Smallholder farmers have developed knowledge about soil and crop management through long-term, on-farm observations. Yet, food insecurity and land degradation continue to threaten livelihoods, globally. Part of the solution lies in linking local and scientific knowledge to develop improved agricultural strategies. We argue that incorporating farmer knowledge in the design and/or technology transfer processes of land management and restoration projects will improve the likelihood of success. The objectives of this study were to understand how farmers in the remote Cabécar communities in southeastern Costa Rica use soil knowledge to allocate and manage crops and to explore how to combine local and scientific knowledge to achieve wider adoption of sustainable agricultural techniques. Cabécar farmers in the foothills of the Talamanca Mountains practice both no-input subsistence and cash-crop farming. They cultivate both annual and perennial crops on their multi-parceled farms. Twenty-three stratified random heads of households were selected and interviewed. A variety of participatory methods were used including, participant observation (1.5 years), semi-structured interviews, farm mapping exercises, farm-transect walks and a participatory community workshop. Results indicate that farmers identified three distinct soil types using primarily soil color, texture and landscape position. Most interestingly, farmers’ understanding of soil properties was tied directly to site suitability for specific crops. While farmers identified limitations of certain soil types’ capacity to sustain a particular crop, farmers did not embark on restoration efforts or employ nutrient management techniques to improve the productivity of the soil. Furthermore, farmers had limited knowledge on processes of soil development and nutrient cycling. Instead of amending the soils to increase productivity, farmers allocated crops according to existing perceived suitability of the soil. These insights illustrate the barriers to farmer’s adoption of new agricultural strategies. These data and experiences will be used to guide future agricultural research in the region, specifically projects that promote the restoration of unproductive soils by providing alternatives to burning and incorporating organic amendments.
Published in | Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (Volume 3, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.aff.20140302.17 |
Page(s) | 93-101 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Local Soil Knowledge, Agroforestry, Costa Rica
[1] | Andrade, H., Detlefsen, G., 2003. Principales actores de Talamanca. Agroforestería en las Américas 10, 6-11. |
[2] | Bailgar, V.C., Fageria, N.K., 2005. Soil aluminum effects on growth and nutrition of cacao. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 51, 709-713. |
[3] | Barrera-Bassols, N., Zinck, J.A., Van Ranst, E., 2006. Local soil classification and comparison of indigenous and technical soil maps in a Mesoamerican community using spatial analysis. Geoderma 135, 140-162. |
[4] | Barrios, E., Delve, R.J., Bekunda, M., Mowo, J., Agunda, J., Ramisch, J., Trejo, M.T., Thomas, R.J., 2006. Indicators of soil quality: A South-South development of a methodological guide for linking local and technical knowledge. Geoderma 135, 248-259. |
[5] | Barrios, E., Trejo, M.T., 2003. Implications of local soil knowledge for integrated soil management in Latin America. Geoderma 111, 217-231. |
[6] | Bertsch, P.M., Bloom, P.R., 1996. Aluminum. In: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3 Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 517-543. |
[7] | Borge, C., Castillo, R., 1997. Cultura y conservación en la Talamanca Indígena. EUNED, San Jose. |
[8] | Creswell, J.W., 2003. Research Design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. |
[9] | Dahlquist, R.M., Whelan, M.P., Winowiecki, L., Polidoro, B., Candela, S., Harvey, C.A., Wulfhorst, J.D., McDaniel, P.A., Bosque-Perez, N.A., 2007. Incorporating livelihoods in biodiversity conservation: a case study of cacao agroforestry systems in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Biodiversity and Conservation 16, 2311-2333. |
[10] | Dialla, B.E., 1993. The Mossi indigenous soil classification in Burkina Faso. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor 1, 17-20. |
[11] | Dove, M.R., 1985. Swidden Agriculture in Indonesia: Subsistence strategies of the Kalimantan Kantu. Mounton Publishers, Berlin. |
[12] | Eigenbrode, S.D., O'Rourke, M., Wulfhorst, J.D., Altoff, D.M., Goldberg, C.S., Merril, K., Morse, W., Nielsen-Pincus, M., Stephens, J., Winowiecki, L., Bosque-Perez, N.A., 2007. Employing a Philosophical Dialogue in Collaborative Science. BioScience 57, 55-64. |
[13] | Ericksen, P., Ardon, M., 2003. Similarities and differences between farmer and scientist views on soil quality issues in central Honduras. Geoderma 111, 233-248. |
[14] | Gee, G.W., Bauder, J.W., 1986. Particle size analysis. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. . Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp. 383-441. |
[15] | Gobin, A., Campling, P., Deckers, J., Feyen, J., 1998. Integrated toposequence analysis at the confluence zone of the River Ebonyi; headwater catchment, southeastern Nigeria. Catena 32, 173-192. |
[16] | Gobin, A., Campling, P., Deckers, J., Feyen, J., 2000. Integrated toposequence analysis to combine local and scientific knowledge systems. Geoderma 97, 103-123. |
[17] | Gomez, V.F., 2001. Analisis de seleccion de mejoras en produccion sostenible y conservacion de la biodiversidad en fincas indıgenas de cacao en Talamanca, Costa Rica. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica, p. 171. |
[18] | Gray, L.C., Morant, P., 2003. Reconciling indigenous knowledge with scientific assessment of soil fertility changes in southwestern Burkina Faso. Geoderma 111, 425-437. |
[19] | Grossman, J.M., 2003. Exploring farmer knowledge of soil processes in organic coffee systems of Chiapas, Mexico. Geoderma 111, 267-287. |
[20] | Habarurema, E., Steiner, K.G., 1997. Soil suitability classification by farmers in southern Rwanda. Geoderma 79, 75-87. |
[21] | IUSS Working Group WRB, 2006. World reference base for soil resources 2006: World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome. |
[22] | Kapp, G.B., 1989. Perfil ambiental de la zona Baja de Talamanca, Costa Rica. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica, p. 97. |
[23] | Krogh, L., Paarup-Laursen, B., 1997. Indigenous soil knowledge among the Fulani of northern Burkina Faso: linking soil science and anthropology in analysis of natural resource management. GeoJournal 43, 189-197. |
[24] | Municipalidad of Talamanca, 2003. Plan local de desarrollo 2003-2013. Municipality of Talamanca, Bribri, Costa Rica, p. 77. |
[25] | Nelson, D.W., Sommers, L.E., 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3 Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 961-1010. |
[26] | Osunade, M.A.A., 1988. Soil suitability classification of small farmers. Professional Geographer 40, 194-201. |
[27] | Oudwater, N., Martin, A., 2003. Methods and issues in exploring local knowledge of soils. Geoderma 111, 387-401. |
[28] | Polidoro, B., 2007. Ecological risk assessment of current-use pesticides in the Sixaola watershed, Costa Rica. Plant, Soil and Entomological Science. University of Idaho, Moscow, USA, p. 212. |
[29] | Polidoro, B., Winowiecki, L., Johnson-Maynard, J.L., McDaniel, P.A., Morra, M., 2008. Suelos del valle y del piedemonte en Talamanca: un paisaje dinámico para el almacenamiento de carbono. Agroforestería en lasAméricas 46, 40-44. |
[30] | Ryder, R., 2003. Local soil knowledge and site suitability evaluation in the Dominican Republic. Geoderma 111, 289-305. |
[31] | Schusky, E.L., 1989. Culture and agriculture: An introduction to traditional and modern farming systems. Bergin and Garvey Publishers, New York. |
[32] | Sillitoe, P., 1998. Knowing the land: soil and land resource evaluation and indigenous knowledge. Soil Use and Management 14, 188-193. |
[33] | Soil Survey Staff, 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. USDA-NRCS, Washington D.C. |
[34] | Somarriba, E., 1993. Allocation of farm area to crops in an unstable Costa Rican agricultural community. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA, p. 165. |
[35] | Somarriba, E., Harvey, C., 2003. ¿Cómo integrar producción sostenible y conservación de biodiversidad en cacaotales orgánicos indígenas? Agroforestería en las Américas 10, 12-17. |
[36] | Somarriba, E., Trivelato, M., Villalobos, M., Súarez, A., Benavides, P., Moran, K., Orozco, L., López, A., 2003. Diagnóstico agroforestal de pequeñas fincas cacaoteras orgánicas de indígenas Bribri y Cabécar de Talamanca, Costa Rica. Agroforestería en lasAméricas 10, 24-30. |
[37] | Steiner, K.G., 1998. Using farmers' knowledge of soils in making research results more relevant to field practice: Experience from Rwanda. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 69, 191-200. |
[38] | Sumner, M.E., Miller, W.P., 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3 Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp. 1201-1229. |
[39] | Talawar, S., Rhoades, R., 1998. Scientific and local classification and management of soils. Agriculture and Human Values 15, 3-14. |
[40] | Thomas, G.W., 1982. Exchangeable cations. In: Page, A.L. (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp. 159-165. |
[41] | Villalobos, M., Borge, C., 1998. Talamanca en la encrucijada. EUNED, San Jose. |
[42] | Whelan, M.P., 2005. Reading the Talamanca Landscape: land use and livelihoods in the Bribri and Cabécar indigenous territories. CATIE, Turrialba, p. 123. |
[43] | Williams, B., Ortiz-Solorio, C.A., 1981. Middle American soil folk soil taxonomy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71, 335-358. |
[44] | Winklerprins, A.M.G.A., 1999. Local soil knowledge: A tool for sustainable land management. Society and Natural Resources 12, 151-161. |
[45] | Winklerprins, A.M.G.A., McGrath, D.G., 2000. Smallholder agriculture along the lower Amazon floodplain, Brazil. PLEC News and Views 16, 34-42. |
[46] | Winklerprins, A.M.G.A., 2001. Why context matters: Local soil knowledge and management among an indigenous peasantry on the Lower Amazon Floodplain, Brazil. Etnoecologica 5, 6-20. |
[47] | Winklerprins, A.M.G.A., Barrera-Bassols, N., 2004. Latin American ethnopedology: A vision of its past, present, and future. Agriculture and Human Values 21, 139-1554. |
APA Style
Leigh A. Winowiecki, Matthew P. Whelan, Paul A. McDaniel, Marilyn Villalobos, Eduardo Somarriba. (2014). Local Soil Knowledge and Its Use in Crop Allocation: Implications for Landscape-Scale Agricultural Production and Conservation Efforts in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140302.17
ACS Style
Leigh A. Winowiecki; Matthew P. Whelan; Paul A. McDaniel; Marilyn Villalobos; Eduardo Somarriba. Local Soil Knowledge and Its Use in Crop Allocation: Implications for Landscape-Scale Agricultural Production and Conservation Efforts in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Agric. For. Fish. 2014, 3(2), 93-101. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20140302.17
AMA Style
Leigh A. Winowiecki, Matthew P. Whelan, Paul A. McDaniel, Marilyn Villalobos, Eduardo Somarriba. Local Soil Knowledge and Its Use in Crop Allocation: Implications for Landscape-Scale Agricultural Production and Conservation Efforts in Talamanca, Costa Rica. Agric For Fish. 2014;3(2):93-101. doi: 10.11648/j.aff.20140302.17
@article{10.11648/j.aff.20140302.17, author = {Leigh A. Winowiecki and Matthew P. Whelan and Paul A. McDaniel and Marilyn Villalobos and Eduardo Somarriba}, title = {Local Soil Knowledge and Its Use in Crop Allocation: Implications for Landscape-Scale Agricultural Production and Conservation Efforts in Talamanca, Costa Rica}, journal = {Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {93-101}, doi = {10.11648/j.aff.20140302.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140302.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aff.20140302.17}, abstract = {Smallholder farmers have developed knowledge about soil and crop management through long-term, on-farm observations. Yet, food insecurity and land degradation continue to threaten livelihoods, globally. Part of the solution lies in linking local and scientific knowledge to develop improved agricultural strategies. We argue that incorporating farmer knowledge in the design and/or technology transfer processes of land management and restoration projects will improve the likelihood of success. The objectives of this study were to understand how farmers in the remote Cabécar communities in southeastern Costa Rica use soil knowledge to allocate and manage crops and to explore how to combine local and scientific knowledge to achieve wider adoption of sustainable agricultural techniques. Cabécar farmers in the foothills of the Talamanca Mountains practice both no-input subsistence and cash-crop farming. They cultivate both annual and perennial crops on their multi-parceled farms. Twenty-three stratified random heads of households were selected and interviewed. A variety of participatory methods were used including, participant observation (1.5 years), semi-structured interviews, farm mapping exercises, farm-transect walks and a participatory community workshop. Results indicate that farmers identified three distinct soil types using primarily soil color, texture and landscape position. Most interestingly, farmers’ understanding of soil properties was tied directly to site suitability for specific crops. While farmers identified limitations of certain soil types’ capacity to sustain a particular crop, farmers did not embark on restoration efforts or employ nutrient management techniques to improve the productivity of the soil. Furthermore, farmers had limited knowledge on processes of soil development and nutrient cycling. Instead of amending the soils to increase productivity, farmers allocated crops according to existing perceived suitability of the soil. These insights illustrate the barriers to farmer’s adoption of new agricultural strategies. These data and experiences will be used to guide future agricultural research in the region, specifically projects that promote the restoration of unproductive soils by providing alternatives to burning and incorporating organic amendments.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Local Soil Knowledge and Its Use in Crop Allocation: Implications for Landscape-Scale Agricultural Production and Conservation Efforts in Talamanca, Costa Rica AU - Leigh A. Winowiecki AU - Matthew P. Whelan AU - Paul A. McDaniel AU - Marilyn Villalobos AU - Eduardo Somarriba Y1 - 2014/03/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140302.17 DO - 10.11648/j.aff.20140302.17 T2 - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries JF - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries JO - Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries SP - 93 EP - 101 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5648 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aff.20140302.17 AB - Smallholder farmers have developed knowledge about soil and crop management through long-term, on-farm observations. Yet, food insecurity and land degradation continue to threaten livelihoods, globally. Part of the solution lies in linking local and scientific knowledge to develop improved agricultural strategies. We argue that incorporating farmer knowledge in the design and/or technology transfer processes of land management and restoration projects will improve the likelihood of success. The objectives of this study were to understand how farmers in the remote Cabécar communities in southeastern Costa Rica use soil knowledge to allocate and manage crops and to explore how to combine local and scientific knowledge to achieve wider adoption of sustainable agricultural techniques. Cabécar farmers in the foothills of the Talamanca Mountains practice both no-input subsistence and cash-crop farming. They cultivate both annual and perennial crops on their multi-parceled farms. Twenty-three stratified random heads of households were selected and interviewed. A variety of participatory methods were used including, participant observation (1.5 years), semi-structured interviews, farm mapping exercises, farm-transect walks and a participatory community workshop. Results indicate that farmers identified three distinct soil types using primarily soil color, texture and landscape position. Most interestingly, farmers’ understanding of soil properties was tied directly to site suitability for specific crops. While farmers identified limitations of certain soil types’ capacity to sustain a particular crop, farmers did not embark on restoration efforts or employ nutrient management techniques to improve the productivity of the soil. Furthermore, farmers had limited knowledge on processes of soil development and nutrient cycling. Instead of amending the soils to increase productivity, farmers allocated crops according to existing perceived suitability of the soil. These insights illustrate the barriers to farmer’s adoption of new agricultural strategies. These data and experiences will be used to guide future agricultural research in the region, specifically projects that promote the restoration of unproductive soils by providing alternatives to burning and incorporating organic amendments. VL - 3 IS - 2 ER -