Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency

Daniela Dimitrova Popova; Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18

| Peer-Reviewed

Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency

Daniela Dimitrova Popova, Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov

Published in American Journal of Applied Psychology (Volume 6, Issue 5)

Received: 15 June 2017 Accepted: 7 July 2017 Published: 24 October 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to present an approach toward creativity and learning in business context in two lines. The first is referred to the processes of creativity as organizational assets and capital. The second line involves a focus on actual learnings settings where the evaluation of results produces new ideas, approaches, contexts, vision, efficiency, organizational needs and goals. This paper discusses Amy Edmondson’s scientific approach to execution-as-learning and the research on execution-as-efficiency (2008). The results include the assumption that a larger independence in assertions from each group (on execution-as-learning and execution-as-efficiency) is needed in an organizational context.

Published in	American Journal of Applied Psychology (Volume 6, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18
Page(s)	132-137
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Creativity, Organization, Efficiency, Learning, Analysis

References

[1]	Guzik, E. E. & K. Goff (2015). The Microfoundations of Creativity: An Economics Perspective. KIE Handbook of Creativity Research Papers on Knowledge, Innovation and Enterprise, Volume III, pp. 26-27.
[2]	Beghetto, R. A & J. C. Kaufman (2007). Toward a Broader Conception of Creativity: A Case for “mini-c” Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 1, No. 2: 73–79.
[3]	Popova, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurial Network as a Crisis Management of Human Capital, Scientific Almanac of VSU, Series “Economics and Business Administration”, Issue 8, pp.162-171.
[4]	Mishra, P., D. Henriksen & the Deep-Play Research Group, Michigan State University (2013). A NEW Approach to Defining and Measuring Creativity: Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21^st Century. TechTrends September/October 2013, Volume 57, Number 5.
[5]	Berber, A., M. Yaslioglu (2014). Managing High Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance. Work Organization and Human Resource Management, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, p.27.
[6]	Consiglio, C., L. Borgogni, C. Di Tecco & W. B. Schaufeli (2016). What makes employees engaged with their work? The role of self-efficacy and employee’s perceptions of social context over time. Career Development International, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 125-143.
[7]	Lisak, A., M. Erez (2015). Leadership emergence in multicultural teams: The power of global characteristics. Journal of World Business, Issue 50, pp. 3–14.
[8]	Cascio, W., J. Boudreau (2016). The search for global competence: From international HR to talent management. Journal of World Business, Issue 51, pp. 103–114.
[9]	Accessed: 15.06.2017 http://www.lpts.edu/about/our-leadership/president/thinking-out-loud/thinking-out-loud/2014/05/27/the-mirror-test.
[10]	Sull, D., Ch. Spinosa (2007). Promise – Based Management: The Essence of Execution. Harvard Business Review, pp. 79-86.
[11]	Bounfour, A., G. Grefe (2014). Organizational Design for Knowledge Exchange: The Hau-Ba Model. In: Learning Organizations. Extending the Field. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, pp. 29-30.
[12]	Edmondson, A. (2008). The Competitive Imperative of Learning, Harvard Business Review, July-August, p. 63.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Daniela Dimitrova Popova, Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov. (2017). Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 6(5), 132-137. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Daniela Dimitrova Popova; Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov. Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency. Am. J. Appl. Psychol. 2017, 6(5), 132-137. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Daniela Dimitrova Popova, Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov. Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency. Am J Appl Psychol. 2017;6(5):132-137. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18,
  author = {Daniela Dimitrova Popova and Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov},
  title = {Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency},
  journal = {American Journal of Applied Psychology},
  volume = {6},
  number = {5},
  pages = {132-137},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajap.20170605.18},
  abstract = {The aim of the paper is to present an approach toward creativity and learning in business context in two lines. The first is referred to the processes of creativity as organizational assets and capital. The second line involves a focus on actual learnings settings where the evaluation of results produces new ideas, approaches, contexts, vision, efficiency, organizational needs and goals. This paper discusses Amy Edmondson’s scientific approach to execution-as-learning and the research on execution-as-efficiency (2008). The results include the assumption that a larger independence in assertions from each group (on execution-as-learning and execution-as-efficiency) is needed in an organizational context.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency
AU  - Daniela Dimitrova Popova
AU  - Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov
Y1  - 2017/10/24
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18
T2  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
JF  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
JO  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
SP  - 132
EP  - 137
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5672
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18
AB  - The aim of the paper is to present an approach toward creativity and learning in business context in two lines. The first is referred to the processes of creativity as organizational assets and capital. The second line involves a focus on actual learnings settings where the evaluation of results produces new ideas, approaches, contexts, vision, efficiency, organizational needs and goals. This paper discusses Amy Edmondson’s scientific approach to execution-as-learning and the research on execution-as-efficiency (2008). The results include the assumption that a larger independence in assertions from each group (on execution-as-learning and execution-as-efficiency) is needed in an organizational context.
VL  - 6
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Daniela Dimitrova Popova

Department of International Economics and Politics, Varna Free University “Chernorizets Hrabar”, Varna, Bulgaria
Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov

Department of International Economics and Politics, Varna Free University “Chernorizets Hrabar”, Varna, Bulgaria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Daniela Dimitrova Popova, Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov. (2017). Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 6(5), 132-137. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Daniela Dimitrova Popova; Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov. Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency. Am. J. Appl. Psychol. 2017, 6(5), 132-137. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Daniela Dimitrova Popova, Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov. Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency. Am J Appl Psychol. 2017;6(5):132-137. doi: 10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18,
  author = {Daniela Dimitrova Popova and Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov},
  title = {Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency},
  journal = {American Journal of Applied Psychology},
  volume = {6},
  number = {5},
  pages = {132-137},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajap.20170605.18},
  abstract = {The aim of the paper is to present an approach toward creativity and learning in business context in two lines. The first is referred to the processes of creativity as organizational assets and capital. The second line involves a focus on actual learnings settings where the evaluation of results produces new ideas, approaches, contexts, vision, efficiency, organizational needs and goals. This paper discusses Amy Edmondson’s scientific approach to execution-as-learning and the research on execution-as-efficiency (2008). The results include the assumption that a larger independence in assertions from each group (on execution-as-learning and execution-as-efficiency) is needed in an organizational context.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Creativity and Organizational Spaces Between Learning and Efficiency
AU  - Daniela Dimitrova Popova
AU  - Zdravko Dimitrov Slavov
Y1  - 2017/10/24
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18
T2  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
JF  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
JO  - American Journal of Applied Psychology
SP  - 132
EP  - 137
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5672
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajap.20170605.18
AB  - The aim of the paper is to present an approach toward creativity and learning in business context in two lines. The first is referred to the processes of creativity as organizational assets and capital. The second line involves a focus on actual learnings settings where the evaluation of results produces new ideas, approaches, contexts, vision, efficiency, organizational needs and goals. This paper discusses Amy Edmondson’s scientific approach to execution-as-learning and the research on execution-as-efficiency (2008). The results include the assumption that a larger independence in assertions from each group (on execution-as-learning and execution-as-efficiency) is needed in an organizational context.
VL  - 6
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download