Space has changed immensely in both the 20th and 21st centuries, but the law has not. The law governing space activities, is the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies resolution 2222 (OST). The OST creates international legal clarity in which domestic law enhances the state's obligations and builds upon the OST. While the OST has undoubtedly laid the foundations for space activities and remains valid in the 21st century, it has left gaps in enforcement, legal advancement and the suitability of space governance. The creation of space governance and the proactive nature of such is a topical question which requires clarity in the 21st century. The activities and suitability of space governance for non-governmental organizations presents an international development gap in light of present-day activities. It may be argued that the OST was not prepared for the likes of commercial activities or the environmental impact of scientific missions. But the framework provided by the OST allows for a simple view of space. It is, therefore, left to the current governance structure to examine the productivity of these groups within the state or under article VI of the OST. Therefore, the hindrance of international law would fall upon current measures and whether space governance can produce a sustainable agreement that benefits the state and space under the OST. This article will consider the premise of the OST’s ability to act within the 21st century and the suitability of space governance. Moreover, elements of non-governmental influences will be explored throughout to determine whether a hybrid approach could be formed by using the OST as a legal foundation for which space governance, through non-binding agreements, international agencies and domestic actors, can create a basis for the future of space. The developments from international law, state practice and space law will feature throughout. Ideas from private actors' philosophies and mandates awarded to international and regional agencies, will form a basis on space law which could be accepted in the international community.
| Published in | American Journal of Aerospace Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajae.20220901.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-13 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
International Law, Soft Law, NASA, ESA, UNCOPUOS, COSPAR
| [1] | United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256, 66 S. Ct. 1062, 90 L. Ed. 1206 (1946). |
| [2] | United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 121 S. Ct. 2164, 150 L. Ed. 2d 292 (2001). |
| [3] | Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 1999 S.C.R. 2 817 (1999). |
| [4] | Thamotharem v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 F.C.A. 198, 2008 F.C.R. 1 385 (2007). |
| [5] | Ball, P. ‘Time to Rethink the Outer Space Treaty’ (2007) Nature. |
| [6] | Beard, J. M. ‘Soft Law's Failure on the Horizon: The International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities’ (2016) U. Pa. J. Int'l L.; 38: 335. |
| [7] | Benkö, M., Schrogl, K-U., Digrell, D., and Jolley, E. (eds) Space Law: current problems and perspectives for future regulation (Eleven International Publishing 2005). |
| [8] | Boley, A. and Byers, M. ‘US policy puts the safe development of space at risk’ (2020) Science.; 370 (6513): 174-5. |
| [9] | Bragg, B. ‘Governing in a Crowded Space: The OST and Development of the Legal Regime for Space: A Virtual Think Tank (ViTTa) (registered trademark)’ Report. Joint Staff J39, Strategic Multilayer Assessment Washington, DC United States; (2018). |
| [10] | Cannizzaro, E. and Rebasti, E. ‘Soft Law in the EU Legal Order’ (2012) Das soft law der europäischen Organisationen - The Soft Law of European Organisations - La soft law des organisations européennes 208. |
| [11] | Chiu, S. W. ‘Promoting international co-operation in the age of global space governance–A study on on-orbit servicing operations’ (2019) Acta Astronautica.; 161: 375-81. |
| [12] | Coffey, S. ‘Establishing a legal framework for property rights to natural resources in outer space’ (2009) Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 41: 119. |
| [13] | Cooper, D. Governing out of order: Space, law, and the politics of belonging (Rivers Oram, London and New York University Press 1998). |
| [14] | Cornec, C. The post-Cold War issues of the space conquest: Thoughts on the future of an increasingly attractive space (2019). |
| [15] | Crane, L. The arms race in space (2018). 1. |
| [16] | De Man, P. Space Law, Scope and Status. In Exclusive Use in an Inclusive Environment (Springer, Cham 2016). |
| [17] | Deplano, R. ‘The Artemis Accords: Evolution or Revolution in International Space Law?’ International & Comparative Law Quarterly (2021). |
| [18] | Double SpaceX Rocket Launch (2017) 235 New Scientist 7. |
| [19] | Dunn, M. ‘Blue Origin Successfully Tests In-Flight Escape System’ (2016) Physics Today. |
| [20] | Ehrenfreund, P. and others, ‘Toward a global space exploration program: A stepping stone approach’ (2012) Advances in Space Research.; 49 (1): 2-48. |
| [21] | Freeland, S. ‘The limits of law: challenges to the global governance of space activities’ (2020) Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales (Vol. 153, No. 477/478, pp. 70-82). |
| [22] | Gabrynowicz, J. I. ‘Space Law: Its Cold War Origins and Challenges in the Era of Globalisation’ (2004) Suffolk UL Rev.; 37: 1041. |
| [23] | Gallagher, N. ‘Space Governance and International Co-operation’ (2010) Astropolitics.; 8 (2-3): 256-79. |
| [24] | Graziano, P. R. and Halpern, C. ‘EU governance in times of crisis: Inclusiveness and effectiveness beyond the ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ law divide’ (2016) Comparative European Politics.; 14 (1): 1-9. |
| [25] | Hampson, J. ‘The future of space commercialisation’ (2017) Niskanen Center Research Paper.; 25. |
| [26] | Handberg, R. ‘Is space war imminent? Exploring the possibility. Comparative strategy. (2017); 36 (5): 413-25. |
| [27] | Hertzfeld, H. R., Weeden, B., and Johnson, C. D. ‘Outer space: Ungoverned or lacking effective governance?: New approaches to managing human activities in space’ (2016) SAIS Review of International Affairs.; 36 (2): 15-28. |
| [28] | Hertzfeld, H. R. and von der Dunk, F. ‘Bringing Space Law into the Commercial World: Property Rights without Sovereignty’ (2005) Space, Cyber, and Telecommunications Law Program Faculty Publications. 15. |
| [29] | Highlights in Space 2002: Progress in Space Science, Technology and Applications, International Co-operation and Space Law (United Nations 2003). |
| [30] | Hobe, S. The Impact of New Developments on International Space Law (New Actors, Commercialisation, Privatisation, Increase in the Number of Space-Faring Nations). Univ. L. Rev.. 2010; 15: 869. |
| [31] | Hobe, S. ‘Historical Background’ in Hobe, Schmidt-Tedd and Schrogl (n 33) 14, para 44. |
| [32] |
Hunt, K. ‘Mission to Clean up Space Junk with Magnets Set for Launch’ (CNN, 1 April 2021) |
| [33] | Iacomino, C. Commercial Space Exploration: Potential Contributions of Private Actors to Space Exploration Programmes (Springer 2019). |
| [34] |
In addition, the Outer Space Treaty has been signed by 23 States (January 1 2020); data available at |
| [35] | Jakhu, R. S. and Pelton, J. N. ‘National Space Policies and Laws and Global Space Governance’ (2017) Space and Society Global Space Governance: An International Study 87. |
| [36] | Jakhu, R. S. and Pelton J. N. (eds) Global Space Governance: an international study (Springer International Publishing 2017). |
| [37] | Jasentuliyana, N. International space law and the United Nations. (Brill Nijhoff 1999). |
| [38] | Jayaraman, V. ‘Space Technology Inputs for Good Governance’ (2015). |
| [39] | Kaul, S. ‘Need for Space Governance for India and Global Space Governance’ (2017) Journal of space safety engineering; 4 (1): 52. |
| [40] | Keefe, H. ‘Making the final frontier feasible: A critical look at the current body of outer space law’ (1995) Santa Clara High Technology Law Journal; 11 (2): 345. |
| [41] | Kopal, V. Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space, including the Moon and other celestial bodies. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law. (2008). 1. |
| [42] | Kostenko, I. ‘Current Problems and Challenges in International Space Law: Legal Aspects’ (2020) Advanced Space Law.; 5: 48-57. |
| [43] |
Kudryavster, K. ‘Blue Origin protests NASA choice of SpaceX to land astronauts on Moon’ (AFP, 27 April 2021) |
| [44] | Lai, A. K. The Cold War, the Space Race, and the Law of Outer Space: Space for Peace (Routledge 2021). |
| [45] | Latimer Martinez, K. ‘Lost in Space: An Exploration of the Current Gaps in Space Law’ (2021) Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental & Innovation Law.; 11 (2): 4. |
| [46] | Lee, R. J. ‘Reconciling International Space Law with the Commercial Realities of the Twenty-First Century’ (2000) Sing. J. Int'l & Comp. L.; 4: 194. |
| [47] | Liu, H. and Tronchetti, F. ‘United Nations Resolution 69/32 on the 'No first placement of weapons in space: A step forward in the prevention of an arms race in outer space?’ (2016) Space Policy.; 38: 64-7. |
| [48] | López, L. D. ‘Predicting an arms race in space: problematic assumptions for space arms control’ (2012) Astropolitics.; 49-67. |
| [49] | Lopez-Claros, A., Dahl, A. L., and Groff, M. Global governance, and the emergence of global institutions for the 21st century (Cambridge University Press 2020). |
| [50] | Lyall, F. and Paul, B. L., Space Law: A Treatise (Routledge 2017). 14. |
| [51] |
Mack, E. ‘Elon Musk: SpaceX Is Sending Starship and Its Super Heavy Rocket to Space Soon’ (CNET, 1 July 2021) |
| [52] | Martinez, P., Jankowitsch, P., Schrogl K-U., Di Pippo, S. and Okumura, Y. ‘Reflections on the 50th anniversary of the outer space treaty, UNISPACE+ 50, and prospects for the future of global space governance’ (2019) Space Policy.; 47: 28-33. |
| [53] | Meyer, Z. ‘Private commercialisation of space in an international regime: A proposal for a space district’ (2010) Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus.; 30: 241. |
| [54] | Mohammed, A. ‘Redefining the Frontiers of Global Governance: Non-Governmental Organisations in the Global Public Space’ (2010) SSRN Electronic Journal. |
| [55] |
Neilson, S. ‘SpaceX's next astronaut mission for NASA has been pushed to November following an issue with its rocket engines’ (Business Insider, 12 October 2020) |
| [56] | Newlove-Eriksson, L. and Eriksson, J. ‘Governance beyond the global: who controls the extraterrestrial?’ (2013) Globalizations.; 10 (2): 277-92. |
| [57] | Nucera, G. G. ‘International Geopolitics and Space Regulation’ Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Planetary Science (2019). |
| [58] | Paliouras, Z. A. ‘The Non-Appropriation Principle: The Grundnorm of International Space Law’ (2014) Leiden Journal of International Law; 27 (1): 37-54. |
| [59] |
Pultarova, T., ‘Commercial Space Clean-up Service Could Be Ready in 2024’ (Space.com 26 May 2021) |
| [60] | Quinn, A. G. ‘The New Age of Space Law: The Outer Space Treaty and the Weaponisation of Space’ (2008) Minn. J. Int'l L.; 17: 475. |
| [61] |
Rainbow, J. ‘Astroscale Breaking New Ground for on-Orbit Servicing Demonstration’ (SpaceNews, 29 June 2021) |
| [62] | Remus, N. L. Theorising institutional change: the impact of the European integration process on the development of space activities in Europe (Springer 2018). |
| [63] | Reynolds, G. H. ‘Space law in the 21st century: Some thoughts in response to the Bush administration's space initiative’ (2004) J. Air L. & Com.; 69: 413. |
| [64] | Robertson, S. and Schlager, N. International Directory of Company Histories (St James Press 2021). |
| [65] | Robinson, G. S. and O’Donnell, D. Space Governance: A Blueprint for Future Activities (Wiley 1997). |
| [66] | Robinson, J. ‘The Role of Transparency and Confidence-Building Measures in Advancing Space Security’ ESPI Report. (2010); 28. |
| [67] | Tepper, E. ‘Polycentric Governance in Global Affairs: The Case of Space Governance’ (2019) SSRN Electronic Journal. |
| [68] | Tronchetti, F. IV–‘Space Resource Exploration and Utilisation of the US Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act: A Legal and Political Assessment’ (2016) Air and Space Law.; 41 (2), 143-156. |
| [69] | Twibell, T. S. ‘Space Law: Legal Restraints on Commercialization and Development of Outer Space’ (1996) UMKC L. Rev.; 65: 589. |
| [70] | UN Office for Outer Space Affairs, Highlights in Space 2002: Progress in Space Science, Technology and Applications, International Co-operation and Space Law (United Nations 2003). |
| [71] | Vacuum, P. ‘Blue Origin Successfully Launches Suborbital Rocket and Returns It to Launch Site’ (2015) Physics Today. |
| [72] | Vernile, A. The Rise of Private Actors in the Space Sector (Springer 2018). |
| [73] | Viikari, L. The environmental element in space law: assessing the present and charting the future (BRILL 2008). |
| [74] | Von der Dunk, F. ‘International Space Law’ In Handbook of Space Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2015). |
| [75] | Williamson, M. Space: The Fragile Frontier (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2006). |
| [76] | Zamanifard, H., Alizadeh, T. and Bosman, C. ‘Towards a framework of public space governance’ (2018) Cities.; 78: 155-65. |
| [77] | Sergio Marchisio, ’The Evolutionary Stages of the Legal Subcommittee of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS)’ (2005) J. Space L. 31: 219. |
| [78] | S. Neil Hosenball, ’The United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges’ (1979) J. Space L. 7: 95. |
| [79] |
United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, 'COPUOS' (Unoosa.org, 2020) |
| [80] | Kai-Uwe Schrogl, ‘The New Debate on the Working Methods of the UNCOPUOS Legal Subcommittee’ (2014) Acta Astronautica 105, no. 1: 101-108. |
| [81] | United Nations Treaties and Principles on Outer Space, related General Assembly resolutions and other documents, Office of Outer Space Affairs, ST/SPACE/61/Rev.1. |
| [82] | Célia Bragg, ‘The post-Cold War issues of the space conquest: Thoughts on the future of an increasingly attractive space’ (2019). |
| [83] | Working paper submitted by the Bureau of the Working Group on the “Space2030” Agenda, A/AC.105/C.2/L.316, AC105_C2_L316E.pdf (unoosa.org). |
| [84] | Kenneth H. Williford and others, ‘The NASA Mars 2020 rover mission and the search for extraterrestrial life.’ in Nathalie A. Cabrol and Edmond A. Grin (eds) From Habitability to Life on Mars, (Elsevier 2018) pp. 275-308. |
| [85] | Rik Volger and others, ‘Mining moon & mars with microbes: Biological approaches to extract iron from Lunar and Martian regolith’ (2020) Planetary and Space Science 184: 104850. |
| [86] | Madhu Thangavelu, ‘Outer Space Activities and City Evolution’ (2020) ASCEND 2020, p. 4059. |
| [87] | Dmytro Dzvinchuk and Oleksandra Kachmar, ‘A Look into the Future: Cyber-aggression as the Problem of Interaction in Space Exploration’ (2018) Philosophy and Cosmology 21: 54-60. |
| [88] | Jesper Tække, ‘Cyberspace as a Space parallel to geographical space.’ in Lars Qvortrup and others (eds) Virtual Space, (Springer 2002) pp. 25-46. |
| [89] | Metcalf, Katrin Nyman. ‘A Legal View on Outer Space and Cyberspace: Similarities and Differences’ (2018) Tallinn Paper 10: 1-11. |
| [90] | Gisela Hirschmann, Accountability in Global Governance, (Oxford University Press 2020). |
| [91] | Michael Zurn, A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation, (Oxford University Press 2018). |
APA Style
Scott Michael Steele. (2022). International Space Law: A Hindrance to Space Activities or a Resolute Action for Change. American Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 9(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajae.20220901.11
ACS Style
Scott Michael Steele. International Space Law: A Hindrance to Space Activities or a Resolute Action for Change. Am. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2022, 9(1), 1-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ajae.20220901.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajae.20220901.11,
author = {Scott Michael Steele},
title = {International Space Law: A Hindrance to Space Activities or a Resolute Action for Change},
journal = {American Journal of Aerospace Engineering},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {1-13},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajae.20220901.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajae.20220901.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajae.20220901.11},
