Rice cultivation during four planting seasons by using cultivation system improvements, especially in the management provision of water and fertilizer, other than increasing rice production can also reduce methane emission which is often rumored as a cause of global warming. Efforts to reduce methane emission from paddy fields must be done because of the impact of ecological damage caused by climate change due to global warming. It is estimated that by the year 2100 the average surface temperature of the earth will increase up 2 to 3° C. The experiment was conducted in the village of Purbaganda, Pematang Bandar District, Simalungun over four planting seasons from July 2011 until June 2012. The research design used in the study was split plot design which was organized into groups based on the difficulty of obtaining an ideal environmental uniformity in the field. Watering System treatment as main plot factor (A) and fertilization as subplot factor (B), with three replications. The treatments in the main plot were intermittent and continuous irrigation system, conducted to determine the amount of methane emissions in each planting season. For subplot, the fertilization treatments were based on laboratory analysis of soil, and Fertilization Recommendation of the Minister of Agriculture regulation No. 40 OT.140/2007. These were then combined with probiotic fertilization. The results showed that the pattern of methane emission varies in each treatment. The average methane emission was highest in treatment A1B1 with 338.50 kg ha-1 per season, and lowest in A2B6 treatment with 63.25 kg ha-1 per season. A2B6 treatment that used fertilization according to laboratory analysis with probiotic fertilization experienced intermittent irrigation process. The higher dosage of fertilizer N in treatment A1B1 led to higher methane emission than treatment A2B6. N fertilizer in rice fields can increase methane emissions due to increased rice growth, which was the source of methane biomass that increased the emission lines. Interaction between flooding and fertilization treatments that gave the highest emission during the four planting seasons was A1B1 and the lowest was A2B6. Comparison between the interaction of A1B1 and A2B6 on methane emission results was significantly different (DMRT test, P = 0.05).
Published in | Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.aff.20140303.13 |
Page(s) | 155-162 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Methane Emission, Intensive Rice Cultivation, Intermittent and Fertilization
[1] | Arafah. 2005. Assessment Intensification rice field base on Integrated Crop Management in Pinrang Regency. South Sulawesi Assessment Institute for Agricultural Technology. http://jabar. litbang.deptan. go.id/html.tp.html [05 Jan 2007]. |
[2] | Balasubramanian, V. 2006. Integrated Crop Management (ICM): Field evaluation and lesssons learnt In Sumarno, Suparyono, A.M. Fagi, M.O. Adnyana (Eds.). Rice Industry, Culture and Environment. Book 1. Indonesian Center for Rice Research. p. 33-42. |
[3] | Cheng-Fang, L., Dan-Na, Z., Zhi-Kui, K., Zhi-Sheng. Z., Jin-Ping, W., Ming-Li. C., and Cao Cou-Gui, C. 2011. Effects of Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilizers on methane and CO2 Emissions and Soil Organic Carbon in Paddy Fields of Central China. National Tecnology Project for High Food Yield of China. On line : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3344821/ |
[4] | Cicerone, R. J., And J. D. Shetter. 1981. Sources of atmospheric methane: measurements in rice paddies and a discussion. Journal of Geophysics Research 86C: 7203–7209. |
[5] | Conrad, r., and f. Rothfuss. 1991. Methane oxidation in the soil surface layer of a flooded rice field and the effect of ammonium. Biology and Fertility of Soils 12: 28–32. (Cicerone & Shetter, 1981; Cicerone et al., 1983) |
[6] | Gomez, A.K. And A.A. Gomez. 1994. Statistical Procedures For Agricultural Research. Translation. Sjamsuddin, E and S. B. Yustika (1995). Prosedure Statistics to Research. Puslisher University of Indonesia Press. Jakarta. 689 p. |
[7] | Holzapfel-P Schorn A, Conrad & Seiler W, 1986. Production of Methane in rice Padies. Fems icrobiol. Ecol 31: 343-351 |
[8] | (IAEA). 1993. Manual on measurement of methane and nitrous oxide emission from agricultural. Vienna. |
[9] | IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1997a). Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Workbook, Chapter 4.3, Agriculture: Rice Cultivation. OECD, Paris, France. |
[10] | IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2006). Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Reference Manual, Chapter 4.3, Agriculture: Methane emission from rice cultivation. OECD, Paris, France. |
[11] | IPCC (International Pannel For Climate Change) . 1994 . Climate change 1994. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. |
[12] | Minami, K. (1995) The effect of nitrogen fertilizer use and other practices on methane emission from flooded rice. Fertilizer Res. 40:71-84. |
[13] | Makarim, A. K., A. Bey, R. Boer and P. Setyanto (1995). Methane gas from lowland rice fields in Indonesia: Development and research directions (in Indonesian). Central Research Institute for Food Crops, Bogor, Indonesia. |
[14] | Schütz H., A. Holzapfel-Pschorn, R. Conrad, H. Rennenberg and W. Seiler (1989). A three-year continuous record on the influence of daytime season and fertilizer treatment on methane emission rates from an Italian rice paddy field. Journal of Geophysical Research 94: 16405-16416. |
[15] | Schütz H., Seiler W & Lonrad R (1994) Methane Production And Emmision From Four Reclaimed Pristine Wetlands of South Eastern United States Soil sciense Am. J. 58: 1270-1275 |
[16] | Setyanto P, A. Karim Makarim and Mudzakkir Fagi, 1997. Methane Emission From Rainfed Rice Fields at Jakenan, Central Java as affected by Organic Matter and Water Condition. |
[17] | Seiler, W., A. Holzapfel-Pschorn, R. Conrad And D. Scharfe (1984). Methane Emission From Rice Paddies. Journal Of Atmospheric Chemistry 1: 241-268. |
[18] | Seiler, W., Conrad, R., Scharffe, D., 1984. Field studies of methane emission from termite nests into the atmosphere and measurements of methane uptake by tropical soils. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 1, 171-186. |
[19] | Setyanto, P. 2004. Methane emission and its mitigation in rice field under different management practices in Central Java. Disertasi Fakultas Pascasarjana University Putra Malaysia. |
[20] | Setyanto P and Rina K, 2008. Management systems rice field low metan emissions. A Journal. A Journal Agricultural Reseach Food Crop. Volume 27. |
[21] | Setyanto, P. 2004. Mitigation methane of rice field. In F. Agus et al. (Eds.). The low land and management technology. The central research and development of Soil and agroklimat. Bogor. P. 287-294. |
[22] | Toha, H.M., Permadi K., Prayitno, and I. Yuliardi. 2005. The increase production of upland rice with integrated crop management and integrated resources. Indonesian Center for Food Crops Reseach and Development. Seminar. Bogor. July, 2005 |
[23] | Wihardjaka, 2001. Methane emission in low land irigation with aplication of several organic matter. Agrivitas 23 (1): |
[24] | Wang M, Shangguan X& Ding A (1996). Methane in riceagriculture in from Cicerone et al., 1983 Atmosphericcirculation to Global Change. The Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academic of Sciences, p 647-659. China Meteorological Press Beijing. |
[25] | Yagi, K. and K. Minami. 1990. Effects of organic matter applications on methane emisión from Japanese paddy fields. In A.F. Bouwan (Eds.). Soil and the greenhouse effect. John Wiley and Sons. New York. p.467-473. |
[26] | Aulakh, M.S., R. Wassamann, H. Rennenberg, and S. Fink. 2000. Pattern and amount of Aerenchyma realate to variable methane transport capacity of different rice cultivars. Plant Biology 2: 182-194. |
[27] | Bouwman, A. F., Boumans L.J.M., Batjes N.H., 2002. Emissions of N2O and from fertilized fields: summary of available measurement data. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 16: art.no. 1058 |
[28] | Cicerone, R. J., And J. D. Shetter and C.C. Delwiche, 1983. Seasonal variation of methane flux from California rice paddy. J. Geophys. Res., 88:11,022-11,024 |
[29] | Setyanto P., Suharsih, A,K Makarim, and J. Sasa. 1999. Inventory of emissions and mitigation of methane on rice field in Jakenan. Symposium on Food Crops IV, Bogor, 22-24 November 1999.. Indonesian Center for Food Crops Reseach and Development (ICFORD). Bogor |
[30] | Nouchi I, Mariko S, Aoki K (1990) Mechanism of methane |
[31] | transport from the rhizosphere to the atmosphere through rice plants.Plant Physiology, 94, 59–66. |
APA Style
Khadijah EL Ramija, Zulkifly Nasution, M. Zarlis, Retno Widiastuti. (2014). Methane Emission on Intensive rice Farming with Water Frequency and Fertilizer Management in North Sumatera. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(3), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140303.13
ACS Style
Khadijah EL Ramija; Zulkifly Nasution; M. Zarlis; Retno Widiastuti. Methane Emission on Intensive rice Farming with Water Frequency and Fertilizer Management in North Sumatera. Agric. For. Fish. 2014, 3(3), 155-162. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20140303.13
@article{10.11648/j.aff.20140303.13, author = {Khadijah EL Ramija and Zulkifly Nasution and M. Zarlis and Retno Widiastuti}, title = {Methane Emission on Intensive rice Farming with Water Frequency and Fertilizer Management in North Sumatera}, journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries}, volume = {3}, number = {3}, pages = {155-162}, doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20140303.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140303.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20140303.13}, abstract = {Rice cultivation during four planting seasons by using cultivation system improvements, especially in the management provision of water and fertilizer, other than increasing rice production can also reduce methane emission which is often rumored as a cause of global warming. Efforts to reduce methane emission from paddy fields must be done because of the impact of ecological damage caused by climate change due to global warming. It is estimated that by the year 2100 the average surface temperature of the earth will increase up 2 to 3° C. The experiment was conducted in the village of Purbaganda, Pematang Bandar District, Simalungun over four planting seasons from July 2011 until June 2012. The research design used in the study was split plot design which was organized into groups based on the difficulty of obtaining an ideal environmental uniformity in the field. Watering System treatment as main plot factor (A) and fertilization as subplot factor (B), with three replications. The treatments in the main plot were intermittent and continuous irrigation system, conducted to determine the amount of methane emissions in each planting season. For subplot, the fertilization treatments were based on laboratory analysis of soil, and Fertilization Recommendation of the Minister of Agriculture regulation No. 40 OT.140/2007. These were then combined with probiotic fertilization. The results showed that the pattern of methane emission varies in each treatment. The average methane emission was highest in treatment A1B1 with 338.50 kg ha-1 per season, and lowest in A2B6 treatment with 63.25 kg ha-1 per season. A2B6 treatment that used fertilization according to laboratory analysis with probiotic fertilization experienced intermittent irrigation process. The higher dosage of fertilizer N in treatment A1B1 led to higher methane emission than treatment A2B6. N fertilizer in rice fields can increase methane emissions due to increased rice growth, which was the source of methane biomass that increased the emission lines. Interaction between flooding and fertilization treatments that gave the highest emission during the four planting seasons was A1B1 and the lowest was A2B6. Comparison between the interaction of A1B1 and A2B6 on methane emission results was significantly different (DMRT test, P = 0.05).}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Methane Emission on Intensive rice Farming with Water Frequency and Fertilizer Management in North Sumatera AU - Khadijah EL Ramija AU - Zulkifly Nasution AU - M. Zarlis AU - Retno Widiastuti Y1 - 2014/05/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140303.13 DO - 10.11648/j.aff.20140303.13 T2 - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries JF - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries JO - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries SP - 155 EP - 162 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5648 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140303.13 AB - Rice cultivation during four planting seasons by using cultivation system improvements, especially in the management provision of water and fertilizer, other than increasing rice production can also reduce methane emission which is often rumored as a cause of global warming. Efforts to reduce methane emission from paddy fields must be done because of the impact of ecological damage caused by climate change due to global warming. It is estimated that by the year 2100 the average surface temperature of the earth will increase up 2 to 3° C. The experiment was conducted in the village of Purbaganda, Pematang Bandar District, Simalungun over four planting seasons from July 2011 until June 2012. The research design used in the study was split plot design which was organized into groups based on the difficulty of obtaining an ideal environmental uniformity in the field. Watering System treatment as main plot factor (A) and fertilization as subplot factor (B), with three replications. The treatments in the main plot were intermittent and continuous irrigation system, conducted to determine the amount of methane emissions in each planting season. For subplot, the fertilization treatments were based on laboratory analysis of soil, and Fertilization Recommendation of the Minister of Agriculture regulation No. 40 OT.140/2007. These were then combined with probiotic fertilization. The results showed that the pattern of methane emission varies in each treatment. The average methane emission was highest in treatment A1B1 with 338.50 kg ha-1 per season, and lowest in A2B6 treatment with 63.25 kg ha-1 per season. A2B6 treatment that used fertilization according to laboratory analysis with probiotic fertilization experienced intermittent irrigation process. The higher dosage of fertilizer N in treatment A1B1 led to higher methane emission than treatment A2B6. N fertilizer in rice fields can increase methane emissions due to increased rice growth, which was the source of methane biomass that increased the emission lines. Interaction between flooding and fertilization treatments that gave the highest emission during the four planting seasons was A1B1 and the lowest was A2B6. Comparison between the interaction of A1B1 and A2B6 on methane emission results was significantly different (DMRT test, P = 0.05). VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -