| Peer-Reviewed

Influence of Small Cereal Intercropping and Additive Series of Seed Proportion on the Yield and Yield Component of Lupine (Lupinus Spp.) in North Western Ethiopia

Received: 2 April 2014     Accepted: 15 April 2014     Published: 30 April 2014
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Small cereals as a main crop and lupine as a minor crop are food crops often traditionally grown in association in North Western Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted on intercropping of lupine (Lupinus albus L.) with wheat (Triticum aestivum), barley (Hordeum vulgar) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana) in 2009 at Adet Agricultural research station. The treatments were sole wheat at a seed rate of 175 kg/ ha, sole barley at a seed rate of 125 kg/ ha, sole finger millet at a seed rate of 30 kg/ ha, sole lupine at a seed rate of 90 kg/ ha, and an additive series of 25, 50 and 75 % of the sole lupine seed rate combined with the full cereal seed rate to determine the effect of small cereal intercropping in additive series on the yield and yield component of lupine. The experimental design was a completely randomized block with nine intercropping and four sole cropping systems in three replications. Lupine was planted in rows after establishment of main crops. SAS software’s were used to compute the analysis of variance. Maximum lupine seed proportion was superior to the lowest when intercropped with wheat and finger millet. The lowest population density resulted in reduced agronomic attributes of lupine. Intercropping higher proportion of lupine with wheat and finger millet did help much in increasing grain yield and biomass yield of lupine without affecting cereal crop yield. However, nearly complete dominance of barley over lupine at all seeding ratios leads to absolute reduction in grain yield. The lupine-finger millet mixture at the 50:100 and 75:100 seeding ratio and lupine-wheat mixture at the 75:100 seeding ratio had a higher yield advantage of intercropping for exploiting the resources of the environment compared with the other intercropping systems.

Published in Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 3, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.aff.20140302.23
Page(s) 133-141
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Intercropping, Wheat, Barely, Finger Millet, Lupine, Seeding Ratio

References
[1] AARC (Adet Agricultural Research Center) (2002). Summary of research achievements (1987-2001), Adet, Ethiopia
[2] Adet Meteorological Station (2009). Climatic data. Amhara Regional State of Ethiopia; Bahir Dar
[3] Aleligne, K. and Steven, F. (1987). Initial results of informal survey Adet farming system, Gojam region,
[4] Banik, P., Samsal, T., Ghosal, P.K. and Bagchi, D.K. (2000). Evaluation of mustard and legume intercropping under 1:1 and 1:2 row replacement series system. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 185: 9- 14.
[5] Bismillah, M.K. and Khaliq, A. (2004). Production of soybean (Glycine max L.) as cotton based intercropped. Journal of Research Science 15(1): 79-84.
[6] Carr, P.M., Horsley, R.D and Poland, W.W. (2004). Barley, oat and cereal-pea mixtures as dry land forages in the Northern Great Plains. Journal of Agronomy 96: 677–684.
[7] Central Statistical Agency (2007). Agricultural sample survey. 2006/2007 Volume I Report on area and production of crops. Statistical bulletin no. 388 .July 2007 Addis Ababa.
[8] Challa, H. and Bakker, J. (1998). Potential production within the greenhouse environment. In: Enoch, Z. and Stan hill, G. (Eds.) Ecosystems of the world. The greenhouse ecosystem. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 333-348.
[9] Chen, C., Westcott, M., Neill, K., Wichman, D. and Knox, M. (2004). Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley-pea intercropping in Montana. Journal of Agronomy 96:1730-1738.
[10] de Wit, C.T. (1960). On competition.Verslag Land-bouwkundige Onderzoek No.66 (8):1-82.
[11] Ghosh, P.K. (2004). Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field crop Research 88:227-237
[12] Gonder soil testing laboratory center (2009), Gonder, Ethiopia
[13] Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Ambus, P. and Jensen, E.S. (2001). Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping. Field Crop Research 70: 101-109.
[14] Hiebsch, C.K. (1980). Principles of intercropping. Effect of N fertilization and crop duration on equivalency ratios in intercrops versus monoculture comparisons, PhD thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N. C., USA.
[15] Jansen, P. C.M. (2006). Lupines albus L.In. Brink, M. & Belay, G. (Editors) PROTA (Plant Resources of Tropical Africa) Wageningen, Netherlands.
[16] Jones, R.K. and McCown, R.L. (1983). Research on no-till tropical legume farming strategy. In: Proceedings of Eastern Africa -ACIAR Consultation on Agri-cultural Research. Nairobi, Kenya: 18-23.
[17] Knudsen, M.T., Havggaard-Nielsenh, J.B. and Jensen, E.S. (2001).Comparison of inter-specific competition and N-use in pea- barely, faba bean-barely and lupine-barely intercrops. Abstract.
[18] Mandal, B.K., Dhara, M.C., Mandal, B.B., Das, S.K. and Nandy, R. (2010). Effect of intercropping on the Yield Components of Rice, Mungbean, Soybean, Peanut and Blackgram. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 162: 30-34.
[19] McGibbon, R. and Watkin, W. (1980). Effects of Plant and Canopy Density on Seed Yield and Oil Content in White Lupin ( Lupinus albus). Experimental Agriculture 16: 409-414
[20] Mitchell C.E Tilman D. and Groth J.V. (2002). Effects of grassland plant species diversity, abundance, and composition on foliar fungal disease. Ecology 83: 1713-1726.
[21] Nigusei, T. (1994). Performance of maize/bean intercropping systems under low and medium rainfall situations, unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Alemaya University of Agriculture, Ethiopia.
[22] Ofori, F. and Stern, W.R. (1987). Cereal and legume intercropping systems. Ad-vanced Agronomy 41:41
[23] Prasad, R. B. and Brook, R.M. (2005). Effect of varying maize densities on intercropped maize and soybean in Nepal. Experimental Agriculture 41: 365-382. Abstract. Accessed in, March, 2010 at: mailto:afs082@bangor.ac.uk
[24] Rahman, M.M., Awal, M.A., Amin, A. and Parvej, M.R. (2009). Compatibility, growth and production potentials of mus-tard/lentil intercrops. International Journal of Botany 5: 100-106. Accessed in, March, 2010 at:.http://scialert.net/fulltext/?doi=ijb.2009.100.106&org=11
[25] Reddy, K.C., Visser, P.L., Klaij, M.C.and Renard, C. (1994). The effects of sole and traditional intercropping of millet and cowpea on soil and crop productivity. Experimental Agriculture 30: 83–88.
[26] SAS Institute Inc. (2002). JMP-5 Statistical Software, Version 5.Cary, NC, USA.
[27] Sheri, M.S., Jane, R.k., Ken, J.L. and Neli, H.K. (2008). Forage potetial of intercropping barely with faba bean,lupine and field pea.Published in Segoe,Canada. Accessed in, December, 2009 at: htt://agron.scijournals.org
[28] Tilahun T., Minale L. and Alemayehu A. (2012). Role of maize (Zea mays L.)- Fababean (Vicia faba L.) intercropping planting pattern on productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of maize in northwestern Ethiopia highlands. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science 2(3):102-112
[29] Trydemanknudsen, M., Haug-gaard-Nielsen, H., Jornsgard, B. and Steen jensen, E. (2004). Comparison of inter-specific compe-tition and N use in pea–barley, faba bean–barley, and lupine–barley intercrops grown at two temperate locations. Journal of Agricultural science 142:617–627
[30] Venkateswarlu, J. (1984). Nutrient management in semi-arid red soils. In: Nutrient management in dry lands with special reference to cropping systems and semi-arid red soils. All India Coordinated Research Programmers for Dry land Agriculture, Hyderabad, India. Part 2:1-56.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yayeh Bitew. (2014). Influence of Small Cereal Intercropping and Additive Series of Seed Proportion on the Yield and Yield Component of Lupine (Lupinus Spp.) in North Western Ethiopia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(2), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140302.23

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yayeh Bitew. Influence of Small Cereal Intercropping and Additive Series of Seed Proportion on the Yield and Yield Component of Lupine (Lupinus Spp.) in North Western Ethiopia. Agric. For. Fish. 2014, 3(2), 133-141. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20140302.23

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yayeh Bitew. Influence of Small Cereal Intercropping and Additive Series of Seed Proportion on the Yield and Yield Component of Lupine (Lupinus Spp.) in North Western Ethiopia. Agric For Fish. 2014;3(2):133-141. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20140302.23

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aff.20140302.23,
      author = {Yayeh Bitew},
      title = {Influence of Small Cereal Intercropping and Additive Series of Seed Proportion on the Yield and Yield Component of Lupine (Lupinus Spp.) in North Western Ethiopia},
      journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries},
      volume = {3},
      number = {2},
      pages = {133-141},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20140302.23},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140302.23},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20140302.23},
      abstract = {Small cereals as a main crop and lupine as a minor crop are food crops often traditionally grown in association in North Western Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted on intercropping of lupine (Lupinus albus L.) with wheat (Triticum aestivum), barley (Hordeum vulgar) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana) in 2009 at Adet Agricultural research station. The treatments were sole wheat at a seed rate of 175 kg/ ha, sole barley at a seed rate of 125 kg/ ha, sole finger millet at a seed rate of 30 kg/ ha, sole lupine at a seed rate of 90 kg/ ha, and an additive series of 25, 50 and 75 % of the sole lupine seed rate combined with the full cereal seed rate to determine the effect of small cereal intercropping in additive series on the yield and yield component of lupine. The experimental design was a completely randomized block with nine intercropping and four sole cropping systems in three replications. Lupine was planted in rows after establishment of main crops. SAS software’s were used to compute the analysis of variance. Maximum lupine seed proportion was superior to the lowest when intercropped with wheat and finger millet. The lowest population density resulted in reduced agronomic attributes of lupine. Intercropping higher proportion of lupine with wheat and finger millet did help much in increasing grain yield and biomass yield of lupine without affecting cereal crop yield. However, nearly complete dominance of barley over lupine at all seeding ratios leads to absolute reduction in grain yield. The lupine-finger millet mixture at the 50:100 and 75:100 seeding ratio and lupine-wheat mixture at the 75:100 seeding ratio had a higher yield advantage of intercropping for exploiting the resources of the environment compared with the other intercropping systems.},
     year = {2014}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Influence of Small Cereal Intercropping and Additive Series of Seed Proportion on the Yield and Yield Component of Lupine (Lupinus Spp.) in North Western Ethiopia
    AU  - Yayeh Bitew
    Y1  - 2014/04/30
    PY  - 2014
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140302.23
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aff.20140302.23
    T2  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JF  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    JO  - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
    SP  - 133
    EP  - 141
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5648
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140302.23
    AB  - Small cereals as a main crop and lupine as a minor crop are food crops often traditionally grown in association in North Western Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted on intercropping of lupine (Lupinus albus L.) with wheat (Triticum aestivum), barley (Hordeum vulgar) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana) in 2009 at Adet Agricultural research station. The treatments were sole wheat at a seed rate of 175 kg/ ha, sole barley at a seed rate of 125 kg/ ha, sole finger millet at a seed rate of 30 kg/ ha, sole lupine at a seed rate of 90 kg/ ha, and an additive series of 25, 50 and 75 % of the sole lupine seed rate combined with the full cereal seed rate to determine the effect of small cereal intercropping in additive series on the yield and yield component of lupine. The experimental design was a completely randomized block with nine intercropping and four sole cropping systems in three replications. Lupine was planted in rows after establishment of main crops. SAS software’s were used to compute the analysis of variance. Maximum lupine seed proportion was superior to the lowest when intercropped with wheat and finger millet. The lowest population density resulted in reduced agronomic attributes of lupine. Intercropping higher proportion of lupine with wheat and finger millet did help much in increasing grain yield and biomass yield of lupine without affecting cereal crop yield. However, nearly complete dominance of barley over lupine at all seeding ratios leads to absolute reduction in grain yield. The lupine-finger millet mixture at the 50:100 and 75:100 seeding ratio and lupine-wheat mixture at the 75:100 seeding ratio had a higher yield advantage of intercropping for exploiting the resources of the environment compared with the other intercropping systems.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Agronomist, Adet Agricultural Research Centre, Institute of Amhara Agricultural Research, Bahir Dare, Ethiopia

  • Sections