abstract = {Space has changed immensely in both the 20th and 21st centuries, but the law has not. The law governing space activities, is the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies resolution 2222 (OST). The OST creates international legal clarity in which domestic law enhances the state's obligations and builds upon the OST. While the OST has undoubtedly laid the foundations for space activities and remains valid in the 21st century, it has left gaps in enforcement, legal advancement and the suitability of space governance. The creation of space governance and the proactive nature of such is a topical question which requires clarity in the 21st century. The activities and suitability of space governance for non-governmental organizations presents an international development gap in light of present-day activities. It may be argued that the OST was not prepared for the likes of commercial activities or the environmental impact of scientific missions. But the framework provided by the OST allows for a simple view of space. It is, therefore, left to the current governance structure to examine the productivity of these groups within the state or under article VI of the OST. Therefore, the hindrance of international law would fall upon current measures and whether space governance can produce a sustainable agreement that benefits the state and space under the OST. This article will consider the premise of the OST’s ability to act within the 21st century and the suitability of space governance. Moreover, elements of non-governmental influences will be explored throughout to determine whether a hybrid approach could be formed by using the OST as a legal foundation for which space governance, through non-binding agreements, international agencies and domestic actors, can create a basis for the future of space. The developments from international law, state practice and space law will feature throughout. Ideas from private actors' philosophies and mandates awarded to international and regional agencies, will form a basis on space law which could be accepted in the international community.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - International Space Law: A Hindrance to Space Activities or a Resolute Action for Change AU - Scott Michael Steele Y1 - 2022/05/10 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajae.20220901.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajae.20220901.11 T2 - American Journal of Aerospace Engineering JF - American Journal of Aerospace Engineering JO - American Journal of Aerospace Engineering SP - 1 EP - 13 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-4821 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajae.20220901.11 AB - Space has changed immensely in both the 20th and 21st centuries, but the law has not. The law governing space activities, is the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies resolution 2222 (OST). The OST creates international legal clarity in which domestic law enhances the state's obligations and builds upon the OST. While the OST has undoubtedly laid the foundations for space activities and remains valid in the 21st century, it has left gaps in enforcement, legal advancement and the suitability of space governance. The creation of space governance and the proactive nature of such is a topical question which requires clarity in the 21st century. The activities and suitability of space governance for non-governmental organizations presents an international development gap in light of present-day activities. It may be argued that the OST was not prepared for the likes of commercial activities or the environmental impact of scientific missions. But the framework provided by the OST allows for a simple view of space. It is, therefore, left to the current governance structure to examine the productivity of these groups within the state or under article VI of the OST. Therefore, the hindrance of international law would fall upon current measures and whether space governance can produce a sustainable agreement that benefits the state and space under the OST. This article will consider the premise of the OST’s ability to act within the 21st century and the suitability of space governance. Moreover, elements of non-governmental influences will be explored throughout to determine whether a hybrid approach could be formed by using the OST as a legal foundation for which space governance, through non-binding agreements, international agencies and domestic actors, can create a basis for the future of space. The developments from international law, state practice and space law will feature throughout. Ideas from private actors' philosophies and mandates awarded to international and regional agencies, will form a basis on space law which could be accepted in the international community. VL - 9 IS - 1 ER -
Email: