantation (1.98) in the overall study sites. Finally, it is concluded that Agroforestry were used to maintaining or as an option for maintaining native woody species to improve the rural community livelihoods of the rural farmers.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Contribution of Agroforestry to Woody Species Diversity and Conservation in Ginir District, Southeast Ethiopia AU - Hirpa Abebe AU - Zebene Asfaw Y1 - 2021/08/18 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211004.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajep.20211004.13 T2 - American Journal of Environmental Protection JF - American Journal of Environmental Protection JO - American Journal of Environmental Protection SP - 90 EP - 99 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5699 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20211004.13 AB - As part of agriculture, agroforestry has great contribution as in-situ conservation for global biodiversity, because it contains different components. Besides, it improves the livelihoods of smallholder farmers by providing various products and services. However, there are limited scientific evidence and studies so far available on the roles of agroforestry to biodiversity conservation. Objective of the current study was to assess contribution of agroforestry on woody species diversity, conservation to sustain rural livelihoods at Ginir district, Southeast Ethiopia. Totally, six villages were selected based on their respective distance from the accessible roads and their agroforestry potential. A total of 70 sample HHs were randomly selected from the farmers full practiced agroforestry categories based on proportions of their representation. For the inventory of woody species, the lengths of farm boundary plantations were divided into 10 m sections. One section was selected for every 50 m of boundary length. A quadrant size of 10 m × 5 m and 50 m × 50 m were used for homegarden and parklands were conducted by taken one quadrant sample for each agroforestry practice from a house head farm. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed. Measurement of diversity needed to quantify and characterize agroforestry practices according to the degree of diversity and to examined the relationship of different agroforestry practices and woody species diversity at the village level and Kebeles. The result showed that 67 woody species belonging to 36 families and 58 genera were identified. Miomosoidceae was the most dominant family with 10 (15%) species, followed by Myrtaceae family with 6 (9%) species, Anacardiaceae and Rutaceae family accounted for 8 (12%). In terms of species diversity, home gardens (2.47) were more diversified than parklands (2.33) and boundary plantation (1.98) in the overall study sites. Finally, it is concluded that Agroforestry were used to maintaining or as an option for maintaining native woody species to improve the rural community livelihoods of the rural farmers. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -
Email: